Waratahs combinations: the oxymoron that shouldn’t be
By Brett McKay, 15 May 2012 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs
NSW Waratahs Tom Carter is tackled by the Queensland Reds Rob Simmons. AAP Image/Dean Lewins
Related coverage
It was interesting to hear returning Waratahs Captain Rocky Elsom speaking on Fox Sports’ The Rugby Club last Thursday night, discussing the difficulties that can arise from forced or unforced changes to the sides.
While Elsom was specifically talking about replacements for injured players, it also applies when ordinary form necessitates starting XV changes.
“It’s just about trying to build the combinations as quick as possible,” Elsom said.
The whole idea of “building the combinations” in week 12 of an 18+3 week tournament (less June Tests) seems more than a little bit strange.
“What on earth have you been building until now, then?” was the follow-up question Elsom was asked, via me to my telly.
With the Waratahs naming a team to the play the Bulls with something like seven personnel changes to the side that was towelled up in Canberra, and knowing how up-and-down the ‘Tahs backline has been in 2012, this notion of still needing to work on combinations in mid-May got me thinking.
Have the Waratahs run out the same starting backline this season?
Some hasty clicking through team sheets, followed by some copy-and-pasting into a spreadsheet over the weekend found that the answer is, surprisingly, yes.
In fact, since the first game of the year, they’ve run out the same backline the following week on five occasions.
All up, they’ve only tweaked the set-up five times as well, a lot less than I expected when I started the exercise.
It goes even further: from week five against the Sharks to week nine against the Rebels (and with a bye in the middle), the Waratahs’ backline remained untouched from 9 to 15. Of those four games, they won three of them, and one came with a four-try bonus point.
You’d like the think the combinations were starting to build themselves by now.
However, that Rebels game looks to have started the unravelling. An injury to Bernard Foley and Rob Horne’s suspension forced two personnel and two more positional changes for the Crusaders game.
And we all know that didn’t end well. Robbie Freuen had his annual Super Rugby field day – this time at Tom Carter’s expense – and though the scoreboard shows a close result, the Crusaders were never really headed.
Against the Brumbies and Bulls, Berrick Barnes has come back pretty close to top form, and played comfortably his best attacking games of the year. The most noticeable difference was that he played so much flatter than he had in previous rounds, and looked to get away from this perceived ‘kick first’ game that plenty of spectators and commentators alike assume is his natural game.
And it was great to see. I’ve long wondered if the ‘kick first’ game was actually a matter of Barnes playing on instruction. I wonder if what we’re seeing now is actually closer to Barnes’ natural game, and he certainly looks more dangerous when he looks to run first.
But against the Brumbies, the ‘Tahs backs outside of Barnes stood so deep in attack that they were practically on the athletics track next door. Despite having played at 12 to Barnes since late March, Carter played as if they’d never met before. And that then begs the question, how did they train that week? Is the Waratahs’ attack coach having trouble getting everyone’s attention in class?
Happily, the new centre pairing of Adam Ashley-Cooper and Horne did go flatter with Barnes against the Bulls, and their first try was a cracker. Ashley-Cooper ran a perfect out-in decoy line to draw in both Bulls centres, and Barnes found Horne in space and try line-bound from thirty-seven metres out.
But, like all too often when it comes to watching the Waratahs in attack, that was it. After highlighting an evident defensive frailty, the ‘Tahs didn’t run that play again all game.
It was a head-scratcher, to say the least. Barnes, Ashley-Cooper, and Horne seemed to have a decent combination between them, yet they barely spoke again for the match. Perhaps ‘Waratahs combinations’ is an oxymoron after all.
If there’s an antithesis to the continually misfiring Waratahs backline, it’s the Brumbies of the last month, and the Reds of consecutive Sunday afternoons.
Until the Wallaby-bound flyhalf went down, there’s little doubt Lealiifano-McCabe-Smith was the form Australian midfield combination. A finals drought that stretched back to 2005 looked to be coming to an end.
Similarly, Lucas-Harris-A.Fainga’a have helped right the wobbly ship that was HMAS Queensland. Fainga’a, especially, has been back for three-and-a-half minutes this season, but already he’s being spoken of in Wallaby terms again.
What both teams benefit from, however, is quality service from their scrumhalf. Nic White and Will Genia will more than likely be the guys to carry the scrumhalf duties for the Wallabies, and their respective teams are able to make the gain line so consistently in midfield because of the service they provide.
Genia, particularly, has really kicked on since being ‘Forced’ into a decision about his future.
Contrast that to the Waratahs, where another less-than-ideal game from their no.9 means they’re still not sure who their best scrumhalf is. It’s worth mulling on that for a minute: Sarel Pretorius has started five times, Brendan McKibbin has started six times, and neither has been able to make the starting jersey their own in 2012.
And when you add that variable to what’s (supposed to be) happening outside him as well, it’s well harsh that Berrick Barnes is often blamed for the Waratahs woes. On his current form, I shudder to think how the ‘Tahs would be going without him.
Every year is supposed to be the year for the Waratahs. But without any combinations in attack, the year seems as far away as ever.
Brett McKay is a former non-tackling scrumhalf and not-quite-1st Grade middle order stalwart. A rugby and cricket expert for The Roar since July 2009 (having joined in Sept 2008), Brett has written for Inside Rugby and Cricket Australia, and is also PLAY Canberra's rugby correspondent. He tweets from @BMcSport
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs



May 15th 2012 @ 6:08am
Krash said | May 15th 2012 @ 6:08am | Report comment
Interesting article, Brett.
I must say, I was also pretty perplexed by the way the ‘Tahs backs operated against the Brumbies. How could Barnes having been playing so flat and so dynamically whilst everyone outside him was so terribly deep? Surely Barnes’s change in play would have been premeditated by him and the coaching staff? Surely this was part of a broader game plan that the whole team (particularly the backs) was clued in on? I’d like to think that, but from what I saw there seemed to be gross lack of communication. It sort of looked like Barnes was on a solo mission that no one else knew about, hence the overall lack of cohesion in attack.
Despite that, I still think Barnes has to be the most logical choice to wear the no. 10 jersey for the Wallabies in the Tests against Wales. After the loss of Lealifano I think he’s probably your most reliable option. I know Kurtley Beale has performed exceptionally at flyhalf in the last two games (particularly against the ‘Saders), but I tend to follow Paul Cully’s sentiment that he’ll still be far more effective at fullback.
May 15th 2012 @ 8:16am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:16am | Report comment
Krash, it really was quite weird, seeing Barnes so flat, but Carter sometimes 20m behind him, just made no sense.
And I’d agree Barnes is the obvious option at 10, too – moving Beale doesn’t make much sense either..
May 15th 2012 @ 6:40am
Damo said | May 15th 2012 @ 6:40am | Report comment
Yeh Barnes should not be blamed for what has been created by at least 10 others- players and coaches.
May 15th 2012 @ 7:11am
rabbitfan said | May 15th 2012 @ 7:11am | Report comment
Barnes is an instinctive serial kicker and can shoulder the blame in the past for his aimless kicking that has led to continual defensive pressure and tries by the opposition, since FINALLY being told to run the ball we now see some cohesion in attack however it is always his instinct to kick hence at times he hesitates or is not fully comfortable with this style of play at this time. If he gets the ball unexpectedly he will kick no doubt about that. Beale for the 10 jersey and Barnes on the bench if you want to see entertaining rugby
May 15th 2012 @ 8:19am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:19am | Report comment
Rabbit, this my question, is Barnes really “an instinctive serial kicker” as you’ve put it, or has he just been playing on instruction the whole time?? If he is a kick-first player, then just switching it off like he has in the last few weeks wouldn’t be easy at all..
May 15th 2012 @ 10:29am
Rusty said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
Well he didn’t really switch it off on the weekend when two of his aimless kicks led to Bulls tries and cost them the match. I think people are blinded by his affable manner and flowing blonde locks, he has been a very average player this year and has done very little to warrant Wallaby selection in my eyes.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:36am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Aimless kicks is different altogether though Rusty. I’m not suggesting he’s stopped kicking completely, because of course he hasn’t (in fact his kick numbers haven’t really changed, only his pass and run number have).
By the same token, though, people see a couple of ordinary kicks and extrapolate that out to the assumption that he’s just a kicking flyhalf..
May 15th 2012 @ 1:42pm
jeznez said | May 15th 2012 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Agree Rusty, that kick late in the game which Kirchner fielded and returned fire to the Tahs five metre line was one of the key plays in the game.
Maybe Barnes isn’t a kick first but rather a kick last player – its just he runs out of ideas frequently and so winds up with option C on a regular basis.
McKibbin is a kicker as well – the amount of turnover ball he has wasted this year has been staggering.
Kingston scored one of the best Tahs tries of the year (I think against the Force in Perth). The Tahs got turnover ball, McKibbin looked to kick but Foley saw the space and screamed at him to run it. McKibbin linked with Foley and they managed to get Tom away to the corner.
May 15th 2012 @ 8:41am
Purple Shag said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Think Barnes just automatically reverts to kicking after 5 phases. It’s in the blood.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:06am
peterlala said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:06am | Report comment
It’s hard to imagine that Barnes is an instinctive kicker. He came from the Broncos where aimless kicking isn’t allowed.
PS: good story Brett.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:24am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:24am | Report comment
cheers PL, it’s got the discussion going, certainly..
May 15th 2012 @ 7:29am
Jack said | May 15th 2012 @ 7:29am | Report comment
It’s 3 minutes to go and the Wallabies are 2 points up against the Blacks. Pocock steals a turnover on our 25 and flicks it to Barnes. Will he (a) use the overlap and run the ball out of our half or (b) kick 35 metres down field to the fullback to give the Blacks another chance to win the game?
May 15th 2012 @ 8:20am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Jack, I’d suggest only Berrick Barnes can answer that. There will be assumed answers to your question, no doubt, but you know what they say about assumptions..
May 15th 2012 @ 8:28am
Shungmao said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
I can’t wait for the days we are 2 points up with 3 min to go!….
May 15th 2012 @ 10:51am
Enron said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:51am | Report comment
Ha Ha… ME TOO!!!
May 15th 2012 @ 10:15am
sheek said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Brett,
Barnes spent some time as a Bronco in rugby league. I would imagine any impulsive/compulsive kicking would have been weeded out of his system.
Barnes is a “traditional” Qld 5/8 in the sense he is conservative, & also possesing all-round skills. But he can play an expansive game if/when required.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:21am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
Precisely Sheek, and that’s what we’re seeing now..
May 15th 2012 @ 10:44pm
Banger said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:44pm | Report comment
Well I remember Barnes playing a lot flatter and a lot more as a ball player when he was at the Reds under Phil Mooney.
People seem to forget that they were a great attacking team to watch then, even if they were flaky. And not all of that was to do with Coooper
May 15th 2012 @ 8:41am
WQ said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Brett, I often wonder about the level of intelligence associated to our Professional Rugby players or the quality of our Coaches?
Surely the whole squad of Waratahs are made familiar with the game plan, defensive structures, attacking moves etc. Surely they train together!
I find it amazing that Elsom would offer up “it is just about trying to build the combinations as quickly as possible” at the 12 week mark of the competition. Given the pre-season preparation they would have at least been together for 5 or 6 months. That tells me one of two things, either the coaching staff have not prepared them adequately or the players quite simply don’t have the capacity to take it all in?
May 15th 2012 @ 10:23am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
WQ, that’s exactly why I included the line about the attack coach (Scott Bowen?) not having people’s attention in class. The message cannot be getting through..
May 15th 2012 @ 1:44pm
jeznez said | May 15th 2012 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
Is Scotty attack coach? And Gafney is backs coach…….what is the difference exactly?
Perhaps everyone is paying attention but to different coaches…..
May 15th 2012 @ 3:10pm
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
too many voices, Jez??
May 15th 2012 @ 3:39pm
jeznez said | May 15th 2012 @ 3:39pm | Report comment
well it makes sense – NSW Rugby has two boards, we have an attack and a backs coach, there is a six man leadership group…..This is why the fan forum is now integral to Waratah rugby, it is many voices making their opinions heard.
May 15th 2012 @ 3:57pm
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
must be just about time for the annual fan forum, too??
May 15th 2012 @ 4:05pm
WQ said | May 15th 2012 @ 4:05pm | Report comment
jeznez, I reckon your right about this, there are so many different people talking to these guys who do they take their direction from?
May 16th 2012 @ 2:52pm
STU said | May 16th 2012 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
JEZNEZ, every band has a repertoire of songs that all members can play and they choose a songlist for a
certain audience——-the choosing is a skill i guess.
the coachs playlist/tactics should be similarly tweaked for different opponents and dare i say the combos
should be fluid with revitalised repetition in the week before game.
if you agree then sack the tahs coaches responsible for this fiasco.
May 15th 2012 @ 6:22pm
LeftArmSpinner said | May 15th 2012 @ 6:22pm | Report comment
WQ, the combinations comment Is a throwaway comment designed to sound good be mean very little.
Combinations are not as important everyone knowing the game plan and what they are expected to do at different times. Sounds simple and it is except that very few teams ever achieve it for long periods.
Wayne Bennett is quoted as saying that teams win when everyone I’d simply doing their jobs, all the time.
May 16th 2012 @ 9:28am
WQ said | May 16th 2012 @ 9:28am | Report comment
Fair enough LeftArmSpinner, however I do suspect there is some significant confusion amongst the Waratahs players as to just what their jobs are and how that job fits into the grand plan.
I think this comes about as a result of the Coach not having the ability or the necessary backing to deliver a clear message to the players.
May 15th 2012 @ 8:56am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Coaching, coaching and coaching. Foley comes across as intelligent and calm, too calm for mine after a loss. I dont see match disappointment or anger in poor performances from his team nor do I see any real “ensemble play” from the Tahs. They appear to operate as two very separate teams within a team – forwards and backs and never the twain shall meet.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:37am
nickoldschool said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
You’re very right Justin. We always get the same PC post-match speeches, i.e. “I was happy with the troops…we did well and only blabla….overall performance was good we just need a bit more x and y…”
not much passion/disappointment there. being too emotional can sometimes be detrimental but rugby is a sport where attitude is (almost) everything. france nearly upset the ab on attitude (and balls) only.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:40am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:40am | Report comment
NOS – read the comments from Blackadder as a comparison. Foley just seems non plussed so often.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:38am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
J2, I reckon that’s fair observation. There doesn’t seem to be a lot of link play at all. “Ensemble play” is a good term, and there not much of it. No ‘enterprise’, as Toby Lawson used to call it on ABC..
May 15th 2012 @ 9:12am
Jake white for Wallabies Coach said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
off the top of my head
How many rugby stars have the Waratahs developed since the inception of super rugby:
- Phil Waugh
- Matt Burke
- Rocky ( had 2 good years here then 1 in Ireland)
- Ben Robinson
- TPN
- KB (was he just genuine talent! Ie note developed)
How many stars have come to Waratahs only to be wasted and spat out
- Sook Face AKA Barnes, played better footy at the reds
- Matt rogers , did not live up to his potential
- Bing Del, played beter at the reds
- Lote, did not live up to his potential
- AAC, best years look to be behind him
- Justin Harison, best years were at the brumbies
- Daniel Vikerman, (played better footy at the brumbies)
- Drew Mitchel, best years behind him
How many players have left the tahs by being overlooked to go onto bigger and better things
- George smith
- Van Humphries
- Owen Fingagen
- Manual Edmonds
- Peter hewatt
- Higginbotham
- Foto Aluea
- Pat Macabe
That’s all I have time for, maybe the waratahs should look at their management structure and stop making selections based off an entitlement culture…
May 15th 2012 @ 9:53am
jameswm said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Higginbotham is from NSW?
That’s a rubbish list. Rogers played some cracking footy for the Tahs, Mitchell improved when he came across, Vicks and harrison have played perfectly well, Lote played well most of the time.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:01am
formeropenside said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
Van started his senior rugby in Qld, despite being born a few miles over the border in NSW.
Higginbotham is not a NSW product in any way.
Peter Hewat was actually a Qld club player who went south for opportunity. There was no place for him in Qld so he went elsewhere.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:58am
Denby said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:58am | Report comment
That list is pure tripe.
-AAC came to the Tahs in some poor form from the Brumbies.
-Vickerman was excellent for the Tahs before he left for England.
-Mitchell has been excellent for the Tahs before he was injured.
-Peter Hewat was excellent for the Tahs. That is the reason he is still one of the Tahs all time highest point scorers. he only left because he overheard Eddie Jones (?) talking to Lote saying Hewatt was never going to be a Wallaby. Nothing to do with poor management in that instance.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:16am
stu said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:16am | Report comment
From memory it was michael o’connor who slagged hewat off to his mate and team mate tuiqri on a speakerphone.
Mckenzie then let him go to london irish even though he had a year left on his contract. My mate who lives in Reading thanked me with a pint of ale for sending over a good player who was still in his prime.
May 16th 2012 @ 4:02pm
Denby said | May 16th 2012 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
Hewatt was awesome. I think it was his second year at the Tahs when he truly mastered the art of the intercept. No the fastest player going around but he had a great rugby brain and was quite and elusive runner. The brumbies will be lucky to have him for the rest of the year, if he is playing with similar form.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:52am
Turnover said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:52am | Report comment
Don’t forget Chris Latham and Mark Gerrard. They both started at the Tahs.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:19am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Foley is a forwards coach and may have the old fashioned view that if the forwards play well the backs will sort themselves out. Ominously for New Zealand Hansen is also more of a forwards coach and the same thinking is evident in his lack of appreciation for backline talent in his first squad.
Barnes should go 10 in June if Cooper is still out. With Beale at 15, Tomane 13, that’s not a bad backline.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:27am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:27am | Report comment
You lost me at Barnes
May 15th 2012 @ 9:34am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
Justin2 I think Brett is right that how Barnes plays has more to do with the gameplan than his own instincts. He is a good attacking 10 though not a magician like Cooper.
Remember who ever the Waratahs put on the field the 10 does a lot of kicking so it is likely to be the gameplan more than the player.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:41am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:41am | Report comment
We will agree to disagree KPM, Barnes has rarely succeeded in getting a team and backline moving dynamically for any team. So unless all of his coaches across his career have instructed him to kick and I think he is a tad over rated.
Everyone loves him for his determination and courage but that isn’t enough…
May 15th 2012 @ 9:46am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:46am | Report comment
Justin2 you may be right, but I think this obsession with Beale at 10 is premature.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:00am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:00am | Report comment
I think had CL not been injured they would have kept Beale at 15. But now I am not sure what they will do. Lucas disappointed me on Sunday but I think he is much better than that and has the all round game to the 10 while Cooper recovers.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:10am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:10am | Report comment
Justin2 CL would have been good but I agree with Paul Cully line from last week that you lose more by taking Beale away from 15 than you gain by putting him at 10.
May 15th 2012 @ 1:38pm
Sage said | May 15th 2012 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
I reckon Berreck’s brain is addled. Good footballer suffering from too many head knocks. Best days are behind him I’m sorry to say. Ben Lucas to start against the Scots.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:06am
Denby said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:06am | Report comment
I always thought Barnes got the backline going very well at the Reds behind a beaten pack. He has only ever been coached at the Tahs by Hickey and now Foley. Neither I would consider good backs coaches.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:24am
soapit said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
and until he consitently get the ball in front of his recievers at hand height he never will get them going. its one thing having a game plan going to the line but you’ve got to hold your nerve and still deliver good ball even when you’re about to get smashed.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:44am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:44am | Report comment
His new found “taking the ball to the line” is all well and good but he too often is just dying with the ball or hasnt organised his backline well enough to take any advantage.
As I have said before part of its coaching but also a 5/8 “runs” the backline. He is or should be in charge of it on the field and take ownership of the team and its tactics to a large degree. I am yet to see Barnes take charge of the backs and “get up” the rest of them if they are clearly not doing what has been trained or is not to his liking.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:36am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Justin2 I think Brett is right that how Barnes plays has more to do with the gameplan than his own instincts. He is a good attacking 10 though not a magician like Cooper.
Remember whoever the Waratahs put on the field the 10 does a lot of kicking so it is likely to be the gameplan more than the player.
May 15th 2012 @ 10:33am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
KPM, Tomane’s not even the best outside centre in Canberra, so I think we’re a way off suggesting he’s the best 13 in Australia. For exactly the reasons I, Paul Cully, and numerous others don’t want to move Beale away from fullback, I also don’t want to move Tomane off the wing yet..
May 15th 2012 @ 10:38am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
Brett it’s hard to say if Tomane’s a good outside centre or not as he hasn’t played there, but I would hope Robbie Deans could try to adapt him to the position.
For what it’s worth I’m baffled by the praise of Smith at outside centre at the Brumbies who seems the worst player they field by a country mile and a minute fraction of the talent Kuridrani showed.
Moving Tomane/Beale is a different situation as Beale has become in many eyes the best full-back in the word while Tomane has only played a few games in any position. While that might mean moving him is an even bigger risk, it also means less would be lost elsewhere. In the Wales series too, the outside centre Davies is in my opinion the worst back in the whole Wales squad and so Tomane would very much not have his work cut out dealing with him. In the long run I think someone over 100kg has to play in the Wallabies centres, and there really are no other candidates…
May 15th 2012 @ 11:14am
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
KPM – you look at “talent” while many of us look at “performance”. A massive difference and you must have both eyes closed if you think Smith is as you describe.
May 15th 2012 @ 11:18am
kingplaymaker said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Justin2 firstly Smith’s ‘performance’ on the field gives minimal evidence of ‘talent’ in my opinion. Kuridrani at least appeared to have some talent and the ability to turn that into performance.
May 15th 2012 @ 12:12pm
Justin2 said | May 15th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Who cares about the talent if they dont perform? Smith is “performing” and thats all that matters. Talent is like potential. It means jack if you dont get performance…
May 15th 2012 @ 11:55am
Brett McKay said | May 15th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
Tomane may well become a decent outside centre, and maybe even for the Wallabies, but you said it yourself, he’s only played a few games. Let’s not burn another promising player straight away, let’s let him develop like he is, and let him develop a hunger for higher honours too.
But I cannot disagree with you more about Andrew Smith. If you seriously believe he’s the worst player the Brumbies field by a country mile, you haven’t been watching very closely. While McCabe has improved his game at 12, Smith done all that and more at 13 as well, and just as I did write about McCabe last week, a similar article could be devoted to the improvements in Smith’s game.
Kuridrani has done well when he’s come on, and could also become the 100kg outside centre you speak of, but the fact remains that Smith came straight back into the side when fit again, even when Kuridrani had played well in his one game. And as much as I enjoy your opinion KPM, I’m going to run with Jake White’s judgement in this particular case..
May 15th 2012 @ 9:22am
sixo_clock said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:22am | Report comment
The simple answer is that the ‘Tahs are not hungry. Accepting that fact explains every inexplicable moment. That they haven’t bonded, don’t gee each other up with any conviction, don’t entertain the faithful indicates that they are a team on paper only and that is just fine and dandy at management level. Those in the front office do not have a clue about this comp and the sooner they get a job more suited to their dubious talents the better.
On the other hand a progressive foundation club may end up limiting the chances of the real teams like the Rebels and the Brumbies. I think we would all be losing something really valuable if that happened.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:26am
Manoa said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:26am | Report comment
Steve Mafi. Now a mainstay at Leicester, many English journalists had him selected in their premiership team of the year. Not deemed good enough for a Waratahs jersey because we had a certain Dean Mumm. It just gets more and more embarrassing every week.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
May 15th 2012 @ 9:55am
jameswm said | May 15th 2012 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Mumm lost us the Bulls game. we were ahead and playing well till he gave away that stupid penalty and got binned. I think he gave away another couple that game. How can anyone with his experience be so stupid so often this season?
How is it that he’s still starting?
May 15th 2012 @ 12:14pm
soapit said | May 15th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
that was one of the dumbest things i’ve seen for a while. so bad could almost have been a red.