End of shoulder charge means NRL is getting soft
By Ben Pobjie, 13 Apr 2012 Ben Pobjie is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Ben Te'o, Brisbane Broncos, NRL, Ray Warren, Rugby League
Ben Te'o in action during the NRL Round 26, Brisbane Broncos v Manly Sea Eagles. AAP Image/Action Photographics/Charles Knight
Related coverage
I have been terribly worried. As a lover of sport, it is always a concern when developments suggest that one of my beloved sports may find itself imploding.
Not just imploding, but sucking itself down the drain of irrelevance, collapsing from triumph and might to a state of decay and degradation, to become ranked among the Greco-Roman wrestlings and dwarf-tossings of the world.
True sportophiles live in a state of constant fear that all they hold dear may be taken away.
I felt my fears being realised when I read of the Ben Te’o affair, which has brought forth a terrible spectre: the chance that we may – oh, it’s painful to even type it – we may lose the shoulder charge from the game.
And good God, wouldn’t that be the last straw? After all the tinkering and fiddling with the game we’ve seen over the years – a change to the stripping the ball rule here, an introduction of golden point there, a failure to force Ray Warren to retire in the middle – it would just be the final fly in the ointment, the last intolerable cockroach turd in the Mars Bar, if we were to lose the shoulder charge.
Because after all, it’s the shoulder charge that makes rugby league such a rough, tough, knockabout, manly, piratical game to begin with. Without the shoulder charge, rugby league would basically just be netball with more sexual ambiguity.
Take the shoulder charge away, and what are you supposed to do to a player running at you with the ball? Tackle him? With your arms? Yeah, great suggestion, grandma!
I hardly think that a game full of people making actual tackles would be in the spirit of Dally Messenger. The great appeal of rugby league is that it has always been a real man’s man’s game, a game for the gruff no-nonsense inner woodchopper residing within us all.
Rugby league is not a game for tacklers, it’s a game for people who can’t be bothered tackling, who consider tackling beneath them, who have the guts and grit to avoid tackling their opponent in favour of attempting to run into them like a blind dog crashing into the fridge, half missing, and allowing them to skip away through the defensive line while that big tough manly man goes spinning away harmlessly.
Tackling, frankly, is for sissies.
Just ask Ben Te’o, who gave moving testimony in his defence, saying he had simply tried to “hit him hard”.
Exactly. That’s what our great game is all about – hitting people. Hard. Hard, brutal, inefficient hitting is the heart and soul of rugby league, and without it, watch the crowds plummet.
The spectators will all rush off to watch the GWS Giants in the AFL, a competition where you’re not only allowed to shoulder charge, you can actually jump on other men’s backs. No contest.
Sure, some people might say that shoulder charges can be “dangerous”, but isn’t being a rugby league player inherently dangerous anyway? Being a rugby league player’s girlfriend certainly is: fact is, it’s a dangerous game. If there isn’t a genuine threat of serious incapacitating injury occurring within the rules of the game, who cares?
No, no, we must not ban the shoulder charge. In fact, we should go the other way and ban regulation tackling. Make it a rule that you can only tackle via shoulder charge. That’ll sort the men from the boys.
Watch the bidding war for TV rights head skyward after every NRL game becomes a huge, frenetic human pinball game, massive men hurtling up and down the field, careening off each other, stopping only to have neck braces applied and count the trainer’s fingers. It’d be like a slightly slower, slightly more confusing version of ice hockey.
We could of course take things further, in our efforts to bring out the animal nature of rugby league that is too often hidden behind a veil of quick footwork and metrosexuality. If players not only apply shoulder charges, but wear metallic spiked shoulder pads while doing so, the frisson of danger injected into the game would be positively riveting.
Arming the players would help even more: if a shoulder charge is exciting, imagine how much more exciting it’d be if players could coathanger each other with golf clubs!
There are many other ways to spice the NRL up – catapults, envenomed boots, trained dogs and so forth – but the first step must be to preserve the shoulder charge.
The commission must throw out Te’o's charge entirely, enshrine the shoulder charge in legislation, and snap-freeze Ray Warren in liquid nitrogen.
Do it now, or lose our great game forever.
Ben Pobjie is a writer and comedian writing weekly on The Age, New Matilda and The Roar, whose promising rugby career was tragically cut short the day he stopped playing rugby and had a pizza instead. The most he has ever cried was the day Balmain lost the 1989 grand final. Today he enjoys the frolics of Wallabies, Swans, baggy greens, and Storms. Ben is also the author of the books Surveying the Wreckage, Superchef, and his latest, The Book of Bloke, available from Momentum Books.
- Explore:
- Ben Te'o, Brisbane Broncos, NRL, Ray Warren, Rugby League

April 13th 2012 @ 5:01am
Rugby Realist said | April 13th 2012 @ 5:01am | Report comment
Enjoyed the tongue in cheek nature of alot of your article, and the league pinball sounds great. But tongue in cheek or not (i couldn’t tell on this issue), why on earth would you want Ray Warren to retire?! He is still the best calls man in either of the rugby codes, from either of the hemispheres. For shame.
April 13th 2012 @ 3:26pm
Jaceman said | April 13th 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
I agree with your tingue in cheek analysis response but I am assume you were doing the same saying Warren was the best caller in any rugby code – how can you tell – he is always arguing with gould over nothing or maybe thats the idea…
April 13th 2012 @ 8:39pm
Rugby realist said | April 13th 2012 @ 8:39pm | Report comment
Haha must be just me. I love Warren and his random comments, excitement, and quite simply, his voice.
April 13th 2012 @ 6:07am
ManInBlack said | April 13th 2012 @ 6:07am | Report comment
Yeah, noted the tongue in cheek aspect – but, left not sure what your position really is?
All I can say re the shoulder charge is that like anything in a contact sport – - there needs to be risk and reward, and part of the risk of running through a guy is that if you don’t execute it correctly and you clobber his head – then you need to be held accountable. Simple.
In AFL it’s now a case that the ‘shirtfront’ is almost out of the game, well, the deliberate pre-meditated one by pretty well thugs is out of the game. The shirtfront that occurs pretty well as a natural part of the game still exists. To me this is the thing, similar to taking a speccie – don’t go out there looking to do it all the time, but, Do be able to do it when the right moment presents.
April 13th 2012 @ 7:09am
oikee said | April 13th 2012 @ 7:09am | Report comment
I dont think it is possible to get rid of the shoulder charge. The other day i mentioned that every action has a reaction, who said that Einstein, Isaac Newton? anyhow the other day i seen the reaction to the shoulder charge. Mick Weyman when he hit Matt Gillet with his shoulder.
So what we have here is a case of if, if you ban the shoulder charge , you would open up a whole can of worms for players not even being able to charge at defenders, it could be classed as a reverse shoulder charge open to claims of fowl play.
You can not ban the shoulder charge, it is physically impossible to play the game without it, players are charging at the line, you only have to watxh a kickoff, what is the first thing a player , or forward does when he gets the ball, he charges into the defence, sometimes useing his shoulder.
Case closed.
April 13th 2012 @ 11:41am
Ben Pobjie said | April 13th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
They banned it in rugby union, yet players still seem capable of charging at the line…
April 13th 2012 @ 7:26am
baller said | April 13th 2012 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Another great yarn Ben,on the mark as always, oikee for mayor !! the man makes sense. I have seen bigger hits in the womens netball on a staurday arvo and these are normally being laid on by the women that do the morning school drop off and have to run home in time to watch ellen. We may as well start chucking helmets and pads on the players so it doesnt matter where they get hit next thing it will be the NFL’s poor cousin. Keep the hits coming its what makes our sport the best that it is if we take the shoulder charge out of the NRL then i reckon you will see a bunch of men at the netball courts on a saturday arvo to get there fix …………..
April 13th 2012 @ 7:29am
eagleJack said | April 13th 2012 @ 7:29am | Report comment
Maybe they could introduce Tazers similar to Ultimate Tazer Ball. The trouble is the players would spend the entire game unleashing on Jamie Soward as he did his little ballet routine before taking a kick!
April 13th 2012 @ 7:30am
Andy said | April 13th 2012 @ 7:30am | Report comment
“you can actually jump on other men’s backs.” Some men might rush off to watch the AFL but i won’t, that does not sound entertaining at all, also sounds like union. Ben Te’o’s suspension was no worse than any other one dealt out, and there is plenty of cases where the shoulder charge is not penalized at all. So it is safe to say the shoulder charge will stay.
April 13th 2012 @ 8:38am
Gareth said | April 13th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
I’m going to propose taking it another bold step further. What about if the whole game revolved around head contact? Everyone loves a big head clash. We all shake our heads, wince and say “Ouch, nobody likes to see that” but that’s just to seem civilised in polite company. The reality is, nothing makes us happier than seeing Anthony Quinn convulsing on the ground after an accidental Simon Mannering knee – except if it had been Simon Mannering’s head and there were two players convulsing on the turf instead.
So let’s rewrite the rules so that any contact that isn’t head-on-head is harshly penalised. Sure, it may devolve into some kind of Rollerball-esque last-man-standing affair, with the unstoppable Dallas Johnson crowned the undisputed king of the new order – but it’s certainly preferable to a game where head contact is constantly punished in tepid ways.
April 13th 2012 @ 11:42am
Ben Pobjie said | April 13th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Gareth I like your thinking. My only regret is that Martin Lang retired before this innovation could be introduced.
April 13th 2012 @ 4:00pm
mushi said | April 13th 2012 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
Martin Lang – League Visionary
We could call the 2050 trophy the Martin Lang cup in the spirit of kick ball’s William Webb Eliis
April 13th 2012 @ 8:48am
pierce said | April 13th 2012 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Mate …you act as if footy is played by brain dead muscle men…you can try to complete a legitimate wrap the ball up “perfect” tackle and still knock someone out…how many shoulder charges do you think you see in any one given nrl match..?out of the 3-400 tackles a game maybe 5…they can be spectacular and intimidating and give your team the advantage through a forced error…unfortunately yes they can go wrong but as I said earlier so can any old normal tackle…
April 13th 2012 @ 8:58am
Crosscoder said | April 13th 2012 @ 8:58am | Report comment
The shoulder charge has not been banned.It is left to the individual .If he makes contact with the head,he pays the price
,with a decent stint on the sidelines.Many shoulder charges have inflicted injury on the giver .Proving it is not always better to give than receive.The shoulder charge might look specactular at times,but is in reality an exercise in defending laziness
.
I watched one of the toughest,most exciting contests I have seen on the game last saturday night.Don’t remember seeing a shoulder charge of note, just full blooded tackling,man on man /men defence and continuous attack.The game was no less tough than the game involving the shoulder charge on Groat.
The best example of tackling was watching Scott Sattler swooping in from afar on flying winger Todd Bryne at ANZ stadium,with a grasscutting tackleThat is what the game is really about,not some behemoth shouldering at times a smaller guy just to look good.
Summmary:The head is sacrosanct.
April 13th 2012 @ 10:29am
oikee said | April 13th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
Agree, we need to keep our big huge ugly players looking good.
Nobody likes Colli-flower ears or broken noses. Brice Gibbs has enough problems without aggravating things.
April 13th 2012 @ 12:05pm
oikee said | April 13th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
http://www.cairns.com.au/article/2012/04/12/214175_local-news.html
Nothing to do with shoulder charge, but i know you like this sort of thing CC.
I just get so annoyed with propaganda from other code’s. I bite me tongue every time and i am glad they did this study. It is what everyone north of the b-line knows, yet they try to tell us otherwise.
Toowoomba is nearly the size of Darwin by the way. Darwin has around 180 thousand, Toowoomba has 150 thousand, Toowoomba could take Darwin on our own if we wanted to, we leave them to it because their brains are fried, ? No really, they are, it is like white hot up their, even the Flamingoes left this area 5 thousand years ago, it was just to hot for them.
Queensland will have 5 cities bigger than Darwin with-in the next 10 years. We have 4 now, Goldie, Logan, Ipswich Cabollture. Plus Sunny coast is getting its own city Stdium and will be bigger overall.
Queensland is like a powerhouse for new cities, just call us little chinatown.
April 13th 2012 @ 1:19pm
AGO74 said | April 13th 2012 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
Oikee – I opened your link but my attention was quickly diverted away from the RL story to the photo gallery on Cairns Bikini Babes. Thanks for the tip!
April 13th 2012 @ 1:25pm
steve b said | April 13th 2012 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
Bloody wel said Crosscoder
April 13th 2012 @ 1:42pm
Nathan of Perth said | April 13th 2012 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Yeah, something best employed when you have defensive support and are looking to make a psychological statement rather than a standard piece of your defensive arsenal.
April 13th 2012 @ 2:11pm
soapit said | April 13th 2012 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
get rid of the careless high tackle charge. a high shot is a high shot and the players brains should be big enough to be able to concentrate hard enough to avoid it. accidental should be the only qualification for when people fall in to the tackle.
April 13th 2012 @ 9:03am
QLDER said | April 13th 2012 @ 9:03am | Report comment
Thankfully the grading he got means the shoulder charge is here to stay, and thank the gods.
I do wonder why players don’t run with their head down like a battering ram at the line. It would make them very hard to stop as any contact with the head brings a penalty and suspension. I am not advocating people getting hit in the head, but I would think at least one coach would twig onto this loophole in the rules.
April 13th 2012 @ 9:09am
rl said | April 13th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Tell you what, if you’re so keen on the tactic, why don’t you show us first? We’ll get Te’o to do his thing and we can see the law of natural selection at work…
April 13th 2012 @ 9:19am
QLDER said | April 13th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
I have been hit and hit people with a should charge. I knew that when I went onto the field.
Stop with this idiotic form of argument. Why don’t you go out and let Jonathan Brown body check you. Why don’t you go out and pack down in the front row of the Wallabies against the all blacks. The same thing will happen to you.
April 13th 2012 @ 1:29pm
Nathan of Perth said | April 13th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
Its same with the “Oh, well if you think is a bad kick, why don’t you try and kick better!” Sounds nice rhetorically but makes little since to say comment can’t be made unless we’re a professional athlete earning multiples of the average national wage.