England win first Test by five wickets
By Julian Guyer, 22 May 2012 Julian Guyer is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Alastair Cook, Cricket, England cricket, Ian Bell, West Indies cricket
Alastair Cook and Ian Bell led England to a five-wicket victory in the first Test against the West Indies at Lord’s on Monday.
Set a target of 191 to win, England faltered at 4-57 before lunch on the fifth and final day.
But Cook (79) and Bell (63 not out) shared a fifth-wicket partnership of 132 that carried the top-ranked side to the brink of victory before left-handed opener Cook was out with two runs needed, caught in the gully off West Indies captain Darren Sammy.
Bell struck the winning boundary for a win that gave England a 1-0 lead in the three-match series heading into the second Test at Trent Bridge starting Friday.
“We felt the wicket was pretty slow and flat,” England captain Andrew Strauss said at the post-match presentation ceremony.
“It looked a bit dicey at 40 odd for four but Alastair Cook and Ian Bell set about it in a very civilised manner and saw us home.”
In England’s first innings Strauss ended his 18-month wait for a Test century and the opening batsman added: “It was lovely to score that hundred and when you do that in a winning cause it makes it all the more special.”
West Indies — who hadn’t won a Test match outside the Caribbean against major opposition since defeating South Africa in Port Elizabeth in 2007 and entered this game with a record of just two wins in 30 matches — made England work for their victory and did well to take the game into the fifth day.
“We did a lot of good things and we need to look at them and repeat them more consistently,” said Sammy.
“We fancied our chances this morning but once the hardness of the ball went away, it became much easier to bat.
“An experienced batting line-up like England’s showed their class and saw them home.”
England resumed Monday on 2-10 after Kemar Roach had claimed two victims for seven runs in eight balls on Sunday, removing Strauss and nightwatchman James Anderson.
Both left-handed opener Cook and Jonathan Trott had yet to score.
Roach struck again Monday to remove Trott for 13 with a good length ball that squared him up and took the edge with Sammy, diving to his left, holding a good catch at second slip.
And 13 also proved an unlucky number for fellow South Africa-born batsman Kevin Pietersen.
He pulled Test debutant Shannon Gabriel’s third delivery for four but next ball tried to repeat the stroke and got a bottom edge to wicket-keeper Denesh Ramdin.
Cook got the home side going, completing a 78-ball fifty featuring eight fours when he late cut off-spinner Marlon Samuels and after lunch Bell followed him to the landmark in 84 balls.
West Indies were once again carried by Shivnarine Chanderpaul.
The Guyana left-hander made scores of 87 not out and 91 while spending more than 10 hours at the crease.
Together with Samuels (86) he put on 157 for the fifth wicket in the second innings as the West Indies gave their bowlers a target to defend and a chance of a first win in 15 Tests in England.
For England, the match was a personal triumph for Stuart Broad.
The fast-medium bowler took a Test-best seven for 72 in the first innings and four for 43 in the second for a match haul of 11 for 165.
Broad, who made 169 against Pakistan at Lord’s in 2010, became just the fourth player to take five wickets in an innings, 10 in a match and score a century in Lord’s Tests.
Only England’s Gubby Allen and Ian Botham, and Australia’s Keith Miller, had previously completed that treble.
© AAP 2013The Crowd Says (5) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Alastair Cook, Cricket, England cricket, Ian Bell, West Indies cricket

May 22nd 2012 @ 2:21am
Johnno said | May 22nd 2012 @ 2:21am | Report comment
Sadly this test was not a good advertisement for test cricket. England were in cruise control and 2 more tests to go a worry for test cricket when a series like this gets 3 tests.
South africa is next in England and they should of got a 5 test series unbelievable how south africa the no1 test nation can not get 4 or 5 but windies get 3 and the ASHES get 5 and south africa are rated higher on the test rankings than Australia. Where is the consistency and ethics and morals of England cricket giving Australia 5 but only south africa the no 1 nation just a paltry 3 I don’t get it ethics wise or morals wise . And they would rather the England cricket board play a meaningless 5 ODI series this year in England than give south africa 5 test series.
Where is the priority for test cricket by England test cricket must always be no 1 priority it must stay that way it;s what the fans want and true cricket fans want, as all roads ultimately lead to test cricket as test cricket in reality is the true and meaningful version of cricket. Anything else wells just not cricket and i’m sure the MCC at Lord’s where some of the true fans of the sport watch would agree with me as would other cricket historians and trajics.
For me Geoffery boycott and mark Taylor and Ed cowan, steve waugh, mike hussey, and Alastiar cook are everything that is good about cricket not T20 stars like dave warner or kieran Pollard.
To me the likes of Boycott, Taylor , Border, Gooch, Hadlee, and Gavaskar are the true faces of cricket.
May 22nd 2012 @ 10:38am
Brendon said | May 22nd 2012 @ 10:38am | Report comment
You write complete rubbish 90% of the time. England won by 5 wickets. Hardly “cruise control. West Indies made nearly 350 in the 2nd innings. If West Indies had scored 60 more runs in the first innings they could have won the match.
The West Indies are improving. Their performances against India, Australia and England prove this.
May 22nd 2012 @ 4:31am
Viscount Crouchback said | May 22nd 2012 @ 4:31am | Report comment
I think you’ll find England are the Number 1 Test-ranked side, old bean.
May 22nd 2012 @ 9:56am
Pope Paul VII said | May 22nd 2012 @ 9:56am | Report comment
I thought SA were cranky because Aus want them to play Boxing Day test in Aus but won’t recipricate in SA, so short series only.
Don’t know what England’s excuse is for not offering South Africa a 4 or 5 test series. They frequently stage 7 and 8 test summers ( although they have the ‘lympics this year so it may be a scheduling issue ).
I thought it was a good match? West Indies again showed promise. Good to see Marlon get a few, touch of the Carl Bloopers. Maybe he’ll get a few runs in the latter part of his career. I think old Chanders should bat 3. Maybe the others would cling to him for longer as long as they didn’t get run out.
May 24th 2012 @ 2:55pm
ak said | May 24th 2012 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Chanderpaul is really a stand out performer. Even if he is playing on 5 from 50 balls you cannot say that he is edgy. Wonderful character. Tough nut to crack really