Five-horse race now a free-for-all
By Vince Rugari, 1 May 2012 Vince Rugari is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Adam Goodes, AFL, Collingwood Magpies, Geelong Cats, Hawthorn Hawks, Sydney Swans
Ben McGlynn and Rhyce Shaw of the Swans (Slattery Images)
Related coverage
- Geelong Cats news
- Hawthorn Hawks news
- Sydney Swans news
- Collingwood Magpies news
- AFL news
- Toyota Premiership news
Congratulations to the Sydney Swans, who were crowned 2012 AFL Premiers on the weekend following their 37-point comeback win over Hawthorn in Tasmania.
They are now the fifth team to have been awarded the flag early this season after Geelong, the Hawks, West Coast and Carlton.
Obviously, I’m being facetious. They don’t give out premierships in May, let alone five of them. But if they did all of a sudden, it wouldn’t really surprise, because this has been a very abnormal year so far.
The natural order has been disturbed, to our horror, and nobody is quite sure what on earth is going to happen from here on out.
Usually we have some sort of idea by now of how the rest of the season is going to pan out.
In seasons gone by, there have been established hierarchies. These allow us to divide the various clubs in the AFL into convenient groups – contenders, pretenders, young up-and-coming sides, Richmond and those who tanking for draft picks. It helps us understand where teams are at in the bigger picture.
Think back to 2004. That was the time of Port Adelaide and Brisbane, when Mark Thompson was still an unproven coach and the Hawks stank to high heaven.
When Port and the Lions fell, nobody could touch West Coast or Sydney. In 2005, the bottom three was Hawthorn, Collingwood and Carlton. Slowly, they’ve risen.
Recently it’s been all about the Geelong and Collingwood juggernauts, while St Kilda and Hawthorn sort of bubbled under the surface while the big boys did their thing.
The point is this – right now, we’re lost. We’ve tried to figure out where we’re going but ended up looking silly.
The narrative so far in 2012 has been that there is a ‘Big Five’. Geelong, Hawthorn, West Coast, Collingwood, Carlton. Outside of them, nobody can win the flag.
That was the plan, anyway.
Hawthorn, the team anointed premiership favourites by an impatient media, have stage fright. The Colliwobbles have been hit by injury and in-fighting. West Coast are up and running, but their true credentials are unproven.
Geelong, annoyingly, aren’t going anywhere. Carlton are terrific, yet nobody will truly accept it until they’ve got silverware in their grasp. There’s your ‘Big Five’, but there are a couple of spanners in the works.
Sydney are the flavour of the week – and rightly so, after their amazing come-from-behind win over the Hawks in Tasmania. Steered by everyone’s hero, Adam Goodes, the Swans went from 20 points down at the interval to six-goal victors after the final siren.
Who needs to bottom out for draft picks when you can stay competitive and play this well?
The momentum will roll along nicely for John Longmire’s side. Just take a look at their next four assignments – Adelaide, Richmond, Melbourne, St Kilda. There’s every chance they’ll emerge from May with their undefeated record still in tact.
On the Crows – they look alright too, and Patrick Dangerfield has taken his game to another level, but they’re way too green to move into the competition’s elite bracket. Apparently.
If we frothed over Hawthorn and overlooked the Swans – not to mention the fact that we were blindsided by the Eagles’ rise last year – what else have we missed?
Will Fremantle have a say? They’ve taken to Ross Lyon’s gorgeous game plan like a duck to water.
It’s hard to imagine them being shoved around by the supposed ‘Big Five’ without hitting back. And what of Essendon and North Melbourne, the two sides who are scheduled to go up a level or two this year?
Who knows. Actually – nobody knows. And there’s no point trying to pretend we do, because it could all change again very quickly.
After so many cut and dried seasons, to have a genuinely, abnormally, excruciatingly open field is a strange feeling. But it’s worth it.
Vince Rugari is an Adelaide-born journalist who cut his teeth on the sporting graveyard that is the Gold Coast. He fancies the round ball and the Sherrin, and used to be a handy leg-spin bowler before injury curtailed a baggy green push. He is a Port Adelaide fan by birth, as painful as that has been recently. He's now sports editor of The Area News in Griffith, NSW.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Adam Goodes, AFL, Collingwood Magpies, Geelong Cats, Hawthorn Hawks, Sydney Swans

May 1st 2012 @ 4:17am
Ironmonger said | May 1st 2012 @ 4:17am | Report comment
Being blindsided by the Swans form is a product of the Victoria centric press in AFL.
Some good coaching moves by Longmire on the weekend is encouraging for the Swans too. But the big turning point was Josh Gibson rolling his ankle. That guy plays better every time I see him and he dominated again until he hurt his ankle in the 2nd quarter. A sign of how much Hawks have become dependent on his great read of the play and strength. He even takes marks now rather than punching the ball away like he used to…
.
May 1st 2012 @ 7:24am
Macca said | May 1st 2012 @ 7:24am | Report comment
The Sydney vs Adelaide game will be an interesting one…as we might have a new flag favourite if Adelaide wins it. Adelaide, one must remember, also gets to play GWS and the Gold Coast twice each for some odd reason. The fixture is well and truly fixed in their advantage. Would have been nice to have seen Port beat them on the weekend. I will be going for teams that don’t get an unnatural benefit from AFL fixturing. On the Swans, Josh Kennedy must be the front runner for the Brownlow right now. Great player.
May 1st 2012 @ 9:09am
Christo the Daddyo said | May 1st 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
The Melbourne media ALWAYS ignore Sydney’s chances. Happens every year. You’d think they would have learned by now, but it doesn’t appear that way…
May 1st 2012 @ 10:00am
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
The Victorian media has never been happier than in the last few years when the Victorian teams got back on top. They got to happily forget about the rest of the country again after suffering years of inter-state blaspheming. Two non-Victorian teams in their Grand Final?? Sacrilege!
May 1st 2012 @ 10:57am
Matt F said | May 1st 2012 @ 10:57am | Report comment
They’ll have to launch another enquiry
May 1st 2012 @ 11:27am
damo said | May 1st 2012 @ 11:27am | Report comment
Oooooooooh, noice call!!!
May 1st 2012 @ 12:09pm
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 12:09pm | Report comment
Its always entertaining to hear from the provinces.
Sadly Christo the Daddyo, the Sydney press have been lagging on the Swans. I keep a bit and eye out and its only been in the last week that coverage has lifted in their home town.
Most people in Melbourne, had Sydney in the top 8. Up until Saturday they had not beaten a top 4 side from last year. The added press is warranted but dont get carried away that Melbourne lags behind when Sydney’s own press had relegated articles to the bottom of the page!
Nathan, I’m afraid West Coast are in the same boat as Sydney. Until they can come to Melbourne and beat Collingwood, Geelong or Carlton they really are not flag favourites despite what the provinces think
Richmond ran West Coast to the brink of defeat. Its only that it is written into AFL regulations the Tiges must finish 9th prevented the win. The AFL Commish at the last minute intervened and ordered Reiwoldt to miss that goal.
May 1st 2012 @ 12:26pm
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
We *did* beat Carlton in Melbourne, actually beat them more handily in Melbourne than we did in Perth, with what is effectively the same team as today.
As for Geelong and Collingwood in Melbourne, well that has stopped being such a daunting ask. And after the first couple rounds the Eagles realised that what is really important is just not losing, the percentage isn’t very important, so we’ve spent the last three games find tuning our just enough strategy to conserve energy and injuries. Just wish all the out of state teams we play weren’t so dirty and focused on injuring us! Our poor necks….
May 1st 2012 @ 12:35pm
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
Interesting though that the majority of the BF Richmond supporters were saying that, out of their matches against sundry contenders, they considered the Eagles to have been the most difficult of the lot and that they had thrown the kitchen sink at this match.
May 1st 2012 @ 1:30pm
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
You beat Carlton last year when you finished 4th. Is that your prediction for 2012.
May 1st 2012 @ 3:04pm
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
It’s a relative prediction: “Above Carlton”
If Carlton get seconds, well…
May 1st 2012 @ 4:30pm
Jonny G said | May 1st 2012 @ 4:30pm | Report comment
The Swans only beat Geelong in Geelong last year, which no team had done in 2 years or so
May 1st 2012 @ 8:27pm
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 8:27pm | Report comment
One off fluke.
May 2nd 2012 @ 1:01pm
Matt F said | May 2nd 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
Just like Essendon’s win over Carlton
May 2nd 2012 @ 9:16pm
Redb said | May 2nd 2012 @ 9:16pm | Report comment
No Fluke – our destiny.
May 3rd 2012 @ 5:43pm
Jaceman said | May 3rd 2012 @ 5:43pm | Report comment
Telegraph coverage improved out of sight with non NSW teams mentioned but this ahppened for soccer when they got the soccer rights to fuel subsciptions but then fell away. The SMH lagging of course and still has other columnists having a dig but I assume NRL money keeping NRL front and centre (as it should) and they suspect the Tele will go “pay wall” soon so they can gain a bit of circulation…
May 1st 2012 @ 9:16am
Tony said | May 1st 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
“GOOOOOOOOOOOO BLUUUUUUUUUUUUE’S”
Hey good on you Sydney gutsy gutsy win
May 1st 2012 @ 11:16am
brendan said | May 1st 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Sydney have been fantastic but realistically who have they beaten? Great win over Hawthorn but how good are the Hawks really they are making a habit of putting in ordinary last quarters.The Eagles are the premiership favourites IMo at the moment as they look like finishing top four with the double chance and dont lose often in the finals at Patterson stadium.I do agree with you Vince that we are in for an exciting season and that none of us really know.As an aside good performance by Suns without Ablett on the weekend .
May 1st 2012 @ 11:38am
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
“at Subiaco Oval”
May 1st 2012 @ 11:49am
hawker said | May 1st 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
“Sydney have been fantastic but realistically who have they beaten?” – Could say the same about West Coast – Bulldogs, Melbourne, GWS, Richmond (3 of those sides will finish in the bottom 5).
May 1st 2012 @ 1:27pm
brendan said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Thats true hawker.
May 1st 2012 @ 12:19pm
Matt F said | May 1st 2012 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
We’ve had a harder draw then West Coast so I’m not sure how we’re unproven yet they’re the favourites if you’re basing it on the draw?
Besides, quite a few “experts” had us losing to the Hawks, the Roos and the Dockers. It looks easy in hindsight but they weren’t considered easy games at the time. It’s by no means the hardest draw but it’s not as easy as some others have had right now.
That being said it’s way too early to claim any team as premiership favourites or anything like that. Some people were calling Essendon a top 4 side at this time last season (Mike Sheehan was still saying it in round 8-9) and they ended up scraping into the 8.
May 1st 2012 @ 11:55am
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
Way too early to predict an outcome on any team. It is wide open with all bar West Coast from last years Top 4 flagging, 2 of the 4 are not even in the 8. Round 10 would be a good time to revisit the ladder and make some judgements from there. At this stage the draw allows some teams an easier run than others.
We had a top 5 for the likely premiers group, we need to add the Swans to make it 6.
May 1st 2012 @ 1:22pm
Strummer Jones said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
Vince, I actually think the Tigers looked OK and might beat the Swans in 2 weeks at the ANZ Melbourne Cricket Ground. Adelaide have had the wood on Sydney as well for a while (minus Swans beating Adelaide 2010 for first time in years), so it might be tougher than you think. Finally, Swans (like a few other teams) have this habit of beating say Geelong at Kardinia Park and then losing to some lowly team. Last year they dropped 3-4 ‘easy’ games, or rather, games where they were clear favourite to win.
May 1st 2012 @ 1:22pm
Norm said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
What happened to the April premiers…Carlton
May 1st 2012 @ 1:29pm
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
see above.
May 1st 2012 @ 1:28pm
Mango Jack said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Early days, my friends, early days. But isn’t is great that things are not so predictable? My Hawks surely can’t continue to fade so badly. Good point about Josh Gibson, Ironmonger, but I also think they are really missing Hodge. Good to see him back on the field, but they really need his drive and leadership.
May 1st 2012 @ 2:51pm
hawker said | May 1st 2012 @ 2:51pm | Report comment
I thought being behind at 3 qtr time might’ve been the tonic for last qtr fade outs but even that didn’t work….
May 1st 2012 @ 3:06pm
Nathan of Perth said | May 1st 2012 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
I hate to say it but there seems to be a problem between the ears. The stat I saw going around the Hawk boards was 0-5 for the last encounters decided by under a goal.
May 1st 2012 @ 1:28pm
Redb said | May 1st 2012 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
They got well beaten by Essendon
May 3rd 2012 @ 5:43pm
Jaceman said | May 3rd 2012 @ 5:43pm | Report comment
Swans and Hunt doing OK but still not world beaters…