Is Muscat the man to lead the Victory?
By Tony Tannous, 13 Mar 2012 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, football, Jim Magilton, Jose Mourinho, Kevin Muscat, Melbourne Victory
Melbourne Victory FC fans celebrate their team scoring a goal against Perth Glory FC during their A-League match at Etihad Stadium in Melbourne, Sunday, Nov. 20, 2011.The game ended in a 2-2 draw. (AAP Image/Martin Philbey)
Related coverage
A clean-out of the players or a manager who can adapt and get the best out of the men at his disposal? That’s the question the Melbourne Victory board are looking to answer over the coming weeks.
If I was offering them any advice, I’d suggest a potential solution might be sitting right under their nose.
This is likely to surprise a few long time readers of The Round Ball Analyst, who have long known my views on the often-boorish behaviour of Kevin Muscat as a footballer, but something tells me he might just be the Victory manager in waiting.
While the conventional wisdom is that Muscat is on his L or P plates, developing his managerial experience in the background, there’s also an argument that, given the opportunity, he’s unlikely to do any worse than what’s been produced this season by both Mehmet Durakovic and Jim Magilton.
Indeed, it wouldn’t surprise if he does much better than that.
For all his carry-on as a player, there’s no doubt Muscat is a dominant personality, and if there’s one thing you need to manage a big club (by Australian standards) like the Victory, it’s a manager with the strength to handle the many stakeholders, from players, to agents, to the board, to the fans and the media.
There’s rarely been a more divisive figure in the Australian game. Many Victory fans love him. Across the rest of the country though he’s often public enemy number one.
There’s every chance, prancing around the technical area and in the press-room, he could become Australia’s answer to Jose Mourinho, a love-hate figure.
Whether he can be anywhere near as successful as The Special One remains to be seen, but there’s no doubt the Victory’s popularity around the country would plummet even more.
But scratch beneath the surface of hardness and there lurks what seems to be a knowledgeable football man.
This in part could be told from his work for SBS in South Africa two years ago, while it was widely felt the Muscat the player often ran the Victory show under Ernie Merrick.
Meanwhile, in his only appearance as the main man in the dugout, or at least on the plastic chairs, Muscat set his team out in what looked a logical formation, and playing with good organisation. The Victory managed to knock-off the Newcastle Jets.
Whether he would be able to produce this kind of work consistently is another story, but there’s little doubt the ride would be interesting. The mind games, you sense, would flow.
One of his biggest challenges, if he is to get a sniff, would be to distance himself from the friendships he has no doubt formed as a team-mate of many of the players still at the Victory.
Managing the obvious need for a regeneration of the roster remains the biggest challenge for whoever steps into the main-man role next season.
Perhaps the board’s feeling is that Magilton, without the context of having played with the likes of Grant Brebner, Archie Thompson, Tom Pondeljak, Roddy Vargas, Leigh Broxham and Danny Allsopp, is best placed to manage this transition.
Perhaps the feeling is that once Magilton’s regenerative work is done, Muscat, free from the challenge of having to distance himself from mates (one most in Australian football struggle with), can step up.
Yet the dilemma is that Magilton doesn’t appear to have come up with enough answers in his two or so months in charge ().
His default has been to attack the players for their performances rather than give them the confidence and technical solutions to perform better.
This, to me, would suggest Magilton’s not the right man. Going for an inexperienced Muscat might seem a gamble, but if it’s a choice between him and the temporary incumbent, it’s a gamble worth taking.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- A-League, football, Jim Magilton, Jose Mourinho, Kevin Muscat, Melbourne Victory


March 13th 2012 @ 7:19am
Lucan said | March 13th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Muscat needs to go elsewhere to better his coaching credentials. Let him work with a different group of players and administrators, and then consider bringing him back to MV as the boss.
March 13th 2012 @ 10:20am
TomC said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Agreed
March 13th 2012 @ 10:41am
PeterK said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
Correct assessment, Lucan, in my view, but I’m not attached to Victory (or KM) so it’s up to them, not up to me.
I guess it’s possible that a butcher of a player could become a good coach.
March 13th 2012 @ 8:51am
philipcoates said | March 13th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Interesting article and food for thought.
One comment that I disagree with is the line “His (Magilton’s) default has been to attack the players for their performances rather than give them the confidence and technical solutions to perform better.” Magilton went out of his way in the early period not to blame the players and consistently said they just needed confidence. Unfortunately the players proved him wrong on that point and despite the support he gave they let him down, and more importantly let the supporters down.
If Muscat were given the job I have no doubt he could distance himself from his ‘mates’ because (a) the job would be so important to him he would do whatever it takes to succeed and (b) in pushing aside these older players he knows he would have the full support of the supporters.
The main reason I think Muscat will not get the job is because the Board would be worried about giving him more power and influence around the club than he has already. Di Pietro, Wilson, et al, like to think they run the club and Jim would be a classic Board appointment – brought in by the Board and clearly accountable to it. Muscat is a club icon (be that a God or a Devil, take your pick) – he has influence and support beyond the Board, among staff and supporters, which would threaten the Board’s sense of power and they would fear their ability to keep him in reign. I don’t think Di Pietro is brave enough to give Muscat the job although the author is right about one thing, “the ride would be interesting”
March 13th 2012 @ 8:56am
Futbanous said | March 13th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Lets trace it back, the coaching caper at MV.
Ernie, proven at A-League level gets the chop. Why he can’t cut the mustard in the ACL.
Solution bring in an unproven local, Mehmet.
Mehmet gets the chop.
Solution bring in an unproven overseas coach “Magic Jim”.
Jim eventually proves he can’t even pull a t*rd out of a hat let alone a rabbit.
Jim gets the chop.
Solution bring in an unproven local, Our Kev.
Seems a bit of a pattern here.
How about this big club gets an experienced manager with a proven track record of developing players & producing exciting, winning, attractive football on the park. Oh yes also needs Asian experience.
March 13th 2012 @ 9:35am
philipcoates said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Up until the last sentence I thought Mourinho or Sir Alex might have been in the frame but you ruled them out as neither have Asian experience. It actually also rules out almost every European and South American coach. Forget about Asian experience. Experience playing in international competitions would be valuable – dealing with international travel, time changes, hostile environments, etc – but it doesn’t have to be in Asia.
Exciting, winning and attractive football, yes. However, the often neglected and most critical other skill is building a squad in a national competition with a constraining and very small salary cap. That is the aspect that tests the best managers and there are few who have this skill on their CV.
March 13th 2012 @ 9:50am
Futbanous said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
So you forget about Asian experience until one day you get back in the ACL.
Then you flop again.
What does the MV board do then ?
Didn’t they sack Ernie,because of his poor track record in Asia?
March 13th 2012 @ 10:16am
philipcoates said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Your argument will then fail when we win the ACL with an Asian experienced manager and then flop at the Club World Championship because we didn’t have a manager with European or Sth American experience.
A good manager manages regardless of where or who you play.
Ernie failed because he played Gamba in Japan with a three man forward line and a thin defence!! It was a suicide structure and we paid the price. In many Asian games MFVC didn’t do their research on the opposition (I was at some games in Asia and saw it first hand) and that was the reason we played poorly and that failure fell at Ernie’s door.
March 13th 2012 @ 12:48pm
Futbanous said | March 13th 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
“A good manager manages regardless of where or who you play.”
Well we’ll have to agree to disagree on that one.
March 13th 2012 @ 5:36pm
apaway said | March 13th 2012 @ 5:36pm | Report comment
Pim Verbeek and Guus Hiddink fit that description…
March 14th 2012 @ 11:41am
phutbol said | March 14th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Phillipe Troussier ?
March 13th 2012 @ 9:20am
Wotdoo said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Kev doesn’t have the credentials to manage at this or ACL level based on that alone he should not be giventhe job. Where Jim has the FIFA pro licence. I read somewhere that his thesis was based on the portugese system.
Kev is now the defensive coach how well are they playing now.
Come on stop dreaming
March 13th 2012 @ 9:26am
agga78 said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Being a Melbourne Victory member I never want Muscat to coach my team, in fact I want him out, his influence at the club imo has caused two years of instabilty at the club, 1st he played on at least one probably two years to long and now as an inexperienced assistant manager who had too much say with Mehmet’s side it was like dumb and dumber out there for the 1st half of the season.
Jim’s came in and seen straight away the areas of weakness tried to fix them with limited time or money Milligan and Ubay slottled into our two weakest areas and though Milligan has been good, Ubay has not cut it at this level and the whole back 4 on saturday night are not cut out for this level. I have seen the side at home under Jim and he is clearly trying to play from the back no matter what Craig Foster says.
Given the clear out which was going to happen anyway I see Jim as the man to lead the way, he can get at least 4 new foreingers in and I suspect it will be straight down the spine that those 4 players will be put, if Jim is smart he make it a point to get rid of the Trojan horse next him if he is to be successful at Melbourne Victory.
March 13th 2012 @ 9:50am
philipcoates said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
agga78, you are not alone in the anti-Kevin camp but just clarify for me, do you want him out because of his influence over the past two years (which is what you wrote) or do you want him out because you don’t like him at all (which I what I suspect)?
March 13th 2012 @ 1:23pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | March 13th 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
I think most non-Victory supporters want him in because they don’t like him
March 13th 2012 @ 3:10pm
Brendo said | March 13th 2012 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Interesting question. I would like to see Muscat do an apprenticeship eslewhere for 3-4 years, to allow a changing of guard so to speak. Not because I don’t like him (I did as a player).
Personally I would like to see Kevin leave because of the influence he exerts on his ex-teammates. I believe that such a strong personality cannot help but undermine the authority of the coach. Any new coach Mehmet, Jim included will find it difficult to re-work a system that Kevin played in and commanded these past 6 years.
March 13th 2012 @ 9:52am
RIP_Enke said | March 13th 2012 @ 9:52am | Report comment
Take on board that Muscats job would most likely be coaching the defencive play, not sure if MV has proven the effectiveness of his coaching skills.
Not a MV supporter so I realy don’t know much but what is written, but Magilton should be given a chance, he says he has plan’s and he definately has the drive to do well.
March 13th 2012 @ 10:02am
Midfielder said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Tony
Massive risk and like many have commented over the years Km is a very influencial person at MV… its is a huge risk because he will either crash through or crash…
Huge risk to take…
March 13th 2012 @ 10:13am
Chop said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
If Muscat is the sort of person any organisation wants as an example of their on field behaviour then that organisation is in MASSIVE trouble.
March 13th 2012 @ 10:24am
mahony said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
I think Kev would do well to go get a bit of experiance elsewhere and come back – but if he were made Head Coach tomorrow I would be very pleased. I like, and rate Jim, but the impact Kev has on the culture cannot be underestimated – and to the cynics I mean this in a very, very positive way. The guy is a leader of men and takes no prisoners.
March 13th 2012 @ 10:27am
TomC said | March 13th 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
I haven’t been impressed by Magilton either, although he had a very difficult job coming in mid-season.
I think the MV board might have painted themselves into a bit of a corner here. Not renewing Magilton’s contract would be an admission that they hired the wrong guy. Twice. That’s a bit of a blow to their own credibility. They might feel it’s better to stick it out and hope Magilton comes good.