ARU must follow FFA’s free-to-air lead
By Bay35Pablo, 5 May 2012 Bay35Pablo is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australian Rugby Union, FFA, football, Foxtel, free to air tv, Rugby Union, SBS football
Is this the best ever season of Super Rugby? (Image: NSW Waratahs)
Related coverage
News that Football Federation Australia are considering splitting their TV rights deal, to ensure one game a week on free-to-air TV, shows they value the importance of exposure.
While the FFA risk their revenue from Foxtel being reduced, they realise the value gained by having free-to-air exposure is worth as much, if not more.
Football has always suffered since it went exclusively to pay TV for both Socceroos and A League games, effecting cutting off its exposure to the masses (envied by all other footy codes).
Yet the FFA had to cut that deal at the time for the money, in order to keep the professional game alive in Australia.
Australian rugby was never in the same turmoil that football was, but has been just as beholden to pay TV since it funded the conversion to professionalism in 1996. Old habits die hard and the filthy lucre is hard to give up.
The problem to many is that rugby has been withering on the vine, exposure-wise; its main competition Super Rugby can only be seen in Australia on pay TV.
Meanwhile, AFL and rugby league are prospering, with their wall-to-wall exposure on free-to-air.
While there had been noises and rumbles about some free-to-air coverage for Super Rugby, the current TV deal – which commenced in 2011 – has seen the most free-to-air exposure for the code since the initial deal in 1996 (which, from memory, Seven botched or didn’t stick with, or both).
Mind you, that free-to-air coverage is nothing more than a regurgitated Fox Sports highlights package, around midnight on Channel Nine.
The FFA is looking at SBS – the traditional home of football in Australia, and the FFA knows it – showing one game a week. This shows exactly the type of thinking (or, in the case of the ARU, probably an epiphany) that Australian rugby needs.
Times have been tougher recently, thanks to the International Rugby Board’s poor handling of the World Cup and inbound tours for the southern hemisphere (you’d never see the Six Nations get mucked about the same way).
But the ARU needs to bite the bullet and realise it needs to get its product out there.
While this is complicated by being part of SANZAR, the next TV deal for Australian rugby absolutely has to have some free-to-air coverage, along the same lines as the mooted FFA/SBS deal.
They could allow a simulcast with Fox and cop some less money, but they must get a game on free-to-air.
Friday night, Saturday evening, Sunday anytime, I don’t care; we need Australian rugby out there selling itself.
It doesn’t even need to be game of the round (because that would affect the revenue badly); just so long as it is an Australian side playing (although Aussie derbies would be even better).
Mr O’Neill won’t be here for the next TV deal.
But the ARU (hopefully in Commission mode by then, thanks to the Cosgrove-Arbib review currently underway) needs to take off the tweed jackets, step away from the buffet, roll up their sleeves and cut a deal that best serves Australian rugby as a whole.
It might mean sacrificing the second serve of saveloys, or that second assistant kicking coach, but it’d be worth it.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (404)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (229)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Can the Wallabies bash the Lions tight five? (9)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (72)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (156)
- Saracens players leading British and Irish Lions
- Wallabies coaching job poisoned chalice (14)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (33)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (14)
- Can the Wallabies bash the Lions tight five? (9)
- What happened to all the rugby enforcers? (72)
- Saracens players leading British and Irish Lions (0)
- Manu Samoa squad to tour South Africa for June Tests (33)
- Looking at the weekend’s Super Rugby games (14)
- IRB Law 12: The forward pass (16)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Rugby Union, FFA, football, Foxtel, free to air tv, Rugby Union, SBS football


May 5th 2012 @ 6:51am
Sailosi said | May 5th 2012 @ 6:51am | Report comment
Unfortunately Aussie rugby needs the cash otherwise they could potentially lose maybe 50% or even more of their best players overseas. I know this is similar to soccer but our best players already play overseas and it is seen as somewhat advantageous for them to play overseas from a standard and development point of view.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
May 5th 2012 @ 8:24am
sixo_clock said | May 5th 2012 @ 8:24am | Report comment
Thanks for bring this up BayXXXVPablo,
Perhaps an argument can be put to Fox that this move would have marketing benefits. People who have forgotten they enjoy Rugby may start with the FTA product and then move up. To placate the bean counters perhaps an hour delay allowing some editing to fit it into a time slot. Our sponsors need to involved in the negotiations to guarantee advertising slot pick up (cannot be avoided).
But more importantly the calls have to be casual viewer friendly, not incessant esoteric hard nut Rugby backs v forwards jokes, whinges about refs etc. The package could also consider school and club results being scrolled across the bottom of the screen to indicate just how widely the game is played. A weekend afternoon timeslot is probably the best to pursue. JON should be in on this at the strategic level, does he have Ruperts email or number?
May 5th 2012 @ 10:14am
Emric said | May 5th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
The ARU has to consider how much money it would lose for this. It would also have to consider how a channel like 9 or 7 might treat the product once it has the contract tied away. Take a look at the complaints streaming from the mouths of our Rugby League friends about how their product is treated by the TV stations.
Rugby in Australia does not have the same pulling power as the other sports.
May 5th 2012 @ 10:23am
Yikes said | May 5th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
The problem is, contrary to your implication it wasn’t even considered, ARU tried to get one match per round on FTA in the last broadcast deal (even on delay).
The potential $ amount from Foxtel dropped ENORMOUSLY. The shortfall was not even close to being made up by the $ offered by the free-to-air network in question. Fox wanted exclusivity, full stop.
We’re not talking no-second-kicking-coach reduction, we’re talking just-not-feasible reduction. And I assume the Fox operators have factored in the usual assumptions about how some FTA might grow their Pay TV audience. They clearly just think it’s a load of rubbish, unfortunately.
May 5th 2012 @ 3:54pm
p.Tah said | May 5th 2012 @ 3:54pm | Report comment
Fair enough about a game causing a revenue drop but surely they could have tried to get the weekly highlights program on at a decent hour. Midnight on channel 9 is pointless.
May 5th 2012 @ 12:42pm
PeterK said | May 5th 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
As a roundball enthusiast I do so hope you’re right about the FTA for one game of the A-League. Do you have a source for that?
Rugby IMO would be wise to consider what you propose.
FFA surely should be able to persuade Fox that they can have a little free advertising on SBS by releasing one game a week to SBS to be replayed maybe on a Monday night or some such. Fox retain all live broadcasts, and get a bit of free advertising. SBS get lots more eyeballs of such as me who don’t want anything to do with Pay TV while it’s anywhere near the price it is (when ALL I want is my football!)
May 5th 2012 @ 3:42pm
BigAl said | May 5th 2012 @ 3:42pm | Report comment
It certainly would be interesting to have the source for the claims here.
As pointed out by Yikes (above), the offers by Foxtel drop enormously for anything short of exclusive coverage.
May 5th 2012 @ 3:50pm
Ian Whitchurch said | May 5th 2012 @ 3:50pm | Report comment
You have to answer the question – do you run rugby union for the benefit of rugby union, or for the benefit of Foxtel ?
If its the former, then tell Foxel how it’s going to be.
May 5th 2012 @ 3:59pm
p.Tah said | May 5th 2012 @ 3:59pm | Report comment
It doesn’t work that way unfortunately. The game needs the money.
May 5th 2012 @ 4:22pm
Justin said | May 5th 2012 @ 4:22pm | Report comment
Its the former and thats why foxtel is involved. Without them we would be a breeding ground for European clubs and be in the same position as soccer.
May 5th 2012 @ 3:28pm
glacier said | May 5th 2012 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
There will be 14 Wallabies’ internationals this year on FTA which is great exposure for rugby in anyone’s language. Only Socceroos’ World Cup qualifiers will be on FTA with the rest still on Pay TV so I think rugby comes out on top on this regard. The Wallabies are the ‘shop-window’ of Australian rugby.
Foxtel does a terrific job with Super Rugby and deserves to keep its exclusivity as long as it pays appropriately for it.
May 5th 2012 @ 4:00pm
p.Tah said | May 5th 2012 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
I agree Foxtels rugby coverage is very good.
Channel 7s and 9s attempts in the past have been woeful. ABC and 10 have been the best of the FTA networks.
May 5th 2012 @ 4:00pm
The Cattery said | May 5th 2012 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
I’m pretty certain that in the early days of the Super 12s there was at least one game per round on FTA.
May 5th 2012 @ 11:14pm
Blake said | May 5th 2012 @ 11:14pm | Report comment
Foxtel delivers great coverage of the rugby and is the SOLE reason I have foxtel membership. FTA coverage of union in the past has been absolutely woeful. There coverage of the 2011 RWC was terrible!!
May 6th 2012 @ 11:04am
Munter said | May 6th 2012 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Just a thought, SBS can be viewed via FOX so they already have a relationship, why not get SBS to take over the highlights package from ch-9, maybe show a repeat of the best game of the week? see how it rates.
May 6th 2012 @ 9:52pm
nomis said | May 6th 2012 @ 9:52pm | Report comment
Well, I love the idea Bay. If there was any way at all, it would do the game so much good.
With the conference system, there is an Australian derby almost every week. It’s all about a FTA station seeing it’s potential and making something of it, to compensate for the drop in revenue from Fox.
Imagine a Friday night game. Friday night RL has really helped to entrench it as part of the culture. There’s no doubt SR would also make further inroads.