HENRY: Hughes should be judged on stats, not on style
Could Phil Hughes be Australia's next key batsmen? (AP Photo/Chris Crerar)
Related coverage
Most of my mates have a pay TV prescription. They watch all types of sports from ice hockey to gaelic football, occasionally even soccer.
Yes, pedants, soccer, that’s what we call it in Australia.
It differentiates the variations of four football codes, it’s a clearly useful term – someone please inform the FFA.
Southern hemisphere winters provide terrific television viewing but you have to stay up late to watch the northern summer sports.
My watching debut this month included the Giro d’Italia, I have watched the Stanley Cup many times as well as the French Open (Go Slammin’ Sam Stosur!). This all adds up to plenty of late nights falling asleep on the lounge.
This week I had pencilled in some tennis watching as the French headed for the semi final stage, being an inveterate channel flicker I got a little bored as Djokovic flattened Jo-Wilfred in the first set (the big Frenchman turned that around quickly) and discovered a cricket game a couple of numbers away.
Worcester versus Lancashire from a cool and overcast Old Trafford filled the 16 :9, the greensward now surrounded by construction zones indicating that the 21st century is arriving at the ground where Laker took 19 in the 50′s and Benaud spun out the Poms from around the wicket in the 60′s . Soon the grimy east Manchester venue may well be rebadged ‘New Trafford’.
While the ground is being reinvented outside the boundary, in the middle wearing the bottle green and three pears of his adopted county Phillip Hughes was reinventing his own game.
I decided to stick with the one channel for a while, to watch Hughes bat against a mixture of quality fast bowling from Sajid Mahood, reasonable stuff from seamer Ajmal Shazad and some club bowling from O Newby.
Hughes began quietly, not getting a lot of strike, being watchful rather than aggressive. His batting partner Vikram Solanki made most of the conditions and obvious ability and duly made a quality ton.
The juxtaposition in the two techniques was stark. Solanki the former England 51 match ODI player was compact, tidy and elegant. He was scoring at or better than a run a ball.
Hughes was, well Hughes.
Left elbow apparently trapped behind the body, jumpy at the short ball and late decision making which makes him appear hurried but as in all things about his batting, appearances are deceptive. He always got there, waiting until the last millisecond to cut, drive or defend in a second or sometimes third thought.
He didn’t look particularly uncomfortable but neither did he look in command of the bowling on what was a very good batting surface. Mahmood shook him once or twice with pace and length directed at the head and chest, but he survived.
The shell was broken intermittently, Newby, at a military medium was belted over cow corner for six, the trademark slicing cut paid dividends as ever when any width was offered no matter the length, then the shell was resurfaced.
I watched closely the retreating left foot, the culprit that j’accuse his loss of balance and form which cost him a Test spot and contributed to his Chris Martin phobia. Was the left shoe shifting to leg as the bowler released?
Was the balance being swayed to a position where it was too difficult to access the ball with the full face of the blade? Was the head being dragged so slightly out of line that edges are produced rather than middles? I couldn’t spot a sign, not that the camera could see and the commentators didn’t bother with technical analysis.
In truth the appearance and substance of the innings reminded me of Phil Hughes whether he was making runs or not, and that is a major chunk of the Hughes enigma.
For Worcestershire so far he has successive limited over centuries and a first class fifty in just one championship outing. He is making runs, something that his 17 first class centuries at just 23 and half tender years suggests he has always done.
I did a double take when I checked his age, the 2009 Ashes when he was effectively dropped after three innings because Mitchell Johnson couldn’t hit the cut strip, feels like ancient history yet he is still a very young man in terms of professional sport.
Ultimately batting is about ‘how many’ not ‘how’, and Phil Hughes is the exemplar of that philosophy. Hughes should be judged on that statistic alone, aesthetics are for the Mark Waughs, Doug Walters and Sachin Tendulkars of the planet.
Hughes just needs to keep the scoreboard ticking and the selectors need to watch the numbers rather than the man.
Geoff ‘Henry’ Lawson returns to The Roar with his first article since 2009. He joins our expert cricket writers, and will offer thoughts as the Australians take on all comers with one eye on the upcoming Ashes.
Geoff Lawson OAM is a former Australian cricketer and the former coach of the Pakistan cricket team. Nicknamed "Henry" after the Australian poet, Lawson was a fast bowler for New South Wales and Australia.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Australia, Cricket, Phil Hughes


June 8th 2012 @ 6:37am
Lolly said | June 8th 2012 @ 6:37am | Report comment
Hughes always seems like someone who can scrap for runs, I’m sure he’ll end up in the test squad again though probably not that soon.
But this is parsley – “he was effectively dropped after three innings because Mitchell Johnson couldn’t hit the cut strip”. Since when has any batsman ever been dropped because of the awful bowling of one or other of the seamers?
June 8th 2012 @ 9:36am
Rickety Knees said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
Totally agree Lolly – at that stage of his fledgling career – he had become the youngest test batsman to score back-to-back centuries in a test – against Dale Steyn none the less.
June 8th 2012 @ 6:44am
Robert said | June 8th 2012 @ 6:44am | Report comment
Hughes needs time away from test cricket.There seems to be an immediate push to get him back in,mainly from the NSW region.When Australia were at their best,so many of the batsmen had done time in shield cricket after they were dropped.Hayden,Langer,Ponting,Martyn all prospered after stints in the shield comp,what makes this bloke different
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 8th 2012 @ 7:20am
Matt said | June 8th 2012 @ 7:20am | Report comment
Hughes was dropped to make way for Watson to open giving Australia the extra bowling thus saving Johnson’s hide (for a little while)
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 8th 2012 @ 9:54am
Lolly said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:54am | Report comment
What extra bowling? Watson hardly bowled in the Ashes. He was picked as an opener to replace an opener. They just wanted Watson in the team and made Hughes the fall guy to bring that about.
I don’t think Hughes was particularly well-treated but he isn’t the first youngster to get dumped on his arse.
June 8th 2012 @ 8:57am
jamesb said | June 8th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Hughes needs a couple of years of first class cricket under his belt to get his game right. If people think Hughes will be ready for the Ashes in 12 months time, than they are sadly mistaken.
June 8th 2012 @ 9:07am
Ian Whitchurch said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:07am | Report comment
I think Lawson’s point is that he doesnt need get his game right, and that his game is ugly and unique. He just needs to keep scoring runs, on the basis of “is about ‘how many’ not ‘how’”
June 8th 2012 @ 9:39am
Rickety Knees said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
agree IW – Chanderpaul has the ugliest technique going round – don’t hear too many people bagging him, but then again he is not an Australian.
June 8th 2012 @ 9:25am
Rob said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Don’t know why we are constantly bombarded by NSW “experts” on Hughes, who, to be fair, is an abject test cricket failure!
One thing though that is remarkably consistent and has never changed, and that is the garbage that Lawson writes.
June 9th 2012 @ 10:25am
Kento said | June 9th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Wow, talk about criticizing a columnist from a shaky base Rob… You got the response your comment deserved.
June 8th 2012 @ 9:47am
sledgeross said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:47am | Report comment
So Henry, should we judge Nathan Lyon by the same standard?
June 8th 2012 @ 9:48am
formeropenside said | June 8th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Judge him on his stats, sure. His Test average is 34.5. That might have been OK in the mid-1980′s against the WI on bigger grounds and lively pitches, but in today’s world its not quite there.
June 8th 2012 @ 10:12am
Tony Tea said | June 8th 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
A pay TV prescription? What, have their doctors branched out from pharmaceuticals?
PS: Is Merv Hughes one of your mates, Henry?
June 8th 2012 @ 10:18am
Tony Tea said | June 8th 2012 @ 10:18am | Report comment
On second thoughts.
It makes perfect sense that an optometrist and cricketer should prescribe TV and cricket.
June 8th 2012 @ 12:41pm
Redb said | June 8th 2012 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
Yes picked up that up as well.
June 8th 2012 @ 10:13am
Tony Tea said | June 8th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
I’m all for keeping Hughes in the Test side, IF he can stop getting out for rock all.
June 8th 2012 @ 10:15am
jameswm said | June 8th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Look, I’ve been one of Hughes’s biggest critics – well, I should say I’ve been at the front of the queue of those wanting him dropped, esp after the NZ series.
However – I don’t really care about anything in his technique, apart from one important thing. His head must be still when he’s hitting the ball.
When his left foot used to retreat to the square leg umpire, he used to be still at impact, even if too side on. That was when he first came in. He looked ungainly, but he scored runs because he was still at impact.
He was then (correctly) told he should get his back foot across, to make him less side on, get his head behind the ball better and make it easier to play to leg. However, he coldn’t adjust to doing this befor eimpact, so the foot was shuffling across at impact. This meant he was moving and frequently in the air at impact, especially when defending. Ironically, when he cut loose with his trademark shots outside off, he was more still and belted them.
So he does have to work his technique out, but only so that he can be still at impact. He’s obviously got a good eye, so if he can sort that out and get some confidence (ie runs) back, there’s no reason why he can’t be back in the test team in the next couple of years.