UEFA Champions League final: a clash of philosophies
By wickedlenny, 19 May 2012 wickedlenny is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Bastian Schweinsteiger, Bayern Munich, Chelsea, football, Holger Badstuber, Philipp Lahm, Toni Kroos
This weekend’s UEFA Champions League final will be a clash of homegrown footballing philosophies as well as a clash between 22 men on a football pitch.
The Bayern Munich squad that contested the UEFA Champions League semi-final in the second leg, contained seven players who have emerged through the club’s youth ranks.
Five of those made it to the starting line-up: Holger Badstuber, David Alaba, Philipp Lahm, Bastian Schweinsteiger and Toni Kroos.
Sadly, both Alaba and Badstuber will be suspended for the final, but that is a story for another day.
Although the club have spent a lot in acquiring the brilliant core group of Franck Ribery, Mario Gomez, Arjen Robben and Manuel Neuer, a large portion of the side was either acquired cheaply or produced through the club’s youth system.
A principled, measured approach to player-acquisition and promotion of youth talent has won the club many admirers, and despite narrowly coming through a hard-fought UCL semi-final and being trounced 5-2 by Borussia Dortmund, they must be considered slight favourites to win this weekend in their home stadium.
Bayern are famed for their prudent fiscal policy, wage-management and retention of former playing staff to serve within the club.
Uli Hoeness has stated that the impending Financial Fair Play rules being promoted by UEFA will not harm the club, but rather that the club welcome the system.
Bayern currently spend far less of their revenue on wages compared to most clubs, especially their opponents this weekend, Chelsea.
The Chelsea side that fought tooth and nail to emerge victorious over Barcelona, contained only one player to have come through the youth ranks of the club, John Terry.
The remainder of the side, whilst containing long-time servants Frank Lampard, Ashley Cole and Petr Cech among others, contained no homegrown talent.
It is evidence of the huge buying capacity of owner Roman Abramovich that the club is able to continually introduce established domestic and foreign talent.
Abramovich has spent countless dollars and hours on his club, with the ultimate goal of UEFA Champions League glory continuing to elude them.
As it stands, it is highly unlikely that the club would be able to meet the requirements of Financial Fair Play regulations: club losses have been underwritten by Abramovich for most, if not all, of the years he has owned the club.
So we come back to a central question of not only who will win the contest between these two sides, but also a contest of prudent football management and steady growth versus rapid growth but no long-term philosophy of bringing youth players through.
Chelsea’s much hailed young talent Josh McEachran does not look like breaking into the midfield starting line-up any time soon, while other talents Sam Hutchinson and Ryan Bertrand may also struggle.
While new footballing money may win over prudent and admirable football management this weekend, if Chelsea beat Bayern, it can only be viewed as a short-term victory.
It is almost certain that next year, one side will be looking abroad for talent, while the other will be continuing to grow due to its intelligent footballing and fiscal policies.
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (158)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (121)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (95)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (93)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (91)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (80)
- Osieck announces Socceroos squad for World Cup Qualifiers (87)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (106)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (16)
- FFA misses opportunity with FTA coverage (16)
- Mariners bow out of ACL with 3-0 defeat (32)
- Grand final pain to power Wanderers
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (118)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (106)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (16)
- FFA misses opportunity with FTA coverage (16)
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (118)
- Fourth place should not be cause for jubilation for Arsenal (17)
- How does the A-League rate? (24)
- The mainstream media continues to ignore football (92)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Bastian Schweinsteiger, Bayern Munich, Chelsea, football, Holger Badstuber, Philipp Lahm, Toni Kroos


May 19th 2012 @ 11:32am
James Bobson said | May 19th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
Great article! I agree completely, the amount of money clubs pay chasing trophies is getting rediculous! Should be a good game though!
May 19th 2012 @ 10:45pm
Stephen Smith said | May 19th 2012 @ 10:45pm | Report comment
Who wrote this? Craig Foster? How are Bayern principled and Chelsea not? No laws have been broken. It’s simply a different approach.
Financial “fair play” may well help clubs outside the big leagues (I note there’s no mention of the huge amounts of cash Real Madrid have spent, nor how Inter won the UCL with only one local player in their team), but wouldn’t it be nice to see UEFA actually set an example, and insist on the fairer redistribution of the massive wealth playing in the top competition brings? The only reason clubs spend huge bucks in the first place is to chase the Champions League dream and the cash it generates.
May 20th 2012 @ 12:51pm
wickedlenny said | May 20th 2012 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
wouldn’t say I agree with a redistribution of wealth, but UEFA certainly has to make sure Financial Fair Play, or something similar, helps balance the playing field.
May 20th 2012 @ 8:38pm
Stephen Smith said | May 20th 2012 @ 8:38pm | Report comment
No redistribution of wealth means the rich clubs get richer every season, hence the disparity between clubs who regularly play in the Champions League, and those at home who don’t. It’s self-perpetuating. This is why UEFA’s attempts to bring in financial “fair play” are a nonsense, all it does is maintain the status quo, and keep the UCl as a boys club for the rich. If they truly believe in an even playing field, then ensure some of the money (not all) goes back down to the individual associations, not just the clubs who grow ever more powerful every year they are in the champions league. This is why clubs like Chelsea, Man City (and PSG with Qatari owners, Malaga in Spain etc) have to bring in wealthy benefactors to close the gap. Remember when the EPL had the same 4 clubs finishing in the top four year after year? That’s Champions League wealth at play.