Super Rugby must resist rapid expansion
By jmacredie, 5 Jun 2012 jmacredie is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- New Zealand Rugby Union, NRL, Rugby Union, Super Rugby
Related coverage
This has been the best Super Rugby season since 2003. But it is only going to get better in the coming years; there is a lot of room for growth.
Growth should happen gradually, as it should be in other countries.
I live in Napier, New Zealand and we have a proud rugby tradition in this province, having produced some exceptional rugby talent (Izzy Dagg, Zac Guildford, etc.).
Our Magpies National Provincial Championship team is awesome and competed well against sides like Auckland, Wellington, Canterburry and Otago Taranaki.
I would love to see my own local super team (not just the Hurricanes) and more matches at McClane park, but I know there isn’t the depth for that to happen.
The last thing Super Rugby needs is to go backwards with our talent.
It needs to not only be a close competition throughout the year, but needs to remain a strong competition.
The last thing Super Rugby needs is to become like the NRL and be a competition filled with mediocre players.
We don’t want to suddenly let in another five teams from North and South America or Asia unless they can compete. It is hard enough having two sub-standard teams in Perth and Melbourne.
The ARU needs a good kick up the arse; having Perth run at the bottom of the table after five yrs is disgraceful.
Melbourne isn’t too bad, but with a person of Rob McQueen’s ability I would expect them to be right up there by 2014.
If Perth and Melbourne don’t improve by then it is an expansion failure.
The NRL is looking to expand in the next couple of years. When they do, it will really show the spread of talent they have.
Although Papua New Guinea is aiming to get a team in there and Wellington is also trying, it will be the Australian teams that get the green light.
This is understandable as New Zealand only pays a few million dollars for TV rights to the NRL and Papua New Guinea would probably pay less than New Zealand.
There would be little incentive to introduce a new New Zealand or Papua New Guinea team.
This is the same logic that has prevented Fiji, Samoa and Tonga getting a team into the Super Rugby competition. Interestingly, when rugby was a amateur sport the island teams were included in the Super 10 competition.
It is one thing to have a salary cap to spread the talent around. But when you have to increase it to retain the top players, like your Benjis and Slaters, then the rest of the team is filled with absolute nobodies.
The thing is that average players are already rife in the NRL and it is only going to get worse.
The NRL might increase its funding through some more teams in the short term. But in five years time, when there could be over 20 teams and small crowds at a lot of the games, the funding will decrease.
It is going to happen in league; I hope it doesn’t happen in Super Rugby.
Rugby has to stay with quality not quantity, a mix between club rugby and international rugby.
It is a club game that will gradually grow, not gradually go in the other direction through over-expansion and under-development.
Rugby needs to think outside the local box and look to the global box.
The International Rugby Board is doing that, but Super Rugby, Top 14, the Avia championship and all the other rugby competitions need to do more.
We have the products and resources that league doesn’t have.
Let’s do it and be the absolute second-most popular code in the world, not just the third-most popular world competition every four years and an Olympic sport.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (407)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (268)
- With Quade, Deans faces a real dilemma (249)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (246)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (232)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Where have the Australian franchises five-pointers gone? (29)
- Brumbies weather Blues storm in Auckland (7)
- Force pip Highlanders 19-18 in Perth (18)
- Dismissed Hartley in Lions doubt (15)
- Snarling Dogs rally for AFL win
- Stormers deny Reds 20-15 in Super Rugby (11)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (235)
- Stormers vs Reds: Super Rugby live scores, blog (235)
- Western Force vs Highlanders: Super Rugby live scores, blog (175)
- Blues vs Brumbies: Super Rugby live scores (212)
- Has McKenzie cost Cooper the Lions Tour? (122)
- Does Quade Cooper really matter? (31)
- Rebels vs Waratahs: Super Rugby live scores, blog (415)
- Chiefs vs Crusaders: Super Rugby live scores (182)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- New Zealand Rugby Union, NRL, Rugby Union, Super Rugby


June 5th 2012 @ 4:48am
pete said | June 5th 2012 @ 4:48am | Report comment
Wow, another fair and balanced article on the Roar lol
June 5th 2012 @ 7:19am
Emric said | June 5th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
I disagree – if rugby had only limited itself to the big population centres of NZ it would never have come to dominate the landscape
June 5th 2012 @ 7:27am
The Greatest Game Of All said | June 5th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Yeah you’re right, the NRL should forget about expansion, and get rid of 9 teams so we can have a 5 club competition full of un-average players just like ARU super rugby union teams! Great article!
June 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm
D Maaga said | June 5th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
Take all the Kiwis and Polynesian players away from the NRL and you will only have enough talents to fill five teams.
June 5th 2012 @ 12:35pm
Ian Whitchurch said | June 5th 2012 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
You seem to be working under the misapprehension that club sides are rep sides …
June 5th 2012 @ 1:04pm
D Maaga said | June 5th 2012 @ 1:04pm | Report comment
AFL, NRL, SUPER RUGBY, A-LEAGUE are all the same mate.
June 5th 2012 @ 7:31am
Football United said | June 5th 2012 @ 7:31am | Report comment
I don’t really buy the more teams decrease standards argument, League (unfortunately) has nowhere near the potential international talent pool that union has. There are heaps of players overseas that could at least be very handy players, it’s just ARU are too stubborn to let them play. The Pacific Islands, Japan, North America, Romania and Georgia proved at the RWC that they had the ability to produce top class players, they need to be given the opportunity to play. If we put teams in West Sydney, Queensland, Newcastle or Adelaide, why not fill them with internationals as long as there is the same amount of player spots available to Australians as there are now?
Australian Rugby only needs to expand to the point where it has enough teams to sustain it’s own national competition (ie about 3 more teams. Then we can finally do things our own way and super rugby will become the knockout comp it should have been in the first place.
June 5th 2012 @ 10:42am
Bakkies said | June 5th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
Wasn’t well written. The Force haven’t been at the bottom of the table. The comp has been very even and they were mid table at best.
June 5th 2012 @ 12:15pm
D Maaga said | June 5th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
To all those who said Australia doesn’t have the talents for five super teams, imagine if the Australian teams are open to all comers from NZ, South Africa, Samoa, Tongan, Fijian, Ireland, Welsh, Scottish, french, Argentinians, Namibia, French, English and Italians like they do wth the NRL?
June 5th 2012 @ 1:25pm
nomis said | June 5th 2012 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
Ther probably needs to be a limit. If young Aussie players can’t get a start, they will look elsewhere. If a team has the option of an international player verses a young unexperienced Aussie, they may take the former option most of the time.
June 5th 2012 @ 5:41pm
Football United said | June 5th 2012 @ 5:41pm | Report comment
if you just added two new teams and made it free for all for those spots, then it’s the same amount of opportunity as we have now, they just have more competition at those teams. regardless you can’t gift everything to these young players, if they can’t break into a team at super level then they were never going to be international standard anyway.
June 5th 2012 @ 12:27pm
code 13 said | June 5th 2012 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
in·se·cu·ri·ty
[in-si-kyoor-i-tee]
noun, plural in·se·cu·ri·ties.
1.
lack of confidence or assurance; self-doubt: He is plagued by insecurity.
2.
the quality or state of being insecure; instability:
June 5th 2012 @ 1:26pm
nomis said | June 5th 2012 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
I think insecurity usually leads in the opposite direction – rapid expansion. This article might just be thinking confidently instead.
June 5th 2012 @ 12:45pm
clipper said | June 5th 2012 @ 12:45pm | Report comment
Good article, jmacredie with quite a few hard hitting reality checks. It is a pity that they can’t have a couple of PI teams – maybe they could be subsidised, but the travel would end up being a logistical nightmare. NZ and SA could easily expand, but as you point out Australia is already exposed with 5 teams.
June 5th 2012 @ 1:06pm
D Maaga said | June 5th 2012 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
3.
the greatest shame
4.
the forbidden blame
June 5th 2012 @ 1:21pm
Rough Conduct said | June 5th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
For SR to grow, they don’t need to expand, they need to stop scheduling regular season fixtures across the Indian Ocean. South Africa is a complete momentum / interest killer to the SR comp. Aus and NZ need to be their own conference with all games played in a suitable timezone.