The problem with women’s tennis
By k77sujith, 14 Jun 2012 k77sujith is a Roar Guru
Russia's Svetlana Kuznetsova sits on the court as she plays Serena Williams of the United States during a Women's singles quarterfinal match at the Australian Open tennis tournament in Melbourne, Australia, Wednesday, Jan. 28, 2009. AP Photo/Dita Alangkara
Related coverage
Unlike other women’s sports, women’s tennis does get its fair share of media coverage. It is one of the few sports wherein female players are given due recognition for their achievements.
However, in contrast with the men’s game, women’s tennis has had to endure the burden of unpredictability since the turn of the millennium.
With Serena Williams’ shocking exit in the first round of the 2012 French Open, women’s tennis continues to be robbed of consistency a la the male equivalent. Over the last few decades, women’s tennis has witnessed some of the greatest rivalries in sport, something that ceases to exist among the current crop of players.
Martina Navratilova and Chris Evert dominated the sport in the late seventies and early eighties, Steffi Graf and Monica Seles were at the pinnacle of their game in the mid-nineties. Then, the Williams sisters along with Martina Hingis and Justine Henin burst onto the scene to dictate proceedings. These are just some of the indisputable legends of the game whose achievements will never be matched by the modern breed of upcoming players.
While some concur that the element of unpredictability in women’s tennis adds to the curiosity factor, there’s another school of thought that’s in complete denial that women’s tennis is as intriguing as the men’s game.
With the Williams sisters on the decline, the sport is in desperate need of a superstar akin to the status of Djokovic, Nadal and Federer – the peerless trio who are not just supremely consistent throughout the year but have maintained a vice-like grip on the entire ATP tour for years. Moreover, the chasing pack of top players such as Andy Murray, David Ferrer, Tsonga and Tomas Berdych, to name a few, are pretty consistent themselves and possess sufficient arsenal to throw a spanner in the works thereby, adding to the excitement of men’s tennis.
In contrast, there has been no female player to dominate the game, let alone a chasing pack, with incessant rounds of musical chairs at the top of the perch.
We have had top-ranked players such as Caroline Wozniacki (67 weeks as number one), Dinara Safina (26 weeks), Jelena Jankovic (18 weeks), Victoria Azarenka (19 weeks) and Ana Ivanovic (12 weeks), who have failed to remain in the top bracket for extensive periods. Moreover, these numbers don’t even come within a bull’s roar from the likes of ex-superstars such as Martina Navratilova (332 weeks in all) and Steffi Graf (377 weeks), keeping aside the number of Grand Slams won. There obviously is a problem in the women’s game.
It seems that modern-day female players are mentally fragile, finding it nearly impossible to match the expectations and demands of the game. For instance, despite being a knowledgeable student from the reputed Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Russia, Vera Zvonareva can be a wreck on court throwing tantrums, sobbing and sufferings meltdowns. Another notable example is Sam Stosur, a brilliant player who has so far failed to put up a good show on home turf at the Australian Open, clearly, an indication of her succumbing to the burden of playing at home.
On this concern, the legendary Martina Navratilova says, “With a lot of the field, when they get to a final, they freeze and I’ve seen it time and time again. They just freeze, they don’t compete, and they can’t play.
“Being in a final is something to cherish, not dread”. This explains Navratilova’s success in the finals of the many majors she has won.
Female players are unable to remain injury-free for continuous periods of time and once back on court they find it gruelling to recapture ‘form’. No one would attest to this fact better than Serena Williams who has been patchily consistent since her return to the tour following a lengthy lay-off in 2011 due to severe health concerns.
There have also been players such as Tracy Austin, Andrea Jaeger, Jennifer Capriati, Martina Hingis, Justine Henin and Kim Clijsters who have excelled for brief periods and then either quit or took a long sabbatical from the game for various reasons. By contrast, in the men’s game, the only example is Björn Borg, who rocked the entire tennis fraternity by retiring at the age of 26 at the peak of his powers.
The current lot of young players do possess all the ingredients necessary to dominate the game but there seems to be the missing element of ‘competition’. Maybe, the WTA should amend the game from the stipulated three sets to five in the majors to offer the players a whole new challenge both physically as well as mentally. Yes, it might be taxing for the players but they are well-conditioned and strong enough to survive the demands of five-setters.
I think it’s worth a try because the women’s game needs a shake-up.
Women’s tennis is in desperate need of superstars that its male equivalent has enjoyed in recent years and as it stands, it’s unlikely that one is bound to emerge any time soon. Not having truly dominant women on tour might offer room for more parity, but I’m not sure if having every player in the top 25 capable of winning a Slam is a blessing for women’s tennis.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Nadal, Serena affirm favouritism for French Open (15)
- Can boxing great Pacquiao return to his former self? (14)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
- Has sports journalism lost its way? (12)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: episode four (9)
- ‘Wild’ Will willing: Tomlinson targets American assault (8)
- Nadal and Djokovic chasing Federer
- Aussie Power chasing history at Indy 500
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (8)
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for (1)
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160 (0)
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160 (0)
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction (0)
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (8)
- UFC 160: Junior Dos Santos vs Mark Hunt – analysis and prediction (2)
- Garcia’s racial comments alude to broader issues (2)
Recommend this story.

June 14th 2012 @ 12:00pm
ChrisW said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:00pm | Report comment
Sharapova has been up there for a long time and is a household name.
June 14th 2012 @ 3:18pm
amazonfan said | June 14th 2012 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
She’s amazing. However, as good as she is, she’s not exactly a representation of dominance. Still, she will certainly go down as one of the all-time greats.
June 15th 2012 @ 2:30pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
Well, true, Sharapova is doing quite well now having just pocketed the career slam and number 01 ranking. Let’s hope she can sustain this level of tennis. If Victoria Azarenka can raise her level, it’d make a good rivalry in the women’s game between these two. Thanks.
June 14th 2012 @ 12:29pm
Australian Rules said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
I thought this was going to be another article on female earnings in tennis… but that’s for another time.
There’s no doubt that a sport’s popularity peaks when there are genuine champions ruling the roost. Michael Jordan’s career coincided with basketball’s peak popularity…and his star crossed with the likes of Johnson, Bird, Barkley, Ewing et al (see Dream Team). Same with Tiger…when he dominated golf, the sport soared into new territory.
For years Federer alone held the sport together on the mens side. His opposition weren’t great (no disrespect to Andy Roddick and Lleyton) but his talent and dominance was so supreme that he drew people into the game. Now that there are 3 at the top, it makes every Grand Slam semi-final an absolute feast.
Can’t say the same with the women’s draw which, as the author points out, hasn’t enjoyed the same prominence and prestige since Martina, Graf, Seles, and to a lesser extent, Hingis. Henin and Clijsters went close, and the William sisters were dominant, but the women’s game needs some genuine stars to step up and lift the sport up again. Too many “ok” Russian players and flaky top tenners (see Stosur).
June 15th 2012 @ 2:28pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:28pm | Report comment
Very good point there on how the popularity of a sport is dependent on a superstar. Thanks.
June 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm
matt said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Is there any data to back up your claim? I for one find the dominance of the top 3 in the men to be a yawn. The NRL seems to be at an all time high in an era of huge parity across the league.
Regardless, the pendulum is swinging the other way now, with absolutely no notable talent coming through on the men’s side (Tomic, seriously?)
June 15th 2012 @ 2:27pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Hi Matt….I don’t think we need stats to back up this claim. It’s a given I reckon. As for the dominance of the big three in men’s tennis….I’m surprised it doesn’t entice you because when these guys compete against each other, the level of tennis is from another planet, and grips the entire tennis fraternity. But yes, like you said…it does help to have even competition. Thanks.
June 14th 2012 @ 1:20pm
clipper said | June 14th 2012 @ 1:20pm | Report comment
You would have to include Agassi as someone who took a long sabbatical, thereby denying Sampras any main challenger.
Plenty of men have been injured and not been able to reach the heights again (Mecir, Philipoussis, Hewitt, perhaps Soderling)
Agree there should be five sets in the Slams – it would raise the level and stop any talk of the prize money being unfair, but it may be one of those cyclical times where there isn’t two or three dominant players – it can’t happen all the time.
June 14th 2012 @ 3:14pm
amazonfan said | June 14th 2012 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
When did Agassi take a sabbatical? He dropped out of the top 100 in 1997 (before returning in 1998), but 1997 aside, he never ceased to be a challenger to Sampras. he certainly never took an extended break.
June 15th 2012 @ 9:48am
clipper said | June 15th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Well, more of a sabbatical in the mind where he couldn’t be bothered anymore and the competitive spirit went – you don’t drop down to about 150 if you’re keen and fit. Credit it to him though for coming back and winning 5 more grand slams.
June 15th 2012 @ 2:22pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Agassi..yes….he’s always been an enigma, hasn’t he? I wonder why professionals find it hard to recapture form once back from injury…is it the mindset or just them having not been in a match situation? However, I’d like to point out Rafa Nadal, who bounced back from injury in 2009 (missing Wimbledon) and is still at the peak of his game (although he was out for a short period). It’s all strange. Thanks.
June 14th 2012 @ 2:09pm
B.A Sports said | June 14th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Its funny. It wasn’t that long ago that people said womens tennis was boring and part of that was because of the divide between the top few and the rest, now its the opposite.
Having said that, like someone mentioned, dominant players help your sport becaus ethey get international advertising deals that vicariously promote the sport as well.
Maybe Ash Barty wil be the next big thing in womens tennis. One can only hope.
June 14th 2012 @ 2:10pm
Max said | June 14th 2012 @ 2:10pm | Report comment
I concur completely. Especially with the point of extending the games to 5 sets. This would only bring them closer to the mens game, but maybe there is a reason why certain mens players have dominated for such a long time…. endurance. I for one couldn’t see Monfils lasting 5 sets all the time, hence, you don’t see him in the latter stages of any large 5 set events. I could almost be likened to 20/20 cricket (being 3 sets) and a test match (5 sets), It’s easy to come out of nowhere and play 1 blinding set and struggle to win the other but in a 5 setter its a whole different ball game. You really need to dominate the whole match to make it through.
June 15th 2012 @ 2:18pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Hi Max….you make quite an interesting comparison with cricket. And like you said, Monfils is a good example of a player having to adapt to playing 5-setters. With no superstars in the women’s game who can attract crowds, I think it’s time to give 5 sets a go. Thanks.
June 14th 2012 @ 8:06pm
Allsports said | June 14th 2012 @ 8:06pm | Report comment
I can’t handle 3 sets of screaming let alone 5.
June 15th 2012 @ 2:15pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:15pm | Report comment
That’s a good one
. Imagine Sharapova playing out a five-setter!
June 14th 2012 @ 10:05pm
amazonfan said | June 14th 2012 @ 10:05pm | Report comment
I get what you’re saying, however I think you take it too far.
“In contrast, there has been no female player to dominate the game, let alone a chasing pack, with incessant rounds of musical chairs at the top of the perch.
We have had top-ranked players such as Caroline Wozniacki (67 weeks as number one), Dinara Safina (26 weeks), Jelena Jankovic (18 weeks), Victoria Azarenka (19 weeks) and Ana Ivanovic (12 weeks), who have failed to remain in the top bracket for extensive periods. Moreover, these numbers don’t even come within a bull’s roar from the likes of ex-superstars such as Martina Navratilova (332 weeks in all) and Steffi Graf (377 weeks), keeping aside the number of Grand Slams won. There obviously is a problem in the women’s game. ”
Women’s tennis does need a superstar, or two, but not another Steffi or Navratilova. Having two players who were number 1 for almost 13 years, and who won 40 slams between them, is something that the women’s game should not want to go back to. The problem with the women’s game in the past is that certain players dominated far too much. It became incredibly boring with player X dominating for an extended period of time, and then player Y dominating. While having different players win every slam over an extended period of time isn’t great as it lessens the prestige of winning a slam, having one dominate for an extended period of time also isn’t wonderful. Yes, let’s have a couple of superstars, but not with the dominance of female superstars of the past.
June 15th 2012 @ 2:13pm
k77sujith said | June 15th 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
I see your point and agree with you….we wouldn’t want just one player winning the Slams all the time, but having said that, women’s tennis could do with some rivalry…a few consistent players who can pose a challenge in every tournament. Having a modern-day Steffi Graf or Navratilova can only do wonders for the game. Thanks.
June 16th 2012 @ 5:10am
amazonfan said | June 16th 2012 @ 5:10am | Report comment
That’s true, I would agree with that. Just so long as they aren’t too dominant.
June 19th 2012 @ 6:52am
cg26 said | June 19th 2012 @ 6:52am | Report comment
really like the idea that 5 sets might give them time to calm down a bit, less freezing, and real champions could emerge.
June 19th 2012 @ 6:45pm
k77sujith said | June 19th 2012 @ 6:45pm | Report comment
Thanks CG….it’d indeed throw a new challenge to them.
June 29th 2012 @ 5:03pm
jinesh said | June 29th 2012 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
jus hit the nail on the head…in women’s tennis u hardlyy hav a player to watch out for cos u dont knw whos gonna win…thou the unpredictability factor is good add-on u dont find a player to root for cos of the inconsistency factor…russians keep on emergin n u hv a new champ…tis 5 setter is a gud idea..i remember a male player arguin wen the ladies askd fr equal prize money in grandslams tat they shud also play best of 5 format to ask for equal prize money..
July 2nd 2012 @ 7:47pm
k77sujith said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:47pm | Report comment
Thanks Jithu..a possibility for a new era of rivalry between Serena, Azarenka and Sharapova maybe in the making?