WIZ: Melbourne State of Origin was a winner
By Gary Freeman, 25 May 2012
- Tagged:
- maroons, melbourne rugby league, NRL, NSW Blues, Rugby League, state or origin
Greg Bird of NSW in action during State of Origin between Queensland and New South Wales (AAP Image/Julian Smith)
Related coverage
I was at the opening State of Origin match in Melbourne this week and it was a wonderful spectacle. Whether they knew much about rugby league or not, to their credit, the Melbourne locals really got behind the event.
I was actually sitting next to two women at the game who had no idea about State of Origin or the NRL, but they loved the action and that type of enthusiasm made the whole evening a lot of fun for everyone in attendance.
People who criticised the plan to play the opening match down south are a little short-sighted.
At the end of the day, rugby league – in a very competitive market – needs to make money to survive. So if someone’s willing to bring the game to another state, and that move generates more money for the game, then we have to lose our parochial attachments to the traditional league centres and embrace the change.
Extra money in the bank for rugby league as a whole will ultimately help play the players more.
And, trust me, they’re well worth it.
As for the game itself, I thought the Blues played good football and really should have won that game.
But a couple of unlucky calls went against them, and the Maroons showed what a great team they are by taking advantage of the limited chances they got, and that was the difference in the end.
Remember, Origin football is very different to regular NRL games. In a typical NRL match, a team might expect 10 or so try-scoring opportunities in a game and perhaps convert 4 or 5 of them.
In Origin, it’s typical that each team might only get a handful of opportunities – if they’re lucky.
That’s the way this game went, and the Maroons, who have had their key combinations playing together for several years now, were able to better capitalise when it mattered.
I thought the Blues could have made more of their opening 20 minute burst and chanced their arm a bit more. They had Queensland on the back foot every time they spread the ball.
But Jennings going to the sin-bin took the wind out of their sails, and the rest, of course, is back (and front) page news still (the tackle Greg Bird made should have been allowed. The ref got it wrong).
As for the Greg Ingils try, well, sorry to let you all know that it was a try under the rules and Shaun Hamstead got it correct. Playing at the ball with your foot or trying to steal the ball and it comes off a player’s hand is not a knock on
It’s in the rule book.
For Queensland, Tait, Slater, Inglis, and Smith were sensational.
Smith was in bed for a couple of days leading up to the game with the flu. But he played the house down and his long kicks were fantastic.
In the Blues camp, Ricky will have to seriously consider bringing Watmough in for Game 2 to add a bit of excitement around the ruck area.
But, really, few changes are needed.
The stage has already been set for a classic Game 2. I can hardly wait.
Gary ‘Wiz’ Freeman is one of the great halfbacks in New Zealand rugby league history. Now an outspoken and popular media personality, he joins The Roar as an expert rugby league columnist.
Gary 'Wiz' Freeman is one of the great halfbacks in New Zealand rugby league history. Now an outspoken and popular media personality, he joined The Roar in 2012 as an expert rugby league columnist, and continues in 2013.
- Explore:
- maroons, melbourne rugby league, NRL, NSW Blues, Rugby League, state or origin

May 25th 2012 @ 9:59am
League fan said | May 25th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Well said Wiz and what a great game of league. Shame the game was marred by some terrible decisions by the referees. I am not convinced about that last try though. For me it seems that when a try should be a try the video ref looks at it so many times to find a reason why they shouldnt give it and when there is a ton of doubt they look for a reason to give it.
I always think if there is too much doubt then it should be no try. If the video ref looks at it 10 times and still there is no clear cut evidence then the benefit of the doubt should go to the defending team.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:14am
Go warriors said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:14am | Report comment
Totaly agree League fan. Some of the decisions by the video refs this year have been atrocious. I wish they would get rid of the refs call as well. If the video ref has to look at it 10 times and still cant see enough evidence that it is a try then it should not be a try. Why go back to the referee who did not have a clue in the first place.
Brisbane scored a try like that against my beloved warriors and I was peeved to say the least. It sets a dangerous presendence and I would hate to see a grand final won by a dubious try.
May 26th 2012 @ 8:16pm
Wotdoo said | May 26th 2012 @ 8:16pm | Report comment
Final score 18-10
Without the inglis try it’s still 12-10.
Suck it up NSW
May 25th 2012 @ 10:01am
Sports Writer said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:01am | Report comment
Slater was not sensational.
And I don’t think anyone is questioning the knock-on rule, what people are questioning is the fact Farah did not play at the ball with his leg. He moved in to make a tackle at the same time Inglis happened to reach down to score. It only looks like he played at it when the video is slowed down dramatically. If a player loses the ball in a tackle it is a knock on
May 25th 2012 @ 10:25am
Renegade said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
As if farah didn’t play at the ball…come one mate, everyone watched the same thing.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:32am
Sports Writer said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:32am | Report comment
“everyone watched the same thing”, good argument…..???
May 25th 2012 @ 11:54am
Renegade said | May 25th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
I don’t need to argue, i’m just sick of everyone whinging about it.
Bill Harrigan has come out and said it was correct, that’s it move on.
It’s not the reason we lost Game 1 – and that’s just fact, simple.
I’d be very surprised if Farah didn’t play at it….if he didn’t, then he has the most unique running style i have ever seen.
May 25th 2012 @ 12:02pm
Sports Writer said | May 25th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
I like a good argument, so I will continue anyway.
Farah’s running style changed because he was moving in for the tackle. As Mals says he was looking forward not down, which suggests he was worried about the player not the ball.
And yes I agree that decision alone did not change the result, BUT what if the referee had penalised Cronk for taking out Hayne five minutes before when NSW put a kick into goal? NSW might have scored or taken the two points and all of a sudden the result is changed.
May 25th 2012 @ 5:08pm
buttery said | May 25th 2012 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
I agree with you on the Cronk tackle, Hayne was not afforded a chasnce to chase his kick, he had forward momentum, how late was that shoulder charge, what were the officials doing.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:52am
Mals said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
Farah was looking forward & not down at the time his foot came into contact with the ball so it is a miracle he actually connected with it.
May 27th 2012 @ 5:47pm
spider said | May 27th 2012 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
cum on it only looks like he played at the ball, I got fined for speeding it only looked like I was speedimg
May 25th 2012 @ 10:04am
Lazy Ted Failyou said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:04am | Report comment
550 kegs of beer sold at the stadium.
It only cost Victoria the price of AAMI park to get SoO 3 times. So for a 300 million buck stadium, works out to be about 100 million a throw.
Chump change for us Vics.
We could have gotten them to relocate Bollywood and Silicon Valley for less.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:13am
oikee said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
I thought you might have been down in Melbourne Gary, watching the New Zealanders play Queensland. Shame you cant get them to play for the kiwis.
Hard to reject Ricky when he rings you up and says i have 20 thousand for you, imagine when they get 50 thousand, wont be any aussies left in the blues side.
Something has got to be done by this commission to stop this or the series will be destroyed by its own making, its own greed.
Greed is good hey Anthony Mundine, well lets see how that works out for us.
May 25th 2012 @ 12:28pm
Jay said | May 25th 2012 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
agree okiee.. id like to see the SoO revenue subsidise international footy. keep the payments at $20k per game and increase payments to test players to 50k per test. how the nzrl will fund this, not sure.. maybe a all blacks v kiwis hybrid game and split the pool.
May 25th 2012 @ 5:16pm
buttery said | May 25th 2012 @ 5:16pm | Report comment
No SoO in QLD funds the QLD Cup, Junior Rep football (schools included), second division comps, country comps, junior club comps for the whole of QLD, its not going to fund any international teams.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:29am
CrossIT said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
“then we have to lose our parochial attachments to the traditional league centres and embrace the change”, thankyou Gary, and while we’re at that lets take the All Blacks home games to PNG? No? Embrace the change Wiz!
Use the All Star game to sell rugby league.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:37am
League fan said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:37am | Report comment
CrossIT if you can get over 50,000 to a RL game in a non league city then I would call that a major success. I doubt an all stars game would get that type of crowd in Melbourne. State of origin is the pinacle of RL and if you are going to promote our sport to new markets then it should be state of origin.
May 25th 2012 @ 1:38pm
CrossIT said | May 25th 2012 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
But then you have to ask, why is it the pinnacle? You could argue that all the best players in Origin essentially play the All-Stars games, so therfore if e=mc2, it should be also considered the pinnacle?
Of course not, State of Origin is the pinnacle because QLD & NSW fans/players/administrators made it that. And in regards to the Melbourne crowd, can you honestly hand on heart tell me that the majority of those fans in that stadium were not either ex-pats/travelling Queenslanders or New South Welshman? I mean how many of that 50 000 were true swinging neutrals? How many AFL fans were converted?
So really beside giving Victoria a kick in its back pocket, what have we achieved? Beside robbing 50000 qldrs & 80000 blues a chance to watch THEIR teams?
May 25th 2012 @ 5:56pm
jmacredie said | May 25th 2012 @ 5:56pm | Report comment
I would say that the crowd would be made up of 40,000+ travelling from qld, nsw, nz, expat qld, nsw, and nz. 5,000+ true victorian’s that already follow the game, and a handful of vic’s that got dragged along. If those handful enjoyed it and will go to another game of origin that is great. In reality though I would hardly say that it is winningconverting the state RL. The Vic govt however will love it with all the tourist dollars that it brings in.
May 25th 2012 @ 2:43pm
Aware said | May 25th 2012 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
Second biggest crowd ever at that stadium. Biggest crowd was for Rugby, England vs Australia. That has to be a concern for the AFL.
May 25th 2012 @ 4:51pm
me, I like football said | May 25th 2012 @ 4:51pm | Report comment
yeah, huge concern. RL is taking over [rolleyes]
May 25th 2012 @ 10:53pm
ManInBlack said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:53pm | Report comment
It’s pretty well almost impossible for the AFL to totally fill Etihad because of the carve up of ticketing/reserved seats/medallion club etc. One off events have the clear advantage and that’s been proven.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:29am
honesty said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
let’s be honest here, 3 quarters of the stadium was full of new south wales and queenslanders is I don’t think Victorians really give a stuff about rugby league .
May 25th 2012 @ 10:50am
Meesta Cool said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:50am | Report comment
I was the one Victorian that attended this game, The Stadium was FULL….. I think in all HONESTY there were more Victorians than NSW men.. but without doing a survey, my assesment is same as yours… pure BULLDUST!.
The all stars game is still seen as non event to most supporters.. maybe someday it will be a significant event but at the moment it rates just below City/ Country game and that one is an abject waste of fan’s money!.
May 25th 2012 @ 11:27am
Col Quinn said | May 25th 2012 @ 11:27am | Report comment
honesty, No, go check the flight details. There is absolutley no way 50,000 or 40,000 could be transported during the period before and after the SOO. Victorians are interested. There would have been 5 to 10 thousand visitors. The STorm can pull 30,000 then 50,000 locals is easy.
May 25th 2012 @ 11:55am
Australian Rules said | May 25th 2012 @ 11:55am | Report comment
Correct Col
My mates down south said there was 10,000 visitors tops.
The funny thing is that one the one hand, QLDers and NSWmen say that Victorians don’t respect Origin and have no interest in League (mostly due to the Minister’s gaffes)…but on the other hand, the stadium was clearly chockers with Victorians and had 313,000 Vic viewers!
May 25th 2012 @ 1:41pm
CrossIT said | May 25th 2012 @ 1:41pm | Report comment
So no Qlders/NSWeshman live in Victoria?
May 25th 2012 @ 2:03pm
Col Quinn said | May 25th 2012 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
CrossIT, of course there are northerners living in Melbourne. It is my understanding that the migration is mainly in the opposite direction toward QLD.
May 25th 2012 @ 5:13pm
me, I like football said | May 25th 2012 @ 5:13pm | Report comment
not exactly true
Interstate migration 2009-2010
from NSW to Vic = 22,686
from Qld to Vic = 17,594
total = 40,280
from Vic to NSW = 20,088
from Vic to Qld = 18,605
total = 38,693
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/AFBA53A473F0F796CA2578B000119835?opendocument
May 25th 2012 @ 11:09am
Chris said | May 25th 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
If they have the game in Melbourne again can they please put it at the MCG. Given they sold out Etihad weeks before the game it isn’t unrealistic to think the MCG could be sold out.
Even if they only sold 70,000 tickets they could simply close the top tier on the same side the cameras are on and the stadium would look full and have a cracking atmosphere anyway.
May 25th 2012 @ 12:04pm
Lazy Ted Failyou said | May 25th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Won’t happen. Ever heard of a capitalist concept called ‘supply and demand’. You limit supply to drive up the value of demand. That’s how it works in the EPL.
Etihad Stadium has a contract to continue with this rugby league exhibition series into the future, the MCG won’t get a look in.
May 25th 2012 @ 12:50pm
Chris said | May 25th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Didn’t know about the contract.
That is the reason for it then (not your bizarre misunderstanding of basic economics!).
May 25th 2012 @ 12:26pm
AGO74 said | May 25th 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
As far as rectangular sports go, Etihad is not too bad due to its playing area size and stand design. The same cant be said for MCG. If you are gonna have it in Melbourne, play it at Etihad.
May 25th 2012 @ 10:54pm
ManInBlack said | May 25th 2012 @ 10:54pm | Report comment
btw – the side of the MCG that the cameras are on happens to be the MCC members stand side,
close the top tier – - never gonna happen.
May 25th 2012 @ 1:01pm
Pot Stirrer said | May 25th 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
The blues were robbed of a 50/50 chance of winning by 2 Ref’s who failed miserably in thier SOO debut. Im not saying NSW would have won, but the while the game was an exellent league match which im sure i would have enjoyed if i was a neutral fan, you cant put your head in the sand and ignore the ref’s are the biggest talking point of the game. How ever it is fish and chip paper now, bring on game 2. Ill be suprised if its not a full house.
May 25th 2012 @ 2:36pm
dddddddd said | May 25th 2012 @ 2:36pm | Report comment
Inglises was not a try. Why did Carney go for goal what a idiot. The worst ref and video ref i’ve ever seen.
May 25th 2012 @ 4:12pm
Jason Cave said | May 25th 2012 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more re Gallen’s & Carney’s decision not to go for a try.
If they had decided to go for a try it would’ve put the pressure right back on Queensland, with plenty of time left in the second half.
It would be interesting to see how the Storm & Broncos players back up from playing Origin 1, considering the wet conditions at AAMI Park.
May 25th 2012 @ 7:22pm
Anakin said | May 25th 2012 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
> Why did Carney go for goal what a idiot.
Interesting comment when Gallen said he’d do the same thing in that situation again; & both Smith Meninga said they also would have opted that way had it been a Qld situation. Points are gold in Origin – discounting Carneys poor form with the boot, the shot at goal was a more certain chance to take points than playing for the try. 2 points is 2 points and on any other day they’d have potted it and it’d have been GAME ON! Easy to criticise in retrospect.