The AFL 2011 Annual Report
The full Annual Report for 2011 has been released by the AFL, and if you’re into that sort of thing, it makes some fascinating reading.
While much of it is just numbers to many, there are a few tidbits for the AFL supporter who needs things to argue about pointlessly on a rainy day at the pub with friends.
Attendance
Total attendance was 7,488,198 – a new record for the AFL. Even though the average was down, the AFL believes this figure is in the top four in the world.
- NAB Cup 2011 Attendance was 256,342 (up 12 percent on 2010)
- NAB Challenge attendance was 92,002 (down 4.2 percent)
- Finals attendance was 614,783 (down 5.6 percent)
- 2,536,695 attended the MCG (53,972 ave)
- 1,575,605 attended Etihad (32,825 ave)
Subiaco, Docklands and the MCG were the only old stadiums to record slight increases. The Gabba had a 30 percent drop, while Manuka also dropped 28 percent.
Participation
According to the report, “The Australian Football participation census is compiled annually and measures participants who play in a structured competition of more than six weeks’ duration.”
Participation numbers were 790,905 in 2011, with 94,412 female participants. The AFL also announced that participation outside Australia reached more than 100,000 for the first time.
In 2011, 2537 community clubs participated in competitions across Australia each week in 273 leagues. 17,971 school teams competed as well. Andrew Demtriou notes in the chairman’s report that participation in New South Wales was 36,390 in 1998 – today that figure is over 136,000. School football reported the highest growth in 2011.
- AFL Auskick 167,080
- Club Football 314,290
- School Football 304,485
- Social Football 4690
Participation by State
- Vic – 227,428
- NSW – 136,438
- Queensland – 133,200
- WA – 130,482
- SA – 116,626
- Tas – 33,295
- NT – 22,800
Membership
AFL record of 650,373, up 5.9 percent on the previous record in 2010. It was still a record even when you exclude Gold Coast members.
Players
- Players earnt a total of $164.83 million in 2011, including 9.2 million in Additional Services Agreements and 1.93 million from marketing arrangements.
- Two players were paid more than a million dollars
- One player between 900,000 – 1,000,000
- Four players between $800 – 900k
- Most players receive between 100-300k per year.
The draft
- 164 players were taken across all drafts
- Victoria – 51 + 29 Rookies
- South Australia – 17 + 5 Rookies
- Western Australia – 15 + 8 rookies
- NSW/ACT – 12 + 7 Rookies
- Queensland – 5 + 4 Rookies
- Tasmania – 3 + 1 rookie
- Northern Territory – 2 + 2 rookies
- International – 0 + 2 roookies
Finance
The AFL total revenue increase by two percent to $343 million with an operating surplus of $234 million and $159 million paid to clubs. As already reported, The AFL made its first net loss in ten years – 23.6 million, due in part to the extra costs for Gold Coast and GWS, as well as a profit share payment of 10 million to the AFLPA.
Things to note
- Between 2007 and 2011 the AFL invested more than $240 million in more than 600 local clubs across Australia.
- The AFL now wholly owns and operates AFL Victoria as of March 2011 (as well as AFL NSW/Q/NT and reports that all AFL operations in NSW, Queensland, NT and Victoria made a profit in 2011. The report does not say what that profit was.
Gold Coast and GWS funding
- Extra Gold Coast funding beyond normal club distributions was 16.8 million as it transitioned to the AFL competition.
- Establishment funding for GWS was $22 million, but it includes the $10 million paid for Skoda stadium.
Club Funds
The AFL has allocated $1.1 billion in funding to the clubs over the next five years from 2012-16 (about 52 percent of total funds), including a $144 million Club Future Fund.
The Club Future Fund, as defined in the Annual Report:”During 2012-16, the Club Future Fund will be invested into the specific needs of each club to improve viability and improve competitiveness. The investment aims to leave a legacy of improved facilities, reduced debt, more and better resources to grow club revenues, more and better resources to improve on-field performance and to compensate for revenue and cost disadvantages that affect a club’s ability to compete.”
The major beneficiaries of this over the next five years:
- Western Bulldogs, North Melbourne – 10.2 million
- Melbourne – 9.1 million
- St Kilda – 8.9 million
- Richmond – 8.0 million
- Port, Sydney, Brisbane – 7.2 million
The minimum funding for each club is 3.25 million (Geelong, Hawthorn, Adelaide, Gold Coast and GWS). All other clubs recieve 4.25 million.
The Club Future fund has been specifically tied to funding needs for clubs, including:
- $30 million for club facility and stadium developments
- $6 million for debt reduction grants
- $21 million for new resource to grow memberships and attendances and other fan initiatives.
- $8 million for achieving a minimum standard in football departments
- $25 million in subsidies for clubs with poor stadium deals
Clubs receiving significant funding will have to meet tougher benchmarks and frameworks.
Media Rights
- Radio rights for 2012-16: $23.2 million
- TV and New Media Broadcast rights for 2012-16: $1.253 Billion
The Financial Report
Where the money went:
- 105 million – Base distribution to all clubs
- 53 million – in other funds to clubs
- 109 million – AFL operating expenses
- 21.9 million – AFLPA funds
- 30.7 million – Game Development Grants
- 5.06 million – Ground Improvements
- 0.16 million – AFL Foundation
- 6.7 million – Facilities development
- 1.9 million – Strategic partnership
- 31.6 million – New Markets
Its important to note that while the AFL made a loss this year, it was in line with predications, and the AFL believes it will generate profits of at least this much in following years.
![]()
Passionate about your AFL? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily AFL email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Record low AFL crowd for GWS home match (209)
- Giant challenges ahead for Greater Western Sydney (200)
- Kevin Sheedy sticks by comments (143)
- My open-letter to AFL supporters (90)
- Long, cold winter ahead for Western Bulldogs (86)
- Why we should ease up on the Giants (81)
- A conference system won’t provide AFL equality (73)
- Essendon chief executive Ian Robson quits Bombers
- A significant day for AFL race relations (70)
- Ever dreamed of kicking the winning goal after the siren? (22)
- Focus on indigenous good news: Johnson
- Angry Tippett jumping off walls: Hannebery
- Stabbed Bomber lucky not to be worse off
- AFL grand final helps Hannebery improve (2)
- AFL grand final helps Hannebery improve (2)
- A dummy’s guide to AFL rules (22)
- Australian rules football and improving Indigenous relations (31)
- Round 8 wrap: Melbourne show heart, Collingwood send flag message (4)
- Essendon continue to bomb out (34)
- Why the easybeats can be the hardest to defeat (7)
- My open-letter to AFL supporters (91)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- AFL, Andrew Demetriou


April 5th 2012 @ 8:23am
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 8:23am | Report comment
thanks Wookie, really good summary
April 5th 2012 @ 8:58am
duecer said | April 5th 2012 @ 8:58am | Report comment
Interesting statistics. The participation rates in NSW and QLD being higher than WA and SA might need some more scrutiny, otherwise you will get all the naysayers telling us that they’re all Auskick kids who did it to get time off school or a free voucher. Do they break down club and school participation by state?
The drafts from NSW and QLD do show the penetration of Aussie Rules coming through, although it may need a few more years to see if it continues to grow in these areas, or wether the juniors go to some other sports.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:00am
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Another favourite is that the AFL is bribing kids with $20 bank accounts.
April 5th 2012 @ 9:53am
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
http://www.afl.com.au/portals/0/2012/afl_annual_report_2011.pdf pg 75 contains a series of graphs that show each state by participation. School, Ausckick participants form the majority of NSW and QLD figures. However the graphs are all there.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:02am
Matt_S said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
TV income suggests the AFL receive no money from overseas broadcasting rights. Is that correct?
April 5th 2012 @ 10:28am
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
Its not really clear how much is paid for any of the overseas broadcast arrangements. We only really know about the Australlian broadcast deals. These will be listed as general revenue from operating activites
April 5th 2012 @ 11:55am
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
Matt
I think we can safely assume that if it’s not nothing, it’s next to nothing.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:39am
Goanajack said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:39am | Report comment
Matt S is a well known anti AFL person…Were there any adult participation numbers. Someone wrote in a couple of weeks ago that the last time the NRL published numbers, adult male players had dropped from a max of 55K in 1992 to 33K in 2006 due to time pressures, insurance, pace of the game etc which gives the hint that we are heading towards the NFL model of a highly paid elite with fewer social players. I am wondering what the comparable numbers for the AFL are. Stabpass had some WA numbers but thats all…
April 5th 2012 @ 11:13am
Nathan of Perth said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
They distributed a million dollars more to WCE and FFC than to Hawthorn or Geelong? Curious.
Nice to see the draft numbers. One thing the AFL has done well is to actually develop player development in WA. FootballWest and Perth Glory have also done very well getting professional contracts to WA players but at present the NRL and S15 have seemingly been very lax in this regard. Although I do believe the development path for S15 has just really begun to produce players and the WARL SG Ball team has some promising prospects. Maybe its the draft system that makes it feasible to develop these players, whereas in the NRL the zonal development means that places without a team simply don’t get exploited?
April 5th 2012 @ 12:08pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Its a combination of many things.
A strong second tier competition in 3 states that produce the most AFL talent. An extremely high rated TAC Cup in Victoria, and National Under 18s championships. An elite competition that actually has money to spend on development in its territories. These things are all part of it.
April 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Australian Rules said | April 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
I don’t like this aspect of the funding arrangement Nathan.
Hawthorn, displaying prudent, sustainable business smarts (and who have shown excellent governance and initiative in spreading their brand and incresing revenue streams) did NOT ask the AFL for any money. They made a small profit (were in the black) and sought not to go to the AFL cap in hand. Didn’t ask for any, didn’t get any. Fair enough.
Collingwood, however, easily the richest sporting club in the country, asked for more money and got it. You could say the same for WCE and Freo…these clubs shouldn’t need handouts…even if they ask for them.
And what’s the message it sends to clubs like Haw and Geel..? Even if you’re keeping your house in check, running a good business and doing the right thing…you should ask for more anyway.
Surely funding must be means tested.
April 5th 2012 @ 1:17pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
much of the grants to the bigger clubs is related to facility developments and upgrades. Much of the grants to smaller clubs is keeping them afloat.
Hawthorn have 20 million lying around – thats not a typo – and prety much nothing they can spend it on at the moment. The Wa teams fund WA footy so the AFL is in effect investing in WA football.
April 5th 2012 @ 11:22am
Capital Burley said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Wookie
Really enjoy your posts, and, like you, share a fascination with the administrative side of the game.
However, I was disappointed to see that on several occasions you incorrectly used “NSW” as a region when if fact it should have been “NSW/ACT”. I realise I might be a little sensitive on this oversight, but when you consider that my local club, Ainslie, has produced the likes of James Hird and Nathan Buckley, and, more recently, exciting speedster Jason Tutt of the Bulldogs, that Canberra has four teams in the NEAFL, and that 5000 of the foundation members of the GWS Giants came from Canberra, I’m sure you can understand my indignation.
April 5th 2012 @ 12:05pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
Justifiably angry my friend. My apologies to all the ACT AFL folks. Keep up the fine work.
April 5th 2012 @ 2:56pm
Anton said | April 5th 2012 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
Vic participation less than 30% of national total. That is a worry – altho a tribute to the national expansion of the game.
April 5th 2012 @ 6:15pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
A key statistic that people may have missed is that for the first time in the 154 year history of Australian Football, there are over 100k playing the game outside of Australia, most of that growth has come in the last 15 years, and most of it has been grass roots growth – the AFL has done very little to foster that growth (until recently).
People down play that organic growth, and they are right to point out that we are talking exclusively of amateur and social footy – but the key point everyone is missing is that players are starting to make their way onto rookie and scholarship lists – and we are no longer just talking about Gaelic footballers.
There’s still a long way to go, but in years to come, it’s my firm belief that we’ll start seeing a few making it onto senior lists per annum, and it will grow from there.
I mentioned on another list that a GB Bulldogs rep had just been signed up for Port Melbourne, well, I’ve only just heard that one of his NT team mates, Anthony Trigg, has been signed up by the Northern Blues (also VFL).
Now the interesting thing about Trigg is that we have already heard of him, even if he learned his footy in the UK. Not only has he represented GB and the European Legion, but he has been nominated for the World XVIII and at the last IC he was invited to a draft combine where he blitzed many of the categories despite being 6 ft 6 – it was clear even then – we had a player here!
How many more Anthony Triggs are out there? There’s a world full of them – that’s the point!!
April 5th 2012 @ 6:39pm
Nathan of Perth said | April 5th 2012 @ 6:39pm | Report comment
“A key statistic that people may have missed is that for the first time in the 154 year history of Australian Football, there are over 100k playing the game outside of Australia”
When I see draftees coming out of the Ontario Australian Football League I’ll put more of a focus on that!
April 5th 2012 @ 6:43pm
Titus said | April 5th 2012 @ 6:43pm | Report comment
Any idea of the numbers playing Gealic Football world wide? Or La Crosse(I know you love it), or Grid Iron?
April 5th 2012 @ 6:51pm
Nathan of Perth said | April 5th 2012 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
Ah Gridiron – you know I considered seeing if I could do officiating for them during the summer months since they play in the evenings. Gotta get and stay fit for winter.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:00pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:00pm | Report comment
No Titus – I don’t know the answer to your questions – I expect LaX would be bigger than Australian Football, especially when you consider that the playing numbers in the North of the US are quite large, and on top of being big in Canada, it’s probably the 6th or 7th biggest sport in the US.
But in all honesty, I’m not interested in tracking down numbers for every sport that pops into your head, that would be a lot of work, and quite tedious.
What I am interested in seeing is whether the occasional player from overseas can make it in the AFL – now that’s interesting.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:06pm
Titus said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:06pm | Report comment
I am just curious, I have seen the Grid Iron ads on telly here, not sure how many Aussie’s will make it to the NFL, better chance if you had played AFL, or Rugby probably.
I just think there is a difference between 9 a side kick arounds in the park and establishing semi-pro leagues around the world.
Food for thought really.
April 5th 2012 @ 9:44pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:44pm | Report comment
Titus
I”m surprised you would see such a difference.
I’ve been involved in with junior soccer in this country, and much of the participatin statistics are little kids chasing a round ball in 5 a side games on a zillion fields marked out with cones – what’s the difference?
April 5th 2012 @ 9:47pm
Titus said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:47pm | Report comment
Those kids have highly organised clubs with multiple divisions that feed into semi-professional second tier leagues, and a professional national league.
April 5th 2012 @ 9:52pm
Anton said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:52pm | Report comment
Surely Titus isn’t talking about soccer in Australia?
(roll eyes)
April 5th 2012 @ 9:58pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:58pm | Report comment
No mate – I’ve been involved with junior clubs whose sole purpose is to allow hundreds of liitle kids an opportunity to chase a round ball for half an hour every Saturday morning, on fields marked out with cones for as far as the eye can see – some will continue playing, many will not, but they all count for the stats don’t they?
Do you reckon the billion Africans playing the game are playing on pristine fields, properly marked out, nets on nice tidy goals, flag posts, etc, etc?
Once again, what’s the difference between counting in your stats blokes chasing bound up rags on dirt, and blokes organising a match of Australian Football as best as they are able?
Indeed, the strength of the game in Brazil is not that they have plenty of organised leagues on pristine fields, in fact the reverse is true – the strength of the game is that anyone and eveyrone is playing on every bit of empty space they can find with whatever kind of ball they can find – and doing it a lot.
April 6th 2012 @ 1:09am
Nathan of Perth said | April 6th 2012 @ 1:09am | Report comment
Optus Small-Sided Football.
April 5th 2012 @ 6:54pm
MFB1991 said | April 5th 2012 @ 6:54pm | Report comment
How does the AFL collate figures for overseas players ? Who and where do they come from ? When you say ‘playing the game’ what does that mean ? Do all these people play in an organised competition over a period of time or do they just turn up at some AFL funded ‘event’ and get added to the numbers, or do they really exist at all. Sorry to be negative but this seems to be another wildly exaggerated claim.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:12pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:12pm | Report comment
MFB
surely you know the answer – the numbers are entirely made up!!
About half the numbers come from our immediate region, and then you have competitions and school programs in about 30 countries – so you only need to average 3,000 per country to get to about 100k – it’s actually quite a small number.
In truth, if the long term goal is talent identificaiton – you’re better reducing that down to about 15 countries, and fostering the game in those places alone, and even then, there’s an advantage to focusing even more within countries.
For example, there’s a decent footy comp in Ontario – decent in the sense that there are enough numbers to have a league, fixtures, full games, officials, administration, etc – that’s a lot better than having teams strewn across Canada that get infrequent competition.
The Danish team has a couple of teams in Sweden because it’s just across the water, so they can run a decent comp with 8 clubs and a fixture, etc.
Being all amateur, and being a resource intensive game, there is more joy in having things condensed rather than spread out.
Croatia is a smallish country and runs a decent AFL9s comp. (Croatia itself does very well at the AFL9s competitions around Europe – but they rarely play the full field version).
The BARFL is mainly concentrated in and around London for obvious reasons.
In South Africa, the schools program is run in 3 or 4 provinces, with one being particularly strong – better to have one strong province, try and achieve a critical mass of players, officials and facilities.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:20pm
Titus said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:20pm | Report comment
Surely you are better off focusing on athletes from other codes, say Rugby, Gaelic Football, Basketball, who don’t quite make it or want to try something different.
Someone who plays Aussie Rules in Denmark has no ambition to become a professional athlete, am I wrong?
April 5th 2012 @ 9:39pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:39pm | Report comment
Well – not everyone can be a lawyer, doctor or star in a Hollywood movie.
April 5th 2012 @ 11:37pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:37pm | Report comment
There are very few people who play a sport that dont have some sort of dream to compete at the elite level
April 6th 2012 @ 6:19pm
Veni, Vedi, Sherrin Calcitravi said | April 6th 2012 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
I disagree. Across asia (thinking here of the Asian champs that I played in from 2007-2010) many train all year for the odd scratch matches. Its for the love of the game, with no intention of eleteism (although I did line up against Andrew Schauble once in Singapore)
April 5th 2012 @ 7:53pm
MFB1991 said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:53pm | Report comment
Cattery,
Gee mate, on your own admission these figures are all made up and extrapalated to come to a figure that the AFL actually publishes in its annual report ! The creditability is nil. Just for balance, as I have been accused of being a troll on AFL threads, the Rugby League International Federation claims their sport is played in about 40 countries, creditability also nil.
April 5th 2012 @ 9:38pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 9:38pm | Report comment
I was being sarcastic mate.
The AFL keeps pretty good tabs on everything – it’s the reason why it is the best run and most prosperous league in the country.
I’m making the point that 100k really ain’t all that much – I’m not rally sure why people like you bother even questioning it – it’s a very low number.
What’s it to you if League is played in 40 countries – why do you care?
April 6th 2012 @ 12:35am
peeeko said | April 6th 2012 @ 12:35am | Report comment
because its misleading
April 6th 2012 @ 2:07pm
Matt_S said | April 6th 2012 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
Peeko, nothing misleading. Go to the RLEF website for instance and check their annual report. Go to websites of countries linked to them. Nothing misleading. If a country says it has a 4 club comp, it has a four club comp. If the Ukraniian league say they have government recognition, then they have it, just read their official statements.
I’m suick of union people coming on here and dismissing league. Union is allowed to grow and at times misleads the public about TV rating, growth etc.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:14pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:14pm | Report comment
You need “3,000 per country to get to about 100k”
Let’s assume an AFL team has minimum of 25 players in the squad – 18 on the field, 4 interchange & a couple of extras in case of injuries, people unavailable on match day b/c of personal commitments, etc.
So, we’re looking at 120 Aussie Rules teams per country, in 30 countries outside Australia. Let’s be generous and say that each league as 20 teams.
So, now we need 6 leagues of 20 teams per country, in 30 countries outside Australia.
Are you really expecting us to believe that this is the truth?
Can you name even 5 countries outside Australia that each have 120 Aussie Rules teams playing in organised competitions.
PS: I was led to believe o/s Aussie Rules competitions are 9-sided teams, which means we are looking at 240 teams per country, in 30 countries around the world. Absolutely ridiculous.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:28pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:28pm | Report comment
The 30 x 3,000 scenario was just to show that mathematically speaking, 100,000 is nothing, right, it’s a low number, it’s nothing, as TW mentions elsewhere, PNG and NZ would account for nearly half of that on their own, you can work out the rest with minimal effort.
What’s ridiculous?
Let me give you a little idea of what one could perceive as being ridiculous. I’ve been involved in junior soccer, so I know first hand how this works.
At my junior club, from 8am Saturday morning, there will be a paddock about the size of an aussie rule ground marked out with 40 to 50 little fields, marked out by little cones, and from 8am to 8:30am nearly 500 little 4 and 5 years olds will chase a little ball around, no officials, no scoring, no rules, nothing, except parents standing along the cones encouraging the kids to stay inside their little patch of grass, and those 500 are counted towards soccer’s participation rates – and then something similar happens at 8:30 (6 year olds), and on it goes till mid afternoon, by which time thousands of kids would have had a run amongst themselves, and that’s all counted in the official statistics. This is one club, all playing amongst themselve, no other club involved.
Now how could anything the AFL does anywhere, anywhere, come up with statistics that are any less valid than counting thousands of little kids runing around on a paddock chasing a ball for half an hour?
Let me tell you – it’s an impossibility – that’s the bar right there – you can’t go any lower.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:47pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:47pm | Report comment
“as TW mentions elsewhere, PNG and NZ would account for nearly half of that on their own,”
So, now you’re suggesting PNG & NZ have around 50k Aussie Rules players participating in organised 18-a-side Aussie Rules games?
Based on the figures provided in the AFL Annual Report, you are suggesting there are approximately as many Aussie Rules players in NZ & PNG as there are in TAS & NT?
We’re talking about 1000 Aussie Rules teams in PNG and anther 1000 Aussie Rules teams in NZ with 25 players per team?
I find this even more ridiculous.
April 5th 2012 @ 10:57pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 10:57pm | Report comment
Fussball
you are having trouble following.
I’ve just given you an example of my local soccer club, which has a couple of thousand kids palying amongst themselves each Saturday, and those 2,000 kids are counted as participants – and they belong to one club! and they are playing a series of tiny games on tiny spaces, often with no officiating.
So I am saying to you – why is it ok for soccer to count those 2,000 kids playing little games for half an hour at a time, all belonging to the one club, playing amongst themselves – but for aussie rules, you will only count teams playing the full 18 a side game.
I don’t follow your logic.
If a club is formed overseas with 50 members, and they split up into four 9 a side teams and play a full season – why are those 50 participants not to be counted, but you’re happy to count the 2,000 kids playing amongst themselves for half an hour at time in the one club?
April 5th 2012 @ 11:04pm
The Cattery said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:04pm | Report comment
Here you go fussball, here’s the strategic plan for AFL New Zealand:
http://www.nzafl.co.nz/Portals/0/1.AFLNZ%20Strategic%20Plan2010-2012.pdf
they’re aiming to have 19,000 participants this year.
If you don’t like it, take it up with them.
PNG would be above that number already, and from memory, Sth Africa was around the 10k mark.
They’re all small numbers – not sure what your problem is.
April 5th 2012 @ 11:25pm
Norm said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:25pm | Report comment
His problem is that he hates AFL & thinks soccer is our life!
April 5th 2012 @ 11:33pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:33pm | Report comment
Strategic Planning for the USAFL is for 10,000 players by 2020.”
The specific wording is” participants.”
Bear in mind, that the AFL adjudges participation to include schools programs and ausckick or its relevant equivelant, so long as they complete a program of at least 6 weeks duration. There are shools programs in a number of countries
April 5th 2012 @ 11:36pm
The_Wookie said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:36pm | Report comment
AFL qualification for participation status is actually mentioned in the article. This is 100,000 participants – people who have done an AFL related program of at least 6 weeks duration in 2011. This includes things like KiwiKick in NZ, Footywild in SA and similar.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:00pm
Norm said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:00pm | Report comment
Definitely organised competitions & numbers easily tallied. When I lived in London there was the early stages of BAFL. Later, when I lived in the US I was amazed to find a well organized league with about 40 clubs. The national championship was quite an event.
April 5th 2012 @ 7:28pm
MFB1991 said | April 5th 2012 @ 7:28pm | Report comment
So if there are 40 clubs in the U.S. how many grades do they have ? Working on the assumption of one team of 22 players per club thats 880 players. Thats about 99,120 more to account for worldwide. Where are they ?
April 5th 2012 @ 11:52pm
piesman2011 said | April 5th 2012 @ 11:52pm | Report comment
clubs and teams are two different things. There might be more then one team at a club.
April 6th 2012 @ 1:19am
Nathan of Perth said | April 6th 2012 @ 1:19am | Report comment
Well, 22 is one team and interchange bench on the field, but there would probably be players under that to cover those who can’t make a game/are injured.
But you’d probably have to add to that those involved in officiating, coaching, various club officials. Juniors under those.
Bloody hell, everyone rags and disrespects, but there are people out there enjoying what they do immensely. http://www.sportingpulse.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=1-7394-0-0-0&sID=211700 <– for instance, the league out of Ontario. Some people are just too focussed on cutting other people down