FIFA must stop on-field theatrics
Carlos Hernandez (right) of Melbourne Victory contests the ball against Fred of Melbourne Heart, during their round 12 match of the A-League season at AAMI park in Melbourne on Friday, Dec. 23, 2011. (AAP Image/Joe Castro)
Related coverage
Footballers have the potential to become reasonably good actors once they decide to hang up their boots. But it’s their on-field acting which has been plaguing the beautiful game for some time now.
Call it gamesmanship or deception, it’s here to stay. On-field theatrics have sadly become a major tactical part of the game. For all the brute force the players possess, it’s such an anomaly that the faintest of touches and nudges can bring them crashing to ground.
While some might consider it fair to indulge in a certain degree of fraud on the field, it is an act of cowardliness.
Playacting is something that is tarnishing the image of the game. However, according to Sepp Blatter, on-field behaviour has improved in recent years. This is not the case. However we are not surprised by inaccurate statements from Mr Blatter.
What happens is pretty straightforward these days. A player simulates a foul to get a free kick and impose a penalty on the guiltless opponent.
This intent is a spineless stab at pulling strings, is totally detestable and is a disgrace to the sport followed by billions.
In every match in every league or international fixture, playacting is prevalent and is bound to worsen in the years to come as FIFA seem to be taking no action against it. It’s awfully common in the Primera Liga with players from two of the biggest clubs in the world, Barcelona and Real Madrid, being masters at this craft.
Avram Grant, who led Chelsea to the 2008 Champions League final, has overtly said that negative tactics are a part of team strategy in modern-day football. Let’s have a look at some of the high-profile incidents that have been etched in memory for the wrong reasons in recent times.
In a 2002 World Cup match between Brazil and Turkey, Brazilian superstar Rivaldo was fined just £5,000 for one of the most embarrassing cases of faking in the history of the game. He pretended as though the ball hit his face when the ball was kicked towards him by a Turkish player who was sent off.
Rivaldo has never accepted the fact that he indulged in an act of cowardliness.
While the great Diego Maradona scored one of the greatest individual goals ever in the history of the game in the 1986 World Cup against England, the match is remembered for his infamous ‘Hand of God’ goal for which he received no punishment.
Thierry Henry, one of the game’s most graceful performers, had his reputation in tatters when he controlled the ball with his hand twice in the 103rd minute of a crucial World Cup qualifier against Ireland in 2009. He passed the ball to team-mate William Gallas who then scored to send France into World Cup 2010.
Henry eventually agreed that he used his hand but claimed that it’s the referee’s job to spot the hand-ball.
The beautiful game isn’t a television reality show. FIFA should not give in to the whims and fancies of on-field drama and cheap antics. Despite several incidents, they are being too slack by not punishing the perpetrators, which sends the wrong message across to players and coaches thereby, amplifying the concern.
Moreover, with the organisation’s outright refusal to employ technology in the game to minimise erroneous decisions, the recurrence of such gutless acts on the field is only going to worsen as the years roll by.
It’s also unfortunate that fans have begun to accept and cheer these cowardly deeds when it’s done to their team’s advantage. In a way, this implies that modern football does have a negative impact on the moral values of society.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- NSL lessons vital for A-League’s future (103)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (92)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (91)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (88)
- Don’t be fooled: FFA Cup is too big a risk (78)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (75)
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (56)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (49)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (8)
- Last-gasp Cahill strike stuns LA Galaxy (2)
- Merrick back in A-League as Phoenix coach (28)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (77)
- Ferguson bows out as Man United draw 5-5
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (49)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (8)
- EPL Super Sunday 2013: Final day live scores, updates, blog (38)
- David Beckham – the underrated superstar (19)
- Who would be a football manager? (7)
- Bundesliga: can Freiburg ‘do a Gladbach’? (0)
- R.I.P Sir Alex (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Avram Grant, football, World Football

March 8th 2012 @ 3:58am
AndyMack said | March 8th 2012 @ 3:58am | Report comment
My biggest issue with “the beautiful game” is the way players circle the referee and argue quite forceably everytime a decision goes against them. Happens all too often in Europe, with the referee backing away from the mob, instead of sending them all off. Its disgraceful behaviour from a bunch of petulent children.
To me, thats the kind of behaviour that needs to be stamped out first. What sort of example is it setting?
Henry not owning up to the handball is the equivilent of a batsmen nicking one and not walking, hardly crime of the century.
March 8th 2012 @ 8:25am
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Hi Andy..
Good point there…it truly does look amateurish like you say. But FIFA being FIFA and as long as Blatter’s at the helm, nothing’s going to change. And you’re right, rules are rules and need to be followed no matter what. Referees should be bold enough or rather, given more authority to take charge. Thanks.
March 8th 2012 @ 5:18am
peeeko said | March 8th 2012 @ 5:18am | Report comment
i think this will be the most commentetated on article today,
March 8th 2012 @ 6:14am
peeeko said | March 8th 2012 @ 6:14am | Report comment
actually i take that back, the article that claims AFL is going to smash all other codes will be
March 8th 2012 @ 8:40am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
peeeko
you just made me laugh with those two posts!
March 8th 2012 @ 8:15am
Macca said | March 8th 2012 @ 8:15am | Report comment
How do you outlaw something that has been a natural part of the the “beautiful game” ? we have always seen controversial penalties and what some call “diving”..I think it is all part of the package you get with the “Beautiful game”…accept it as being part of the package and enjoy the moments that make up soccer.
March 8th 2012 @ 8:58am
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 8:58am | Report comment
You’re right Macca but with all these tangentials forming a major part of the game, the game might suffer in the long run. It’s still a beautiful sport and the most popular on the planet but these weeds need to be stamped out. Just my thoughts. Thanks.
March 8th 2012 @ 9:04am
Futbanous said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:04am | Report comment
There is as this article indicates only one body that can fix theatrics FIFA.
The buck stops & starts with them.
This debate returns again & again because they obviously don’t feel its a problem.
This for me comes back to a question of culture.
Once Football passed from the British way into the hands of the rest of the world via FIFA the idea of what is & what is not fair play passed into the realm of how to get an edge by any means possible.
In that sense football is truly the World game.
Personally I find it cringeworthy(play acting) having been brought up in the British way in a time before money also exaggerated the drive to get an edge by whatever means possible.
There was no play acting then, the idea was as foreign as curry was in Britain initially.
But like curry & Indian restaurants even the British have got a bit of a taste for it. Not as much as Roast beef ,but a taste nonetheless.
So you can have an opinion for or against, highlight distasteful incidents ad nauseum,but you will not change it.
What you can do though is control the antics in your own domestic League.
The A-League overall is doing a good job in this respect as Australia subscribes to the original British mentality in relation to sport generally.
Once however we enter the arena of competing against some Asian nations the dynamics change.
You still don’t have to accept their shenanigans, but trying to change them is like banging your head against a brick wall.
Let me just add to that the ACL match I attended the other night was played throughout in a fair manner. Little indication of players creating an edge by fooling the referee.
I find generally that matches between Australian & Japanese/Korean teams are played in this spirit.
Not so though for Chinese & in particular some Middle East nations.
March 8th 2012 @ 9:52am
mahony said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
I love the west asian refs – they keep the game mooving and dont buy into the theatrics. The east asian refs less so in my opinion. Dont even get me started on the Australasian ones – good attitute but far to inconsistent. That is enough geographical and cultural generalisations for one post!
March 8th 2012 @ 9:58am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
Good post Futbanous – I agree that the A-League does a terrific job in limiting on-field theatrics and we really don’t have anything to complain about in Australia (and in once sense, the league is forced to do that because of our unique market).
However, one can’t help thinking that problems become inevitable when players raised in the A-League way are forced to play internationals, especially at U20 and U23 level, where they are still learning to tune their games to different scenarios.
In these situations, the culture of the ref becomes as important.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:00am
Futbanous said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
The Cattery
Mentioning U20 under 23 level. Heres a thought regarding A-League & overseas players in the same age group & success & getting to it eventually the Socceroos.
Maybe its a long shot but I’ll give it a crack.
Rightly you say this is a unique market & the A-League has adapted to that .
However by playing in it, the A-League youth have little exposure to other football cultures(with good or bad traits as discussed).
Go overseas gather a little experience & doesn’t matter where it is, you either adapt to the surrounding football culture or wither on the vine.
In other words those who succeed overseas are not necessarily the best players from Australia,but may be the best at adapting to surroundings,including referees.
So if the majority of any U20/23 team are A-League players with little or no overseas experience, were behind the eight ball.
Back to the Socceroos then.Generally the team is comprised of overseas players. Correct me if I’m wrong but every player who took the field against Saudi Arabia had played overseas at some stage.
They had exposure to overseas football cultures so had some understanding that theres a Football world outside the A-League. In other words they had learned that there is a need to adapt.
How else do we explain that the Socceroos are ranked number 20 in the world.
I don’t see any world beaters in the team,but maybe we have some great adapters,unlike the lower age teams.
As I said could be a load of crap.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:28am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:28am | Report comment
Futbanous
The evidence is there to support your thesis.
The golden age of the Socceroos preceded the A-League, i.e. they all had their start as youngsters in the NSL, and headed off overseas and often paid their dues in lower level leagues – as you are implying – can you imagine what you learn going through that sort of cycle – and only the mentally tough survive – and new, young supporters of the game pay too little heed to such attributes as adaptability, mental toughness, will to succeed, etc, etc – they see an up and coming player on the park, get involved in a few passages of play, and think it’s a one way ticket to the top for the said player, when in truth his voyage has just begun.
As Ringo Starr sang: you have to pay your dues if you wanna sing the blues, coz you know it don’t come easy.
March 8th 2012 @ 7:41pm
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 7:41pm | Report comment
Hi…good to read your views. Let’s not forget the Primera Liga where theatrics are over the top. As for the Asian teams, I feel they follow the top leagues & players in the world, and get inspired to indulge in negative tactics. Thanks.
March 9th 2012 @ 6:20pm
PeterK said | March 9th 2012 @ 6:20pm | Report comment
One of the reasons I love watching the Bundesliga is that the refs there do seem to be right on top of this sort of thing, and as a result, players don’t seem to try it too often.
I very much agree that it spoils a match.
March 8th 2012 @ 9:30am
Rusty said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
rubbish article. poorly written. examples/facts don’t support claims.
I do agree on the time wasting of asian teams (not mentioned in article).
Pure and simple there are occasions where it looks like a players goes down easy, but think about the situation. Usually there will have been some infringement that hasn’t caused the player to go down but has impeded play enough to take away the attackers advantage. In this situation if he doesn’t go down the ref isn’t going to give a free kick. Not because its not a foul but because the ref cant always see whats going on.
Get off your high horse champ… the game is bigger than you.
March 8th 2012 @ 9:49am
mahony said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
There is no evidence that football is “suffering” from “theatrics”. There is no shortage of evidence of the aforementioned “theatrics” – but that football is “suffering” ignores its growth and increasing stranglehold on the global sports economy. Football is doing to global sport what the AFL is doing to Australian sport. For this – I am happy……
March 8th 2012 @ 9:53am
mahony said | March 8th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Has anyone seen how football is suffering in the USA ( a cultural analogue to Australia and the new worle more generaly)………
March 8th 2012 @ 10:13am
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
Simulation or trying to con the match official is present in every sport, which relies on subjective (i.e. a referee) interpretation of rules.
Having watched a huge number of Football matches & Aussie Rules matches, in my opinion, simulation in Football is nowhere near as prevalent as simulation in Aussie Rules, which features umpire intervention every 45 seconds.
Anyone, who watches AFL, will admit that in just about every minute of every game there will be an episode of on-field theatrics where players try to con the umpire into giving them a free kick, including:
* acting by throwing their arms back to simulate being illegally held by their opponent
* acting by diving forward to simulate being illegally pushed by their opponent
* acting by holding their head to simulate being illegally challenged with a head-high tackle
* acting by pretending they are trying to dispose of the ball when, in reality, they are lying on top of the ball and holding it in illegally
* acting by pretending they’ve caught the ball when the ball bounced before it was caught
* acting by pretending their opponent is preventing them from taking a free-kick, in order to gain a further 50m penalty advantage
In football, the referee intervenes approx 20-30 times during a 90 minute period – i.e. once every 3 – 4.5 minutes.
In a highly regulated game, like Aussie Rules, the umpire intervenes approximately 100 times (45 free kicks per game; 55 stoppages to resart play) during an 80 minute playing period (i.e. once every 45 seconds), which increases the players’ incentive to gain an advantage through simulation.
March 8th 2012 @ 10:27am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
Currently the average game of footy at AFL level goes for 124 minutes.
I agree with the point about the player pretending to handball it so that they effectively force the stoppage without being called out for holding the ball – not sure what the solution is there – I prefer less stoppages.
As for the rest of your claims – any player going to ground too easily at AFL level will have a very, very short career.
March 8th 2012 @ 10:31am
neos osmos said | March 8th 2012 @ 10:31am | Report comment
Is this discussion about theatrics or going to ground easily?
March 8th 2012 @ 7:45pm
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 7:45pm | Report comment
Hi Osmos, it’s a combination of both – theatrics & going to ground.
March 8th 2012 @ 10:38am
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Laws of Australian Football 2011
Rule 10.1.1 Duration
Subject to Law 10.1.3 (which allows the time controlling bodies to vary the match time) a Match shall be played for a period of 80 minutes.
Ref: http://www.afl.com.au/portals/0/afl_docs/Laws%20of%20Football_2011.pdf
—–
The clock is stopped after goals are scored (approx 30 seconds for each goal) and for most umpire interventions. If AFL games are lasting 124 minutes it means 44 minutes – more than 40% of the duration of the game is not considered by the umpire to be “playing time”.
March 8th 2012 @ 10:46am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
The average quarter lasts 31 minutes. Four times 31 =124 minutes. Free kicks can still be awarded whenever the ump stops the clock, and are often rewarded: centre square infringements, ruck contest, behind the play, etc, etc
March 8th 2012 @ 11:03am
Nathan of Perth said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Fuss, you just watched a series of ACL games, is this really the time to start throwing down a who dives more gauntlet?
March 8th 2012 @ 11:25am
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Nathan there has been more simulation in every AFL match I’ve watched than any ACL match I’ve watched.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:42am
peeeko said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
ive been waiting to see your response , some valid points.
March 8th 2012 @ 7:44pm
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 7:44pm | Report comment
Very well said Fuss but let’s not digress to AFL
March 9th 2012 @ 9:41am
Dippa666 said | March 9th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Fuss,
Just because other sports also have occurences of simulation doesn’t mean we can’t get our own house in order and stamp this poor behaviour from football. As the most followed sport on the planet football should be leading the way for others to follow.
March 9th 2012 @ 11:57am
Rusty said | March 9th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
x2
March 8th 2012 @ 11:09am
Antonio said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
The FFA should use a match review penalty of 10 matches for a simulation offence that results in a penalty or a goal and 5 match bans for any simulation. This would surly stop simulation. Football players have to stop acting like pussies take a teaspoon of cement and harden the F*ck up. Simulation is one of the reason football is having a hard time winning over a mainstream audience in Australia.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:17am
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Do you suggest AFL should also impose such harsh penalties for simulation?
An AFL player last year admitted he’s a serial diver (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/i-took-a-dive-monfries/story-e6frf9io-1226094387053)
Coleman Medallist & Premiership Player, Matthew Lloyd has also admitted he used to dive & fake to win free kicks.
I could say too many free-kicks & diving in AFL are reasons I stopped watching AFL, but it wouldn’t be true. I stopped watching AFL b/c I find the game mind-numbingly boring.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:25am
Antonio said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:25am | Report comment
Matthew Lloyd I think we can all agree was the biggest driver in AFL history. A goal is less valuable in Australian Football than it is in world football, but serve penalties should be in place. In recent years i have seen the steady increase in AFL players either diving for a push in the back free kick or acting after a small striking offence occurs to win a free kick. We do not want AFL to become a laughing stock on this issue as world football has become.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:32am
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
And yet, for all its flaws, political issues, alleged corruption, etc. etc. – billions of people across this planet continue to be drawn to only one sport Football.
More people on the planet will be watching every second of every major football than would watch a whole season of AFL … so, if football is “a laughing stock”, I’ve certainly got a big grin.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:37am
Antonio said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:37am | Report comment
I didn’t say World Football was a laughing stock, I said that on the issue of simulation world football is a disgrace to the notion of sportsmanship. And the FFA need to intact laws to further stem the influence of the great divers on our local game.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:44am
The Cattery said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Antonio
As mentioned by Futbanous above, the FFA and A-League does NOT have an issue with simulation. You’re lucky to get one case attracting attention every season, and invariably it’s an overseas player who is very quickly set straight (probably much to his surprise).
March 8th 2012 @ 12:28pm
Antonio said | March 8th 2012 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
No Promblem in the A-league with diving?
March 8th 2012 @ 12:42pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | March 8th 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
@ Antonio
I, too, could create a 2 min video of simulation in AFL but I honestly couldn’t be bothered watching any AFL match footage.
March 8th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Nathan of Perth said | March 8th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Antonio, it happens periodically but the overall climate in the A-League is *extremely* non-permissive. When Kewell made his little preemptive dives even the MV supporter boards were livid with him.
March 8th 2012 @ 11:16am
mds1970 said | March 8th 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Players in any sport will try to pull a free their way and try to hoodwink the official; be it appealing for an lbw when there’s clearly been an edge in cricket to diving in football. It’s not right, but it’s always going to happen.
But when a decision doesn’t go your way, get on with the game.
What annoys me, and many others, isn’t the diving but time-wasting with fake injuries. When a player holds up the game getting stretchered off, only to then jump off the stretcher and return to the game. It’s a farce that detracts from the continuously flowing action that football should be; and sadly it’s a blight that makes the Asian Champions League totally unwatchable.
March 8th 2012 @ 7:49pm
k77sujith said | March 8th 2012 @ 7:49pm | Report comment
Hi MDS…I agree with you…a lot of time is wasted when they fake injuries and act like kids, something’s got to be done about it. Thanks.