NRL should follow AFL’s example and prop up Gold Coast
By Ryan O'Connell, 29 Mar 2012 Ryan O'Connell is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Gold Coast Titans, Michael Searle, NRL, Rugby League
Greg Bird: NRL Rugby League match, Parramatta Eels V Gold Coast Titans at Parramatta Stadium, Sunday April 24th 2011. Digital pic by Robb Cox © Action Photographics.
Related coverage
With the Gold Coast Titans in serious financial trouble, the newly formed Australian Rugby League Commission will need to make a difficult decision very soon. Do they help the club out to ensure its survival, or wave the white flag and surrender the Gold Coast to the AFL?
The NRL’s newest club is in danger of extinction due to an estimated $25 million debt, though it’s important to note that the football club itself is profitable.
The real issue is that the club, wisely at the time, decided to diversify its revenue streams and build a five-storey complex that included state-of-the-art training facilities along with commercial office space. The plan was for this ‘Centre of Excellence’ to provide the club with amazing training facilities, while the lease on the office space would generate additional revenue for the football club.
Unfortunately, when the global financial crisis hit, the Gold Coast economy contracted and the office space remained unleased. This meant that the club was left to cover the costs associated with owning a building that was essentially empty.
Loans were required to cover the costs and eventually things spiralled so out of control that the club now finds itself in this unenviable position.
The club now faces the very real prospect of going under, and may require the help of the NRL in order to survive. So what should the NRL do?
Perhaps they could learn from their supposed enemy.
I personally believe that the AFL has been incredibly smart about its own expansion plans. It has been patient and has a long term strategy in regards to growing its footprint.
Most importantly, it’s been generous, investing plenty of money into new teams, along with allowing salary cap exemptions and high draft picks. The AFL quite deliberately ensures new clubs get preferential treatment, helping them to establish themselves early on in their existence.
Crucial to the expansion strategy is the fact other AFL clubs are fully aware of and support the concessions for new teams.
OK, ‘support’ may be too strong a word. Some clubs hate the concessions. But for the most part, the Melbourne AFL clubs recognise that a growing and truly national competition benefits everyone. In particular, it increases sponsorship opportunities and drives up the price of the broadcast deal, which in turn, benefits all clubs.
Why is this relevant to the NRL?
Because they should learn from the AFL’s ability to look at the bigger picture.
New rugby league teams are essentially left to fend for themselves, and get little to no assistance from the NRL. They get little support from most NRL clubs, too, who lack the ability to think about anything other than their own team, and certainly aren’t prone to the sentiment of helping other clubs, particularly new ones.
Yet with the formation of the new Commission, the previous hierarchy’s expansion strategies can be revisited and revised, while NRL clubs’ myopic outlooks are now irrelevant.
The Australian Rugby League Commission’s mandate is to look after the overall health of the game, to act within the best interests of the NRL.
The Gold Coast region is deemed to be of strategic importance to rugby league. It is therefore most certainly in rugby league’s best interests for the Gold Coast Titans, in one form or another, to survive. Quite simply, that means the ARLC should help the Titans out of their financial quagmire.
Yes, it will be perceived as the NRL favouring a team, and the reality is that it will be.
I haven’t got a problem with that, as long as the Commission is making decisions based upon the long term health of the competition and the game.
And I’m not just talking about geography here. There is also the important consideration that the NRL requires eight games a week to fulfil its current broadcast commitments. It needs 16 teams in the competition.
The Titans should in no way simply be given a handout by the NRL. If cash is required, any bailout strategy needs to be met with strict conditions that the club must meet. This could include paying the NRL back over time, or Titans CEO Michael Searle, the man responsible for almost all of the Titans’ decision-making, stepping aside.
The overall point is that if the Commission deems the Gold Coast too important to lose, then the NRL should take a leaf out of the AFL’s book, and prop the Gold Coast up.
Case closed.
Ryan is an ex-representative basketballer who shot too much, and a (very) medium pace bowler. He's been with The Roar as an expert since February 2011, has written for the Seven Network and NBA Down Under, and been a regular on ABC radio. Ryan tweets from @RyanOak.
- Explore:
- AFL, Gold Coast Titans, Michael Searle, NRL, Rugby League

March 29th 2012 @ 7:14am
SpartanSM said | March 29th 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
Great article mate, I disagree about having the commission stepping in and giving the Gold Coast Titans assistance. The debt itself as you point out in the article, is if I’m correct; the “property arm” of the Titans organisation and not the club itself.
The commission and the NRL as a collective don’t have the sources to invest in the future with the AFL receiving $150 million dollars in their latest Broadcasting Rights deal sold to Mobile, Internet, Television and Media outlets giving the AFL the means and resources to ensure the survival and dominance over rival codes.
You say “The AFL quite deliberately ensures new clubs to get preferential treatment” the Western Sydney Giants and the Gold Coast Suns were given extra funds, draft picks and practically bank rolled by the AFL. Sadly to say the teams combined have a Win/Loss tally of 3 wins and 20 losses in 23 games, with Collingwood finishing the 2011 season with 20 wins and 2 losses in 22 games with 13 other teams finishing with 4+ Wins out of the 22 game season. So it would seem that the AFL is at a loss, but with their investment they’ve introduced 2 new teams bringing numerous benefits for the sport, cities and the economy.
The NRL and the Independent Commission need to negotiate a Broadcast Rights deal the same if not more than the AFL’s deal if they intend of following the AFL’s future investment plan. The Gold Coast Titans are in some form of debt in the organisation it is their mistake. They should have made sure the all costs involved would be covered.
I read in a news article that the Central Coast Bears bid had a $50 million dollar war chest to bank roll the team, signed a coach and players intending to sign if the NRL accepted the bid, when the Broadcast Rights deal is done the commission should introduce the Central Coast Bears
Until a better deal is done, the Titans need to “fend for themselves” just like the other 15 teams
March 29th 2012 @ 9:39am
Ryan O'Connell said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Spartan, it’s a tricky one. In writing the article I explored both sides of the argument and there are pros and cons to both sides. Eventually I decided I needed to not sit on the fence and to actually have an opinion.
And quite simply, my opinion is that if the NRL wants a team on the Gold Coast, they’ll have to get involved in this matter. Whether that’s helping out financially, or helping to find new owners, or giving some form of concessions, or something else, the point is that they’ll have to involve themselves. It will be perceived as favouring, and it will be. But that’s the job of the ARLC – to act in the best interests of the overall game.
But, countering my own argument, isn’t Penrith a area of strategic importance to rugby league? Aren’t they under threat from the AFL too? Do they get a handout too? Where do you draw the line?
That’s what the Independent Commission has to decide. . .
March 29th 2012 @ 10:04am
JamesP said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Not sure why you mention GWS/Gold Coast win loss record. No one is expecting them to win more games than they lose in the first 1-3 seasons. The difference between the Titans and the Suns is that the Suns, like all AFL clubs, are controlled by their members. And each AFL club has a CEO, a board and a chairman. Michael Searle is answerable to no one – there is no board, he is the managing director. If this was an AFL club, the Centre of Excellence would never have been built. Due diligence and strong corporate governance would dictate that risky projects like that are quickly put on the backburner. Searle on the other hand, decides to do whatever he likes. Why then, should the NRL support this club – especially wth him in charge? He should step down and ideally, the club should fold and re-form as I agree that the Gold Coast area is way too important for Rugby League to give up
March 29th 2012 @ 10:59am
SpartanSM said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:59am | Report comment
“The AFL quite deliberately ensures new clubs to get preferential treatment” i was quoting Ryan and using the GWS and GC win/loss tally as a point of reference that “preferential treatmant” for new clubs giving my argument against the commission assisting the Titans the “AFL” way.
March 29th 2012 @ 8:05am
oikee said | March 29th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
Here is the real tragedy, the Rockhampton bid would have been propped up by billion dollar companies, along with multi millionaires. Clive Palmer wanted a team, we probably have lost him. You have billionaires over in Perth wanting a team.
I want to know which billionaire this game is going to say no to, come-on, tell me.
We must be the only fool code on the planet who shoot ourselves because we have fools running the game. This commission has got to cut, burn, do what it has to for the good of the game.
We have 2-3 clubs that should be tapped on the shoulder, no more Mr Nice Guy crap.
Manly gone, Sharks gone, Titans, either gone or get big players involved, sell it to Palmer and let him buy who he likes for 2 years.
Do something, but stop stuffing around or these money men will move on, like they did with Singleton.
Manly were suppose to merge with the Bears, they did not, they are now gone. Sharkies will go good for a few games, then when Gallen gets injured, gone, send them to Wellington Sharks.
Manly gone, Bears back, Manly feeder team. We got rid of Souths , we can get rid of Mnaly.
Titans, reborn, a team in Perth and a Team in Rocky and second Brisbane team. Tell the game what is going to happen, if fans in those areas get peed off, tough titties, tough love is needed for growth, this commission has got to show leadership, not prop up dud damm teams.
March 29th 2012 @ 8:28am
Australian Rules said | March 29th 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
So… your solution to long term stability is: “Axe the poorer clubs…find more billionaires”.
March 29th 2012 @ 8:48am
Ian Whitchurch said | March 29th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Oikee has a remarkable capability to not learn from history – not even from history that isnt even history yet.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:13am
PLANKO said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Oikee does not get it Billionaires and millionaires get sick of it. You become rich by investing in things that make money. Rugby league teams do not make money. Some do but most don’t. You have to love them. Palmer loves money not Rugby League. He loves publicity not Rugby League. Palmer despite being rich is a complete nutter. Manly did amalgamate with Norths it did not work. Cause norths were broke. I do agree with Oikee that QLD needs more teams but it would be smart that you let teams die not kill them.
I know a whole lot of North supporters that rugby league will never get back. Their side was killed when they were dragged to the alter with Manly. If either Manly or Cronulla or both die in the new world so be it but you will loose a lot of RL supporters if you kill them. The AFL do acknowledge the VFL. As much as it hurts to admit it but the NRL did come from NSWRL not the QRL.
Good luck with getting more QLD sides in the comp they deserve it.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:32pm
Queensland's Game is Rugby League said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:32pm | Report comment
“As much as it hurts to admit it but the NRL did come from NSWRL not the QRL.”
Maybe so, but it’s also the reason I’m losing interest in the NRL. The only NRL I watch is the Cowboys’ matches. Sorry NRL, but your refusal to give Queensland the respect it deserves has forced me to give my full support to the QRL.
This year I’ve become a member of Wynnum-Manly Seagulls and Northern Pride. For $150 I got a season pass, a keyring, a cap and a polo shirt of the Seagulls. I get to watch the Pride’s home matches on the internet thanks to the membership I bought with them. I’ve spent over $120 on their apparrel, too.
I encourage all Queenslanders to pay more attention to the Queensland Cup. We need to get the Clydesdales back into the competition.A Logan-based team and a second side on the Gold Coast would be great.
March 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm
PJ said | March 30th 2012 @ 12:25pm | Report comment
Are you serious mate? Are you not aware that the Souths – Logan Magpies are based in Logan? There are already two teams on the Gold Coast the Burleigh Bears & Tweed Heads. another typical queenslander. half a brain you lot would be dangerous
March 30th 2012 @ 10:55pm
Queensland's Game is Rugby League said | March 30th 2012 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
Souths Logan are not based in Logan.Their Leagues club and football oval (Davies Park) are based in West End. None of their games re played in Logan. Their website doesn’t even make any mention of Logan.
Tweed Heads is based just south of the Gold Coast. The Tweed is not part of Gold Coast City.
March 29th 2012 @ 8:38am
Been said | March 29th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
I love the people deathriding the sharks….
Fact, the development will get approved in some form, the Sharks will be debt free with an incredible income….. With an increased grant and the income from the development they will be swimming in money, better facilities, millions for the right coach….
This isn’t the AFL where people follow teams for no logical reason, if for some reason Hawthorne died there is no geographical area of Melbourne you could identify that would be lost to AFL, people just follow random teams (Geelong and Bulldogs excepted)…. That is not the case in the NRL, teams represent areas, communities, if Manly were lost you would lose the Peninsular…. If the Sharks went you would lost the Shire (population greater than NT)
If any team should go its the Roosters, they don’t have any fans, it’s just one rich guy and some celebrity fans…. Sunny Sunday afternoon and they get 8,000, what a joke….. Sharks got 15k against an out of town team, they will sell out against the dragons….
Everyone needs to drop the anti Sharks act….
Local derby, Parra v Panthers, 13k…. Joke
Sharks Dragons local derby – will be a sellout
March 29th 2012 @ 10:22am
duecer said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:22am | Report comment
Been – although I would agree with you that Cronulla should stay as they have more Juniors and more supporters than the Roosters who have virtually no supporters or Juniors, if Cronulla did exit, the people of the Shire would hardly start following AFL or Rugby, whereas the few people in the East that follow RL might if the Roosters left.
March 29th 2012 @ 7:44pm
jdubya said | March 29th 2012 @ 7:44pm | Report comment
The Roosters have more members than the Sharks. And getting rid of the only team that has a presence in Sydney’s Eastern Suburbs (ignoring the Souths bandwagoners) and has played in every season would be idiotic.
The Sharks have never won a thing and have been on the verge of bankruptcy for years. Don’t try and deflect the Sharks failings onto the Roosters.
March 29th 2012 @ 9:13am
Brett McKay said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:13am | Report comment
Oiks, reliance on Clive Palmer doesn’t have a track record of going well. Ask the FFA, ask Hyatt Hotels. You should be looking at “we probably have lost him” like it’s a good thing..
March 29th 2012 @ 11:12am
Renegade said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:12am | Report comment
Oikee,
It looks like today’s one of your off days…. overall a terrible post mate.
I will agree with the introduction of Perth and second Brisbane side though.
March 29th 2012 @ 3:26pm
oikee said | March 29th 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
I was in a hurry this morning, and i cant understand why everyone is down on Palmer, the guy likes rugby league, and he is the first guy with money i have ever taken a liking to, just because other people dont like him, makes me warm to him even more. He is a living treasure, i can see why. He is brilliant and will only make and invest more and more into Queensland, and wherever else he may roam.
Queenslanders will propbably peeve him off over time, he will then just move on, could not blame him, when you deal with fools, not much else to do. I just hope Campbell Newman keeps him on board.
Sharks gone, they can become a feeder team, merge with the Dragons, do other things, no need for them to be in the comp. The name can still be used.
Manly can never grow, they are stuck in a non growth area, so keeping their piddley 10 thousand fans will mean 2 million West Australian fans will miss out, is that your thinking. ?
Mate, this game has got to stop worrying about losing fans, and start worrying about gaining fans. Thei are millions to gain, maybe a few thousand to lose.
Mate, Maths obviopusly was not your high point. as english obviopusly was not mine. No i blame the compute.
Come-on, lets stop this blackmail. Your holding the game back, like the dinosaurs have done for 100 years, now you guys are trying to do the same, let the damm Commish do their jobs for crying out loud, cut and burn.
Look, my mighty Bronx are being beamed into Victoria, South Australia, West Australia, Central Queensland and North Australia, ??? This is why the game has never grown, they only show the game in 2 bubble states.
No more, it is time to sacrifice to grow, anyone who tries to stop me or the commish is on a losing battle becaus ei have waited for 100 years for this.,
Anyone who would pick a good bloke to run a club over a billionaire has got rocks, rocks in their heads.
The game will be growing and punching its product around the world, the last thing we need is clubs on life support.
If your weak, cant excwept change, cant cope, move to another code, if your strong and with me, here is the plan, lets kick some.
Rugby league is on the verge of being shown live into all Australian states, and we as followers know it is a brilliant TV product. I repeat, climb on board or get out now, because as god is my witness, we wont be taking any prisoners.
March 29th 2012 @ 5:26pm
Mals said | March 29th 2012 @ 5:26pm | Report comment
Oh dear Oikee, according to you there are 2 million RL fans in WA eh? What have you been smoking lately?!?! WA is a state dominated by AFL. RL would come a distance 4th in the football codes behind soccer and rugby union.
April 1st 2012 @ 8:22pm
Pete75 said | April 1st 2012 @ 8:22pm | Report comment
While I agree that Oikee seems to have been smoking some substance, I disagree that RL will be a “distant fourth” behind the other football codes. That is just a nonsense.
I actually life in WA and can tell you that there it’s a large appetite for RL here. That will be confirmed when Perth gets a team.
March 29th 2012 @ 9:10am
voodoo people said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Searle has to wear it – he will have to give up the football club and take on all the debt himself (rightly considering he made this mess).
Bill Rae and a few other businessmen will probably buy the Centre of Excellence from the Commonwealth Bank and the NRL licence from the ARLC for $1, and the football club staff will transfer to his new entity when the Titans are disolved.
Then Rae might buy the Titans name – that bit is up to Searle.
March 29th 2012 @ 9:41am
Ryan O'Connell said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
If Searle is the sole decision-maker, and he seems to have been, then yes, you’re right – he does have to wear it.
March 29th 2012 @ 4:42pm
Nathan of Perth said | March 29th 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
Your solution to this is to wait for Searle to do the honourable thing and fall on his sword?
March 29th 2012 @ 9:54am
King of the Gorgonites said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:54am | Report comment
The GC titans must be killed off and killed off now.
RL shoudl exist on the GC, but it needs to be centrally owned and run by the NRL, at least in its formative years.
The GC is not the land of milk and honey that people once thought it was.
March 29th 2012 @ 9:57am
The Cattery said | March 29th 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
A lot of the support from the AFL is of a non-financial variety, for example:
1. extra draft picks, high ones, lots of them, which gives the clubs something to work with off a zero base
2. additional opportunities to trade players, e.g. allowing the Giants to sign up four 17 year olds pre-draft for the express purpose of allowing them to trade with other clubs (for mature players or more draft picks)
3. stadium assistance, this involves indirect capital funding and lobbying Government, by putting up cash upfront, the AFL has organised very good stadium deals for both new clubs, giving them a fighting chance to meet operating expenses as early as possible
4. no doubt the AFL has been involved directly in assisting the new clubs get lucrative sponsorship deals
5. marketing – as we all know, the AFL has pumped up the PR machine for both new clubs, and Izzy and Karmichael are part of that.
Now obviously the NRL can’t assist with draft picks at the moment, but there are things in that list that allow a bit of support that does not necessarily constitute direct financial assistance, and at a minimum, the IC should be pursuing those forms of support.
The last thing to note is that a large TV deal requires a minimum of 16 teams, in other words, any time you have your 16th team teetering on the edge, whatever money needs to be thrown at it, it’s worth it!
March 29th 2012 @ 10:04am
Danny said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Sad times at the moment. Looks as though Bradford Bulls will find it hard to survive past next week.
March 29th 2012 @ 10:09am
The Cattery said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
But the figure I heard for Bradford was quite small, about $1 million or something.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:13am
Danny said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
Not small, they need 500,000 pounds in the next week and another 500,000 in a month but they don’t think they’ll get enough this week.
KOG, their crowds are not that that’s about what Wigan and Leeds average. Bradford about 8-10,000
March 29th 2012 @ 4:37pm
Nathan of Perth said | March 29th 2012 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
Tax bills?
March 29th 2012 @ 10:11am
King of the Gorgonites said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:11am | Report comment
wtf?
how can a club that draws 15K in RL heartland fold?
March 29th 2012 @ 11:41am
Ian Whitchurch said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
At a guess, the same way the Otago RFU and Collingwood in the early 1980s got into trouble – bad financial control, followed by over-enthusiasm in spending, followed by cash crisis.
March 29th 2012 @ 10:23am
Gareth said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
The ARLC should buy the Centre of Excellence for $5-$8 million on the caveat that Searle then uses the proceeds to pay out player contracts. They then revoke the Titans license and replace them with a new franchise. Everyone wins except Michael Searle, who deserves everything he gets.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:17am
Renegade said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:17am | Report comment
Revoking the titans license and replacing them with a new franchise does not seem like a win at all.
The titans brand needs to survive.
March 29th 2012 @ 5:15pm
Nathan of Perth said | March 29th 2012 @ 5:15pm | Report comment
Also, you would be very hard-pressed to convince Searle this is in his own interests. Unfortunately there is very little power to force Searle’s hand. This is, by the way, why I never advocate private ownership.
Just look at Clive Palmer. Or look at the US top tier women’s football league which went completely belly up courtesy of a private owner who threw a tanty.
March 29th 2012 @ 10:34am
Prince Imperial said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:34am | Report comment
The author like a lot of other people seemed to have bought the Searle line that the RL company is profitable and that its the property arm that is causing all the problems. However if the RL company was being required to pay rent for its training and admin faciliities elsewhere would it being making a “profit”? I have my doubts and the attempted distinction seems very artificial.
It’s very difficult for the the NRL/ALRC to favour any privately owned franchise especially by providing additional funding as real questions would be asked by all the other teams in the competition whether this was just boosting the personal wealth of a few individuals. At least with the Suns/Giants other clubs know the money is staying in the game. I actually agree with KOG on the best approach but doubt that it will happen.
March 29th 2012 @ 10:41am
Ryan O'Connell said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:41am | Report comment
It’s pretty simple – if the club didn’t have to pay for the rent for the vacant office space, it would be turning a profit.
And I agree, the ‘help’ the ARLC provides doesn’t necessarily need to be financial. There are a number of ways the ARLC could help the Gold Coast out. The point is, it would still be playing favoritism in some people’s eyes. Whereas I think they’d just be doing their job.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:07am
Prince Imperial said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:07am | Report comment
Maybe, but the accounts of Searle’s private companies have not been made publicly available so I’m not as confident as you. Given the Titans have only averaged 11k to their first two home matches their chances of being profitable this year would appear to have diminished.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:19am
Renegade said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
True. Although the fact that they’re in a significant amount ($13.4m)….i don’t think the first two home games this year have caused that, it’s obviously over a longer period than that.
March 29th 2012 @ 12:04pm
Prince Imperial said | March 29th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
I read a report earlier this year that 14 of the 16 NRL entities made a loss last year. Of these 16 teams a substantial number receive multi-million dollar grants from their Leagues clubs (e.g. Penrith, Canterbury) or were privately owned and propped up their owners (e.g. Melbourne to the tune of $8m though this is probably the worse example). The Broncos are quite literally in a league of their own with the size of their supporter base and TV coverage and clearly would be profitable.
In a year (2011) that the Titans averaged less than the NRL average for crowds and where it is claimed that they have a poor stadium deal and with none of the grants that many other teams receive from their League clubs, we are supposed to believe that the Titans were profitable? I think people should have their BS radar on. Though they may do better than many other teams in terms of sponsorship there appears to be quite a complex relationship between their property arm and their RL arm and Searle’s statements should be taken with a strong degree of scepticism.
March 29th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Ryan O'Connell said | March 29th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
I’ll grant you this, I’m a brave (stupid?) man for not taking anything Searle says with a grain of salt!
March 30th 2012 @ 12:29pm
PJ said | March 30th 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
averaged 11,000 my backside, i have been to all Titans games last season and this, and if they have had crowds of anything over 8,000 i will walk to Cairns in a G String. Some creative over inflation of figures is happening on the gold coast
March 29th 2012 @ 11:42am
Ian Whitchurch said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Prince Imperial,
Thats one of a number of reasons why private owners are a bad idea.
March 29th 2012 @ 10:47am
Cody said | March 29th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
It is clear Searle has been clutching at straws for a long time. His negotiations with PNG Govt were delusional (sell 25% for $20 mill, thus valuing the club at $80 mill !!!). No one in their right mind would partner with Searle. Interested parties need only simply sit back and wait for the licence to become available due to insolvency and then buy it from ARL. Thus getting 100% ownership for several million. They don’t need to buy building, just lease it off the mortgagee/. Not a complicated deal to do to maintain NRL on the GC. Just revoke licence off Searle (I am sure he has plenty of defaults) and sell it to a properly capitalised group. Searle never had any real capital, only debt.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:05am
Cody said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
Correction: Apart from debt he also had a bag of tricks that contained smoke and mirrors.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:09am
A1 said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Why don’t the Suns play in both the AFL and NRL? They couldn’t be any worse than the Titans, and Karmichael Hunt would be guaranteed to at leady have some impact.
March 29th 2012 @ 11:20am
PLANKO said | March 29th 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Nice like that… Also they could rent out the empty space !!!
March 29th 2012 @ 12:13pm
Ryan O'Connell said | March 29th 2012 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Win win!
Funnily enough, the Titans have received support from an unlikely source. Gold Coast Suns chairman John Witheriff. He telephoned Searle and offered his support and encouraged the broader community to follow.
“This is clearly an issue with a property interest. We should all be pushing for a solution which is in the best interests for the NRL and the broader Gold Coast community,” he said.
“We have got to come up with a solution.”
He said the community could support the team by going to a game.
“If the Gold Coast community stands up and heads to a game, it gives the NRL a compelling reason to support it and see it survive.”
March 29th 2012 @ 12:24pm
Australian Rules said | March 29th 2012 @ 12:24pm | Report comment
But hang on…aren’t the 2 codes at war with each other???
Damn you lying Sydney pressclub !!!
March 29th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Ian Whitchurch said | March 29th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Remember, the Suns have management rights at Metricon Stadium.
This means that if they were to offer the Gold Coast NRL club a ground on the weekends they arent using it, they can.
Yes, spectators will have to sit a little further back in many cases – but they dealt with that for decades at the SCG, so they will deal.
As well, the ground is sitting empty when the Suns arent playing in it, so I suspect they could offer a competitive deal for the Gold Coast successor club.
Offering a joint membership would also be – in my view – a good call.