Unity and rivalry the best way to honour ANZAC Day
By Damo, 28 Apr 2012 Damo is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- AFL, anzac day, Collingwood Magpies, Essendon Bombers
Related coverage
Every year, in front of 90,000 plus fans, two Melbourne clubs battle it out in a traditional match. The rest of us battle it out in the public forum over the validity of the game.
So much of the debate is centred on the two teams involved. Many feel it should be a privilege to play on such a sacred day, not a right solely afforded to Collingwood and Essendon. These people often argue the previous year’s grand final teams should have the privilege, a la the NRL and most state-based competitions.
Others argue the round should be shared in other ways, Like Lethal Leigh Mathews, who argued recently the game, being incredibly Melbourne-centric in nature, should be a right for the two highest-ranked Melbourne teams.
Undoubtedly this would anger both the traditionalists and the non-Victorian rabble-rousers over the border (of which I am proudly one).
But changing the day at all would risk damaging years of hard work and the resulting revenue for both clubs, the AFL (and by extension the rest of the clubs), and the nature of the day, which should rightly be steeped in tradition and ritual.
I argue that the game between Collingwood and Essendon, which yearly draws in more people than the NRL with its grand final teams model could even dream of mustering, should remain sacred. Even a foreign crow-eating heathen like myself can see the advantage in having such a gem of a game in the league’s crown.
But for those who (quite rightly) wish to share the pie, or perhaps the ANZAC biscuit, this won’t do. After all it’s simply another chance for the Vics to enforce some imagined ownership of the game and neglect the rest, right?
Well, wrong.
Every school kid knows the game was not an AFL initiative, but one launched by the Woods and the Dons. A grassroots, tail wagging the dog initiative.
Please sir, may we play on ANZAC day and create something unique?
Such initiatives are so rare in modern sports that they should be respected, rewarded, and honoured. If other teams want the right to play on ANZAC day, fantastic – get a plan, get together with your neighbour, and do it.
The Crows and Power recently began just such a plan, with negotiations supposedly under way behind closed doors between the two South Australian clubs. Any game played between these clubs may or may not be played on ANZAC day, but another ANZAC tradition in another state would not only be good for the league and the occasion, but for the ANZAC Day tradition as a whole.
After all, such great events held in the public eye help to not only honour but entrench the memory of the ANZACS and their deeds. This should not be a Victorian sentiment, but a national one.
In a perfect system, Collingwood and Essendon would play their traditional game on ANZAC day. It brings in the crowds, the bucks (no pun intended), and it has the history and tradition. Like anything that was there first, it deserves credit. At least.
Then the weekend would host rivalry round. Now that we have legitimate rivals in each state of the country, we could bill the round less as the old hatreds being reignited, but as a day for neighbours to stand together and remember the cause.
Power and Crows fans standing side by side in silent reflection as the Last Post plays. GWS and Swans fans shaking hands and sharing a bear at the pub after. Richmond and Carlton fans letting their kids play together just for the day.
Not only enjoying the day and the freedoms the ANZACS died to give us, but also embodying our Diggers – they, like footy fans, came from every walk of life, from different ethnicities, creeds and political persuasions, but still stood side by side for the cause.
We as footy fans could embody this by sharing the chips and sauce with our most hated neighbour. Across the Ditch, similar sentiments could be expressed with exhibition matches. I love Saint Kilda’s initiative to play for four points in The Land of the Long White Cloud, and the AFL should be at pains to allow it and find them an opponent.
If ANZAC days is for all, which it is, then the day should be shared. But taking the day from two teams who have worked on creating a grand spectacle is not the way.
Expanding it across all rivalries would truly embody the memory of the ANZACS.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Misplaced rivalry between the codes needs to end (205)
- Football public stupid when it comes to free kicks (128)
- GWS Giants living up to their name (84)
- A letter to the first openly gay AFL player (78)
- Neeld sacked: Melbourne’s problems slowly being cut out (75)
- Stephen Milne charged with rape (58)
- AFL expansion means boring, lopsided matches (55)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- AFL, anzac day, Collingwood Magpies, Essendon Bombers

April 28th 2012 @ 6:16am
Norm said | April 28th 2012 @ 6:16am | Report comment
Don’t forget the Fremantle game. Their tribute to ANZAC Day is just as impressive. Also a full house
April 28th 2012 @ 8:53am
Macca said | April 28th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Those defending the Collngwood -Essendon format arrogantly argue that no teams would draw 80,000 plus to an Anzac match. Well in 2011 Carlton and Collingwood drew 88,000 and Geelong and Collingwood drew 81,000 and they did it without the support of an Anzac Day clash. People want to see the best of the best on Anzac Day and that is why I support the concept of the two highest placed Victorian teams playing it – not an exclusive Coll-Essendon concept.
April 29th 2012 @ 9:56am
Con said | April 29th 2012 @ 9:56am | Report comment
Yeah, but take away both essendon and colligwood. Which other two teams could fill the G with 80,000 – 90,000 people each year?
April 28th 2012 @ 9:26am
The Cattery said | April 28th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
It’s a good point, it was the clubs, in partnership with the RSL, that made the initiative for the match on ANZAC Day, the AFL endorsed it later – so it’s quite incorrect for people to refer to it as some sort of opportunistic money-making venture..
Sheeds vision at all times, from the very start was to both do it in conjunction with the RSL and to make sure that the event was fully respectful of the ANZAC tradition.
If anything, a whole generation of Australians, from many backgrounds, have been educated anew about the ANZACs.
April 28th 2012 @ 9:44am
Titus said | April 28th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Watching a game of football isn’t educating people about the war, do kids really understand the horror of war? Or are they going to think it was pretty cool and glamourous and a bit like barracking for a footy club?
April 28th 2012 @ 10:30am
The Cattery said | April 28th 2012 @ 10:30am | Report comment
Titus
everyone involved is moved by the pre-match commemorations and minutes silence, etc.
I think many would agree that it has had a positive effect on a new generation of Australians, recalling that it was only 20 years or so ago when many feared for the survival of ANZAC Day.
On top of all that, it is not for nothing that the MCG is referred to Australia’s Cathedral.
April 28th 2012 @ 9:34am
Kasey said | April 28th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Undoubtedly this would anger both the traditionalists and the non-Victorian rabble-rousers over the border (of which I am proudly one)
Great little piece. I’m happy to have the SANFL AnzacDay clash being the GF replay. It works well for us here especially when Adelaide Oval isn’t a construction site and the game happens just over the road from the cenotaph/st Peter’s cathedral .
Off topic – I’m curious. I’m trying to explain to some American friends just how deep this dislike everybody from the southern states(the Aussie Rules ones at least SA/WA/TAS) has of Victoria and its inhabitants. Can anybody think of an American equivalent? I’m pretty sure lots of Americans dislike California, but only because of its image as a liberal(free thinking – not Tony Abbott! stronghold) state that endorses things like gay lifestyles and marrage thart ‘middle America’ tends to take longer to come around to . Texans are arrogant like Vics ëverything is bigger in Texas etc, but AFAIK Only Oklahoma refers to them as Tex- ass and that has a lot to do with the red river rivalry (Oklahoma Sooners v Texas Longhorns in College Football.
April 28th 2012 @ 10:29am
rikki doyle said | April 28th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
collingwood and essendon should remain the only teams to play on anzac day thats tradition just saying
April 28th 2012 @ 10:32am
The Cattery said | April 28th 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Perhaps you can make a reference to one of the many looney fringe groups in America?
April 28th 2012 @ 11:28am
damo said | April 28th 2012 @ 11:28am | Report comment
Perhaps NY and boston?
April 28th 2012 @ 12:34pm
Kasey said | April 28th 2012 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
I think despite the tame American version of rivalry/barracking(a Red sawx fan in NYC yelling “you suck!” to a Yankees fan is considered risque/out of the norms?) I think there exists a basic level of respect between the two cities of Boston and New York that I don’t get observing the Adelaide and Melbourne rivalry. Besides, there’s more to the SA v VIC rivalry than just the 2 biggest cities in SA and VIC. it literally seems to be state against state at times.
April 28th 2012 @ 9:44pm
Paul said | April 28th 2012 @ 9:44pm | Report comment
Being American, I can tell you that your perception of a dislike for California is incorrect. Oh, no doubt, many Americans do not care for California’s (Or New York City’s) politics, but still respect (possibly even admire) the state and the city. Most strong rivalries in the US are city based because of our much greater population. The two biggest rivalries I can think of are the New York City-Boston and San Francisco-Los Angeles rivalries. The only state-based rivalry I can think of, and then it is only in university football (gridiron) is Ohio – Michigan.
April 28th 2012 @ 3:07pm
Whites said | April 28th 2012 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
It’s not really state based but there is some level of north-south antipathy remaining in the US. Afterall there was a war. It’s probably more in some parts of the south then it is in the north.
April 28th 2012 @ 12:40pm
steggz said | April 28th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Just a small point: NRL doesn’t have a ‘grand final teams’ game on ANZAC Day. Dragons v Roosters started about 10 years ago, and Melbourne v Warriors started a couple of years ago.
April 28th 2012 @ 1:16pm
JVGO said | April 28th 2012 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
As part of the overrall day the services, the march and the two up and drinking a game of football is fine. The important thing would be for the football not to overshadow the other aspects of the day and become the centrepiece. The only place this could ever possibly happen is Melbourne of course.
April 28th 2012 @ 1:49pm
The Great G Nepia said | April 28th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
I don’t have a problem with club teams from any code playing each other on ANZAC day. What bothers me is the use by rugby league of the phrase “ANZAC test” as a cheap, and tacky marketing ploy, especially when rugby league did not suspend its competitions during World War I.
April 28th 2012 @ 3:29pm
Whites said | April 28th 2012 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
Well it was only officially the ANZAC Test from 1997-99 when they had permission from the government. So you’ll be happy to know it hasn’t been called the ANZAC Test for more then a decade. However, since it is still played close to ANZAC Day it is still commonly called the ANZAC Test.
April 28th 2012 @ 7:37pm
TW said | April 28th 2012 @ 7:37pm | Report comment
According to this article today the NZ AFL Anzac Day game in 2013 is almost certain to be a goer. The concept has attracted all of the big hitters in the AFL and elsewhere. They do not know whether to have the match pre or post the MCG game.
Also it will be likely to form part of a football code extravaganza three match series over a month with Soccer Football and Rugby Union at Westpac Stadium in Wellington. Some big ideas being floated by the Wellington City Council.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/sport/afl/st-kilda-takes-anzac-day-to-new-zealand/story-fnca0u4y-1226341209751
April 29th 2012 @ 9:47pm
Emric said | April 29th 2012 @ 9:47pm | Report comment
So Wellington Rate payers, like myself, are paying for the AFL to play a game in Wellington?
What benefit is this going to provide Wellington?
April 29th 2012 @ 10:05pm
allblackfan said | April 29th 2012 @ 10:05pm | Report comment
emric, it will provide a good laugh if the game is played during a windy day!!:-)
Standup live comedy (otherwise known as AFL)!!
Can you imaging them trying to bounce the ball or kick from deep pocket with a northerly in their face? They’ll have to run with the ball in hand and cut out the kicking. Oh wait! We got a game like that — it’s called rugby! Two if you include league!!
April 29th 2012 @ 10:26pm
Nathan of Perth said | April 29th 2012 @ 10:26pm | Report comment
Abruptly occurs to me why the Australian rugby game won’t stop it with the kicking compared to the Kiwi teams…
April 29th 2012 @ 11:18pm
Emric said | April 29th 2012 @ 11:18pm | Report comment
I was wondering what would happen if we had a 80 to 100 knot gale hitting us when they are playing a game based on kicking. Every Wellington Schoolboy is taught to kick the ball low and hard into such winds and even then its dosn’t always work.
I’m hoping that the Lions might put a stop to this madness before the Wellington rate payers become nothing but another source of income for this Australian game.
Since when did Wellingtons city council turn into traitors and against our national sport.
April 30th 2012 @ 11:31am
allblackfan said | April 30th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
Emric, take some mates and turn up at Well Council’s next meeting and ask the hard questions.
Apparently they see it as some sort of tourism event.
Please!! The Hobbit is due out in December; that should be more than enough tourism marketing!
April 30th 2012 @ 11:41am
Emric said | April 30th 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
thats not a bad idea ABF. I wouldn’t care if the AFL held the game if the money for it was coming from their 250,000,000 dollars a year budget – honestly it woudn’t surprise me that 250,000,000 was bigger then what the Wellington Economy is worth.
April 30th 2012 @ 12:07pm
The Cattery said | April 30th 2012 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
Emric
you have my sympathies about ratepayers having to put in for this “event”, because in truth, no one has a clue how it will turn out (in terms of interest).
I can understand cities in Australia wanting to host AFL games, and bidding amongst themeselves for the privilege, but I don’t really understand why Welly would want to do it – I hope what they put in is minimal.
As for kicking against the wind, in many of our closed stadiums these days, kicking into the wind is less of an issue, so there is a good chance that a windy day might impact on the game, especially if there is a scoring end – that’s something we were well used to in the 70s and 80s when more open suburban grounds were used.
Hard to know how a modern day AFL footballer would handle gale force winds – you might be pleasantly surprised.
April 29th 2012 @ 3:05pm
Republican said | April 29th 2012 @ 3:05pm | Report comment
Why on earth am i censored in airing a view that does not support the expansion of our code to an overseas demographic with NO footy cred whatsoever, at the expense of domestic ones i.e. ours?
I am fed up to to back teeth, at the lack of empathy and comprehension of how disenfranchising this NZ obsession has become and the double standard that the AFL obviously shows in having a totally different set of criteria for Wellington, compared to what has been set for Canberra for many decades now.
May 1st 2012 @ 2:13pm
TW said | May 1st 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
Emric,
The question about the Wellington ratepayers susidising the AFL match has already been asked by the NZ media.
The Wellington City Councillor John Morrison has explained it this way-
Apparently there is a group of inner city businessmen who have banded together to authorise the Council to try and get more major events for Wellington for obvious reasons. – They bring in money for the inner city and is the reason for the hoped for football code festival
The normal ratepayers are not involved in this. Contact John Morrison for confirmation if you are a normal ratepayer and have concerns.
John M is very happy with progress so far in this deal. The only figures that I think are optimistic are the 10,000 travelling AFL fans being tipped to fly over.
Crowd attendance is another unknown but they are hoping to get at least 30,000.
The AFL – Read as Andrew Demitriou – would not touch this unless it pays its way. He gets bonuses for every profitable venture.