NRL shaking after Gallop coup, but finally there’s a leader
By ScottWoodward.me, 12 Jun 2012 ScottWoodward.me is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- ARLC, David Gallop, John Grant, NRL, Rugby League
170 Have your say
David Gallop has resigned as NRL boss (Image: AAP)
Related coverage
I walk past rugby league central every morning on my way to breakfast at the SFS Café, and you can still feel the foundations of the brand new building shaking.
National Rugby League Chairman John Grant has left such an imprint at HQ by sacking CEO David Gallop after ten years of service, that every time an executive walks out for some fresh air, they still carry a look of bewilderment, wondering if they will be the next to go.
What they do know is that their new caretaker boss does not like his people to be “reactive”.
Make no mistake, a big skyrocket has hit RLC, and everybody including the tea lady is googling the term ‘proactive’.
When John Grant hung up his football boots in 1973, he did not grow his company Data#3 from 14 people in 1984 to become a billion-dollar operation by being a follower.
“In order to build businesses you have got to be creative; you have got to be different; you have got to be quick; you have got to be, in a word, innovative,” said Grant in 2009.
The business style adopted by David Gallop was contrary to Grant’s philosophy, “If you look at the way the game in the NRL has run over the last 10 years, you’d have to say that it was a reactive business,” he said last week after he told Gallop not to come in Monday, or ever again.
Many observers consider Grant’s cold blooded chop harsh, largely based on the fact that the NRL has developed and gone ahead in leaps and bounds over the last decade. That is true, and is testimony to how good the game is, and to its TV popularity, but there can be no denying that AFL’s Andrew Demetriou out-pointed David Gallop by a staggering margin of $73 million a year in their respective TV deals.
In plain language, over $500 million was lost to rugby league, and the buck stopped with David Gallop. If you don’t think that is a sackable offence then you probably think President Obama has managed the U.S. economy well.
There is a popular rumour that if the chairman cannot find a suitable replacement for Gallop, then he will assume the role himself. There is no doubt that his resumé and list of business achievements are formidable, and even AFL’s professed king Andrew Demetriou would be impressed, but he would have nothing to gain by driving his $370,000 Maserati to Moore Park every day, just plenty to lose.
Grant’s personal stake in Data#3 is said to be $160m, so why would he jeopardise that? Certainly not for the expected $2 million CEO’s salary, as Data#3 shares would plummet if he left the general’s post.
The mainstream media will have their own agenda, trying to guess or influence the outcome, but some of their reports on possible Gallop replacements, including past and current executives from NRL clubs, Racing NSW, and cable TV, would not sit well alongside the man named 2009 Microsoft Worldwide Partner of the Year.
John Grant has already indicated who he wants.
Likely applicants only need to listen to some old Grant speeches where he emphasises the importance of innovation because of his belief that, “today’s business model is not tomorrow’s business model, and tomorrow’s business model is not the business model the day after.”
Based on that John Grant business philosophy, maybe the ARLC can be proactive and invest in their very own cable TV network like FetchTV, and include live streaming so more rugby league fans can actually watch every game.
Grant grew Data#3 to be one of Australia’s great companies because he was astute enough to see a gap in the way the larger global organisations were delivering product to customers. He has exactly the same challenge with delivering the NRL into people’s homes, as only 30% of people have cable TV and they are forced to pay a premium and get other channels that they never watch. Foxtel and Austar have a monopoly and footy fans are getting ripped off.
Fans could pay only $20 a month and watch every game on an alternative cable TV network to Foxtel/Austar where they must fork out $65 to $150 a month. Live pay-per-view via streaming on the NRL website would be great for fans, but not all fans have a computer or an iPhone.
John Grant would say, “the fans remain relevant.”
So owning the game and personally maximising delivery of it live and direct would seem the ultimate in innovation and proactivity.
![]()
Passionate about your league? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily league email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (170) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (116)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (91)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Six things that will improve the NRL (85)
- Another NRL mistake: the shoulder charge (2)
- Maloney’s selection is not building NSW’s dynasty (1)
- Did the NSW selectors get it wrong? Don’t be so sure (1)
- Sydney Roosters vs Melbourne Storm: NRL live scores, blog (107)
- Manly Sea Eagles vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (98)
- St George-Illawarra Dragons vs Penrith Panthers: NRL live scores, blog (110)
- Wests Tigers vs North Queensland Cowboys: Live Scores (26)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- ARLC, David Gallop, John Grant, NRL, Rugby League


June 12th 2012 @ 1:59pm
p.Tah said | June 12th 2012 @ 1:59pm | Report comment
My favourite quote from Grant about Gallop:
“The business style adopted by David Gallop was contrary to Grant’s philosophy, “If you look at the way the game in the NRL has run over the last 10 years, you’d have to say that it was a reactive business,”
This from an email Grant sent to employees at Data#3 outlining that some would be made redundant:
“The sign of a responsible and successful company is to react quickly to change. That’s what we’re doing.” Is reactive a good thing now
http://delimiter.com.au/2012/02/22/data3-flags-job-cuts-read-the-internal-email/
June 12th 2012 @ 2:40pm
Crosscoder said | June 12th 2012 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
Reactive to change is a darn side different to reaction on the run or after the event.Especially in an IT industry.
If employees are living in the past,or not up to speed with modern develomentsThen they have not reacted to change..
There was no reaction by Gallop,when ch9 Melbourne held over NRL games after midnight.There was belated reaction,when Gallop realised the GWS was scooping the money pool in Wagga,and rode into town after the Indians had left.
The lack of effort(it appear) to get state and federal govt to secure grants to clubs for capital works such as stadium,in comparison to GWS and other AFL clubs,suggests perhaps lack of foresight.
Whilst he did a lot of good things,thinking outside the square did not appear on the radar IMO.
June 12th 2012 @ 2:52pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
Crosscoder,
Agreed. No disrespect to Lawyers, but showing foresight or being pro-active is not what they do. They are robots, who send us big bills for their time.
June 12th 2012 @ 7:17pm
p.Tah said | June 12th 2012 @ 7:17pm | Report comment
CC and Scott, no need to explain, my post was tongue in cheek. Perhaps the winking emoticon was a bit subtle we’ll have to ask Zac and Tristan to include comic sans. In saying that I bet News Ltd would be a field day with the quote if they came across it.
In regards to Grant, I don’t know enough about him to form a substantial opinion of him yet. My only thought is that he made a smart move with respect to the Gallop decision. The next TV deal will bring with it a new life to the game. Gallops critics will point to his era and say ‘look Gallop did nothing for the game, but look at what the IC has done.’I believe the next era would have been a success with Gallop at the helm. it’s just a matter of timing. It’s time for the game to grow.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:09pm
Jaceman said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
CC he was beholden to News on the Melbourne thing and he had no money to offer the Wagga council as the AFL did..BTW I’m intrigued you have a job near the SFS cafe…
June 12th 2012 @ 5:08pm
Crosscoder said | June 12th 2012 @ 5:08pm | Report comment
That is part of my argument.”"Beholden to News Ltd.That is conflict of interest,which no doubt had influence in the last Tv deal Jaceman.Ch9 Melbourne has nought to do with News.
Where did I suggest I have a job near the SFS cafe.I am nowhere near the place,never have been.You are confusing me ,with another poster,possibly using the same after shave.I get moderated(such as now) for whatever reason,the other poster does not.
June 12th 2012 @ 8:59pm
Poor Boy Blues said | June 12th 2012 @ 8:59pm | Report comment
Just about to say that – there are so many degrees.
Its a bit different from say Gallop sitting round waiting for things to happen, rather than being out there making things happen.
Do salespeople sit around waiting for callers? Or do they get on the phones, and get out, and make sales happen?
There’s many degrees. If you have a choice, you be proactive to the level which your proactiveness is still a positive. Nothing worse than meddling to the point where you wreck things; but actually thats what the NRL needs to do atm (yet maybe not forever). Meddle. Like in AFL. A bunch of meddlers. Sinking their claws and teeth into things….
see. you dont get that by being reactive.
June 12th 2012 @ 2:43pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
p.Tah
I think you have taken Grants comment about being re-active out of context.
He meant Gallop’s overall thought process and business acumen. Like all Lawyers he is conservative and ensures he does not make a mistake. I am sure that Grant has made a heap of re-active decisions, but overall, he has proven to be a leader and an innovator.
You may not like him, but you cannot knock his business track record.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:44pm
Mushi said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:44pm | Report comment
Most lawyers aren’t reactive unless they are outright useless. the whole point of getting legal advice is for it to prepare you for future events.
To try and paint lawyers are reactive is a fundamental misunderstanding of their services. It ‘s like saying your electrician is the guy who does your plumbing.
Head shakingly bad
June 12th 2012 @ 2:22pm
turbodewd said | June 12th 2012 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Gallop was a nice guy…seemingly in charge of an impossible-to-steer group of entities.
Since 2005 crowds havent moved. Dollars from TV deals were well below AFL efforts.
So what actually did Gallop achieve? Can someone name me ONE Gallop initiative to improve the NRL or RL in general?
June 12th 2012 @ 2:49pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
turbodewd
I dont think there is any doubt that he is a nice guy.
The AFL have stuffed up big time by expanding too fast and too early when they did not have the quality troops. Have a look at all the lopsided games they have every week.
Gallop was very strong on NOT expanding until the game was ready to sustain another team. You have seen what has happened when our Origin stars are out.
I applaud him for holding off, we are still not ready, but to me, the Commish must have at least 1 game in brisbane and NZ every week. So to me that means another Bris team and one in South NZ. NZ have 40k juniors who play League.
June 12th 2012 @ 3:39pm
turbodewd said | June 12th 2012 @ 3:39pm | Report comment
Certainly NZ #2 should be in the equation for expansion.
Personally id go Perth and Wellington. SEQld has 2 teams…how will a third do anything else but squeeze the Titans to death?!
The Titans need to lift their game and become SEQld’s undisputed rival to the Broncos – a la Coke v Pepsi…
June 12th 2012 @ 10:28pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 12th 2012 @ 10:28pm | Report comment
“SEQld has 2 teams…how will a third do anything else but squeeze the Titans to death?!”
How is a 2nd team in Brisbane going to squeeze the Titans to death?
Brisbane and Gold Coast are two completely different cities. There’s another city, Logan, separating the two. Logan is much closer to Brisbane, so most of its people — bar the ones from Beenleigh and Eagleby, as those suburbs were part of Gold Coast City Council before the state government amalgamated councils and changed boundaries in 2008 — are more likely to support the Broncos. If the Titans can’t even get the people from Logan to support them — most of Logan’s residents live in the northern suburbs, which are quite far away from the Gold Coast — then good luck trying to convince people from Brisbane to support them over a Brisbane side.
There needs to be a second Queensland side.
You’ll find some support from people in Beenleigh and Eagleby as they preferred it when their suburbs were part of the Gold Coast — there goes Ian Whtichurch’s claim that no one cares about LGAs — but everywhere else in Logan is supports Broncos, Cowboys, Warriors or the Sydney clubs.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:13pm
Jaceman said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
So was Gallop conservative, not proactive or reactive on not expanding?? You just said the AFL was silly to expand yet they take the long view and get record TV rights figures- the GCS and GWS have been competitive some weeks but certainly are off the pace. Storm won in their second year and still average 12K a week and are rarely on FTA…
June 12th 2012 @ 5:25pm
Crosscoder said | June 12th 2012 @ 5:25pm | Report comment
He lacked vision,dynamism and perhaps conservative ,certainly at times reactive,although a decent human being,loyal,and honest and respected by most in the community.that does not provide the moolah to expand and fund the game,the way it should,and the reason the code lost players to other codes
.
GWS and GCS have been thrashed regularly,the competitive for 1/4 whatever,is the usual spin we get by the usual media suspects.A thrashing is a thrashing.The public are not mugs.
Well the Swans are coming first and last week got 13,000 odd and have been on FTA more than the Storm have been since day one ,by a country mile..They have been domiciled in this great city for 30 years.And have had nearly as much PR and marketing as a US presidential election.They have been well up the ladder and won a comp to boot.The Storm should be proud they get that number with the lack of exposure they receive overall.
i also have to correct you Jaceman the Storm crowds to date average just over 14,000.So 12,000 is close enough apparently.
Surprise I have been moderated in a rugby league forum,for sticking up for or commenting on the code I follow.
June 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm
Maximus said | June 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
The Storm average is 13K after the AFR wrote garbage about Storm averages expecting the Storm to get 30K for the Broncos games but only 13K turned up for the Broncos. because of rain. Swans got 13K when it was raining – funWoodward said there were 200 at the Broncos/Easts game but the crowd was 10K aklthough onSunday quite possibly 9K were in the bar…
June 13th 2012 @ 11:21am
Crosscoder said | June 13th 2012 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Gee it’s not hard.As per the Big league magazine up to rd13 inclusive ,the Storm crowd average was 14,477 this year.The Tigers game in the rain with just over 11,000 dragged the average down,but it is still over 14,000.
At the SFS when it squirts down,people duck under the covered area,it was self evident.
When we are constantly reminded by fans of the other code attend regardless of the weather,the 13,000 at the SCG.kind of stuffs that theory,especially when the team is near the top of the ladder..
June 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 12th 2012 @ 10:32pm | Report comment
“Storm won in their second year and still average 12K a week and are rarely on FTA…”
You’ve just snookered yourself.
If the Storm were on FTA regulary througing the 2000s then their fanbase would probably be larger. It’s hard to draw new fans to the game when there’s little exposure. Gallop stuffed up in a big way by not enforcing the stipulations in the contract. His incompetence prevented the game from capitalising on the Storm’s excellent form during the 2000′s.
If the Lions were never on FTA TV in the 90s and 2000s then far fewer people in south-east Queensland would have given two hoots when they won 3 premierships.
June 12th 2012 @ 11:42pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 12th 2012 @ 11:42pm | Report comment
regularly throughout the 2000s
June 12th 2012 @ 9:07pm
Poor Boy Blues said | June 12th 2012 @ 9:07pm | Report comment
True this. On crowds.
I have noticed all over the globe really, that crowd trends take around 5 years to eventuate.
from 1998 to 2005 is about 5years, after which nrl crowds steadied. In that, gallop raised the level back to where it would have been.
But after this point, nothing was done to get the people who didn’t like going to those stadia that continue to draw poorly, going.
I think this runs across much of the nrl.
Gallop will say do not tamper. Is that shrewdness or is that from someone who can’t be sure if tampering is going to pan out right?
I think Gallop is someone who is cautious and won’t stick his neck out, is all. Not a failing, as much as an attribute – but one we can’t utilize well atm.
Is there any crime in any of this? No. Its just life. Wish him well. Smile, and move forward.
June 12th 2012 @ 3:28pm
Midfielder said | June 12th 2012 @ 3:28pm | Report comment
Will be very interesting to watch RL’s management over the next twelve months or so..
From the outside I see Grant as a passionate RL person who is also a very astute business person… further a business person used to operating in a competitive market and using ideas and thinking [other words for pro-active and innovation ] … someone not scared of making a decision …
The only issue I see … and it’s always a subjective call anyway… do you want a proactive say executive chairman with an excellent CEO to manage what the Chairman and commission want.. or do you want the Chairman and commission to set up a general policy framework for the CEO to take charge of and run …
Take News limited … Chairman Rupert is a executive and lets his CEO’s run within his instructions… whereas the CEO of BHP is in charge of carrying out the boards policy objectives…
If the first view is taken then the commission now runs RL directly …
June 12th 2012 @ 4:17pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
Midfielder
I always judge people by the quality of the people who they hire. It will be interesting to see who they hire.
June 12th 2012 @ 9:12pm
Poor Boy Blues said | June 12th 2012 @ 9:12pm | Report comment
Yes, thats always struck me. The balance of power, and its source. Who they hire will be interesting
But to be fair, where we have come from, either structure is a massive improvement.
I think you will find its always morphing, or has potential to change from one state to the other.
In rl at the moment I think they are doing the commission-runs it, as it goes about setting up the directives, ect, and makes trends and puts things in order. They will do this for however long they need to do it, one would think.
Then they may well switch back, to letting the ceo take the reins more, or pointing him in a direction and letting him solve it however he sees fit within the bounds.
We will know more when we see who they hire and how they instruct him. (oops, and whether he does what he is bid, or thinks he knows best just because….and then whether the commission BUYS it, by saying either “hmmmm this guy seems to know what he is doing”, or “hmmmmm actually no you don’t know what you are doing, have you been in touch with David?”)
June 12th 2012 @ 3:46pm
bjt said | June 12th 2012 @ 3:46pm | Report comment
The departure of Gallop is the best thing to happen to the sport of rugby league in a very long while. Gallop did nothing for the game of rugby league. He acted on some scandals in the NRL, which if didn’t happen we wouldn’t even be speaking about him now, because no one would remember who he was. He did the minimum in all of those cases, but behaved as if only he held the entire burden of the evil of league on his shoulders, and he, and only he would stand up to be our hero.
But what he did do was to hand out some tough love band-aids. Did he ever think to question why it occurred? Of course not. To be a true leader would be to go after the root cause of the problem, but there lied the problem with Gallop. Because in his mind nothing was ever broken and everything was always perfect, therefore there was never a need to change.
Scandals aside, what has he brought to rugby league? The Gold Coast? Well the gold coast should never been cut in the first place. 2 refs? His best move, because now that we’ve got 2 out there we never have any referring controversy. Golden Point? If we liked field goals so much why did we make them worth 1 point?
Gallop never saw league for what it was, and that is a great product. He was no business man. He’s an emotionless lawyer. Who in their right mind would let a lawyer run any business, let alone a sporting code?
League for the last 10 years was stagnant, which was a perfect reflection of its former leader.
Time to get fresh, time to get proactive and give league a chance to show everyone what it is capable of.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:19pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:19pm | Report comment
bjt
It is a very exciting time….now we just need the right CEO.
June 12th 2012 @ 11:20pm
bjt said | June 12th 2012 @ 11:20pm | Report comment
Indeed it is, and indeed we do.
But the very fact that will all feel this sense of excitement, proves that the feeling of suppression was no imagination.
June 12th 2012 @ 9:21pm
Poor Boy Blues said | June 12th 2012 @ 9:21pm | Report comment
Here, here. Well said.
Gallops philosophy tied it all together and dragged it all in, closed body posture rather than open.
“Its perfect” is the flip side of “better not change it – they are too shaky just now” = “do nothing, change nothing” which eventually turns into “we’ve gone almost no where in all this time.”
I get key indicators are up, but in TEN YEARS. TEN! What have the NRL really done, apart from play a few games, pay a few players, avert disaster a few times.
??????????????????????????
God bless Gallop is 1….and thank god he is gone is 2. Both equal, job well done, but time to pull up stumps.
June 12th 2012 @ 11:31pm
bjt said | June 12th 2012 @ 11:31pm | Report comment
yes, really nothing to show.
this theory that he got us through the bad times is weak at best, because there is only one thing that keeps league going through the tough times, and that’s the game itself. It doesn’t matter what you throw at league, its just too good to be kept down. Any lesser sport with administrators like ours wouldn’t have lasted 5 years!
June 12th 2012 @ 3:56pm
oikee said | June 12th 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
Nobody thinks Gallop did not do a good job, lets make that clear. The guy was made for getting a wayward code with not many good points into a position to go forward. Going forward is not Gallop. He is to reactive or whatever they are saying. This is just a simple truth. I feared for the game when Grant said he had a 4 year deal.
Grant being the businessman wrote a clause to get rid of Dave, and for 700 thousand it is a bargain. I did not think Gallop would throw in the towel.
Going forward, with Grant and the other commissioners, my god, how good is this going to be, the first time in history rugby league has ever had big money behind the game, run by hardheads who love the game, in a postion where growth is all around the game with hundreds of millions of dollars to throw at whatever comes their way.
If they get Origin expansion right, this game is set for mega growth, it will set up not only the game itself, but also probably every region around us as well. Imagine if the only worry for league is setting up a comp for PNG.
Well that is a likely senario. With hundreds of millions for expansion, rugby league will show codes what money can do for a sport. think soccer, only that will become league.
We are on the presepice lads, we are sitting on a fully loaded springboard, watchout.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:21pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:21pm | Report comment
oikee,
We will judge the Commish on the quality of the CEO they hire.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:31pm
Charles said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:31pm | Report comment
Well said Oikee and some valid points!
I am personally excited with the prospect that Rugby League will finally go forward in leaps and bounds.All the constraints of the past have been lifted, the Independent Commission have some talented people on board and they can make decisions as to what is best for our game. What appeals to me most is that finally we can have our game back since it was hijacked!
June 12th 2012 @ 4:35pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:35pm | Report comment
Charles
Never forget why it was hijacked.
Because the players were getting ripped off. They were being used as puppets and they were the entertainment. They are still under paid IMO.
June 13th 2012 @ 10:12am
Charlie said | June 13th 2012 @ 10:12am | Report comment
Scott that is absolute nonsense. Yes the players weren’t being paid enough, but that was the carrot used to get the players to make the switch. The reason that the game was highjacked was because someone thought they could make a whole heap of money out of it and the people running the game wouldn’t let them make that money, so they took matters into their own hands.
June 13th 2012 @ 11:38am
Charles said | June 13th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Too right Charlie! It was an attempt to make easy money and it nearly destroyed the game forever. We were wide open for a takeover so we need to ensure it never happens again. Now for the first time since then, the game has freed its shackles and if the Independent Commission does its job well, Rugby League will grow in leaps and bounds!
June 12th 2012 @ 4:46pm
turbodewd said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:46pm | Report comment
Mr Grant,
now that you’ve cut Gallop loose pls consider enacting the following:
1. Change RL culture so it attempts to appeal to all, it has a slight skew to the ‘working man’ but Sydney is now mainly white collar. Like the AFL, or NFL in the US, the NRL should try to appeal to all.
2. Stop the anti-family rot. No more beer sponsorship, no more gambling sponsorship. And less night games. 8pm kickoff for SOO, for example, is not kid friendly.
June 12th 2012 @ 4:50pm
Mac said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
I think Gallop did a good Job, just to make it clear oikee. He has left the NRL as one of the most, if not the most evenly matched competitions in the world where any team can beat any other team on their day. This was one of David’s stated goals when he took over back in 2002. The salary cap restrictions have ensured an even spread of talent through out the comp so that we no longer see a huge chunk of the best players at one or two clubs as was the case with Canberra and Brisbane in the late 80′s/early 90′s. He introduced golden point, the All Stars game and handled himself and the integrity of the game extremely well in my opinion during the constant player scandalz that routinely plagued him throughout his reign. John Grant’s comments regarding Gallop’s tendency to be reactive rather than proactive were both unfounded and disrespectful to say the least. The thing about David Gallop was that everyone expected him to crack at some (probably due to his slightly nerdy appearance and inability to hide his defensive demeanor in the face of extreme adversity) but he never did and he deserves a lot more praise for the Job that he did whilst in charge..
June 12th 2012 @ 4:58pm
Midfielder said | June 12th 2012 @ 4:58pm | Report comment
Mac
You said “”" e has left the NRL as one of the most, if not the most evenly matched competitions in the world where any team can beat any other team on their day.”"”" more unique to Australia as both the AFL & Football have the same or similar structure ….
June 12th 2012 @ 5:31pm
Meesta Cool said | June 12th 2012 @ 5:31pm | Report comment
When I was a young bloke in Pomland (50s/60s, We (My mates and I ) marvelled at what a wonderful team Saint George must have had,, we would have given anything to see them play. TV from overseas was still a thing in comics so we never got our wishes.
Alas, the salary cap has made it that in all probability a team this good can never be recreated. it is a matter of opinion on whether you want to see a genuine even competition with x amount of mediocre teams with hardly any reserve strength, or whether you would like to see a team of champions taking all before them.
I immediately hear the reply “You will just get A team buying success”. Believe me, this MO does not always create a great team. otherwise a couple of NRL teams would have made their way to the top by now… Yup, we all know who they are!.
June 12th 2012 @ 6:52pm
Damien said | June 12th 2012 @ 6:52pm | Report comment
Thanks for the infomative article Scott.
Just a little post I’ll add before I get onto the league issues. I understand your reasoning behind the Obama comment but I don’t think its a good comaparison. ( I know, I’m a nerd, but I take a huge interest in American politics, I’ve actually got the 2012 US budget in front of me and am happy to go into in but I understand that this is not the correct forum. Yes I know, try bringing that topic up at a BBQ and you’ll soon find yourself talking to the house pets.)
About the NRL leadership battle.
I think the reaction to Gallop’s treatment had been the cause for angst more than the actual axing.
I think most people feel (myself included) that Gallop wasn’t given a dignified exit when he got the chop. I’m not a Gallop supporter by any stretch but I thought his treatment when given the boot was shabby.
Your points about Gallop selling the NRL short on the TV deal is valid however when put into context with the Super League War surely there must be some understanding about the ‘Why the NRL got short changed’ that is above Gallop’s level. He was the NRL CEO fine, but lets be honest, Gallop wasn’t put there to grow the games revenues, he was put there to help News Ltd keep their golden goose in check and he copped plenty for it (mostly fair comments but some were uncalles for, comes with the territory I suppose).
Grants business creditials are impressive but sports admin at the top is a vastly different beast to the software industry. Change is predictable in that industry because technology is always moving forward, and code/technology is quite easy to manage at a HR level.
Most tech companies are remembered for their products not the people who make them (unless you;re a super geek). In sports admin the people get the attention because its alot easier for the public and the media to relate to people rather than binary code. With that comes all the dramas that go with it.
The ‘reactionary’ label given to Gallop is in all honestly probably fair but thats part and parcel of the NRL. I agree with Gallop that it is an easy criticism to make because you’re not dealing with a ‘conveyer belt’ that churns out the same thing (I wonder if that was a little back hander to Grants industry of expertise).
Personally saw the axing as a final ‘get that up ya’ to News Ltd from the Commision headed by Grant. It sort of felt like the Commsission was thinking ‘you know what ? I’ve had a gutful of these News Ltd wankers and this is what we’re going to do about it !!’ Which I think makes Gallop look like collateral damage to a bigger conflict.
That being said. It was time for Gallop to move on.
All the best to the Commission. They better deliver some results. They can’t keep blaming News Ltd forever.
June 13th 2012 @ 1:06pm
ScottWoodward.me said | June 13th 2012 @ 1:06pm | Report comment
Damien,
Happy to talk US pollies anytime over a cuppa. Can you believe Obama has sunk the US debt to $17 trillion and he is still odds on to get back in, but then we are talking about a country that voted Bush Jnr in twice and found OJ innocent.
Your comment:”Most tech companies are remembered for their products not the people who make them” is incorrect. I founded 3 I/T companies which become #1 in their field and it was all about building the right team and providing a vision to keep you ahead of your opposition. You cannot implement your strategy without the right people.
Gallop may very well have been a patsy, but he was also the “main man” for NEWS which puts a big black cloud over the skinny TV deal.
Its called progress.
June 13th 2012 @ 4:57pm
Damien said | June 13th 2012 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Yeah, my comment didn’t come out right. I was trying to word it correctly and when I read it after it was posted it just didn’t sound right. Totally agree on having the right people on the right bus analogy.
We’re reacting to two different things. And I’ve gone over that topic enough so I’ll just leave that be.
Sorry I can’t leave you without a small post on Obama.
In 2012 the Obama Admin will cut spending to $USD3.7 trillion down 2%, And increase the reciepts to $USD2.609 trillion up 20% which means he has cut the deficit to $USD1.1 trllion which is down 33%. Of course there’s more detail to these stats but thats not such a bad performance given the circumstances.
Congrats on your tech success. I’m in the start up phase for mine and the odds are never in your favour but hopefully with the right people, direction and a bit of luck it’ll go OK. Very exciting times but it evens out with the regular panic attacks that tell me that this will all end in tears LOL..