Michael Clarke grows into leadership role
By Andrew Tilley, 11 May 2012 Andrew Tilley is a Roar Rookie
Twelve months ago, Michael Clarke was nowhere near the public’s first choice as Australia’s next Test cricket captain.
In the eyes of the public, when Ricky Ponting stepped aside, Clarke wasn’t even in the top three. He was behind Shane Watson, Michael Hussey and even the dropped Simon Katich.
But 12 months is a long-time in professional sport.
Identified as a potential Australian Test captain almost as soon as he debuted for Australia in 2004, Clarke has been on the receiving end ever since from fans who felt that the ‘golden boy’ of Australian cricket was being given a free ride by Cricket Australia into the Test captaincy.
Despite being a mainstay of Australia’s middle order and Ricky Ponting’s vice captain for a number of years, Australian cricket fans felt that Clarke hadn’t properly earned the captaincy like those before him – Waugh, Taylor and Border.
Off the field Clarke was the David Beckham of Australian sport, and for this reason he suffered a case of ‘tall poppy syndrome’. He was the sportsman with the model girlfriend, he sported the latest haircut, was plastered with tattoos and he drove a sports car.
However, when you study the last 12 months carefully, the leadership that Clarke – Australia’s 43rd Test captain – has shown since taking over the reins, has been extremely sound.
His leadership in helping to turn around a bruised and battered Australian team bares similarities with the great Allan Border.
Like Border did in 1984, Clarke has risen to the acute challenge of inheriting a team that was suffering from a crisis of confidence (following the departure of a number of its greatest players and a run of loses) and a lack of player depth.
Clarke is the first captain since Border to inherent a team that included a former Australian captain.
While Kim Hughes only lasted two tests back in 1984 after relinquishing the captaincy to Border, Clarke has faced the continued challenge of putting his stamp on the team despite the ‘white elephant’ that Ponting could have represented in the dressing room.
The fact that this hasn’t occurred is testament to both a gracious and unselfish Ponting and a politically astute Clarke.
In the last 12 months, Clarke’s captaincy record reads as nine victories from 14 Tests.
While this doesn’t scream ‘sensational,’ Clarke’s approach on and off the field has been.
Since April last year, Clarke has helped usher in no less than nine debutants, including Nathan Lyon, Pat Cummins, James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc, David Warner, Ed Cowan and Matthew Wade.
Despite the challenges that Clarke has faced, his first 12 months as a leader will be remembered as aggressive, brave and innovative.
Clarke has led from the front, racking up 1,355 runs at an average just under 60 with the willow.
While his 329 not out against the Indians at the SCG was an obvious highlight, what is even more encouraging is that he has consistently been churning out hundreds, scoring five in total.
Clarke has been well supported with the bat by Michael Hussey (averaging 46) and Ricky Ponting (44), but he can also point to improvements made at the top of the order by the dashing David Warner and his foil, Ed Cowan.
Without doubt, Australia’s greatest improvement of the last 12 months has been with the ball.
Australia’s fast bowlers have really turned up the heat on their opposition, putting in consistently aggressive and disciplined performances – a trait of Clarke’s tenure.
James Pattinson has been phenomenal, while Ryan Harris, Peter Siddle and Ben Hilfenhaus have all experienced renaissances under the Clarke tutelage, following either periods of poor form or lingering question marks over long-term fitness.
Clarke has provided a never-ending source of confidence for Nathan Lyon – who has quickly acclimatised to Test Cricket like no Australian spin bowler has been able to do since Shane Warne retired in 2006.
Lyon, who has still curated more first class wickets than he has played on, seems to have locked down Australia’s number one spin option, thriving on the confidence that Clarke is able to feed him.
It is in the field that Test captains decision making is often found out, and it is here that Clarke has a shown a brilliant knack of bringing on the right bowler at the right time.
In the absence of all-rounder and two-time Allan Border Medalist Shane Watson (who returned during the most recent Test Series in the Caribbean) Clarke has taken a greater responsibility with his left arm orthodox, and has even managed to get crafty bowling spells out of ever-green Test cricketer Michael Hussey and part-time net bowler David Warner – all of whom have chipped in with valuable wickets.
Australia’s field placements have been far more aggressive than they were under Ponting.
This has seemingly led to greater bowler confidence as Clarke consistently sets more fields that encourage disciplined bowling rather than to protect the bad balls. Off the field Clarke has taken great strides in turning around the media’s perception of him, and subsequently the public’s opinion of him.
Clarke has always exuded an incredible calmness with the media.
What used to be attributed as arrogance and being overly media trained just a few years ago is now viewed by many as exuding composure, confidence and self-assuredness – all vital qualities for arguably the second most important job in the country, behind the PM.
Clarke has left no stone unturned in his quest for bettering himself and his team. Upon being announced as captain in March last year Clarke organised a private boot camp at Coffs Harbour.
The point of the training was to make him physically and mentally stronger, which would in turn make Clarke a stronger leader and his team a stronger unit.
Despite a few setbacks – most notably against New Zealand in Hobart and South Africa in Cape Town – it seems to have paid off in spades.
After 12 months at the helm there is no doubt that this revitalised Australian Test cricket team is Clarke’s team, following a leader that is now as popular among the fans as he is among his team mates.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- England are a greatly overrated Test team (175)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (74)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Clarke take note: England has some weak points for Ashes (48)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (46)
- DIZZY: It’s time for the Aussie batsmen to fulfill potential (43)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again.
- How can we win the Ashes?
- I should have called Craddock: Warner (30)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- Landmark day for women’s sport as cricket cuts a cheque (15)
- Cricket Australia fines Warner (7)
- New Zealand shows fight, and then capitulates, again. (1)
- How can we win the Ashes? (0)
- Aussies Abroad: Journeymen expats tear up early County season (33)
- Adam Gilchrist bows out Gangnam Style (2)
- The Aussie cricket team aren’t THAT bad (58)
- Australians off to win back the urn (0)
- Has cricket corruption been filed in the ‘too hard’ basket? (2)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Allan Border, Cricket, James Pattinson, Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey, Ricky Ponting


May 11th 2012 @ 5:47am
Bongo Fury said | May 11th 2012 @ 5:47am | Report comment
My view is that Clarke’s performance, tactically and diplomatically, since taking over as captain put Ponting’s overall reign into perspective. To me Ponting was very negative, tactically naive and overall a poor leader. Clarke has had to cope with a good deal of disruption, largely because of injury, but I believe has handled the situation and the pressures of captaincy with considerable aplomb.
May 11th 2012 @ 9:17pm
Melissa Felton said | May 11th 2012 @ 9:17pm | Report comment
In my opinion Clarke has done a great job as Australian captain and as shown that you should never judge a book by its cover because you don’t judge people by their actions it’s their personality that counts
May 11th 2012 @ 11:46am
Morning Son said | May 11th 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
I think it’s important we just get a bit of perspective here.
Clarke has been in the role for 12 months, including a loss against NZ and a 47 all out game against SA.
The West Indies at various times probably should have won a test or two.
It is very easy to come into a new role, and appear ‘fresh’ and ‘innovative’ – afterall, the stresses of the job haven’t taken their toll yet.
Australia could quite easily lose to SA this summer, then lose in England and in the return series in Australia.
Would people’s views of Clarke change then? Fuelled by the frustation of losing and getting whipped. I would suggest they probably would? Unfairly too.
Ponting had to deal with far more pressures than Clarke; a baying media and public; the expectation that he had to score most of the runs and the public’s totally unrealistic expectations.
If Clarke wins the Ashes back and comes out the other side post the 2013/2014 Australian season, then great, he will have confirmed himself as leading a remarkable regeneration in Australian cricket. He should recieve all the praise in the world if that does occur.
Ponting did a lot of good for Australian cricket – unfortuntaley he was given the poisoned chalice of having to rebuild the side post-Warne and McGrath. Ponting did as good a job under the circumstances. No other captain in Australian cricket history had to deal with the type of retirements and player exodus Ponting had to.
I think Australia will get beaten by SA and England in the coming 18 months, and probably India in India.
The Ashes in 2015 is a more realistic goal of winning them back.
IF however Clarke does manage to win the Ashes back, and beat SA in Australia, then, he would have done a magnificent job. But lets just hold the plaudits at the moment.
May 11th 2012 @ 3:00pm
Christo the Daddyo said | May 11th 2012 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
“No other captain in Australian cricket history had to deal with the type of retirements and player exodus Ponting had to.”
You mean apart from Kim Hughes losing Greg Chappell, Dennis Lillee and Rod Marsh?
May 11th 2012 @ 11:59pm
Morning Son said | May 11th 2012 @ 11:59pm | Report comment
Hmm,
Justin Langer, Matthew Hayden, Shane Warne, Glenn McGrath, Adam Gilchrist, Damien Martyn, Stuart MacGill, Brett Lee, Stuart Clarke, Michael Kasprowicz, Jason Gillespie.
All of those players were established test players for Australia – all of them have stellar career records in test cricket.
All of them retired during Ponting’s reign, the nucleus of an entire team. Your kidding yourself if you think there is another captain that has had to deal with the exodos of players that Ponting has had to deal with – only to be replaced with vastly inferior cricketers.
May 11th 2012 @ 4:59pm
Blaze said | May 11th 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
Just can’t please some people…. Guess that bitter pill is getting harder to swallow, so I guess it’s understandable to try and soften the humble pie blow…. Cant expect everyone to admit they were wrong and accept that the way Clarke has captain games to wins regardless of who we played is what has made people take notice and adjust their narrow minded thinking… But like I sed, cant please everyone…
May 12th 2012 @ 12:11am
Morning Son said | May 12th 2012 @ 12:11am | Report comment
@ Blaze.
What Im saying mate is that people should just settle down. People have this idea that a captain can take a average side and turn them into world beaters.
Clarke’s field settings are not that aggressive – at times in the west indies Clarke had zero or 1 slip when the Windies had lost early wickets. No captain in modern cricket today attacks enough with field placings. By that I mean slips and gullys.
Clarke rotates his bowlers well, and makes use of the part-timers.
But that isn’t going to win us an Ashes series because our batting and bowling is inferior to England’s and probably South Africa’s.
My point is – will everyone still be as supportive of Clarke if we get flogged in the next 18 months by England, India and South Africa?
We seem to have this idea to make scape goats. Rather than admitting that the other team was/is better, we prefer to blame the captain and / or coach. Replace each and your good to go.
Well, no.
England will roll us over next year, and everyone here will have to simply admit, that yes, England has better players than us.
Ponting won’t be their to be the scapegoat; either will be Hildtich; either will be Neilson. So, I hope your bitter pill goes down sweetly mate.
May 13th 2012 @ 2:27pm
Blaze said | May 13th 2012 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
That’s rubbish, you can be a great captain of an average team, which Clarke is… Just because he wins a few and yes possibly may lose a few coming up, doesn’t mean he isn’t a great captain…. He has proved to me the way he handles his team, himself and by his onfield decisions and placings that he is a very good and capable captain. People had personal issues with Clarke, that was the only issue, even tho they never met the kid…. Now after changing a few opinions in the way he captains the side, do you really think those same people will revert back to their personal issues of him because of a few losses? There is a big difference between the public not liking you for personal media beat up issues and not performing in his role as captain. Clarke may lose a few series, but I’m sure he won’t do it not trying and being complacent in his captains role and not willing to roll the dice and take a chance to win at times which punter fell into the trap doing… Average teams can play out of their skins when captained well… And if they don’t, and lose, and the captain didn’t just sit back and let it happen, then no, there will be no bitter pill for me mate… There is still pride in your countries captain and your losing team…. Some teams are better than others to put it simply, it’s how your team loses is what makes the difference… So to answer your point, I won’t be looking for a scapegoat and I will still be supportive of clarke. Purely because he has proven to be a great captain regardless of who they have played.
May 11th 2012 @ 3:03pm
Christo the Daddyo said | May 11th 2012 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
“In the eyes of the public, when Ricky Ponting stepped aside, Clarke wasn’t even in the top three. He was behind Shane Watson, Michael Hussey and even the dropped Simon Katich.”
Who on earth was advocating Watson as captain? Most people don’t understand why he’s in any sort of leadership role…