Sarel Pretorius must start for the Waratahs
By David Lord, 14 Apr 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Force, Rugby Union, Sarel Pretorius, Super Rugby, Waratahs
Wycliffe Palu for the Waratahs. AAP Image/Tony McDonough
Related coverage
The Waratahs won’t reach the Super Rugby playoffs while marquee half-back Sarel Pretorius remains on the bench. Last night the Waratahs did it the hard way in beating the Force in Perth 23-18.
While starting half-back Brendan McKibbin was on duty for 60 minutes, the Waratahs led 10-3 at the break and 17-3 two minutes into the second half.
But the Waratahs had enough ball in the first half to win two games, with 62% possession, spending 60% in Force territory, and 3 minutes 11 seconds in the Force 22 as against the Force’s 30 seconds in reply.
For the icing on the cake, the Waratahs won the rucks and maul 43-23.
Totally dominant for just 10 points, thanks to a pedestrian McKibbin who chocked a backline keen to run. The Waratahs should have cracked 30 points by half-time and the game would have been all over.
Had Pretorius started, a 30-point first half haul was almost certain.
With all that possession and territory, he would have had the backline hunting for the four-try bonus by the break.
The difference between McKibbin and Pretorius is the South African delivers the ball far faster from set and broken play. Berrick Barnes, Tom Carter and Rob Horne would have so much extra time and space to strut their stuff with that mountain of possession.
It was not to be. Hopefully by next week against the Rebels, followed by the tough assignment against the Crusaders, the half-back problem will be sorted.
From one-way traffic in the first half, the third quarter saw an incredible transformation. In that 20-minute period the Force came alive with 79% possession and were camped in the Waratah half and 22, forcing the visitors to defend as though their lives depended on it. The result certainly did.
By the 63rd minute the Force led 18-17 for the first time with a distinct sniff of victory. They had come from nowhere scoring two tries in posting 15 unanswered points, 10 of them while Waratahs full-back Bernard Foley was in the bin.
Game on.
The last 17 minutes ended up an arm-wrestle, the result up for grabs. But the Force lost their discipline under pressure by giving away three kickable long range penalties – Barnes landed two of them and that was that 23-18.
Surprisingly, the much vaunted Waratahs pack was at its best when benchmen Jono Jenkins, Paddy Ryan, John Ulugia, and the Timani brothers Sita and Lopeti took over late in the game.
For the Waratahs, David Dennis had a huge game, highlighted by his 30 metre sprint to touch down just after half-time after winning lineout ball, Tatafu Polota-Nau had his best game in weeks, Wycliff Palu was always dangerous, Berrick Barnes directed traffic apart from the odd wayward kick, and Pretorius livened up the backline, even though they were pretty much done.
For the Force David Pocock had a quiet game by his lofty standards in the first half, but burst forth in the second to claim man-of-the-match, while Matt Hodgson, Nathan Sharpe, Toby Lynn, Nick Cummins, and full-back-turned-fly-half David Harvey were outstanding.
Even though there were 18 Wallabies on duty, the game never reached that standard. But it was entertaining thanks to sensible and clearly understood refereeing from Kiwi Glen Jackson that had the 12,838 crowd involved from start to finish.
Jackson is the refereeing find of the year. In only his sixth game in control, the 36-year-old was fit, fast, and very much in control. He only retired in late 2010 but has been fast-tracked by the appointments board that deserve praise.
Jackson played 60 games as fly-half for the Chiefs from 1999-2004, accumulating 404 points, and 1505 points for Saracens from 2004 to 2010 over 130 games.
He is a breath of fresh air and will be in demand from all 15 franchises.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- Force, Rugby Union, Sarel Pretorius, Super Rugby, Waratahs


April 14th 2012 @ 7:14am
Justin said | April 14th 2012 @ 7:14am | Report comment
From what I saw both teams need decent 10s. Harvey’s hands are painfully slow and is not a long term solution. His goal kicking is pretty good though.
David you got it wrong in your piece – The Tahs won’t win the comp with Barnes at 10. He needs to go back to 15 and let Foley run the ship. In fact the 10-12-13 channel is ordinary. The Tahs are no chance.
April 14th 2012 @ 7:46am
David Lord said | April 14th 2012 @ 7:46am | Report comment
Justin, I agree with you entirely, I never said anything about the Tahs winning the tournament. But Berrick Barnes is a lot better 10, when Sarel Pretorius is on duty.
April 14th 2012 @ 8:38am
Justin said | April 14th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Apologies David, yes you were talking finals. My position stands and after now watching the first 30 this morning. Barnes either kicks poorly, too often or throws long inaccurate cut out passes that just allows the defence to drift easily.
McKibbin passed pretty well from what I saw and Sarel would not have got them 30 points
April 14th 2012 @ 10:21am
mikeylives said | April 14th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
Not sure what your anti-McKibbon agenda is David, but he distributed pretty quickly and accurately. Sarel in fact appeared a bit slower in recycling the pill. Sarel worth another 20 points? Dreaming.
Tahs were unlucky not to get a pushover try when Palu lost control of the ball and Barnes took some horrid kicking options in the first half. Barnes is talented enough to launch counter attacks (NB I saw him look at his teammates and point to the air prior to a 22 dropout from the force, which suggests his up and unders are pre-meditated). He needs to run it back first and kick if his options are shut down or if there is an obvious gain that presents itself.
April 14th 2012 @ 3:11pm
bluerose said | April 14th 2012 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
the ref send Foley to the sin bin and the next maul Palu came from the side and pulled it down, isnt that a yellow card infringement after he just warned the Waratahs?
April 14th 2012 @ 3:17pm
PeterK said | April 14th 2012 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
jackson heavily favoured the force, not once did he look if they were offside but endlessly penalised Tahs for it.
The scrum that was reset at the end was error in law, it was a new scrum time was up, it should of been game over.
so it is rich complaining he didnt help the force even more.
April 14th 2012 @ 3:37pm
sittingbison said | April 14th 2012 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Rubbish Peter, he didn’t favour the Force. He had the two ARs yabbering all night about looking out for force infringements, yup that’s right “force” infringements not “infringements”. He was going to send a Tah off at that point, but didn’t when AR couldn’t furnish the number. Blind Freddy AR couldn’t even confirm a try despite being 3m away and looking straight at at, and couldn’t see crooked throws from TPN.
Then we have Kafer suggesting Force should get more penalties against them.
Sure the scrum reset was a mistake, but for all Lordies praise the guy had no idea about scrims, there was barely a decent one all night and that’s not Maafus entire fault
April 14th 2012 @ 4:01pm
PeterK said | April 14th 2012 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
the throws were straight, draw a line down the middle of the lineout BEFORE it closes and check where the ball ends up. Charles had more latirtude than TPN in lineouts. TPN had one called not straight and he had to right down the middle but charles threw to his side.
Thats right the AR’s did report a lot of Force infringements BUT Jackson ignored them and kept penalising the Tahs.
Maafu was a disgrace as a prop. There were few decent scrums because the force props folded like deck chairs with the pressure they were put under, and rightly penalised. Even here Jackson made the props packs really close and try and take away the hit.
Kafer is the only aussie commentator I respect the others are too one eyed and seemingly dont understand the laws.
Kafer was right the force should of been penalised more.
April 14th 2012 @ 8:58pm
sittingbison said | April 14th 2012 @ 8:58pm | Report comment
Sorry Pete you are wrong, I was at the game and can categorically report TPNs throwing was abysmal, it got to the point the crowd was laughing, and there wasn’t much to laugh about with this game.
Ask yourself why a force scrum that has more than held its own all season suddenly couldn’t hold a single scrum against the same pack they held four weeks ago. Sure Maafus is a worry, but he wasn’t totally to blame the ref didn’t have a clue what was going on. In fact the very next scrum after he was sent off Robinson went down like a pack of cards and no whistle either way.
Look at the performance or lack thereof of both teams- the ref was very ordinary at the set pieces and breakdown for both sides.
April 14th 2012 @ 7:22am
Crashy said | April 14th 2012 @ 7:22am | Report comment
Will be interesting to see how they progress in the final third of the season with elsom, vickerman, pakalani and possible drew Mitchell back. It’s a long season sodas long you are thereabouts by midseason you have a real shot at the finals. The last game against the reds could be a real road bump.
Force are a well coached team and I hope they knock off some of the Staffa and kiwi teams.
April 14th 2012 @ 7:27am
Crashy said | April 14th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
I guess shared needs to web rotated at some stage so as long as we are winning while he is on the bench we are ok. The rebels game should be a formality but the shaders on a sunny afternoon should be a massive test.
April 14th 2012 @ 8:40am
Justin said | April 14th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Rebels a formality – that smells like the Cheetahs game last year
NSW couldn’t be that arrogant again could they? Mmmm… Maybe.
April 14th 2012 @ 7:29am
Crashy said | April 14th 2012 @ 7:29am | Report comment
Sorry re spelling- damn iPad predictive text. I meant to say say that Sarel needs to be rotated to preserve him for the rest of the season.
April 14th 2012 @ 8:32am
Sailosi said | April 14th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
For the waratahs to be successful, pakalani when fit must be fullback, foley to 10, sarel at 9 and berrick fighting for a bench spot.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
April 14th 2012 @ 8:44am
nickoldschool said | April 14th 2012 @ 8:44am | Report comment
” Had Pretorius started, a 30-point first half haul was almost certain.” let’s not get carried away: Pretorius started the match against the same WF a month ago and the Tahs lost 20-21, at home. McKibbin could have done better yesterday but he was sound with the boot and converted a couple of crucial penalties/conversions.
April 14th 2012 @ 10:04am
p.Tah said | April 14th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
I actually think McKibbon was better than Sarel last night. his passing was in front of the man. Sarel’s were above the head forcing the runner to lose momentum.
Kingston’s try can be put down to McKibbon running (not kicking), finding Foley on the fly who then put Kingston in. Obviously McKibbon and Foley work well together. (Fly half/ half combo perhaps in the future?)
The Tahs opportunity in the first half were partly attributable to the fast ball McKibbon provided. The fact there opportunities didn’t convert to points was because of dropped ball or ruck turn overs not because of McKibbon.
I think Sarel is a great player as well. Great to have two half backs fighting it out. I prefer McKibon to start because he provides structure and I like Sarel to come on when legs are tired.
April 14th 2012 @ 9:21am
Short-Blind said | April 14th 2012 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Lordy – Barnes is the one chocking the Tahs back line not McKibbin – Justin summarizes it above and a slightly quicker service from Sarel would not stop his poor passing and kicking. The bigger question is will coach Foley have the balls to bench Barnes and put their only creative force (Foley) into the hotseat? I doubt it as the coach Foley seems very conservative in his selection practice see Mumm vs Timanis etc etc I’m still not convinced about Palu, played well in patches but often chooses to be ‘soft’ in contact despite his imposing presence – just doesn’t run hard enough for an 8 and takes too much static ball. Ask yourself this: when did you last see Palu run with the speed,grunt and angle that K. Read did to score that smashing try against the bulls last week? I’ve never seen it.
April 14th 2012 @ 9:47am
nickoldschool said | April 14th 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Agree 100% with you and Sailosi about Palu. He’s an old fashion n8 who lacks speed in today’s game. Would have been great in the late 90s-early 2000 (similar to Lyons) but his lack of pace is obvious in 99% of the games he plays.
April 14th 2012 @ 9:29am
Sailosi said | April 14th 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
Palu stands along side the second new ball as the biggest myth in sport.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
April 14th 2012 @ 9:37am
Who Needs Melon said | April 14th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
By my reckoning Barnes is like a boxer that’s taken one too many shots to the jaw. Late in the 2nd half he surprised everyone by running straight and taking a tackle. I think it was the only time in the match… and one of a handful of times since about 2009. He is not just running across the field but often backwards, away from the opposition. If you were generous you could say he was trying to loop around the guy he is passing to… but he actually hardly ever gets the ball back on such a loop.
And of course if there’s nothing on – or often even if there is! – Barnes will kick rather than take a tackle. It’s a shame because he does have good skills. He is courageous in defense… But completely gun shy with ball in hand.
I’m sorry to have a go at the Tahs again – they’ve got some good players – but they are terrible to watch. They will win a few games ugly like that but they have the same fundamental flaws they’ve had for years.
April 14th 2012 @ 9:37am
Atawhai Drive said | April 14th 2012 @ 9:37am | Report comment
Lots of love is flowing Glen Jackson’s way. Eddie Jones, Justin Marshall and now David Lord have lined up to sing his praises.
Do I detect a subtext here? “Glen Jackson is a former elite player, ergo he must be a good ref.”
It ain’t necessarily so.
It used to be said that props made the best refs. When scrums were a bigger part of the game than they are now, only a former front-rower was considered capable of understanding the dark art of scrummaging.
Scrums are now a bad joke, and the emphasis has switched to the pile-up _ otherwise known as the breakdown. A case could be made to recruit loose forwards to the refereeing ranks.
Glen Jackson was a five-eighth, and he struggled with scrums and breakdowns last night. No doubt he’ll be better for the experience.
I’m glad the Waratahs won, but this was the sort of game only a purist could watch to the finish.