Rebels keen on Reds’ Higginbotham
By Melissa Woods, 15 May 2012
- Tagged:
- Melbourne Rebels, Reds, Rugby Union, Scott Higginbotham, Super Rugby
Related coverage
- Queensland Reds news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- Melbourne Rebels news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
The Melbourne Rebels see Queensland’s Scott Higginbotham as the ideal replacement for France-bound star Gareth Delve but say they’ve yet to make him an offer.
Wallaby Higginbotham has been linked to the Rebels, who are on the search for backrowers following Welshman Delve’s decision to leave the Super Rugby competition after the season and play for French club Toulon.
Higginbotham, who has played 11 Tests, has the ability to play both blindside flanker and No.8 and again showed his value on Sunday with a strong performance in the Reds’ 42-27 win to topple the Chiefs.
“He (Higginbotham) would have to be player of interest to us if he was available,” Melbourne chief executive Steve Boland said.
“We’ve had no formal talks about Scott Higginbotham at this stage.”
The athletic Higginbotham would be an excellent replacement for No.8 Delve, who has been one of the Rebels’ best in their two seasons and served as interim captain while Stirling Mortlock was sidelined.
Boland said the Rebels still had six to eight positions that they need to fill for next season, and hoped to have their roster finalised before they head to South Africa for two Super Rugby matches in early July.
Skipper Mortlock, 34, is still to make a decision on his playing future, while in-form veteran utility back Mark Gerrard is another off contract.
Boland said flanker Michael Lipman, who was one of the stars in their upset win over the Crusaders, may still be offered a new deal.
“We told a number of the players we’d be having a look over the next three to four weeks … and Michael’s certainly a player we’re still really interested in,” he said.
Boland said there was no truth in a rumour that flanker Jarrod Saffy’s neck injury could see him unable to resume his rugby career.
“I sat next to Jarrod at the Crusaders game and he’s got some scans he’s going to undertake in the next eight weeks, but the prognosis is really good,” Boland said.
He’s really confident he’ll be able to get back to training by October-November.”
© AAP 2013Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
The Crowd Says (11) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Melbourne Rebels, Reds, Rugby Union, Scott Higginbotham, Super Rugby


May 15th 2012 @ 7:43am
formeropenside said | May 15th 2012 @ 7:43am | Report comment
It would be such a shame for Qld to lose Higgy, who was developed out of club rugby after missing the usual schoolboy pathways. I thought a little while ago it was reported he had resigned, but the salary cap threw doubt on the deal.
Its ridiculous if that is the case. Home-grown players developed by a team should be exempt from such salary cap nonsense: it should be a poaching or purchaes cap that is imposed – you can only spend so much on new players from outside your own development ranks.
May 15th 2012 @ 8:05am
RedSkippy said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
A home grown policy as you suggest would be much better for the game as it would incentivise and promote development….but some franchises have a better (larger) pool to draw from than others so how would you account for that?
May 15th 2012 @ 8:40am
formeropenside said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Why should we need to account for that?
Larger is not always better – just look at NSW.
In any event, I dont care about an “even” competition. Test rugby is not artificially restricted, and that seems to be going fine.
May 15th 2012 @ 8:59am
AndyS said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I like the concept, or anything that encourages the development of players. The only proviso would be that, if that were the case, the money for player development would have to be much more evenly distributed than it is at the moment.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:10am
Albo said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:10am | Report comment
I really like the idea of a ‘home-grown’ exception to the salary-cap, FOS. Would it also apply to those who have already been poached returning to their, for want of a better phrase, ‘state of origin’ e.g. Kurtley Beale returning to the Tahs?
May 15th 2012 @ 12:10pm
redsnut said | May 15th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
The salary cap is a grossly unfair restriction on the Aussie teams IMO.
If it is to come in, it shouldn’t happen for at least two to three years from now in order to allow the teams to sort themselves, and the salaries out. And should be no less than the current payments at the end of this/next season.
May 15th 2012 @ 1:15pm
AJH said | May 15th 2012 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
You cannot have a salary cap unless it applies across the whole competition. It gives an unfair adavantage to other conferences i.e. SA and NZ. We are still considered the weakest of the conferences even after last weekend. But the risk the ARU is creating is that the Salary Cap will:
1. Force our best players to go overseas where there are no caps and they can maximise their earning potentital.
2. Weaken the strength and depth of the Australia Rugby franchises – meaning that Australian sides will lose more than they win – this will turn off fans and reduce dwindling interest in Rugby in this Country.
The lack of Free to Air TV resulting from the need to pay for professionalism of Rugby is bad enough in reducing public exposure to the code.
This CAP is a hell of a legacy that J.O’Neil is providing to Australian Rugby. It’s brainless, short sighted and will leave Australian Rugby close to death.
May 16th 2012 @ 11:25am
formeropenside said | May 16th 2012 @ 11:25am | Report comment
COOPER BACK FOR REDS v LIONS (on other news)
1. Greg Holmes
2. Saia Faingaa
3. James Slipper
4. Rob Simmons
5. James Horwill (c)
6. Jake Schatz
7. Liam Gill
8. Scott Higginbotham
9. Will Genia
10. Quade Cooper
11. Digby Ioane
12. Mike Harris
13. Anthony Faingaa
14. Dom Shipperley
15. Ben Lucas
16. James Hanson
17. Ben Daley
18. Adam Wallace-Harrison
19. Eddie Quirk
20. Nick Frisby
21. Chris F’Sautia
22. Luke Morahan
May 17th 2012 @ 12:00am
jeznez said | May 17th 2012 @ 12:00am | Report comment
MR, Holmes is starting this week – do you have to reverse your argument from last week and say that now Ewen thinks Holmes is the stronger scrummager?
May 16th 2012 @ 10:26pm
Justin2 said | May 16th 2012 @ 10:26pm | Report comment
the Australian is reporting Higgers to the Rebels. You feckin beauty!
May 16th 2012 @ 10:40pm
PeterK said | May 16th 2012 @ 10:40pm | Report comment
The salary cap will ensure all the aussie rugby teams become mediocre. Any year a team develope players and arises from the pack like the reds did means they will not be able to hang onto developed stars. They will be forced to spread out hence no strong teams.
Sure its fine when it applies to all teams like the AFL or NRL , really stupid when only the aussies do it.
It should be up to the aru to determine what aru top they pay for a player, regardless of where he plays, and thats all.
After that any franchise should be allowed to pay what they think they can afford. Also 3rd party sponsorship and 3rd party deals should be unlimited, but without the franchise guaranteeing it. This means if the 3rd party (like Firepower) does not honour its deal the player loses out, but makes them a free agent, AND the franchise does not have to make up the loss.
The most stupid thing ONEil has done.
The aussies need a dynasty ie a team like the reds winning multiple titles, this is what attracts sponsorship, interest, crowds, membership. NOT all teams finishing between 6 and 10.