Moving Kurtley Beale would be a well-intentioned mistake
Australia's fullback Kurtley Beale is tackled head high by Ireland's Rob Kearney AFP PHOTO / GABRIEL BOUYS
Related coverage
A penny for the thoughts of Wales defensive coach Shaun Edwards at reports that the Wallabies are contemplating a move from fullback to five-eighth for Kurtley Beale.
Should it transpire, the Welsh are likely to declare with great solemnity their utmost respect for Beale as a five-eighth while privately investing in some lottery tickets.
Beale has logged plenty of hours in the No.10 jersey – Robbie Deans prepared a Crusaders team against him in that position in the 2008 Super 14 final – but he has gone to another level at fullback.
The Wallabies might not gain enough from Beale at No.10 to compensate for what they will lose at No.15.
The number of “world class” Wallabies – for the sake of this argument, players viewed as top three in their position – diminished at the 2011 World Cup as the tournament progressed, but Beale was one of those who kept his label. Shifting him doesn’t mean that status goes with him.
Evidence that he could fill the playmaker role at Test level is being compiled on the basis of his outings for the Rebels.
But evidence – such as the recollections of Reds and Crusaders fans about what actually happened on Sunday – comes in varying degrees of reliability.
There is no chance that Wales would give Beale, who is still out of shape, the sort of leeway that is being offered at Super level, especially with yesterday’s news that Sam Warburton will be fit to make the trip.
Although Beale did some wonderful things against the Bulls, a pattern emerged that would quickly be targeted by the pacy, aggressive Welsh back-rowers.
Beale likes to advance towards the line and hit runners – inside and out – with short passes. It does not take too much imagination to envisage the Welsh rushing up on his outside shoulder to shut down his space. There will be a preview of what is to come when the Crusaders – with Richie McCaw set to start in the back row – face Beale on Saturday.
A few years back Fox Sports’ Rod Kafer produced a telling bit of analysis comparing the long, accurate passing of Quade Cooper to Beale’s distribution. In a nutshell, it showed how Cooper’s attributes allowed the Reds to play a wider game, a style that helped win a Super title.
Beale, meanwhile, went on to develop his brilliance in a different way, turning himself into a frightening counter-attacker once he mastered the high ball.
Playing at No.15 does not mean an end to the good things that Beale produced against the Bulls. He is more than capable of judiciously stepping in at first-receiver when opportunity calls for it, using his pace and footwork against mismatches in the defensive line.
There are also other options at No.10 if James O’Connor and Cooper are not ready.
Berrick Barnes has been on a rollercoaster ride in the court of public opinion over the past six months, from Messiah-in-waiting at the World Cup to a handbrake on the Waratahs’ Super Rugby aspirations.
Even the normally diplomatic Sean Fitzpatrick, in his role as an analyst for UK television, was bluntly critical of the playmaker in the preamble to the Brumbies match.
But Barnes served up generous doses of humble pie to his critics – mine tasted fresh – with his willingness to take the ball to the line in Canberra, an attribute which, if you were being cruelly suspicious, did not look like returning after last year’s troubling head knocks.
That the Waratahs did not make a larger impression on the scoreboard was due to factors other than Barnes’ mini-reinvention. He especially was not helped by a poor passing display by his halfback.
And discount his defensive error on Henry Speight. The tapes in recent years do not lie. He does not miss many and everyone is permitted an aberration.
There was also a lot to like in the performances of Mike Harris and Ben Lucas for the Reds in Christchurch. Lucas’ passing is sharp and Harris’ running lines are straight. He also showed that Kiwi knack of being strong over the ball that even their five-eighths (except one) seem to have. Should the mercurial Cooper decide that even singing the team song isn’t enough to keep him at the Reds, there would be plenty of life in Brisbane after him.
As for the Welsh, it is the sight of Beale in No.15 that would cause them the most fretful nights. They have not forgotten that moment in Cardiff in 2010 when Beale launched an up-and-under from the back, plucked it out of Mike Phillips’ hands and then grubbered ahead to almost score the try of the year.
It is harder to fly like that with the burden of directing a Test on your shoulders.
Paul Cully is a freelance journalist who was born in New Zealand, raised in Northern Ireland, but spent most of his working life in Australia. He is a former Sun-Herald sports editor, rugby tragic, and current Roar and RugbyHeaven contributor.
- Explore:
- Kurtley Beale, robbie deans, Super Rugby, Wales rugby, wallabies

May 9th 2012 @ 5:24am
kingplaymaker said | May 9th 2012 @ 5:24am | Report comment
Great article: Beale could have become a wonderful 5/8 but became a wonderful full-back instead and is where he has played most of his rugby. The lavish praise of him is more a function of the rage against Cipriani for being English than anything objective.
Funnily everyone gives Weepu/Williams/Nonu slack for playing in the misfiring Blues but no one in the Waratahs gets such leeway. Barnes also doesn’t have many decent backs outside him to make anything of his creativity. He is not as brilliant a playmaker as Cooper but is experienced in the position and would indeed allow Beale to roam free. Besides, without JOC the Wallabies need Beale to provide attacking quality outwide alongside Ioane.
One further point.
Why does everyone assume Cooper won’t be fit?
May 9th 2012 @ 8:54am
rl said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
KPM, Paul said “if” they are not ready, I don’t think he assumed so. Cooper might/should be physically fit, but will he be test match ready? Given our injury woes, I suspect the answer may well be: if he’s fit, he’s ready.
May 9th 2012 @ 10:33am
kingplaymaker said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
rl true Paul did say that-obviously however ready he might be wouldn’t be very.
I have a far higher opinion of Cooper than many and think that in any old state he has such vision and as Paul refers to, fabulous long passing, that he’ll still be good. I think Cooper’s performances depend more on whether the lightweight Wallabies pack is being pummelled in front of him or if dud centres outside are squandering the positions he creates. He is the prism through which the rest of the Wallabies failings are warped into invisibility.
May 9th 2012 @ 5:28am
mania said | May 9th 2012 @ 5:28am | Report comment
barnes had a abberation vs saders when fruean ran past him and he just froze.
dont move beale. he is the best counter attacking fullback in the world at the moment. would rather have barnes in 1st5 than move your best attacker closer to the defence
May 9th 2012 @ 8:28am
Adam_JJV said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Would you say he was the best counter-attacking in super rugby? Andre Taylor has been going pretty good id even say hes the form fullback right now.
May 9th 2012 @ 9:01am
RebelRanger said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Agreed Andre Taylor is the form 15 in Super Rugby. Beale is no where near the best counter attack player in the world. Just because he was in ’09/’10 doesn’t mean he is at the moment. I wish stats were more readily available (like American sports).
May 9th 2012 @ 9:41am
Red Kev said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
I woudl rate the Stormers 15 Joe Pieterson as slightly better than Andre Taylor this year. Certainly Taylor’s attacking (especially counter-attacking) gifts and form have been on display but Pieterson is the better fullback. Smarter positional play, better boot, and no slouch on attack either.
May 10th 2012 @ 2:00am
maxikh said | May 10th 2012 @ 2:00am | Report comment
It would be brilliant to have stats like the Americans do. The only reason I have ever shown interest in US sports is because of the awesome approach they have to statistical evidence. they have started counting carries and meters in the super 15 but these can still be hard to come by. The blues have a great site in terms of stastical analysis and individual numbers, shame they haven’t been inputting better numbers this season
May 10th 2012 @ 1:53pm
JC said | May 10th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Ha! Nice one maxikh – exactly the same reason I got into NFL – love their obsession with stats, and it adds an extra dimension to being a spectator and fan when you know how each player statistically stacks up against their opponents…..
May 9th 2012 @ 9:45am
mania said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
andreTaylor’s def good and in form counter attacker in Super. no argument there
but beales shown he’s test quality that still remains to be seen with aTaylor. beales had a rough season 2011 & 12. i still have faith in beale tho
May 9th 2012 @ 10:15am
Jutsy said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Beale had a pretty good s15 last year but his test season was plagued with injuries which he carried into this s15 year.
He still look a bit unfit/overweight. Friday night showed he was getting back to his top form but I hope he loses some more weight and get his speed back before the trinations start.
May 9th 2012 @ 11:09am
Adam_JJV said | May 9th 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
It will be interesting to see if Taylor gets into the AB’s training squad.
May 9th 2012 @ 8:39am
Elisha Pearce said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Check the stats for Waratahs v Crusaders for 5/8 run pass kick options also. You’ll find that Barnes actually started his taking the ball to the line and passing before kicking game in that match too. He’s obviously consciously changed his game, and that is only a good thing,
May 9th 2012 @ 5:46am
Demers said | May 9th 2012 @ 5:46am | Report comment
Interesting stuff, Paul. Here’s a penny for Shaun’s thoughts plus his dialogue with Howley. “Well, Rob, it looks like the Wallabies are going to have to play Beale at fly half. ” Yes, it does, Shaun. I thought they might play Barnes there.” “I hope they do, Rob, because Barnes doesn’t kick very well and he’s not that quick and will be easy meat for our pacy, aggressive back rowers.” “What bothers me, Shaun, is that Beale is very fast and elusive and just once during the first test might zip right through a gap and unload to Ioane as he did to Cooper Vuna last weekend and if he scores one he may well score another and then where will we be?” “Fourteen points behind, Rob, because Beale’s not a bad place kicker.” “Maybe they’ll play O’Connor at fly, Shaun.” “He’s injured, Rob.” “Then Lealiifano.” “He’s injured too, Rob.”
“In that case, they may go for Rodney Blake at 10.” “I doubt it, Rob. He’s even slower than Barnes.” “Well, anyway, the Wallabies will have no answer for Neil Jenkins and Paul Thorburn.” “That’s true, Rob. Anyway, what do we do about Beale?” “Let’s not worry about him. They’ll probably play Matt Rogers at 10.”
May 9th 2012 @ 10:36am
BennO said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
gold!
May 9th 2012 @ 6:40am
Darwin Stubbie said | May 9th 2012 @ 6:40am | Report comment
The welsh may also be saying (quietly) that he definitely needs watching – but everyone seems to peg against his 2010 form – he hasn’t produced anything near that over the last 1.5 seasons …. And playing at the Rebels hasn’t helped that drop off
The big loss is CL – the standout Aust 1st 5 of SR so far – not many teams will lose too much sleep over the alternatives …. I seriously can’t believe Harris keeps getting mentioned … A decent enough player – but he is more at the level that NZ used to export to Scotland in the 90s
May 9th 2012 @ 2:06pm
Amateur Hour said | May 9th 2012 @ 2:06pm | Report comment
Warehousing? Give him a Wallabies jumper so he can never wear black.
May 9th 2012 @ 4:59pm
Darwin Stubbie said | May 9th 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
Don’t think I’d be worrying about that – he’s nowhere near an AB jersey
May 9th 2012 @ 6:56am
p.Tah said | May 9th 2012 @ 6:56am | Report comment
I agree Paul. Barnes at 10 and KB at 15 for all the reasons you mentioned above. I was impressed with how he took the ball to the line against the Brumbies.
Barnes’ game is slightly off because he has shouldered the responsibility of turning the Tahs season around. He is still the best 10 available. I think he’ll have a different, more relaxed mindset when in the Wallaby fold.
May 9th 2012 @ 7:59am
Wally James said | May 9th 2012 @ 7:59am | Report comment
If you play someone out of position you thereby weaken two positions. I agree with Paul.
May 9th 2012 @ 8:20am
Brett McKay said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
completely agree Wally (and Paul), weakening a strength makes no sense at all.
I can see the obvious reasoning behind the thinking of shuffling Beale to 10 – there’s plenty of options behind him at 15 – but these need to be ignored so that the best balanced side is assembled..
May 9th 2012 @ 8:43am
Elisha Pearce said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
The Waratahs this season are an example of what happens when everyone is shuffled out of position.
May 9th 2012 @ 9:32am
rl said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Brett, I’m not sure there are that many options behind him at 15. AAC wouldn’t let you down, but I think if we are to use him to plug a gap (and I’m relctant to do that) it’s at 13. A fellow Roarer (was it Justin?) observed yesterday that while Beale can certainly cameo at 10 to provide some spark, is he the bloke to steer your team around the park?
May 9th 2012 @ 10:03am
Brett McKay said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Ashley-Cooper, Mogg, and Morahan are the obvious ones, RL, and even Sheppard, I suppose too.
I agree though, I’d leave Beale at the back for precisely the reasons you outline..
May 9th 2012 @ 9:47am
Drop kick said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Barnes at 10 and Beale at 15 gives you the option of swapping them during a game for specific plays or phases. Both are experienced in both positions. It means Wales, NZ etc have to plan for two styles of play.
May 10th 2012 @ 1:56am
maxikh said | May 10th 2012 @ 1:56am | Report comment
Quade’s sole useful performance at RWC 2011 was his cameo at 15. it will never happen but I would love to see him play off the bench or at 15 for the wallabies, with someone like Beale or Barnes controlling at 10. Imagine Quade coming on against a tired defence. the added advantage would be similar to the threat Beale offers at 15, coming into the line and playing the ball, It would be great to see them swapping first receiver roles. both have lightning footwork and great playmaking ability so It would make for an interesting experiment, to say the least.
May 9th 2012 @ 8:03am
formeropenside said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Put Ben Lucas at 10.
May 9th 2012 @ 8:32am
Red Kev said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
This would be my solution as well. Lucas doesn’t have Beale’s individual brilliance, nor does he have Cooper’s or Lealiifano’s passing brilliance, but he is a solid all around 10. He is also playing far better rugby than Barnes has been. Harris would only have been a chance if he’d kept his kicking over 90% but it’s dropped off a lot since his hamstring injury – he is an even less dynamic flyhalf than Barnes.
May 9th 2012 @ 9:54am
rl said | May 9th 2012 @ 9:54am | Report comment
Agree FOS & Kev – Lucas isn’t outrageously gifted, but he is a solid defender, good kicker, and importantly one of the main reasons Knuckles loved him was he follows instructions to the letter. If everyone runs their plays as they should, he’s more than capable. If you need a bit of X-factor, you can always drop him back to 15 and put Beale up at 10.
This season has shown that Harris is not a 10 – very, very good 12, and equally adept at 15. Harris’ strength is running to gaps, not feeding runners.
I’m not as down on Barnes – for all his supposed faults, I hark back to his performance in last year’s RWC playoff v Wales – all class. Why can’t he do that all the time? He’s proven at the highest level, and is at least playing better these last few weeks, maybe the sniff of test season has got him going. For some reason Barnes adopted the Steve Waugh approach and took the low-percentage stuff out of his game (perhaps dating back to his days under Wayne Bennett?).
May 9th 2012 @ 10:47am
Justin said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Correct, he is a superior pivot to Beale. Beale is a bit of a one trick pony and once the defence reads his across field jink and go himself or throw a short pass there is not much left. He is playing quite well AT 10 rather than playing quite well AS A 10 if that makes sense.
Lucas has a far superior kicking and passing game and better defence.
This talk of putting Barnes in now because he “took the ball to the line” is rubbish. Do people understand that just “taking the ball to the line” and being tackled is not the primary role of a 10 and nor does it achieve much. I can tell you doing that is pretty darn easy. Being able to mix up your game, manipulate defences with a variety of different kicking and passing option is as well as running is far more difficult.
For all this talk that Barnes played quite well vs the Brumbies he still COULD NOT get the Tahs back line going. He is the playmaker and has to take responsibility for the back line. I didnt see him getting stuck into the other guys and saying “flatten up, flatten up”. It continued all night so Id suggest he wasnt part of the solution to fix the backline and hence is just a part of the problem.
May 9th 2012 @ 8:37am
WQ said | May 9th 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Why not try what the French did at the RWC2011 and play two scrum halves, Australian Rugby has no shortage of quality scrum halves at present?
What about McKibben, Stannard or Sheehan outside Genia, they are all in good form.
May 9th 2012 @ 11:54pm
Ben S said | May 9th 2012 @ 11:54pm | Report comment
Because historically French 9s play tend to play quite a bit of rugby at first receiver, hence quiet a few are adept at playing 9 and 10 and have very good kicking games. I couldn’t ever imagine Sheehan playing at 10.
May 9th 2012 @ 10:06am
nickoldschool said | May 9th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Waratahs back-line has been one of the most disappointing in this SR season so far and to say Barnes should get the n10 jersey doesnt make sense to me. Of course he isnt entirely responsible but as the team’s playmaker, you cant avoid pointing at him.
Its still early days to assess KB’s form at n10 but if he has a few more good games there, i reckon he should start at n10 v Scotland (if QC doesnt make it).
The fact a player is a great n15, 10 or 8 doesnt mean he can’t/shouldnt play elsewhere if deemed necessary (in the interest of the team). Carter is currently playing n12, Parra played n10 during the RWC, Higginbotham is at n8, why not Beale at n10 then if he’s performing there at SR level and our second best option isnt?
May 9th 2012 @ 11:02am
ohtani's jacket said | May 9th 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
Barnes is a test match second five or nothing at all. Beale hasn’t been able to replicate his breakout 2010 season, which is a problem most Wallabies suffer.