This is turning into the best ever Super Rugby tournament
By Spiro Zavos, 12 Mar 2012 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Rebels, Rugby Union, Super Rugby
Is this the best ever season of Super Rugby? (Image: NSW Waratahs)
Related coverage
Wayne Smith, the former All Blacks coach and All Black in his own right, reckoned last week that the 2012 Super Rugby tournament matches had the physicality, skills, tension and drama of Test match rugby. In my opinion, he is right in this assessment.
And, more importantly, I reckon that we are enjoying and will continue to enjoy the best ever Super Rugby tournament.
In the opening three rounds there have been only a handful of blowouts. Most of the games have been still alive right up to the final whistle.
Favoured teams before the tournament started have been beaten. Underdog teams have caused upsets or got close to achieving one. And in all the matches, the players were exhausted with the punishment they had absorbed and the energy they had expended.
I know on The Roar there have been columns and comments about invidious comparisons between the Super Rugby tournament and the NRL.
Before I say nonsense to these comments, let me make this point so that the rugby league tragics, in particular, are not offended by my defence of the Super Rugby tournament.
Rugby league is a great game. No ifs and no buts. However, rugby union is also a great game. It is a different game, though.
When people complain about the penalties and the scrums what they are really saying is that rugby union should be played exactly like rugby league. This is a nonsensical proposition. The games are different. Vive la différence!
On the matter of penalties, for instance, they are as much a part of the DNA of rugby union as free shots are with basketball.
The scrums, with their man-on-man contests, the shoving, the disruptions and the possibilities of turnovers and penalties are also as much a part of the DNA of rugby union as the line of scrimmage is in American gridiron football.
So when I say this 2012 Super Rugby tournament is shaping up into the best ever tournament, I am talking from a rugby union and not a rugby league, football or AFL perspective.
After three rounds we have the Reds on top of the table, without their match-winner Quade Cooper. The Reds struggled to get on top of the Melbourne Rebels at Brisbane on Saturday night. They also had to score an 80m try on time to defeat the Waratahs, admittedly in Sydney, in the first round.
The Stormers and the Brumbies are also on 12 points but both these teams have benefited from the 4-points they have gained from their bye.
The Stormers were fortunate with an inexplicable TMO decision in their favour (and they also enjoyed a massive penalty count in their favour) when they defeated the Hurricanes in the first round.
The Brumbies relied on two penalties in the last five minutes to defeat the winless Cheetahs on Saturday at Canberra. In all their matches in Australia, the Cheetahs have won a grand total of: one.
They came ever so close on Saturday to picking up their second ever win, but conceded a scrum penalty on fulltime which was booted over by the dead-eyed, steely-nerved Christian Lealiifano.
The fourth team on 12 points, and arguably the most impressive of the leading sides, is the Highlanders.
The Highlanders defeated the Chiefs in the opening round of the tournament and then, very comprehensively in fact, smashed the Crusaders, including in the scrums. And on Saturday night they played out a thriller with the tenacious Waratahs.
There has been some criticism already on The Roar of the Waratahs. As readers will know I have been critical, extremely critical at times, of the way the Waratahs have played, especially their determination to win (or lose) in an ugly manner.
But I have nothing but praise for their performance at Dunedin on Saturday night. The new totally enclosed stadium at Dunedin is becoming a New House of Pain in the deep south. The fantastic surface, which is a mixture of articifical grass and the real stuff, is a perfect layout for the brutal, high-octane, smashing, ball-in-hand game the Highlanders are developing.
The defence of the Waratahs, particularly, was impressive. A side that defends tenaciously is a side that has plenty of ticker. And the Waratahs showed that.
They were helped by some curious decisions by the Highlanders not to take easy kickable penalties (incidentally the Blues in Pretoria enjoyed the same generosity from the Bulls who have the super-boot Morne Steyn to convert any chances from halfway or closer).
I thought the Waratahs made a tactical mistake when Benn Robinson, the chunky and effective prop, was substituted. The first scrum without him resulted in an important penalty to the Highlanders.
Also I cannot understand why Sarel Pretorius was substituted, again at a crucial stage in the match. This coaching by numbers, with the game plan drawn up before the match calling for this sort of substitution is a form of tactical madness, in my view.
The Highlanders, too, almost gifted the match right on time when Jimmy Cowan, who had replaced the brilliant Aaron Smith, booted the ball to a Waratahs wing who could easily have scooted away for the winning try.
Brendan McKibbin has not made an impact when he has come on towards the end of matches, indeed his chip kick against the Reds lost the Waratahs the match. The clock-work replacement of Pretorius is even more ridiculous when it is noted that he is the most lethal running back the Waratahs have right now.
I thought the tactic of using Daniel Halanghu and Berrick Barnes in the NZ two five-eights game worked well. Halangahu is not one my favourite players (his defence is usually about as non-existent as that of Quade Cooper). He also generally stands too deep. But against the Highlanders he stood up on defence and made a couple of breaks.
Rob Horne was a tower of strength with his defence. But his attack has been muted so far this season. The Waratahs desperately need Drew Mitchell, a strike runner, back on the field as soon as possible.
Kurtley Beale, lost to the Melbourne Rebels, would also be useful for the Waratahs. As it is he is playing very well for the Rebels. His defence against the Reds was terrific. The Rebels, as a team, are much improved on last season’s side.
There have been rumours coming out of Melbourne that the coach Damien Hill is for the chopper. But on the strength of their performance against the Reds, the Rebels are one of the better coached sides in the tournament.
At this stage in the tournament the Rebels, the Force, the Lions and the Cheetahs are the only teams that can be discounted from being potential winners of the 2012 Super Rugby tournment.
Having said that, the Rebels were impressive in going down to the Reds. And the Cheetahs have a potential super-star number 10 in Johan Goosen. They also scored the try of the round with a long lineout, a prop popping the ball inside to a flying winger who cleared out to defeat two covering defenders to score under the posts.
Finally, a word about a virtuous circle for New Zealand rugby. The NZ national under-20 side have won every IRB Under-20 tournament held so far. The value of this development of talent is now showing up for sides like the Chiefs, the Hurricanes, the Blues and the Highlanders.
A crop of young, massive, no-neck, squat, fast and skilful props have emerged. At the other end of the weight scale, a number of brilliant halfbacks and fly-halves have emerged this season as well: number 10s, Tyler Bleyendaal, Aaron Cruden, Beauden Barrett (NZ’s next Dan Carter), Gareth Anscombe (a new Grant Fox?) : Aaron Smith, Tawera Kerr-Barlow, TJ Perenara.
Question: where are the Australian equivalents of these young stars?
Player of the round: TJ Perenara, 19 years old, and three tries from halfback in his Super Rugby debut.
Spiro Zavos, a founding writer on The Roar, was long time editorial writer on the Sydney Morning Herald, where he started a rugby column that has run for nearly 30 years. Spiro has written 12 books: fiction, biography, politics and histories of Australian, New Zealand, British and South African rugby. He is regarded as one of the foremost writers on rugby throughout the world.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Rebels, Rugby Union, Super Rugby



March 12th 2012 @ 7:20am
Billo said | March 12th 2012 @ 7:20am | Report comment
Spiro, you are right about the differences between rugby and league.
Both have their own qualities, but who would ever want them to be the same?
From what I’ve seen of the NRL this season, there have been some great games, but the rugby I’ve seen recently in Super Rugby and the Six Nations has a different kind of beauty.
The two games complement each other well, and I struggle to understand why more people can’t enjoy them both.
The only danger for rugby, as far as I can see, is that you now need to be a giant to play it at the highest level, almost regardless of which position you play in.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:30am
Will Sinclair said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:30am | Report comment
“The two games complement each other well, and I struggle to understand why more people can’t enjoy them both.”
As a member of both the Tigers and the Tahs, I agree with this x 1,000.
Still, the only people these code-haters are hurting is themselves. Quite why anyone would be so ignorant as to deny themselves the enjoyment of rugby league or rugby union is beyond me.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:16pm
Westie said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
Will take another look at RL when they bring back contests to the scrum. It is farcical in my eyes how it is played presently. If you could play union, why would you play league is my question?
March 12th 2012 @ 10:24pm
Ian Whitchurch said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:24pm | Report comment
Westie,
How about “Because a crowd has turned up for a club game, so you’re getting paid” ?
March 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm
The Link said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
Two comments in and Westie drags the debate down.
If you’re going to the footy to watch the contest in scrums Westie then Rugby League is not the game for you.
March 12th 2012 @ 7:35am
trakl said | March 12th 2012 @ 7:35am | Report comment
The passage from “rugby league is a great game” to “Vive la différence” is a balanced and sane response to David Lord’s article.
March 12th 2012 @ 8:31am
warren said | March 12th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Exactly – I am a league fan but enjoy rugby for the difference that it brings to the game. In particular I like how their is a contest for the ball which league does not have. I do however get frustrated by the kicking rather than running in rugby but the sports are different even though many of the skills sets (tackle, running, kcking etc) are the same. I wish we could bring the codes together but this will never happen unfortunately. Wouldn’t it be great if we had players like Billy Slater up against the best South African and New Zealand rugby players.
March 12th 2012 @ 8:53am
nickoldschool said | March 12th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Dunno if its the best ever (the Spencer, Larkham, Caucaunibuca years were not bad at all…) but this year’s SR finals race seems closer than ever.
Its also good to see teams stepping up in defence and not giving easy soft tries. And am just loving Chiefs pack so far: Messam, the young prop Tameifuna, Taumalolo etc have been great! strong at scrum-time and dynamic in the game, they have it all.
March 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm
Samvandamn said | March 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Nick he was referring to the closeness of the competition and the test like battles.
Back in the days of Larkham, Spencer etc yes there were some brilliant players to take the field but there was a massive gap in competitiveness from the top teams to the bottom.
Some games would blow out to ridiculous margins.
This year its a pretty awesome comp, you never know who’s going to tip up who.
March 12th 2012 @ 9:00am
Sam Taulelei said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:00am | Report comment
In comparison to previous years, Super rugby is becoming much harder for tipsters because the pre season favourites have either lost or struggled to get into their rhythm as yet. The NZ conference in particular is a tipping minefield with everyone’s two top contenders the Crusaders and Blues losing more games than they’ve won.
The emergence of new talent is adding to the excitement of the early rounds for fans and supporters of the Highlanders, Chiefs and Hurricanes are feeling more buoyant after all the experts downplayed their chances for a plethora of reasons and now have all their predictions turned on their heads.
One thing is for sure nobody would have predicted that after three rounds the NZ conference would be led by the Highlanders, Chiefs and Hurricanes.
The other two conferences are running to form with the Reds and Bulls on top.
I do wish SANZAR hadn’t persisted with their decision to award four points to teams in a bye round.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:35am
Tissot Time said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Sam so I can brag for at least one week (I am #1 in the Roar Tipping) I watch each game (havent missed one SR for three years) and make good use of the record, fast forward button and getting up early as not to encroach on other commitments. Form analysis has many variables and momentum and game plan is becoming more important in my analysis as all the teams become more evenly matched. I see you made a good move during the weekend.
March 12th 2012 @ 9:19am
Ryan O'Connell said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Why anyone would deprive themselves of watching either is beyond me. Both tournaments have been nothing short of sensational. Why do people feel the need to choose one? Watch both!
March 12th 2012 @ 9:34am
katzilla said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Indeed Ryan.
You still feeling your Penrith wooden spoon tip was on the money considering their form last night?
The Super Rugby has been compelling viewing, but its only going to get better now that the inter-conference games start to kick off,
I can’t see the Brumbies pulling their weight to stay near the top, a few of the other teams will fall away from the front runners too, although if you had to pick a NZ team you’d probably be safest doing it with a dart board such is the closeness of the conference.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:03am
Ryan O'Connell said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:03am | Report comment
It’s never a wise thing to put your neck on the line and make predictions pre-season! But yes, I still stand by the Panthers to ‘win’ the wooden spoon.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:34am
Brett McKay said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:34am | Report comment
I have chosen one mate, out of a simple equation of limitied time over a weekend (though loving the long weekend in the ACT currently
), but in picking Super Rugby over the NRL, I have no interest and see no point in denegrating league. I used to watch it a lot, not so much any more. That doesn’t make it a lessor game, it just makes it another game.
And entertainment is in the eyes of beer holder anyway. I’m sure the NRL’s been great this year, but I’ve been thoroughly entertained by Super Rugby and the Six Nations. Vive la différence indeed…
March 12th 2012 @ 11:54am
johnny-boy said | March 12th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
Eyes of beer holder – very good Brett
March 12th 2012 @ 9:35am
kingplaymaker said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
‘Question: where are the Australian equivalents of these young stars?’
Answer: playing rugby league.
Interesting to see this week there is talk of Jared Waerea-Hargeaves moving to the Waratahs, exactly the type of powerhouse forward whose absence is the main reason behind Wallaby losses.
JWH, like Elsom, Barnes and many others, are rugby’s own players that they lose as youths. There are many others, such as Jamal Idriss, who play both but are not acquired by rugby. That’s where all the talent is (as usual, solution Western Sydney and Gold Coast teams….).
It would be odd for Damiel Hill to get the chop anyway after two matches! Given the laziness of the Rebels in recruiting forwards in the off-season, he seems to have done pretty well with what he has.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:35am
Brett McKay said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:35am | Report comment
that’s where some of the talent is KPM….
March 12th 2012 @ 11:14am
kingplaymaker said | March 12th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
Brett if someone knowledgeable were to find which players with strong rugby origins were now playing that other code, such as the few mentioned there, I think it would fill the ARU with tremendous horror, and anyone who bemoans the fate of the Wallabies or the success of some Australian Super teams.
March 12th 2012 @ 6:24pm
Kuruki said | March 12th 2012 @ 6:24pm | Report comment
JWH is a Kiwi.
March 12th 2012 @ 11:46pm
Westie said | March 12th 2012 @ 11:46pm | Report comment
Sydney and Brisbane need to start selling out their venues regularly to warrant more pro teams in those areas.
Union needs to do what AFL is doing, buying in the biggest NRL names to get the fans through the turnstiles, just like the Dally M move back in 1908, but in reverse.
March 13th 2012 @ 12:04am
Ian Whitchurch said | March 13th 2012 @ 12:04am | Report comment
Westie,
And using what for money ?
The AFL can do this because it has a number of clubs that regularily get crowds of 50 000, over a home and away season of 22 rounds.
While rugby union has no viable club competition, low Super 15 crowds – and they *are* low – and low membership figures, this will continue.
Finally, how did Rogers and Tahu work out last time this was tried ?
March 13th 2012 @ 1:16am
jeznez said | March 13th 2012 @ 1:16am | Report comment
Rogers was pretty good.
March 13th 2012 @ 5:45am
mania said | March 13th 2012 @ 5:45am | Report comment
rogers was no where near as good as he should’ve been. rogers had all the skill and temperament to make it but was screwed over by the coaching staff and made a scape goat. in the 2-3 seasons that rogers played he was still getting his head around the game. if he’d stayed he would’ve been a great player but at his exit he was only above average.
March 13th 2012 @ 6:09am
kingplaymaker said | March 13th 2012 @ 6:09am | Report comment
mania I would agree with that but I would add that league converts over the age of 25 have never been much of a success: clearly it’s easier to learn when younger, the motivation and commitment is greater and the body is probably better.
Had Rogers and Tahu moved at 21 I’m sure they would have been much more successful.
March 13th 2012 @ 6:17am
mania said | March 13th 2012 @ 6:17am | Report comment
yes KPM but the point i was making is that league players dont convert to union very well. before rogers came over to union i thought he’d make a great union player but he took awhile adapting. if a player like rogers takes more than 3 season to acclimatise how long would it take other players. longer imo
your correct in saying that to be a good convert a league player has to have played rugby at an early stage in their lives, but this wouldnt guarantee a good transition.
and “Had Rogers and Tahu moved at 21″ would they have been the great league players that they ended up being?
March 13th 2012 @ 6:19am
peeeko said | March 13th 2012 @ 6:19am | Report comment
rogers was pretty good and he actually played 5 seasons
March 13th 2012 @ 6:26am
mania said | March 13th 2012 @ 6:26am | Report comment
peeko – as good as he was a league player? rogers is an awesome pivotal playmaker in any team he plays with an all round skill set. but how do u think he did in rugby?
i expected more from him but i’m sure he was being shackled off feild by mismanagement of the coaches.
March 12th 2012 @ 9:39am
Bearfax said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
I am also basically a League fan but enjoy Union and it was the only rugby form I played as a pup. I agree that the dvelopment of the Super 15′s has enhanced Union dramtically in the southern hemisphere, though I would like a Pacific Island, Argentinian and Japanese side in the comp. But adminstrators have done a great job on the code at that level.
My only complaint about Union is the impact referees have on the game (not suggesting I like their impact on League in some areas but that’s another story). Too often it seems to me that refereeing decisions often based on incidents that are petty or could go either way, have too great an impact on the outcome of the game. Teams scoring several tries are too often being overtaken by penalty counts within their goal kicking range and I think there is a need, as apparently is being seriously discussed internationally, to reduce the value of the penalty goal from 3 to 2 points and raise the try conversion to 3 points from 2 points. I’m OK about field goals because that is the skil of the player and not determined by refereeing decisions.
The skill in Union is the ability of one team to score more tries (or field goals) than the opposition. Too often these days the outcome is influenced and sometimes determined by a referees interpretation of very pedantic rules that seem to be concentrating on petty issues yet leaving more significant issues, such as forward passes, untouched. This change would I believe ensure more open rugby, where teams aim to score tries rather than play for penalties and make sure that the team that scores the tries is better rewarded.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:36am
Will Sinclair said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Bearfax – agree with you on the significant impact that referee decisions have on big games. It’s very frustrating, and I think all rugby fans would share your concerns.
But reducing the value of a penalty kick is dangerous.
Penalties are there – afterall – to protect and preserve the battle for possession. This battle is at the very heart of the game (as opposed to league, where every effort is made to REMOVE the battle for possession), and there needs to be adequate punishment for those players who attempt to destroy or slow opposition ball.
But, I so agree with you… the ability of referees to decide the outcome of a contest (hello Mr Lawrence!) is very frustrating.
March 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm
Bearfax said | March 12th 2012 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Point taken Will. Mind you I am not challenging penalty kicks in general either to the side line or for goal. I just think a team scoring two penalties beating a side scoring one unconverted try, especially if its based on petty issues is a bit rich. And I think teams are more and more playing for the penalty rather than for the try because of the value of the penalty. If it was less they would concentrate more on scoring the try (or the field goal). I think this is the argument being used by those oveseas who I think are experimenting with much the same idea I’m proposing. But yes I know its a game of possession, and it doesnt stop penalties if the other side transgresses. I just get so very annoyed by referees who seem to think we watch games to see them perform…..a good referee is rarely noticed.
March 12th 2012 @ 3:26pm
steve.h said | March 12th 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
There is an article on the roar of the system being tried in South Africa varsity cup. In the competition it’s eight points for a converted try and 2 for a penalty and some interesting states have come out of the competition. There has been an increase in tries, a decrease in the amount of shots at poles but the amount of penalties have stated the same.
March 13th 2012 @ 12:07am
DumpStar said | March 13th 2012 @ 12:07am | Report comment
Sounds like a good thing. Do you have a link to the comp. Would love to see a tape of a game under these rules.
March 12th 2012 @ 3:20pm
David said | March 12th 2012 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
I agree Will. To change the value for a penalty goal is dangerous. What I would add though is that the technology of the football has changed so much that players can now kick a 60m penalty and 20 years ago that would never have been possible. Pehaps a 3 point goal line like a 3 point basketball line might be in order
March 12th 2012 @ 9:42am
King of the Gorgonites said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Thank God for Spiro!
Now that is an analysis.
I have been very disappoiting of some of the articles written by David Lord, campo and the like. Also some of the so-called elder statesmen on the roar have had some very silly comments lately concerning the state of the game.
Spiro is spot on when he says they are different games. RL is a great game, espically on the box. however, rugby is rugby. i will paraphrase gillard (who paraphrased someone else) – we are us!. for all its sins, RU is a unique game. please stop death riding it.
Every game has been up in the air at some point this season. huge upsets. the blues beating the bulls. the chiefs. the highlanders.
how good was the dunedin stadium. 18K screaming fans. seems like they are liking what they see. and so am i. even though the tahs lost it was a courageous effort. pure guts. thats what i want to see. i dont care if our only try game from a charge down. it was all heart. we lost pat mccutheon, and alcock was back in oz. but still the tahs came. we lost palu before the kick off, but still the tahs game.
as for the brumbies – what an effort. what a finish. a team people wrote off at the start of the season are palying as a team. just like the brumbies as old had to do. they will not embarss themselves this yeear.
the rebels tackeled their hearts out. every team (except the force) showed heart. as a wallaby fan this is what i want to see. i dont care that its not rugby league. and rugby and thank God it is.
March 12th 2012 @ 9:57am
Rugby Diehard said | March 12th 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
x 2. Good, positive article Spiro, withiut having to resort to the pathetic “my code’s better than yours”.
March 12th 2012 @ 2:54pm
Touko said | March 12th 2012 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
X 3
I agree – very good article. Thank you, Spiro.
March 12th 2012 @ 10:04am
kingplaymaker said | March 12th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
It’s certainly true that rugby union shouldn’t always be judging its own standards of entertainment by those of rugby league.
There is too much veneration for league and even some acceptance that it represents entertainment somehow. Rugby should be prouder of itself and not justify its entertainment in league’s terms, just because league is more popular in two states of one country.
For all its flaws Super rugby is the best sport in the world after the formerly named Tri-nations, and it shouldn’t be afraid to say so.
Indeed, it can often be even freer and more entertaining than the sometimes tighter though more intense Tri-nations.