Coaches only as good as the players they coach
By Michael Warren, 10 Mar 2012 Michael Warren is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- International Rugby, robbie deans, rugby, wallabies
Wallabies coach Robbie Deans. AAP Image/Julian Smith
Related coverage
On March sixth, David Lord wrote on The Roar that Wallabies coach Robbie Deans is number six in the Australian coach pecking order.
I invariably return to the same conclusion regarding coaching: coaches are only as good as the team they coach.
Whether at international, national, Super or provincial levels, only players who have the necessary skills and ability to excel make the top teams.
Very little coaching takes place at these levels, unless we call “fine tuning” coaching. Players who reach the standard of the national or Super teams don’t need coaching. These players are not “coached” as we know it at lower levels.
A coach at these levels is really a strategist (or should be!). It is his job to devise game-plans to outplay the opposition. Only after doing so, do the “fine tuning coaches” move in and guide, coach or teach the players the selected game-plan and how that game-plan is to be implemented.
Prospective coaches become contenders for the top jobs due to their profile. Many struggle to back that profile up with results.
When the time comes for the national selection of coaches we should first look for the very best strategists who have the skills to pass their winning strategy onto players.
The finer points of honing talent is left to the specialist sub-coaches who must obviously have skills in areas such as scrums, defence, attack and fitness.
They must also be able to implement and hone their area of expertise to suit the strategy of the head coach.
Their plans need to be simple and effective, fluid and changeable, easily understood and implementable at a moment’s notice, yet be confusing to any opposition.
Teams work hard to achieve this but the unbridled talent of many young players and their inability at times to hold the line in the thinking department, has sometimes led to catastrophic results.
Rugby has many things that make it an exciting game to watch, but at times it is also a nightmare for coaches, captains and senior players when the young heads have a rush of blood and forget the plan.
By contrast, NFL sides have teams of strategists who spend weeks devising plays to win games.
Is it time, therefore, that rugby adopt a similar group? A group, whether they be called coaches or whatever, to provide the plays for the sub coaches to implement and drill players for games?
Some say we have this already, but it is not nearly as well established as that in the US.
Maybe we have been looking in the wrong direction, appointing old players who we believe will be good coaches because they were great players. Often, great players show themselves to be lousy strategists.
Do we believe that the current top-team coaches provide strategic game plans already? I do not believe they do. More often than not, results show that the strategic plan was so flawed, faulty or nonexistent in the first place, you could be forgiven for thinking that the team was never coached at all.
Team coaches must have the skills to impart strategy and plan to a team who will act on the winning plan submitted. The great flaw however is, without the “top of the class players” to work a top plan, no coach is ever going to be successful. Whether top plan, lesser players or top players, lesser plan, both will always bring poor results.
Robbie Deans is a strategist as is rugby league’s Wayne Bennett. Both of these coaches have proven over time to produce the best results, using the best players, implementing the best plans.
Deans fails because he has a “flighty talent” team who only show up on some days. The Wallabies lack of success is not because Deans’ coaching or plans are faulty, but because his players are.
It has taken Deans many years to obtain his strategic knowledge. With this knowledge he has worked with top-shelf talent who have understood his plan, implemented it, and have walked away with titles.
When the Wallabies learn to perform at a consistent level, adopt without flaw his plans, both the Wallabies and Australian rugby will see the quality of Robbie Deans.
They will also realise why he is revered in New Zealand, and still considered the number one coach who got away.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (319)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
- Could Matt Lucas be a Wallaby bolter? (85)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (207)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (42)
- Deans must forgive Quade: Slack (130)
- SPIRO: Super Rugby TMOs are making too many mistakes (109)
- Rebels’ O’Connor stays on sidelines (11)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (8)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (207)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (42)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (8)
- My open letter to the ARU (17)
- Super Rugby teams will skin the Lions (116)
- Super B to the rescue for rugby? (53)
- Picking your ‘First V’ for the Wallabies (68)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- International Rugby, robbie deans, rugby, wallabies


March 10th 2012 @ 7:54am
Kuruki said | March 10th 2012 @ 7:54am | Report comment
How do you explain the absolute turn around of the Chiefs pack so far this season?. They are hungry, they are working as a unit and not individuals and there basic skill level and ball retention has improved out of sight. Dave Rennie and Wayne Smith have everything to do with that.
March 10th 2012 @ 8:34am
sixo_clock said | March 10th 2012 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Wonderful Rugby to watch, should go a long way.
March 10th 2012 @ 12:02pm
jeznez said | March 10th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Good point Kuruki, their tight five have made a massive leap up this year.
March 10th 2012 @ 7:59am
Who Needs Melon said | March 10th 2012 @ 7:59am | Report comment
You had me nodding along until I read “Robbie Deans is a strategist”. If you’re going to make this claim, at least provide some examples to support it. Numerous people on this and other blogs have found numerous examples of us adopting the wrong tactics under Deans.
A number of times while watching the Reds last season I’d comment that they went into the game with smart tactics. I don’t think I’ve ever said the same thing watching Deans’ Wallabies. And that’s despite them being largely the same players.
March 10th 2012 @ 8:01am
Darwin Stubbie said | March 10th 2012 @ 8:01am | Report comment
“They will also realise why he is revered in New Zealand, and still considered the number one coach who got away.”
Is he really … Think his currency has dropped massively – probably only Canterbury still hold that view …
March 10th 2012 @ 8:31am
sixo_clock said | March 10th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
I would argue with the premise that Dingo has no need to coach. It is not true that all our Wallabies are top flight Rugby Union players. They have far too many bad habits, running into contact with heads up, trying for an extra inch giving opponents time to ruck, falling off ball and all tackles instead of instinctively going for the legs, loosies who pop their heads up way too soon at scrummage time, backs who run away from support etc. Technically they are not good and the World Cup exposed those shortcomings.
It is true that he only has his squad for a short time but I hope he is constantly emailing his Wallabies and the Super (even Club) coaches of the games he gets to watch with tips for the players. What the coaches do with the input is up to them. Dingo has quite a few runs on the board but the lack of preparedness we see at the start of every International season speak very loudly about how shallow Rugby dynamics are ingrained into our better athletes and that is the responsibility of every coach.
As for game plans!! Don’t get me started!! Every game requires a huge amount of thinking by the on-field leadership group to deal with the game as it unfolds. The coach has very little say in this except at half-time. As for some sort of ongoing advisory board calling plays, struth mate, this is Rugby, the ball is live till the refs whistle. We see 20+ phases all orchestrated by the players. That is the point of Rugby, to teach young men how to work in a team, to own their own game, to stand up and try to be part of a winning formula. That is why our form of football attracts leaders all over the world who sponsor and promote the game because properly coached they grow up to be successful team builders in their future endeavours.
March 11th 2012 @ 8:36am
stillmissit said | March 11th 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Great post 6 o’clock. Many good points and has me thinking about my own post on this interesting timely article , given that the first tests are coming up in 3 months.
March 10th 2012 @ 8:31am
all7days said | March 10th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
You can blame the players for errors,
But If most of what the coaches do is devise a game plan, then Robbie is well behind the mark.
They are stale and one dimensional.
Multiple times his Wallaby team has lead into half time, but lost.
This shows to me that he doesn’t have the ability or will to change a strategy mid game.
It may work at Super level where, he bought up talent from regions all over NZ, the comp was less intense, and he got to build off what Wayne Smith had already created.
Just look at what Link can do with “flighty talent”
I also think there is tonnes of coaching at all levels.
New techniques are always being tried and implemented.
Coaches are always looking for better ways to Ruck, Tackle, Scrum, kick. etc…
For these reasons I disagree with most of this article.
Every part of the team is responsible for their area.
Looking at the evidence, Robbie isn’t quite ticking all the boxes yet.
Henry on the other hand….
March 10th 2012 @ 10:44am
Onor said | March 10th 2012 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Why is everyone getting into deans.. He dodesnt have the talent pool to call on lilke when he was
at the crusaders.. Crusader rugby has more talent pool to take stocks from than the whole
of the ARU… go figure.
March 10th 2012 @ 11:32am
sheek said | March 10th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
I prefer the football position where the coach is actually the manager.
When Gus Hiddinck became Socceroos manager, he said it wasn’t his job to get players fit, or teach them the basic skills.
His job was the overall strategy, the game day tactics, making the players understand what he was trying to achieve, & selecting the personnel best equipped to carry out his plans.
But he made it clear the players themselves were responsible for their fitness, & at international level, must already possess the prerequisite skills.
It is the same in rugby, & the same with Deans. We can criticise his tactics & strategy, & perhaps poor selection of personnel. But the often poor skill level displayed by many Wallabies is a fault of our system, & not the coach.
March 10th 2012 @ 12:54pm
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | March 10th 2012 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
Dead right ” the often poor skill level displayed by many Wallabies is a fault of our system”.
I sometimes look at the Rugby fundamentals on display by the Wallabies and wonder how these guys ever made it to that level? They are either only selected because there’s simply no one better or else the selectors are thick. I think it’s the first.
Having said all of that, I am still amazed that we are able to give the likes of the AB’s & Boks a good run for the their money.
March 10th 2012 @ 11:54am
ohtani's jacket said | March 10th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
If a coach is only as good as the players he coaches then what’s the point having a coach? Why waste a million dollars a year on Robbie Deans if it doesn’t make a difference? Deans was hired to turn the Wallabies into world beaters just as he turned average Super Rugby players into perennial champions, but ::gasp:: he’s not that good.
March 10th 2012 @ 4:07pm
johnny-boy said | March 10th 2012 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
Amen to that !
March 10th 2012 @ 12:41pm
redsnut said | March 10th 2012 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
Not only that – you have to select the squad(s) sensibly. Not likr the RWC – imo that was a disaster
March 10th 2012 @ 12:45pm
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | March 10th 2012 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
” Their plans need to be simple and effective, fluid and changeable, easily understood and implementable at a moment’s notice, yet be confusing to any opposition. ” I think Robbie is part way there. His plans are confusing to most watching the game unfold.