Beware a New Zealand ambush at Eden Park
Kangaroos player Jharal Yow Yeh takes the ball forward during the Anzac Test match between Australia and New Zealand. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Related coverage
On Friday night old foes, Australia and New Zealand will battle each other in the trans-Tasman rugby league Test match.
Whilst the Kangaroos will start the match as favourites, the make-up of the Kiwi side has me thinking an upset could be on the cards.
The New Zealand squad has a little bit of everything: skill, size, speed, experience, youth, finishers, mongrel, passion and x-factors.
Whilst that’s not to say that the Australian team lack these qualities, the point is, this is a very good Kiwi side and if Australia think it’s going to be a walk in the park, they’ll be in for a rude shock.
As with most rugby league games, the battle will go a long way to being decided by the respective forward packs.
Australia has a nice blend of size and speed with its forwards, however New Zealand will throw plenty of muscle and intensity at Australia. Any pack that includes Adam Blair, Jeremy Smith, Frank Pritchard and Jared Waerea-Hargreaves is going to be a tough proposition. Led by these four, the Kiwi pack will run hard and tackle hard. If Australia isn’t ready from the kick-off, they’ll be counting the bruises pretty quickly.
Whilst not even the Kiwis would pretend that Isaac Luke is in Cameron Smith’s class, the South Sydney hooker has been in pretty good form, and the Australian’s will need to watch his dangerous darts from dummy-half. Luke also plays with plenty of passion when he dons the famous black jersey, and seems to lift his intensity a couple of notches. A focused Luke is not a player the Australians should underestimate.
The ability of the New Zealand pack to lay a platform for their ball players will be crucial, because the Kiwis possess some potentially lethal strike weapons in the form of the aforementioned Luke, and their outstanding halves, Benji Marshall and Shaun Johnson.
In Marshall and Johnson, New Zealand will field their most exciting halves pairing ever. Both players are capable of producing sheer magic out of nothing, and if they strike an early chemistry and both play well, Australia are in big trouble.
Despite the Wests Tigers slow start to the season, Benji has actually been playing pretty well. He was at his sublime best on Sunday in the Tigers dismantling off Penrith, attacking the line, side-stepping big forwards, and setting up his outside backs.
His confidence should be high coming off a big win, and everyone knows that a confident Benji is a dangerous Benji. He should also relish playing with Johnson, who will surely take a lot of pressure off the five-eight.
Johnson will be making his debut for the Kiwis, but if anyone thinks the 21-year-old will be nervous, they clearly have never seen the Warriors halfback play. The youngster does not suffer from a lack of confidence. Most importantly, he certainly doesn’t suffer from a lack of talent.
Johnson has all the tools to be an all-time great, and playing with Marshall will ensure he doesn’t have to do too much, too often. Johnson is also a lot bigger than he appears, and close to their own try line, the Australians will have their work cut out with the amount of options Marshall and Johnson have up their sleeve.
Rounding out the strong New Zealand side is their backs, who offer the Kiwis a rare combination of size, speed, safety, experience and unpredictability.
Whilst you never know what you’re going get from Manu Vatuvei, on a good day he’s one of the best wingers in the world, with an intimidating combination of speed and strength.
Jason Nightingale is one of the safest players in the NRL, rarely making a mistake and always being in the right place at the right time, in both attack and defence. He also offers a cool and level head in a team that has some fiery and passionate players.
Shaun Kenny-Dowall is a dangerous weapon in the centres, and given the right amount of ball, can cause major issues for defences. He hasn’t been in the best form for the last year or so, but anyone who remembers his 2010 season would be aware of what he is capable of, and with Marshall and Johnson calling the shots, he should see plenty of quality ball.
Meanwhile, with Warriors fullback and Test incumbent Kevin Locke sidelined with a badly corked leg, the Brisbane Broncos’ Josh Hoffman produced a timely display against the Canberra Raiders on the weekend, which ensured that he will make his Test debut after just 49 NRL games.
He was unlucky not to win the man-of-the-match award in racking up over 250 metres in the Broncos 30-6 win. He runs hard and fast, and likes to get involved all over the park. His combination with New Zealander’s ball players will be crucial, and I expect him to be a constant threat to the Australian defensive line.
The Australian team is no doubt strong, but there are a few selections that New Zealand might be able to capitalise on.
Darius Boyd has been little more than a passenger for Newcastle this season, as he struggles to fit in with his new team. He’ll also be playing on the wing, rather than fullback, and whilst he has plenty of experience playing on the flank, he will still be out of position. Combine that with a lack of confidence, and it’s something the Kiwis could target.
Daly Cherry-Evans is a fantastic player in great form. But I’m not sure if he is the best option as the utility player off the bench. He’s a halfback by trade, and I can’t see Thurston or Cronk requiring a rest during the game. That means Cherry-Evans will most probably be used as the back-up hooker, a position he has little experience in, and lacks pure dummy-half skills. Again, this is an area the Kiwis may try to exploit.
David Taylor is on debut, and is prone to the odd mental mistake. Look for the Kiwis to apply the blowtorch and see how Taylor responds.
Lastly, I can’t imagine that the decision by James Tamou to turn his back on New Zealand will have gone down well in the Kiwi change room. Make no mistake, this will have been discussed, and I anticipate a very, very rough welcome by the New Zealanders when Tamou enters the game. It just may be that Tamou’s ‘defection’ fires the Kiwis up and provides the added motivation that sometimes makes the difference on the scoreboard.
The Australian team is very talented and very experienced, and I expect them to win. But I won’t be shocked if New Zealand can topple the Kangaroos because they are putting a very strong and exciting team on the park.
Prediction: Australia 24 – New Zealand 20.
Ryan is an ex-representative basketballer who shot too much, and a (very) medium pace bowler. He's been with The Roar as an expert since February 2011, has written for the Seven Network and NBA Down Under, and been a regular on ABC radio. Ryan tweets from @RyanOak.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.

April 17th 2012 @ 1:57am
AndyMack said | April 17th 2012 @ 1:57am | Report comment
It looks a very good team from the Kiwis. Would not be surprised if they pull off a win. If the forwards can hold their own, then benji, johnson and Luke will be a handful for the Aussies. Looks to be a ripper coming up, hopefully.
April 17th 2012 @ 5:49am
Purple Shag said | April 17th 2012 @ 5:49am | Report comment
Wouldn’t be the first time our ANZAC brothers have surprised us. Get the Brehs on ice, should be a cracker.
April 17th 2012 @ 6:08am
Gaz said | April 17th 2012 @ 6:08am | Report comment
NZ a tough side, not so sure about the coach. Nothing much happening for him at the Eels at the minute.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
April 17th 2012 @ 6:17am
Whites said | April 17th 2012 @ 6:17am | Report comment
It could been played on Saturday so we could watch it live instead of a 2 hour delay. Thanks again Channel 9.
April 17th 2012 @ 6:58am
Boomshanka said | April 17th 2012 @ 6:58am | Report comment
Or it could just be shown live.
SBS are showing the FA cup final live in the early hours of Sunday morning, why can’t the league be shown live here?
There’ll be no radio, no TV and internet surfing in this household until the end of the broadcast. Hell I won’t even read text messages from friends / family in New Zealand (who will get the game live).
Stupid in 2012 to see a FTA provider arguing for exclusivity only to then deny fans the opportunity to see the game as scheduled.
April 17th 2012 @ 7:41am
eagleJack said | April 17th 2012 @ 7:41am | Report comment
Wow I didn’t realise the game isn’t live?! That is disgraceful! Hopefully that is the final nail in Channel 9′s coffin. Although I predict the close bond between David Gyngell and David Gallop (who I suspect are one and the same. Has anybody seen them in the same room together?) will see fans forgotten about at the negotiating table and we will have to put up with non-live league in this day and age for years to come.
April 17th 2012 @ 8:23am
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 8:23am | Report comment
eagle I like what you say cause your a fellow Manly Fan but I don’t understand any reference to “the final nail in Channel 9′s Coffin.” People at Channel 9 can do whatever they want with their property. That’s right the game is their’s to do whatever they want to and will continue to do so if they write the biggest cheque. End of story.
April 17th 2012 @ 8:29am
Boomshanka said | April 17th 2012 @ 8:29am | Report comment
Planko
It may be Channel Nine’s “right” to do with what they own today, but that “ownership” ends at this year.
Personally, I can’t wait to see the back of them.
April 17th 2012 @ 9:11am
rl said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:11am | Report comment
amen – oh that the Ch9 cricket & rugby league commentary teams could be sent where they deserve to go. It is a sad indictment on the quality of commentary that I’m actually missing Andrew Voss! Seriously, whatever incriminating material Ray Hadley has on the Ch 9 execs, it can’t be that bad?
April 17th 2012 @ 9:17am
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Your missing my whole point it does not matter what time or commentators or anything like that who has the biggest cheque wins. It will be Channel 9 and Foxtel bad luck people. Suck it up
April 17th 2012 @ 12:00pm
JVGO said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
Spoken like a true manly supporter.
April 17th 2012 @ 12:14pm
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
So tell me you think the person with the Second biggest Cheque will JVGO ? Tell me how it is going to be channel 10 or 7 ? Seven has blown it’s load on AFL and Ten has no load to blow. FOXTEL is where the money is and Packer Junior is probably looking at channel 9 again with Rose coloured glasses again at the right price.
Ryan what do you think ?
April 17th 2012 @ 1:05pm
Ryan O'Connell said | April 17th 2012 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
The harsh reality is that whoever buys the rights to a sport, needs to see a return on investment for it.
If Channel 9 (or whoever) own the broadcast rights, they pay a substantial fee for it, and need to recoup their costs. They do that via advertising revenue, which means they need ad breaks to make money.
Rugby league is a free flowing sport that has few natural breaks during play, hence offering few advertising opportunities.
AFL, on the other hand, offers 15 to 30 second breaks after each goal, plus they have a quarter and three quarter time breaks. In other words, more advertising opportunities, and more revenue opportunities. It’s a more attractive game, financially, for networks. That’s why its broadcast rights will eclipse the NRL’s.
If rugby league wants to increase the amount of its broadcast rights, it needs to add some ad breaks for networks. 4 quarters instead of 2 halves? 15 second breaks every time the ball goes dead? These are the things the NRL needs to look at.
http://www.theroar.com.au/2011/08/09/how-the-nrl-can-match-the-afls-tv-rights-deal/
April 17th 2012 @ 1:10pm
JVGO said | April 17th 2012 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
Planko, in case I win lotto, are Manly still for sale? I have a hankering to buy myself a premiership. Biggest cheque wins.
But I doubt that the ARC are obligated to go with the highest bid, though they probably will. There should be other considerations taken into account.
April 17th 2012 @ 9:23am
eagleJack said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:23am | Report comment
Yeah Planko I understand that but that’s the crux of the problem. My inference was that Im hoping this latest snubbing of league fans will cause such a backlash that the offers posed by Channel 7 and 10 during negotiation will look more appealing. It is currently amateur hour at Channel 9 and they don’t realise that you can maximise advertising revenue through other avenues, not necessarily just by showing games on delay. Fans nationwide are tired of Channel 9 and their antics.
Come on Leckie/Murdoch/Packer show Gallop and the ARLC the money!
April 17th 2012 @ 9:34am
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Who is home a 5pm on a Friday Jack ? I like the idea of turning the radio off (So I don’t find out the score putting the kids to bed sitting down in my country town and watching it at 730 800 and watching it LIVEish ? It has been 10 years since I moved out of my unit in Balgowlah mate but I was never home at 5 to 530pm on any night of the week to watch football mate.
April 17th 2012 @ 10:01am
Whites said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
It’s good the game is being played in New Zealand but it should be on a Saturday like rugby union tests so it can be shown live into the eastern states at 5:30. The only reason it’s on Friday is so Nine can still have their Friday Night Football.
Get ready for 5 minutes of game time, 10 minutes of adds, 5 minutes game time…..
April 17th 2012 @ 10:02am
eagleJack said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Yeah fair enough Planko. If you can hold off from finding out the score and don’t mind ad breaks every 5 mins then it’s all good. Bally’s a good spot – grew up in Manly but lived there a few years myself. I now live on the dark side (the East haha).
April 17th 2012 @ 3:52pm
Jaceman said | April 17th 2012 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
Whites well said, an addathon
April 17th 2012 @ 9:49am
clipper said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
eagleJack – would you take $800m for games live into every state and your right to pick what games are shown, or $1b for the status Quo? Obviously option 1 would be the fans preference and may help expansion in the long run, and option 2 would get more money to help clubs and expansion now. This may be the dilemma for the commish. I’m just using two figures, in no one implying what monies may be offered.
April 17th 2012 @ 10:26am
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
Clipper the biggest cheque will win. It will not be Channel Seven. Channel 10 has Rupert Junior who has no real cash. Gina on the other hand has the money but she can’t have both Fairfax and Channel 10. So if Gina decides she would prefer the Fairfax mastheads Channel 9 will be the only FTA in town with the dollars. The Commish will be threatening foxtel with the FTA only bluff. Foxtel can’t afford to drop the serious subscriber base that they would loose should league go FTA only.
So I would budgeting on $1Bill from Channel 9/Foxtel
April 17th 2012 @ 10:45am
Boomshanka said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
Under the new quality provisions of the anti siphoning laws, the right to pick what games get shown will be a matter for the Minister of Communications under any new deal.
Multi-channeling and the ability to onsell will also negate any “cost” with respect to showing into non heartland states.
The real question is without the vested self interest (which sold the game short last time), can Channel 9 and Foxtel afford to lose the rights. A good bid from Seven and Ten could upset big time as FOXTEL would loose subscriptions and Nine consigned to Two and a half men, Big bang Theory and Farmer wants a slave.
April 17th 2012 @ 12:08pm
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Channel Seven and Ten won’t have that kind of cash in the kitty
April 17th 2012 @ 12:27pm
clipper said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
PLANKO – I realise that the biggest cheque will win, but was theorising if you had the chance, would you forgo a wad of cash for the ability to show games live in 5 states, and to have the final say in what games get televised. If not, can you complain if games aren’t shown live?
April 17th 2012 @ 1:57pm
Boomshanka said | April 17th 2012 @ 1:57pm | Report comment
Maybe Seven and Ten don’t, but their respective owners seem a little flush and could be in for a strategic move.
Securing the NRL rights off FOX and Nine could make sence
April 17th 2012 @ 5:17pm
Jaceman said | April 17th 2012 @ 5:17pm | Report comment
Imagine if Nine dont get the rights this year – they will pull this years games in the non NRL states
April 17th 2012 @ 5:21pm
Jaceman said | April 17th 2012 @ 5:21pm | Report comment
Planko
Yeah the FTA bluff with the NRL is fanciful as they will decimates their audience because they would have to show it on the second channel as the national programs would take precedence. Seven and Ten could deal with Fox for Saturday games and maybe share Monday night.
April 17th 2012 @ 12:50pm
The Barry said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Gotta stick up for 9 a little bit here. The game is played in NZ so if they show a 7.30 kick off live it will be on here at 5.30. Hardly a ratings bonanza – I won’t even be home from work.
Conversely to show the game live in Australia would require a 9.30pm kick off in NZ – equally unpalatable.
All we have to do is avoid scores for 2 hours. The downside is there will be more ads, the upside less live market punting updates from Rabs and Sterlo…
April 17th 2012 @ 7:47pm
Brett McKay said | April 17th 2012 @ 7:47pm | Report comment
correct Barry, just as it’s pain not to have the game live into Australia, it’d be an even bigger pain to try and sell tickets to a game starting at 9:30pm in Auckland…
April 17th 2012 @ 7:18am
baller said | April 17th 2012 @ 7:18am | Report comment
as much as i dislike the antics of the guy, i reckon New Zeland should be worried about Justin Hodges and his dummy half runs he has played so well this year and i reckon between himself, Boyd, Uatai (not sure if spelled right sorry if it isnt ) and Smith the kiwis will have trouble slowing them down.
April 17th 2012 @ 8:43am
Damo said | April 17th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Great analysis of the game. Spot on too, I think NZ will really give us a hard time.
Totally agree about Tamou as I think the NZ’s will try and smash him.
NZ bench is a bit skinny but if their forwards aim up it should be a great game.
April 17th 2012 @ 8:44am
Chris Chard said | April 17th 2012 @ 8:44am | Report comment
From the title of this article I had assumed Robbie Farah had been called into the test side…
Seriously though if NZ can hold the Kangaroos in the centres then it’ll be a good match, just worry about Beale defending out of position.
April 17th 2012 @ 10:12am
Ryan O'Connell said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
I’d be lying if I didn’t say I loved using the word ambush in its proper context!
April 17th 2012 @ 12:48pm
Chris Chard said | April 17th 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Well, looks like they’ve gone the safety option with Mannering in the centres anyway….spose he did score a double on the w/e
April 17th 2012 @ 8:53am
Johnno said | April 17th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
James Tamou wow, what a storm he has created. Now reading today, his parents have said the design was agonising, but he did it coz he was snubbers last year, when he missed the cut on the 4 nations squad.
It still doesn’t sit right with me Tamou playing for aussies, I think he will regret design too when haka is played at eden park.
April 17th 2012 @ 9:20am
llieno said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:20am | Report comment
I agree with you Johnno, he should be playing for the Kiwis, but unfortunately, it’s the system. He’ll get way more money playing for NSW/Australia than NZ so it sounds like a commercial decision.
I also think it’s a bit rich for the likes of Tony Kemp to be giving the young kid so much grief when Nathan Fien and Brent Webb, who have played many tests for the Kiwis in recent years, were born and raised in Queensland. People have such short memories…
April 17th 2012 @ 9:43am
eagleJack said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Agreed the system is at fault. This dual citzenship scenario is something that will continue. Particularly when so many Kiwis reside in Australia. The lure of Origin for many (and let’s face it, it is no doubt the pinnacle of Rugby League worldwide) is too hard to knock back.
And you are right about Tony Kemp. The tug-o-war happens from both sides of the ditch. Jason Nightingale was born and raised in Sydney but chose NZ as he wasn’t in the Origin mix at the time of the 2008 World Cup. The Kiwis tried to lure Tony Williams across who was once again born and raised in Sydney. He chose Australia as to him NZ was a foreign land he had visited briefly for holidays.
April 17th 2012 @ 10:24am
Go warriors said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
The problem with the eligibility laws or lack of them in most cases is that is killing international RL. NZ and Australia will always be strong as they have an abundace of depth. It is the Pacific Island nations that gets screwed though. With the amount of Pacific Island players playing the game now we should now give the likes of Samoa, Tonga, Fiji etc more test matches and encourage players with Pacific Island heritage to play for these countries. RL needs more competive nations for the sport to grow.
April 17th 2012 @ 4:07pm
soapit said | April 17th 2012 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
the guys been here since he was 13. not much you can do to stop people who come that early from playing for us.
April 17th 2012 @ 11:55am
Mals said | April 17th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
And Jason Nightingale
April 17th 2012 @ 9:36pm
Sylvester said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:36pm | Report comment
I think the issue and point of difference here is rep selectors actively pursuing NZ-born players who have previously represented NZ and aligned themselves with the Kiwis.
I never agreed with the Webb or Fien selections, but at least they were snatched when they were wanted by the other country.
The other players mentioned aligned themselves very early with the Kiwis because they had NZ heritage.
It’s easy for the Aussie to make a play for our talent because 90% qualify by virtue of simply playing for teams in Australia. It;s not right.
April 17th 2012 @ 9:01am
PEP said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Isaac Luke is definitely in the same class as Cameron Smith. He’s been carrying Souths for years.
April 17th 2012 @ 10:12am
Ryan O'Connell said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
I think you would be the only person on Earth who believes that!
April 17th 2012 @ 10:28am
PLANKO said | April 17th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
LOL ! no ! Ryan Luke probably believes it !
April 18th 2012 @ 8:28am
PEP said | April 18th 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
We’ll see
April 20th 2012 @ 8:20pm
PEP said | April 20th 2012 @ 8:20pm | Report comment
There you go. Luke breaks through Cameron Smith’s tackle to score under the posts. Gettem onside!!!!!!
April 17th 2012 @ 9:03am
jamesb said | April 17th 2012 @ 9:03am | Report comment
I think NZ will win.
They’ll make sure its a forwards type game, but Australia have got a few players out of form like Boyd, and I’m not completly sold on Tamou either.
Lets hope for a close game
Than again, I may find out the result somewhere before hand. Thanks Channel 9.