Socceroos: Always happy with one point?
Related coverage
Warning: If you’re a die-hard Socceroos fan that believes a 1-1 home draw in a World Cup Qualifying match is a satisfactory result, perhaps stop reading now.
I’m quite surprised at the amount of positive feedback the Socceroos are receiving following their 1-1 draw with Japan in Brisbane.
If you hadn’t seen the game, and I told you that Japan, the away side, had outplayed Australia and were probably deserving of the win and that the home side weren’t deserving of a point, you might end up questioning me.
But I don’t believe I would have been lying. Why are we glorifying the fact that our players got out-played and out-thought, regularly cut up through the final third, but somehow managed to hold on for a draw?
Had it not been for a soft penalty decision awarded in our favour, I’m willing to bet the Japanese would have scored two more.
Let’s not forget, prior to Mark Milligan’s incorrect send-off, the Japanese were already knocking hard on our door. But in light of the send-off, credit is due for the Socceroos in holding on from that point.
The Socceroos in my opinion are living off the memories of the “Fritz Walter” and the Munich Olympic Stadium. The tactics and team selection are stale, and won’t provide any future success to match, or even exceed that of 2006.
Some might see this as being harsh, particularly following a tough few days culminating in an outing against a quality Japanese side, but frankly, this squad is a long way from where it needs to be.
Where does it need to be? Well I’d say the expectation of most Australian football fans and the players themselves would be to see the side at least get out of the group stage in Brazil. They have to get there first.
The Socceroos are fit enough, also strong enough. But I’m stumped if you ask me to describe how they play.
Spain, a great incisive and quick passing game. Italy, skilful but more defensive. England, direct and quick. Brazil, flare and style with great skill. Germany, skilful, organised and disciplined.
Australia. Physical, fighting spirit, hangers on… That’s one of the main problems. There is no real distinction or style of play. It’s remained that way since as long as I can remember, back to that heartbreaking campaign against Iran, with Azizi streaking away to bury us on away goals. But at least we had the likes of Lazaridis, Slater and a fit Kewell, who would more often than not take on their man.
These are the fond memories I’ve been left with of the Socceroos when I was growing up. This was the style, to take the attack to the opponent. Was the style, which provided the memories.
Aside from Cahill and Brosque who were work horses and actually provided some threat, the only real inspiring move or flare shown by the Socceroos last night was a simple turn on the ball by Wilkshire. You can probably remember which one I’m referring to.
Left and right backs are a major weakness. There is no positional certainty in defence, and certainly no attacking threat, lest I should hope at least for an overlapping run. In their defence though, our central defenders are not the fastest, youngest and most skilful and it wouldn’t be prudent should our wingbacks go marauding in a Danny Alves-esque manner and leaving themselves frequently exposed. Holger may also be held accountable on this.
Build up from the back is non-existent and the number of times Ognenovski or Schwarzer were left to clear up field left me fuming and frustrated, particularly when clear possession had been gained in the Japanese half.
Again, Holger may have instructed the style of play to favour this method more, with Cahill and Brosque to bully the Japanese centre backs off those long balls. But part of this can also be apportioned to a defensive or holding midfield that is there basically for that reason only, to defend and cover holes left by the central defensive pairing.
Xabi Alonso, Javier Mascherano, Michael Essien and Marcos Senna are among the better holding midfielders in the world. They are also among the best passers and distributors of the ball. I can’t draw any parallel with our holding midfield.
Please let’s not forget that part of the job of the holding midfield in building from the back, no, period, is to provide the link from front to back, provide passing options and create things when only small chances or windows of opportunity exist. Why are we playing two holding midfielders anyway?
McKay and Wilkshire toiled hard but similarly to our wing-backs, didn’t provide any width or thrust, and the attacking support was just not there for our strikers. We miss Brett Emerton in this regard. We miss Harry in this regard.
We miss Chippers in this regard (good luck to the local Wollongong side with their signing of Chippers by the way, possibly the signing of the season locally). The youth like Ruka, Spiranovic, Kilkenny and Kruse need to be given a meaningful shot.
The question also needs to be raised – where are our new upcoming youngsters? Or are these the ones who are constantly left on the bench to soak up the dreary play of the ageing Socceroos (yes Timmy, I mentioned age. Slick move on Mel in the post-game by the way).
Injuries and jetlag aside (we can’t use these as permanent excuses), the Socceroos are playing a staler version of 2006 football. Threats of the aerial raid against the Japanese are hiding the fact that we are resorting to playing a more polished version of park football.
Let’s define our goal, create our persona and style, and get the fans permanently on side and cause a stir. We have talented youth, but it’s in the thinking, mindset and coaching where the philosophies need to change. Let’s face it; I would honestly have preferred to lose 4-3 against Japan than that result last night.
I love the Socceroos, and have since I was a kid. I was in Sydney for the Uruguay game in 2005. I was in Germany in 2006. I was in Thailand in 2007 for the AFC. I’m all for promoting the game here in amongst the plethora of other mainstream sports, but let’s not paint the wrong picture of the game either.
Am I a cynic, or just being realistic? Am I even starting to sound like Fozzy?
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (158)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (127)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (114)
- The mainstream media continues to ignore football (97)
- Osieck announces Socceroos squad for World Cup Qualifiers (96)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (95)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (93)
- Football fans need to forgive Channel Seven (3)
- Channel Seven to broadcast Liverpool, Man United friendlies (75)
- We must learn from Guangzhou humbling (44)
- Socceroos need to give up on World Cup (89)
- Assessing the 2013/14 A-League draw (15)
- Socceroos’ door not closed on Kewell (5)
- Osieck banks on World Cup experience (2)
- Football fans need to forgive Channel Seven (3)
- Socceroos need to give up on World Cup (89)
- Assessing the 2013/14 A-League draw (15)
- Scrap the A-League finals and replace it with State of Origin (114)
- AS Monaco’s taxing promotion to Ligue 1 (17)
- FFA misses opportunity with FTA coverage (22)
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (118)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Football, football, Socceroos


June 13th 2012 @ 12:04pm
nordster said | June 13th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
No you’re summing up the thoughts of many so dont be perturbed if its not sticking to the party line
Yes we fought well and always do …we were still second best to japan and will be for some time. My issue is when are going to start putting results at least partly secondary to ambition in style of play or dominance. Hopefully not till we have some more points in the bag i guess! But if we do get a ticket, will it be same same or taking a lesson from brisbane roar’s approach to acl. Sure not for qualies just yet, for the finals though i hope so. Even if it means ‘failure’ in the short term.
June 13th 2012 @ 12:55pm
TomC said | June 13th 2012 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Meh. We’re a limited side trying to scrape together enough points to get to Brazil.
I think it’s worth pointing out that even though Japan had more of the play, Australia still generated the better scoring opportunities. I doubt we’d have conceded at all if it hadn’t been for that red card against Milligan.
June 13th 2012 @ 1:09pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 13th 2012 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
What are you on about “always happy with a point”? What’s the evidence that Australia wanted a point from this home game – or any home game?
The AUS NT has now played 11 home matches in WCQs since joining the Asian Football Confederation.
How many of those home games have ended in a draw? When you find out the answer, post it here so we can all judge whether your headline: “Socceroos: Always happy with a point” makes sense.
June 14th 2012 @ 12:06pm
bj said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
The evidence we would be happy with a point from this game is our team captain saying “if we’d been offered a point before the game we would have taken it”
June 13th 2012 @ 1:40pm
Dinoweb said | June 13th 2012 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
I’m sorry, but I was at the game last night, and I didn’t see too much of anything you describe.
Australia dominated the opening 25 mins and had at least five genuine scoring opportunities before half time. Japans best was a flash across the box that found no one.
Second half and Milligan was sent off for trying to shoot while the Japanese player desperately dived in. In my opinion, the Japanese player put himself in danger, and I have seen many free kicks awarded the other way for doing just that.
Japan scored, but it was Australia that received corner after corner, hit the bar, and pulled the best save of the night from the keeper.
To be honest I’m disappointed that Australia didn’t win. They were the better side on the night.
June 13th 2012 @ 2:18pm
tomdartnell11 said | June 13th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Great article. Found your argument quite persuasive considering I’m not in agreeance.
Firstly though, I have to say I think the chorus of positive feedback is in regards to the result GIVEN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, both prior to and within the game. We’ve heard plenty about the stifling conditions and physical toll on the Aussie players of playing Oman in 40 degree heat so recently, so no-one should be overlooking that. Secondly you’ve got to consider the way the draw has played out so favourably for Japan, who came into the game full of confidence with 6 points in the bag from two convincing home wins. They were under far less pressure to get a result.
Then look at the shambolic refereeing performance, which just about evened itself out. A lot of the praise is, I think, directed towards the Socceroos’ ability to limit the damage to one goal conceded whilst playing so long with 10 men, until they finally got their lucky break with the soft penalty awarded.
Regarding the young players not getting a run, I agree I would love to see more pitch time afforded to Rukavystya, Jedinak, Tommy Oar, Chris Herd and others but the reality is you can’t risk experimentation in WC qualifiers with so much on the line and experience is largely going to win out.
The fullback positions aren’t as weak as you suggest, Rhys Williams is a very promising player waiting in the wings and Wilkshire usually returns to defence when Emerton is available to play wide. On the left side David Carney has proved servicable, whilst Michael Zullo is a good option if you’re looking for real drive.
And Matthew Spiranovic is just plain unlucky that Sasa Ognenovski has played so well since his late rise to prominence. Spiranovic is touted as a technically gifted central defender who can facilitate playing out from the back, which is a potential foundation of our future play so look forward to the time when he gets an extended run.
Australia’s playing style, like Osieck said when he took the job, is a malleable and flexible one. Some nations will just always be better than us at playing football. When we come up against a very good side we adapt a pragmatic gameplan, of defensive solidarity and targeting a specified weakness of the opposition. Japan are a very good side, and I think we effectively attacked their arial deficiencies. When the manager feels we can dominate another team, we’ll try to. Look for us to control much more of the home games against Oman, Jordan and even Iraq.
June 14th 2012 @ 9:39pm
drom5343 said | June 14th 2012 @ 9:39pm | Report comment
Thanks for the feedback Tom.
I agree with your point about the results “given the circumstances” and maybe I should have recognised that a little more. Osieck is also doing a fairly good job with the resources at hand.
June 13th 2012 @ 2:23pm
Nathan of Perth said | June 13th 2012 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
It doesn’t matter how many points we have an absolute number. We just need to have more than three of the other jokers – and considering they’re all either drawing to each other or losing to Japan, this stands us in good stead. Our only real competition for the other spot is Iraq and they just lost two points in a complete gimme-game against Qatar. We’ve converted two of our three toughest games into two points and they have converted two of their easiest games into two points. Advantage Australia.
June 13th 2012 @ 4:00pm
The Cattery said | June 13th 2012 @ 4:00pm | Report comment
Iraq didn’t play Qatar – they’re not in our group.
Otherwise, it’s true that we only need to finish second, and the point against the best team in Asia helps.
I half-agree with the OP in that their mids showed up our mids (who were almost non-existent). I mean seriously, Bresh was replaced by Milligan, that sort of says a lot.
Can anyone remember a recent game where we have defended so deep in numbers?
But the flip side is that the Japanese central defenders and their keeper were pretty ordinary – we didn’t actually need to do too much to put them under pressure. Anytime we were forward of centre they were $hitting their dacks!
The game was presented to Japan on a platter – and they weren’t able to close the deal.
June 13th 2012 @ 4:15pm
Nathan of Perth said | June 13th 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Oopth, Oman, rather. And drew Jordan before that.
June 13th 2012 @ 11:08pm
apaway said | June 13th 2012 @ 11:08pm | Report comment
You were almost right, Nathan. they played IN Qatar.
June 13th 2012 @ 11:44pm
TomC said | June 13th 2012 @ 11:44pm | Report comment
I think this is an important point.
It looks like we’re competing against Oman, Iraq and Jordan for that second spot. So far each of those teams has had a chance to take maximum points against another team in that quartet and have all failed. We still have all of our home games against those teams.
Funnily enough, it’s not for another nine months that we actually play another home game in this qualification round. The side might well be radically different by then.
June 13th 2012 @ 2:39pm
alan said | June 13th 2012 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
Great article Drom. Australia do toil well but the draw last night increases the pressure for a victory. Given that Australia’s next two qualifiers are away from home, the pressure will be on to secure three points against Jordon and Iraq. Failure to do so and the Socceroos could have one foot outside Brazil. I think the Japanese were wasteful to be honest. Socceroos also had some chances but neither came about threw terrific build up play. Japan on the other hand managed to carve out opportunities thanks to their crisp play with possession. The Socceroos do lack style and as a neutral, they are hard to watch at times.
June 15th 2012 @ 11:15am
michael said | June 15th 2012 @ 11:15am | Report comment
See Lucas Neill’s comments in the SMH this morning where he suggests they only need to win all their home games and get a draw in an away game to get thru.
I like it when get up beat, but Lucas has a tendency as he did in the last WCup to suggest that the bridge has been built when in fact we are still building the foundations. This type of mindset has the ability to bring everyone crashing down to earth hard when we don’t get what we expected. Better to act cautious and take each game on its merits and on the day….
And as the saying goes only a fool and his money would not count Jordan and Iraq as walk overs on their home turf in a WC qualifier…..
June 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm
Midfielder said | June 13th 2012 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Drom
First please give credit to where Japan is in the football world… if not in the top ten very close to it… this changes most things in your article…
Also you lack of football knowledge I find let you down… you imply technical skill is the true measure of a football team… the father of Total Football on which most modern football is based Rinus Michels..
Rinus Michels identified four key attributes modern football players needed…. each attribute was equally valued with a player needing a minimum score in each attribute with an overall minimum score to play for his teams…
Doom sorry Dorm I should point out almost every modern coach uses his ideas and adapt them better…
Anyway its called TIPS ..
Technical … i.e. 25%
Intelligence … i.e. 25% …
Perseverance … i.e 25% … This is what that Spirit thing is all about..
Speed … i.e 25%..
So why I agree we still need to improve our technical game it is also not as hopeless as some indicate… but remember we are a very smart side with lots of determination and that takes some beating…
June 14th 2012 @ 10:04pm
drom5343 said | June 14th 2012 @ 10:04pm | Report comment
Well, Japan is actually ranked 23rd in the FIFA rankings at present (http://www.fifa.com/worldranking/rankingtable/index.html). If you look further down the list, Australia is ranked 24th. If you look into those numbers a little more, you’ll notice that the rankings released prior had Australia ranked 21st and Japan 30th.
I wasn’t implying anything about technical skill being a measure of a side, but you’d expect a World top 25 side to have some ability (good God, we’re 24th??)
We are smart and determined i guess, but those alone aren’t going to get us far.
What’s Rinus Michels and Total Football got to do with anything I wrote?
June 13th 2012 @ 3:06pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 13th 2012 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
Playing for a point or playing for a win – you be the judge of the FACTS
1. Tim Cahill beat out manoeuvrs his opponent in the box & his shot on target is parried by JPN GK (5:30)
2. Dave Carney shoots from inside the box & his shot heading inside the bottom right corner is pushed away by JPN GK for corner (5:40)
3. JPN GK out of position, ball bounces 1m from open goal with Brosque lying on the ground with JPN defender, who sticks out a boot and clears as Lucas is about to shoot (18:50)
4. From the resulting corner, Carney shot is heading for goal & parried by JPN GK; rebounds and Lucas shot is heading for goal & saved by JPN GK (19:30)
5. Even playing with 1 less man, AUS continue to attack. From a corner, Sasa Ognenovski has a shot from inside the box. It beats the JPN GK & is heading for the top right corner but hits the crossbar & bounces out instead of in (77:30)
6. We are now in stoppage time, AUS continues to attack. Cynical foul on Cahill & Luke Wilkshire takes the free kick. It’s a bullet that beats the wall & is heading into the bottom right corner of the JPN goal but saved 1m from the line by JPN GK (90:30)
Yeah … AUS is always happy with a point at home!
Video Source: http://www.foxsports.com.au/football/aus-v-jap-match-highlights/video-e6frf423-1226393599334?subcat=1111112039415
June 13th 2012 @ 8:54pm
Nathan of Perth said | June 13th 2012 @ 8:54pm | Report comment
So many chances that were so very, very close … That free kick by Wiltshire at the end was magic.
The Japanese keeper would have gone to bed that day with a very satisfied mind.
June 13th 2012 @ 9:19pm
Aleks Duric said | June 13th 2012 @ 9:19pm | Report comment
I don’t think Drom is saying we play for a point…rather more often than not we’re happy to settle for a point. My frustration with the socceroos has always been we pat ourselves on the back a little too much after getting a tough draw or a close loss to a good team. There are no moral victories in sport, and while a come from behind draw with ten men is nice, sometimes it’s better to recognize two points lost over a point gained. Gone are the days of spanking western Samoa. We wanted to play with the big boys, so we have to believe we can beat them each time we take the field.
June 13th 2012 @ 9:24pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 13th 2012 @ 9:24pm | Report comment
Last night’s 1-1 draw against JPN was the 1st time AUS has drawn a match, at home during the WCQs since joining the Asian Football Confederation.
For me, 1 draw – out of 11 home matches – is not evidence of being happy with a draw.
June 13th 2012 @ 9:36pm
Midfielder said | June 13th 2012 @ 9:36pm | Report comment
Aleks
We did not start or finish the match like we were looking for a draw… IMO the first 25 mins and last 15 mins or roughly half the game we were on top… we had the better chances ….so am struggling to connect the dots about being happy for a draw…
If you are talking about fans…. HHHHHMMMMMmmm my guess is we have some of real tough love fans…. Pim’s name can hardly be spoken without all sorts of comments… Graham Arnold, Frank Ferina do you think they got good press … remember Ange & Fozzie …. look at what Holman took and in many ways because he was Pim’s pick… so not sure I follow what you are trying to say …
June 14th 2012 @ 10:06pm
drom5343 said | June 14th 2012 @ 10:06pm | Report comment
My point exactly.
June 13th 2012 @ 10:12pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | June 13th 2012 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
I agree, Nathan. Kawashima had a blinder and you can see why he is Captain of Lierse and being courted by some EPL sides.
June 14th 2012 @ 11:10am
Kasey said | June 14th 2012 @ 11:10am | Report comment
Fuss: IMO Cahill of 2006 vintage would have buried that shot, in fact I was waiting for the net to bulge when I realised who had the ball and was bearing down on the JPN ‘keeper. I love St Timothy, but this year has been a terribly barren patch for him in front of goal. I hope he finds his scoring boots very soon.
June 14th 2012 @ 11:50am
Nathan of Perth said | June 14th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
He really should have placed the shot better. Easy to criticise from the loungeroom I know but it was far too straight.
June 14th 2012 @ 12:02pm
Kasey said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
St. Tim is a great player and far be it for me to tell him how to do his job. Honestly who the f*ck am I as a player? I’m (just) a fan.
However if the world had paused before the trigger was pulled and the Devil asked me how much would you like to wager that the resultant shot would deliver a goal, I would not have a place to sleep at the moment. I’m sure once he re-discovers his scoring touch, he will get a bag of goals, form is temporary; class is permanent. I just hope he discovers his scoring touch whilst wearing a Green & gold shirt. I watch every Socceroos game, but rarely catch the toffees and I would love to see the great man gorge himself at the goal scoring table.
June 14th 2012 @ 10:31pm
drom5343 said | June 14th 2012 @ 10:31pm | Report comment
Maybe a more balanced video source: http://youtu.be/Cuc9Tfwf_38 . If you don’t see it that way, at least enjoy the commentary and graphics.
June 15th 2012 @ 4:16am
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 15th 2012 @ 4:16am | Report comment
Excellent video commentary & the footage clearly shows AUS had more clear goal-scoring chances.
June 13th 2012 @ 9:17pm
Damo Baresi said | June 13th 2012 @ 9:17pm | Report comment
Good article Drom. Like Dinoweb, I was also at the game last night, however, I do agree with your above assessment.
” The Socceroos are fit enough, also strong enough. But I’m stumped if you ask me to describe how they play “.
” we are resorting to playing a more polished version of park football”.
“Why are we playing two holding midfielders anyway?”
Our game last night was full of fighting team spirit and a couple of good individual performances, but that won’t get us far if we get to Brazil in 2014. We will need much better with team system and better individual performances from most or all of our players.
Hopefully last night was the not to bad, low point in our entire campaign and we improve vastly from here on.
June 13th 2012 @ 11:15pm
The Cattery said | June 13th 2012 @ 11:15pm | Report comment
It’s basically a carbon copy of the Pim years, except the the team is getting older.
June 14th 2012 @ 10:37pm
drom5343 said | June 14th 2012 @ 10:37pm | Report comment
Thanks for the feedback Damo.
Hopefully things will only get better from here.