Western Force unprofessional as Graham goes to Reds
By Ewen W, 26 Apr 2012 Ewen W is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Brumbies, Michael Hooper, Reds, Richard Graham, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force
David Pocock (left) captain of the Western Force and coach Richard Graham. AAP Image/Paul Miller
Related coverage
- Western Force news
- ACT Brumbies news
- NSW Waratahs news
- Queensland Reds news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
This past week saw two significant transfers take place in Australian rugby. Flanker Michael Hooper left the Brumbies for the Waratahs, and coach Richard Graham moved from the Force to the Reds.
While they are both good moves and significant boosts for their new clubs, what is different about the two situations is how their current clubs have treated the news of their defections.
In doing so they have highlighted the continuing tensions between the amateur and professional aspects of modern-day rugby.
Hooper’s loss will be a blow to the Brumbies. He’s an emerging talent and has shown to be a huge influence in games. The Brumbies loss to the Reds at Suncorp was partially a result of him not having more game time.
When it was announced that he would be leaving, the response by the Brumbies, in particular Jake White, was commendable.
Instead of freezing out Hooper, as had been done in the past, (as with Ashley-Cooper, for example) White insisted nothing would change as Hooper had already earned the right to play for the Brumbies.
This is how it should be done.
Once news hit that Richard Graham was moving to the Reds in 2013 to take up a head coaching role there was an outcry at the Force.
Despite assurances that a parting would be amicable, The Force ousted Graham the day after his announcement, via a player vote of no confidence.
This is despite Graham having a clause in his contract that would allow him to move at the season’s end. He is a good coach, that’s why the Reds went and got him. How he has been treated in the West is unprofessional and desperate.
These two transfers highlight the tension between amateurism and professionalism – between loyalty and money – in this modern era. The reality of rugby and all sporting codes is that players no longer play just for loyalty and accolades.
Since the mid-1990s rugby has being paying its players and the code has benefited enormously. The players can concentrate on playing.
If this standard is to continue, the teams and the public need to recognise that other factors aside from loyalty will now influence a player’s or coach’s decision about where they ply their trade.
Loyalty and mateship will still play a part, but a club can’t cry foul when a professional in their ranks decides to switch clubs. Sidelining a player or coach creates a bad precedent for the club.
The Brumbies knew this with Hooper but the Force did not with Graham.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
The Crowd Says (39) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- SPIRO: Beale and Folau brilliant, Mogg subbed (278)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (242)
- I was dead-set wrong about Folau (237)
- What gives with Israel Folau? (184)
- Deans promises ball in hand rugby for Wallabies against Lions (183)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (180)
- My Lion tamers for 2013 (167)
- Cheetahs vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (12)
- Waratahs vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores, blog (512)
- Wallaby backline options (66)
- An exciting weekend in Australian rugby (0)
- Western Force vs Sharks: Super Rugby live scores, blog (114)
- Rebels vs Stormers – Super Rugby live scores, blog (359)
- Hurricanes vs Chiefs – Super Rugby live scores (47)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Brumbies, Michael Hooper, Reds, Richard Graham, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force



April 26th 2012 @ 12:16pm
sittingbison said | April 26th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
Good grief, has Ewen not read any of the 666 posts on several threads on RG leaving the Force, link for wallabies and what’s happened to the reds?
Thanks guys for wrapping it up suucincly, I’m struggling to suppress my natural inclinations in responding to an ill informed and factually incorrect article.
BTW the players reaction was bought to a head with RGs derogatory and insulting comments in the press conference, and when it was revealed he had been negotiating before the season started. Both showed in his lack of endeavor as a coach this season.
April 26th 2012 @ 12:45pm
slaggerknocker said | April 26th 2012 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Hlow to put it.. the man exhibits a touching sense of loyalty .. to himself.
April 26th 2012 @ 1:00pm
Brett McKay said | April 26th 2012 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
show me one professional player or coach in any sport that doesn’t…
April 26th 2012 @ 12:57pm
kingplaymaker said | April 26th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Another point to add to my earlier post about professionalism is that while a player only has a very short time to provide money at a far higher rate than he will earn for the rest of his life, a coach’s career is a multiple of the length, and counted out often in long spells, so he should not need to rush as much in moving from place to place.
Having said all this and disagreed fundamentally with the article, one has to say that Ewen’s point of view has been aired by very many others recently, including John Eales who wrote an article saying RG’s behaviour was above board.
Also it’s nice to have an article in the blue column and there aren’t many these days, and this is well-written and argues its point fairly and well.
Obviously articles published as late in the week are not much read, but otherwise I wouldn’t be suprised to see many supporters of RG’s behaviour coming out of the woodwork before too long.
April 26th 2012 @ 2:07pm
nickoldschool said | April 26th 2012 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
Well said KPM. It’s everyone’s right to agree or disagree with someone’s article and/or point of view. But to do so in a polite and well-behaved manner is fastly becoming the exception (roarer v writer, roarer v roarer etc).
Let’s not forget we are all rugby lovers (well most of us) who just want to have a good chat with fellow fans, share what we think, listen to others etc. We have all played, or not, some rugby, watched thousands of games on the telly or at the stadium, read even more articles. We come from rugby-mad countries or not. Whether we have a guru, expert or rookie label next to our name doesn’t make our opinion more or less valid than the others. So Ewen, tx for sharing what you thought of RG’s departure.
April 26th 2012 @ 2:14pm
Brett McKay said | April 26th 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
well played Nick..
April 26th 2012 @ 1:01pm
apelu said | April 26th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
The Brumbies lost to the Reds because Geroge Auoup awarded a try despite Higgingbottoms’ elbow clearly touching the touch line. A week later, he denied a legitimate try to Fanolua. Does he have anything against the Brumbies, or is he bilnd, or needs a lesson in physics?
April 27th 2012 @ 7:11am
formeropenside said | April 27th 2012 @ 7:11am | Report comment
wrong thread I think
April 26th 2012 @ 2:33pm
Stanley grella said | April 26th 2012 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
I think the debate over professionalism and if the hooper/Graham signings can be compared are ignoring the biggest problem with the article.
How is Richard Graham, based on results in his career considered a good coach?
April 26th 2012 @ 3:01pm
sittingbison said | April 26th 2012 @ 3:01pm | Report comment
“…the 666 posts on several threads on RG leaving the Force, link for wallabies and what’s happened to the reds?…an ill informed and factually incorrect article…”
Covered at some length previously, but I agree completely. In fact what really should have been the gist of all the articles, why did a premier winning franchise sign a 75% losing coach who has not accomplished any KPIs in developing the franchise, players, skills and style, or local development.
April 26th 2012 @ 5:38pm
Short-Blind said | April 26th 2012 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Because he is connected and a member of the QLD rugby old boys club – shows how amateur it all is really and this after Reds rugby seemed to have turned the corner. Q. How are Rod McCall and Mark Connors connected to this recruitment decision?
April 26th 2012 @ 10:35pm
stu said | April 26th 2012 @ 10:35pm | Report comment
SB,quite right it seems a bit underhand and in house these dealings and who really benefits from it.?SURE as hell its not the reds or force team or their supporters.
graham is no catch as a coach and his proudest moment wasnt announcing his departure mid season.
how silly is the qru?THEY should study the reds form with all the recent losses being attributed to injuries.BUT take a look around and many teams in the same boat.
the stormers beat the last years champs on their home ground with 3 stars injured; tomorrow the blues will be without 2 all blacks in their front row and half the internationals the reds could put on the park.
So what is happening at the reds?Is it the posturing of the management and coach ?Are the players more self absorbed in things miscellaneous to rugby .Mckenzie talks and writes a good game but isnt fronting.Tomorrow he plays a bottom team and surely looking at the teams he must prevail.