Finals come early for Brumbies and Reds (plus run home)
Related coverage
The Brumbies will mount a vigorous judicial challenge to have linchpin flanker Michael Hooper available for Saturday night’s high-stakes Super Rugby clash with a resurgent Queensland.
The Brumbies have engaged lawyers to help defend Hooper when he fronts a SANZAR hearing on Monday evening, desperately hoping to escape suspension for an alleged dangerous tackle.
It’s no surprise the Australian conference leaders will do all they can to get the in-form No.7 off the charge as the result will have a huge bearing on a match both sides are treating as a final at Canberra Stadium.
Hooper was sorely missed when he was strangely left on the bench for the Brumbies’ 20-13 Good Friday loss to the Reds when the defending champions outpointed them at the breakdown with ball scavengers Liam Gill and Beau Robinson starting together and reaping the rewards.
Teenager Gill has been instrumental in Queensland’s surge up the table to cut the Brumbies’ (44) conference lead to eight points.
Hooper’s potential ban would not only rob the Brumbies of a key man but also rugby fans and Test selectors of an eagerly-anticipated head-to-head battle between Australia’s two rising stars.
Last year they were Australian Under-20 teammates but now they’re Super Rugby’s leading pilferers and competing to be the next Wallabies open-side flanker behind David Pocock.
Despite SANZAR’s intentions in stamping out lifting tackles, Brumbies skipper Ben Mowen was confident Hooper would be exonerated for his accidental effort on Hurricanes back-rower Victor Vito in Friday night’s 37-25 win in Wellington.
Hooper was only penalised by referee Mark Lawrence, but cited post-match, and then on review the tackle was referred to a hearing before New Zealand judicial officer Nick Davidson QC.
While it was not deliberate, a lack of intent did not help Reds winger Digby Ioane to escape a four-match ban for a similar tip-tackle in March.
“A lot of the time it’s more due to what the attacking player does, twisting and turning in the tackle,” Mowen told AAP.
“It would be great for the fans to see that competition (between Hooper and Gill). For a long time it was Pocock and then no one but now we have these two guys on the rise.”
Colby Faingaa looms as Hooper’s potential replacement for his first match back from an ankle injury in front what’s set to be Canberra’s biggest crowd for several years.
“We’ve already taken the view that it’s a final,” Mowen said.
“While you don’t want to focus too much on other sides, the reality is we can almost end their hopes of the finals or make it really hard for them.
“There’s a lot at stake in respect to the conference but as much as that we want to have momentum going into the June break.”
With Quade Cooper making a sparkling first-half comeback from knee surgery, Queensland (36) scored a 34-20 win over the last-placed Lions to be eighth on the table and five points out of the top six.
The Waratahs’ finals hopes were extinguished in Cape Town by a 19-13 loss to the pace-setting Stormers (49), while the Melbourne Rebels leapfrogged NSW with a 32-31 win over the Western Force.
The Chiefs (49) lead the Kiwi conference following a bye but the Crusaders (42) snapped back into form with a 59-12 drubbing of the Blues.
Super Rugby Run Home
1. STORMERS (49pts) – Sharks (a), Bulls (a), Lions (h), Cheetahs (a), Rebels (h)
2. CHIEFS (49) – Bulls (h), Blues (a), Highlanders (a), Crusaders (h), Hurricanes (a).
3. BRUMBIES (44) – Reds (h), Rebels (a), Force (a), Waratahs (a), Blues (h).
4. BULLS (47) – Chiefs (a), Stormers (h), Cheetahs (h), Sharks (a), Lions (h).
5. CRUSADERS (42) – bye, Highlanders (h), Hurricanes (h), Chiefs (a), Force (h).
6. SHARKS (41) – Stormers (h), Lions (a), bye, Bulls (h), Cheetahs (h).
——————-
7. HIGHLANDERS (39) – Blues (a), Crusaders (a), Chiefs (h), Reds (a), bye.
8. REDS (36) – Brumbies (a), bye, Rebels (a), Highlanders (h), Waratahs (h).
9. HURRICANES (35) – Rebels (h), Waratahs (a), Crusaders (a), bye, Chiefs (h).
© AAP 2013Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
The Crowd Says (30) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Brumbies, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby


May 21st 2012 @ 8:32am
Red Kev said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
I hope Hooper gets nothing more than an off-field yellow card the same as Morahan. Everyone should want to see Hooper v Gill in this match.
May 21st 2012 @ 8:39am
formeropenside said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Nope, I want the Reds to win. If that means missing Hooper v Gill, so be it. The Reds got screwed on Digby’s card; the Ponies can too to even things up.
The Reds really have to win this one; lose it and season is over. I’d take a win by the entire Brumbies team falling over the minute they step on the field.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:15am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Much like how the Chiefs were screwd against the Reds when the assistant ref claimed not to see the number on Morahans back FOS?
May 21st 2012 @ 9:38am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:38am | Report comment
If Morohan was yellow carded then the reds would be screwed by a pedantic, nit-picky rule.
Would you prefer the game to be officiated and played in the right spirit or do you prefer the refs to make pedantic technically correct calls (ala bryce lawrence) at the expense of a good spectacle?
May 21st 2012 @ 9:45am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Claim it as nit picking as you do Jutsie
Fact remains it was a dangerous tackle the Ref said if he had a number Morahan would’ve gone and SANZAR agreed hence why he was given an off field yellow.
Sure it wasn’t as dangerous as some of the tackles this year but FACT remains it was dangerous and he should have gone to the bin end of story no ifs buts or maybes.
When games are as high stake as that of the Reds vs Chiefs I most certainly do expect the refs to be on the nail there was nothing pedantic about that call it was just plain wrong and he should have gone. He was lucky very lucky
May 21st 2012 @ 9:47am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Well I guess will have to agree to disagree, as I don’t think it was dangerous at all.
“we’re not palying tiddly winks”
May 21st 2012 @ 9:57am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:57am | Report comment
Thats ok Jutsie disagree all you like but what matters is SANZAR and the on field officials.
The Assistant messed up Morahan should have gone to the bin there is no debating that FACT.
Should he have been suspended?
No I don’t think so as it was at the lower end of the scale however he lifted a player up off the ground and did not bring him to ground safely therefore it was a cardable offence.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:39am
bennalong said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:39am | Report comment
WHAT A ONE-EYED POINT OF VIEW!
For the sake of the game Hooper should be exonerated because the tackle was not a true ‘tip tackle’ and commonsense would not record a black mark against this great young player
May 21st 2012 @ 8:49am
Brett McKay said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Kev, SANZAR ruled that it was in the red card range in referring it to the judiciary, so they think it’s worse than an off-field yellow. Low range charge + discount for clean record + discount for early plea would seem the best hope for Hooper..
May 21st 2012 @ 9:01am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Mark Lawrence is one of the best ref’s going around, he had a good look at it and thought it didnt even deserve a yellow.
What nationality was the SANZAR official that thought it was red cardable?
THe judicial system needs more consistency and transperency
May 21st 2012 @ 9:59am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
What does the nationality of the citing official have to do with anything Jutsie?
Are you trying to infer some conspiracy here against Australian teams?
May 21st 2012 @ 10:04am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Just like SANZAR should go back to neutral refs for all games they should also move towards an independent unbiased citing commision. Its nothing to do with aus vs NZ/SA its do with percieved inconsistencies of judgements made in the different countries.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:02am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:02am | Report comment
I am all for neutral officials.
The best example of this in recent weeks is again the Chiefs vs Reds match the assistant was Australian and therefore can be seen to have a vested interest in the Reds maintaining a full compliment on the field and therefore the win.
There have been many a bad call in this seasons Super Rugby and SANZAR needs to pull their heads out of their ar ses and do something about it. If at least to take away the perceieved bias of home refs.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:13am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
You have hit the nail on the head regarding perceived bias Jarmen. 9 times out of ten I don’t believe ref’s are favouring the team of the same nationality as them as they are professionals just like the players, however moving back to neutral refs/Judicial panels would remove the perception of bias that alot of supporters hold.
It would also give us less to complain about lol.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:03am
Brett McKay said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:03am | Report comment
Jutsie, I agree that Lawrence not giving a yellow on the field SHOULD help Hooper’s cause, but the citing process goes through their standard process, and on viewing the tackle, the ruling has been made. I don’t have the release with me currently, but I can imagine that the citing commisioner was from NZ, given that’s where the game was played. Regardless, it matters not where they are from, all the have to do is base their judgements on the tackle. So they can hardly say that Hooper picked him up, swung him around four times, before driving the top of his head into the ground, because that clearly didn’t happen.
All the CC would’ve done is viewed the tackle, noted that Hooper lifts Vito (?) above the horizontal, and that Vito’s landed on the upper part of his body while his legs were in the air. That in itself is a red card offence, if clearly seen that way by the onfield officials. But they also have the white card as recognition that some things need to be looked at more closely..
May 21st 2012 @ 11:10am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:10am | Report comment
Thanks for the explanation Brett, from my recollection I don’t think Lawrence even took the white card out.
I just think that SANZAR should implement something similar to the AFL’s match review panel, where the same individuals make the decisions for which incidents are punished and what punishment is given out. It would make for more consistency and transparency (although there have been some inconsistent decisions over the years by the MRP).
May 21st 2012 @ 8:50am
Rusty said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Ponies have a very good run in and should easily maintain top of the conf and perhaps the overall table
May 21st 2012 @ 8:51am
Coxinator said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Some tough games ahead for those competing for 5th and 6th. Looks like the local derbies may really hurt the Bulls, Sharks and Highlanders. At least it’ll be exciting.
May 21st 2012 @ 8:52am
kingplaymaker said | May 21st 2012 @ 8:52am | Report comment
Looks ok for the Reds. If any of the last three lose most of their matches and the Reds win most of theirs they could be in. Crusaders and Bulls don’t look to good. Of course the Reds need to play pretty well though.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:05am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Red’s really can’t drop a game from here, if they get up this weekend I think thats achievable. Their best hope is for the sharks to lose to either bulls/stormers or preferably both as that would take the bonus point out of the equation.
In regards to the highlanders the reds have their destiny in their own hands as they play the highlanders at home.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:18am
Jarmen said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:18am | Report comment
There’s no hope in “hoping” for other teams to fall over.
The Reds have their season in their hands now should they go down to the Brumbies their season will be very much on a short thread.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:36am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Just stating the facts. The sharks are 5 point ahead of the reds so even if the reds win all their games they clearly need the sharks to drop at least one game.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:47am
formeropenside said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Yeah, once you start on “mathematically possible” you are on the slippery slope to middle of the table.
I think the only way the Reds avoid that is winning all their games from here.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:50am
Jutsie said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Like I said they need to win every game, their toughest game being this week. But even with winning every game their 5 points behind sixth so they do need teams above to drop some games. Judging from the run home the sharks look the most likely to do so.
May 21st 2012 @ 9:49am
nickoldschool said | May 21st 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Hooper also needs to get the all clear following Friday’s heavy head knock. Hope Brumbies medical staff assess him as objectively as possible. safety first
May 21st 2012 @ 10:04am
Justin2 said | May 21st 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Agreed Nick – this needs to be taken seriously. It has the short term that is questionable but 10 or 20 yrs from now that needs to be taken into consideration.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:12am
WQ said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:12am | Report comment
Regardless of the desire for everybody to see Gill vs Hooper, he will have to get a suspension if there is any consistency at the Judiciary at all!
Quite clearly it makes no difference at all if it was deliberate or not, and nor should it.
May 21st 2012 @ 11:53am
bennalong said | May 21st 2012 @ 11:53am | Report comment
I don’t agree
Hooper was assisted in the tackle making control impossible.
His action was not alone decisive in finally tipping the player onto his shoulder.
Each case on it’s merits
Consistency nowhere in evidence anyway
(Maybe he needs a week off anyway as said above, but IMO he should come out of this with an unblemished record)
May 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm
flying hori said | May 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
Hope the young fella plays, 2 of the best up and coming opensides in the game, so it will be a good tussel, both teams look fairly even
good luck Hooper, hope the gods smile on you
May 22nd 2012 @ 9:24am
Jutsie said | May 22nd 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Hooper has been cleared to play, common sense prevails:
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-union/brumbies/hooper-cleared-to-play-in-vital-brumbies-clash-20120522-1z1yb.html