AFL needs to grow a pair when it comes to staging
By Michael DiFabrizio, 23 May 2012 Michael DiFabrizio is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, Leroy Jetta, staging
Essendon look to be a club in crisis (Slattery Images)
Related coverage
Players that blatantly stage for free kicks should be, at the very least, rubbed out for a week. Essendon’s Leroy Jetta this week became the first AFL player to be charged with staging after all-too-easily going to ground in the second quarter of his club’s game with Richmond.
But while Jetta will miss this week’s game with GWS for a separate incident, his punishment for staging was a mere reprimand.
It wasn’t deemed an offence worthy of a stint on the sidelines.
Indeed, players found out are given a written reprimand for the first offence, then fines of $1600 and $2400 for further offences.
It’s crazy. Staging might seem like an innocent enough act, but this is just not good enough from the AFL.
Staging can affect umpire decision-making, it’s an ugly look for the sport, the fans absolutely hate it and, most important of all, it’s just not in the spirit of the game.
In incidents where it’s clear and obvious that a player has played for a free kick, without any substantial contact from an opponent, a reprimand is a weak excuse for a punishment.
Meagre punishments will do nothing to deter players from pushing the boundaries in the future. The threat of missing games would.
Now, it’s true that Jetta might now think twice the next time an opportunity to over-exaggerate presents itself. Given he’s on a warning, he probably won’t go there again.
But discouraging an individual player shouldn’t be the point. The point should be to discourage all players.
It’s not just the punishment that’s frustrating, either.
The fact Jetta is the first AFL player to be charged for staging makes it even worse. The rule has been in place since 2010.
Adrian Anderson summarised the mood of clubs late 2009 when he claimed they wanted the AFL to “stamp it out before it becomes a major problem”.
A video was released explaining the new rule with four examples of what was supposed to be targeted.
However, while we’ve all seen staging similar to what was in that video occur since, it’s taken until now for the match review panel to act and use its new powers.
The rule is a farce.
Throughout the 2010 season especially, there were numerous examples highlighted on footy TV shows that identified staging occurring, but the match review panel failed to address the issue.
Perhaps if it was addressed with a firm hand then, Jetta wouldn’t have dared do what he did Saturday night.
Instead, the problem continues.
And if the kids at home keep watching their heroes get away with it, it may continue for a long while yet.
Michael DiFabrizio is completing his journalism degree. As an AFL writer, he has been an expert columnist at The Roar since 2009, and appeared in The Age and on ABC television and radio. Follow Michael on twitter @mdifabrizio
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- AFL, Essendon Bombers, Leroy Jetta, staging

May 23rd 2012 @ 5:51am
Redb said | May 23rd 2012 @ 5:51am | Report comment
Been going on for years to milk 50 metre penalties. Leroy actually did an expert job technique wise in drawing an offensive foul if it was basketball
May 23rd 2012 @ 4:46pm
tristina said | May 23rd 2012 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
its not basketball and it was a very weak act, typical of the essondon club culture.
May 23rd 2012 @ 6:10am
ManInBlack said | May 23rd 2012 @ 6:10am | Report comment
Unlike some sports (in some cultures too it seems) – - where ‘staging’ might be deemed a totally legitamate part of those sports and where due to the low scoring nature of such unnamed games and the huge potential reward of a penalty kick (a mulligan!) from the penalty spot close to the goals of such unnamed games…….anyway, in AFL it usually get’s lost in the wash so to speak and guys over the journey who have developed too great a reputation for ‘staging’ (and it can be a fine line) such as Lloyd, Monfries and Harvey were quickly to find themselves on the wrong side of the umpires – - and they adapted their gameplay. No biggy for me. That’s for general play.
However – in staging to potentially get someone reported – that’s another issue but with a celebrated case in footy history relating to the highly celebrated Carlton ruckman John Nicholls who took a total dive and got Neville Crowe (Rich) reported, subsequently suspended and missed a GF. Obviously now – you’d think video replays and the MRP etc would mean that Crowe might get a reprimand for attempted striking and Nicholls a reprimand for staging and everyone could have a laugh about it?
May 23rd 2012 @ 7:51am
Australian Rules said | May 23rd 2012 @ 7:51am | Report comment
Jetta will forever wear the ignominy of being the first player charged with staging. It just has a cringey feel to it. Suspension or not, that’s a lasting penalty.
I actually don’t think it’s a massive issue in the game – only some players do it and the ones that do are jeered by the crowd and commentators alike. No player wants to forge a reputation that’s based on that.
Essendon legend Matthew Lloyd admitted after he retired that he had staged for frees in games. He said it was his one and only regret from a celebrated career – I think the message to young players lies there.
May 23rd 2012 @ 11:35am
Australian Rules said | May 23rd 2012 @ 11:35am | Report comment
I should clarify my comments above: convicted stagers should get an automatic 1 week suspension.
May 23rd 2012 @ 11:51am
stabpass said | May 23rd 2012 @ 11:51am | Report comment
‘Convicted’ ….. getting a bit serious !,
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:02am
Lucan said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:02am | Report comment
Is a tough one. I’d like to see match penalties for staging, but when we see strikes like Brent Harvey’s draw 1 week can we really say a dive is worthy of the same punishment?
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:25am
Titus said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
In that clip, why is there no foul for a push in the back when he takes the mark?
I think your problem is that in AFL players are just able to rough each other up off the ball for no particular reason, why that Richmond guy is just allowed to walk up to the Essendon guy and shoulder him in the face as he walks back to position makes no sense.
If you are marking a guy ok, there is going to be some contact but open fist punches, shirt collars and shouldering/blocking people as they walk to position is stupid.
You’re a wierd mob.
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:25am
GrantS said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Why is it always the Essendon players who get suspended when the AFL decide to change a rule?
Players “staging” in every game played but Leroy get suspended. Goddard, half the West Coast team and many other players tried to milk free kicks since the start of the season but copped no penalty.
It will be exactly like the “deliberately forcing the ball” rule they brought in where the first three players penalized were Bombers then they gave a couple of other free kicks and five weeks later said it was legal “under pressure”.
The AFL should stop all these “kneejerk” reactions to episodes that happen on the field and “THINK” before changing or instigating new rules.
Nobody likes the staging or the head ducking or the many other ploys that are used to get free kicks but rules must be put in place at the start of the season and enforced not just plucked higardly pigardly when some umpire feels like it.
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:39am
Redb said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
I don’t care that it was an Essendon player. It should be stamped out.
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:52am
GrantS said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:52am | Report comment
I never said it shouldn’t be Redb I just asked why it always the Bomber’s players who are first to be penalized when the AFL decides to enforce a rule.
May 23rd 2012 @ 9:33am
Macca said | May 23rd 2012 @ 9:33am | Report comment
Maybe they are just cheats!!
Matty Lloyds dive was the biggest act of staging I have seen and it got him a lot of goals.
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:09am
Redb said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
No Macca, there is only club who cheats and its Carlton – well known for it .
Thats why everybody despises the Blues.
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:14am
Macca said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
We prefer the word “rort” at Carlton thanks. GrantS did give me to good an opportunity.
You are right though I am not sure Grant has his facts completely straight, just playing a typical hard done by bomber.
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:09am
Redb said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
GrantS,
I dont beleive that to be true anyway. St Kilda’s Goddard was the first player named and warned about staging.
Other clubs have had players rubbed out under he 3 strikes,etc
The sliding rule came from acts by Goodes of the Swans.,
May 23rd 2012 @ 3:26pm
GrantS said | May 23rd 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
Big difference between “warned” and “suspended”.
May 23rd 2012 @ 3:32pm
Macca said | May 23rd 2012 @ 3:32pm | Report comment
And what’s the difference between “warned” and “reprimanded” as Jetta was (he was suspended for another offence)?
And which other rules have Essendon been the first to be hit with, Redb has pointed to a couple of others that didn’t get you first.
May 23rd 2012 @ 4:36pm
Coops said | May 23rd 2012 @ 4:36pm | Report comment
He was suspended for striking not staging. He got a written warning for staging.
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:03pm
GrantS said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
Apologies to all for being wrong.
May 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am
BigAl said | May 23rd 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Off ball incidents are a chlidish blight on the game – difficult to see how they can be reigned in, due to the large playing area.
Possibly post match video analysis could be used – there needs to be a cultural change that its just not acceptable.
This applies to players AND coaches !
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:47am
stabpass said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Agreed.
May 23rd 2012 @ 9:36am
Macca said | May 23rd 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
The most common staging act is where the likes of Milne kick a goal go back to get in the face of their opponent (even if it is the ifrst kick he has had all day) get’s a slight puch and drops to the ground like he has been shot. Given that this has often resulted in a second goal with out the ball being bounced there need to be a much bigger deterent than a reprimand as the risk reward level is way out of whack.
May 23rd 2012 @ 9:42am
Mango Jack said | May 23rd 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Start a media campaign – Name and Shame Stagers. Print their names big and bold in the press. Maybe The Roar could host it?
May 23rd 2012 @ 10:56am
Ian Whitchurch said | May 23rd 2012 @ 10:56am | Report comment
Staging, diving or simulation should get players suspended, as it brings the game into disrepute.