Cancelled NAB Cup game raises plenty of questions
By Michael DiFabrizio, 4 Mar 2012 Michael DiFabrizio is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, NAB Cup, Scott Watters, St Kilda Saints
St Kilda play an intra-club after their NAB Cup game with Essendon in Wangaratta was cancelled (Slattery Images)
Related coverage
The AFL need to give fans a “please explain” after last night’s NAB Cup game between St Kilda and Essendon was called off.
The match, which was to be played in Wangaratta, couldn’t go ahead because Essendon were stuck in Melbourne.
While the Saints wisely chose to take the bus the day before, the Bombers intended to fly up on the day. This plan hit a hurdle when the two planes carrying the team were unable to land due to bad weather.
The game was initially declared a draw, however late last night the AFL revealed they had used laws from the premiership season to determine that result and different rules applied during the NAB Cup.
Instead, a coin toss will determine a winner – unless it can be proven that Essendon’s non-arrival wasn’t beyond the club’s control.
Given the original result relied on this not being the case, a coin toss at this stage appears like a very real possibility. What’s concerning about that is a loss would mean the Saints would be out of contention to win the NAB Cup, which would be quite farcical considering they were the team that actually made it to the ground.
The whole saga has been unbelievably amateur, on so many levels, and begs a number of questions.
First of all, why were Essendon allowed to fly up on the day of the game? This practice isn’t allowed in the home and away season to avoid situations such as these. Yet the club’s travel arrangements were approved by the league.
Why did Essendon decide to fly instead of take the bus? Sure, officials were concerned about the small turnaround before their game next Friday night. But Wangaratta is a mere 2 hours 46 minutes from Windy Hill.
The decision to take a plane came across as unnecessary extravagance.
Why wasn’t a bus used after it was obvious a plane would be problematic? At the end of the day, if the Bombers want to fly that is their prerogative. The initial plan, though, was to arrive in Wangaratta in the morning. This was reported in yesterday’s Herald Sun.
Surely, if attempts to get there in the morning weren’t successful, alternative arrangements should have been put in place straight away.
Again, it’s a 2 hour 46 minute trip. The team could’ve easily made it up by the scheduled 7.00pm start by leaving at any point before 4.00pm. Instead, though, word of Essendon being “stuck” in Melbourne didn’t emerge until about 5.00pm.
Figure that out.
Why wasn’t the game declared a forfeit instead of a draw or, worse, the subject of a coin toss? The Saints have a right to at the very least ask this question. They were at the ground and the other team wasn’t. In junior footy, as coach Scott Watters pointed out last night, that’s a forfeit.
What muddies the waters here is that the AFL approved Essendon’s plans, so the dodgy travel arrangements aren’t solely the Bombers’ fault. The league couldn’t really take two points away from the Bombers when they were part of the process too.
Nonetheless, if you were St Kilda, you’d feel a bit hard done by.
Will the AFL admit to their mistakes and make any changes? Allowing a team to fly up on the day of a game, without a back-up plan in case of any problems, can’t be allowed to happen again. Especially when the final destination is the subject of flood warnings and heavy rain in the lead-up to the match.
Admitting that yesterday’s events were unprofessional would also demonstrate to fans that the league knows they deserve better.
Finally, an explanation as to why an alternative travel arrangement wasn’t made yesterday morning, or even before then, from either Essendon or the AFL, would be handy. At what point the Bombers informed the AFL yesterday there were troubles is another useful piece of information.
If it can be shown the Bombers could have done more to get to the game, after the point where the AFL ticked off their plans, then the four points should go to St Kilda.
The sad part of this story is what it means for the people of Wangaratta. The town was genuinely excited to be hosting AFL football. The game sold out last week.
Hopefully the league can compensate them by ensuring there will be a NAB Cup game next year – only then, with both teams actually at the game.
Michael DiFabrizio is completing his journalism degree. As an AFL writer, he has been an expert columnist at The Roar since 2009, and appeared in The Age and on ABC television and radio. Follow Michael on twitter @mdifabrizio
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your AFL? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily AFL email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, NAB Cup, Scott Watters, St Kilda Saints


March 4th 2012 @ 6:19am
amazonfan said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:19am | Report comment
In NO way should there be a coin toss!!! It’s one thing to make it a draw (which I’m personally opposed to as I think that St Kilda should get all four points), but to have the result rest upon chance is ludicrous. A coin toss should never ever be utilized. Many, if not most, fans don’t care about the NAB Cup, and to have a result rest upon a coin toss is just more evidence why we shouldn’t care. It’s a complete and total joke. Either St Kilda gets the four points (my preferred scenario), or the teams share the points; don’t base the result upon pure chance!
March 4th 2012 @ 6:24am
mds1970 said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:24am | Report comment
A coin toss may have been necessary in a knockout format to determine who goes through to the next round. No reason for it this year.
March 4th 2012 @ 6:27am
amazonfan said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:27am | Report comment
No, I don’t think it is necessary. It’s pure chance. I think it would be better if they base whom goes through on percentage, or some other criteria. IMO there is no place in football for a coin toss other than at the start of matches when they need to determine which team kick to which side of the ground.
March 4th 2012 @ 6:22am
mds1970 said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:22am | Report comment
Why anyone would fly from Melbourne to Wangaratta is beyond me, even at the best of times. With the time involved with going through security etc at the airport, the time saved would be minimal on such a short flight.
But I agree, it’s just not good enough. Essendon had plenty of time after their first flight was cancelled to make alternative arrangements. St Kilda got there, and both clubs were coming from the same city. It would be an injustice if Essendon won on a coin toss.
It makes the AFL look amateur that such a stuff-up could happen. For an interstate trip it’s unavoidable, but a short trip like this could easily have been made some other way.
March 4th 2012 @ 6:44am
Kasey said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:44am | Report comment
Is there a train from Spencer Street to the Wang? no security rubbish, mobile phone coverage the whole way, trains in general>planes, except for interstate travel.
March 4th 2012 @ 6:53am
Tupiza said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:53am | Report comment
St Kilda probably started the bus ride from Seaford as well, a lot further away from Wang than Windy Hill. Let’s see what the always seemingly indignant Paul Hamilton has to say about the matter today.
March 4th 2012 @ 6:58am
amazonfan said | March 4th 2012 @ 6:58am | Report comment
Sorry, who’s Paul Hamilton?
March 4th 2012 @ 8:05am
Tupiza said | March 4th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Essendon Football Operations Manager.
March 4th 2012 @ 8:33am
amazonfan said | March 4th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Thanks.
March 4th 2012 @ 7:59am
AndyS said | March 4th 2012 @ 7:59am | Report comment
Sounds a ludicrous situation – the AFL may have approved Essendons plan to fly, but surely they didn’t approve them just giving up once that got difficult or them not having any sort of back-up plan? I can’t see how they could say it was “beyond their control” – that implies there was simply no possible way to make it happen, not that it was merely inconvenient. They should give St Kilda the result
March 4th 2012 @ 8:40am
Matt F said | March 4th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
That’s what I’m thinking as well. The flight being cancelled was beyond their control but they could have flown or gone by bus the day before, like the Saints did, and there was plenty of time for them to get a bus up once their flight was cancelled. As you said, “beyond their control” means that they had no other option, not that they just couldn’t be bothered trying.
March 4th 2012 @ 11:54pm
Forbes said | March 4th 2012 @ 11:54pm | Report comment
They did have a back-up plan. Hird said there were buses on the standby. Reportedly the pilot was sure they would be able to get there when Essendon staff were inquiring able the probability of landing just before take off. It’s logical to give St Kilda the points, but a lot of people are ignoring facts.
March 4th 2012 @ 8:30am
The Cattery said | March 4th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Sounds like a forfeit to me – give the points to the saints.
March 4th 2012 @ 9:09am
B.A Sports said | March 4th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
I’m watching lots of stories this morning about evacuations, people who have homes damged, businesses ruined and people missing in the rain and floods. But a single pre-season game being missed hardly seems to be the biggest issue….
March 4th 2012 @ 9:30am
The Cattery said | March 4th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
No one would disagree, it’s a minor issue, but this is a sports site and it’s still a sports story, whether big or small.
If you want to discuss the more elevated issues of the human condition in general, I’m sure there are plenty of sites for you to discuss that as well, and you have my full support in that endeavour.
March 4th 2012 @ 9:39am
Ian Whitchurch said | March 4th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
At minimum, the game should be replayed in Melbourne as a charity fundraiser for people flooded out.
Wangaratta is also owed a game of footy by the Essendon Football Club.
March 4th 2012 @ 11:42am
The Cattery said | March 4th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
It would be a nice gesture by both clubs to perhaps schedule a post-season match there, funds raised for any community facilities that have been flood damaged.
March 4th 2012 @ 12:16pm
stabpass said | March 4th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
That sounds like the best idea.
March 4th 2012 @ 4:29pm
joe blackswan said | March 4th 2012 @ 4:29pm | Report comment
no chance with post season match, but certainly should have a gurranteed fixture for next season’s kick and giggle cup….the AFLPA won a 6wk uninterrupted break for players during the off season and such a post season fixture would breach this esp if one or both appear in finals.
March 4th 2012 @ 9:43am
mjg said | March 4th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
The train would have been the best way to get there, plenty of leg room, dining car,etc. It left Southern Cross station at midday, arrived Wangaratta 2.45pm. The game should be declared a forfeit, points to St Kilda.
March 4th 2012 @ 11:17am
brendan said | March 4th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
I agree with the two previous comments ponts to Stkilda and replayed charity game for flood victims.
March 4th 2012 @ 11:24am
Michael DiFabrizio said | March 4th 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
UPDATE: This is from Essendon’s website today:
Essendon is unlikely to contest any challenge by St Kilda to claim the four points for Saturday night’s abandoned NAB Cup game in Wangaratta.
[...]
St Kilda immediately voiced its displeasure at the decision to award the game a draw and Essendon coach James Hird said they were well within their rights to expect to be awarded all four points.
“The AFL will make the decision but I can understand why St Kilda want the four points. They are probably theirs, they got to the ground and we didn’t. No one at Essendon would begrudge St Kilda getting the four points,” Hird said at Windy Hill on Sunday morning.
Hird said he was not fussed about how the abandoned game was decided as his mindset had already shifted to this Friday night’s clash with the Sydney Swans.
“I haven’t spoken to our club about what we are going to do but if St Kilda are pushing for the four points, I don’t think we can jump up and down about it. and if the AFL decided they get the four points well so be it,” he said.
The Bombers have come in for some criticism for choosing to fly to the Victorian country town rather than embark on a three-hour drive.
But Hird said the club went to the effort of organising contingency plans and relied on expert advice the whole time.
“The thing is we were guaranteed by the airline all through the day, all through Friday that we would get there. We had a bus on standby from Friday lunchtime to go up if need be,” he said.
“But the airline kept telling us as close to 2pm (on Saturday) there would be no problem and you’ll land in Wangaratta. Both myself and (Essendon official) Danny Corcoran as we got on the plane asked the pilot ‘Are you sure we are going to be OK to get there?’ and he said yes. You can only take the expert’s opinion and that’s what we’ve done.”
Hird apologised to the people of Wangaratta, who had bought every available ticket for the game, but admitted there was more to the idea of flying in and flying out than simply aiding his players’ recovery.
“There was a bit of a mix up with some of the accommodation in early January so that was the first reason we thought about flying. We needed to get back by last night for preparation for the Friday game on a six-day break,” he said.
“There were some circumstances that have all come together to prevent us getting there but the majority was the fact that the weather was terrible and no one can control that.”
http://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/a/Hird-happy-to-give-Saints-the-points/8891
March 4th 2012 @ 11:26am
Michael DiFabrizio said | March 4th 2012 @ 11:26am | Report comment
UPDATE PT 2: St Kilda says it won’t seek the four points, from the AFL website:
But in a statement on Sunday morning St Kilda said it would not formally seek to be awarded the win.
The statement said it was “inappropriate to assess the circumstances surrounding Essendon’s non-arrival from Melbourne.
“St Kilda Football Club has resolved that it will accept the final decision of the AFL.
“We remain more concerned for the City of Wangaratta and the disappointment that was experienced by the local community who supported the game despite extreme weather conditions,” St Kilda’s head of football, Chris Pelchen, said.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/129998/default.aspx