Tito Ortiz: A fitting induction into the UFC Hall of Fame
By E. Spencer Kyte, 14 Jun 2012 E. Spencer Kyte is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- dana white, MMA, Tito Ortiz, UFC
First, let’s get one thing clear up front: the UFC Hall of Fame isn’t exactly on par with the shrines of sports like baseball, football or hockey.
Being inducted isn’t a situation where a collection of voters deems you worthy of enshrinement. In UFC, if Dana White and Lorenzo Fertitta think you’ve earn your place, in you go.
That being said, the announcement that Jacob Christopher Ortiz, better known to fight fans as “The Huntington Beach Bad Boy” Tito Ortiz, will be inducted into the UFC Hall of Fame in advance of his third bout with Forrest Griffin in July is timely and fitting. While his success may have waned in recent years as the competition got tougher and injuries began to take their toll, few fighters – if any – did more for the company during the sport’s “Dark Ages” than Ortiz.
Back before the UFC was on every weekend, there was actually a time when it wasn’t on at all, and during those years, Ortiz was one of the men doing the heavy lifting to keep the company (and, in part, the sport) from sinking. His battle with Frank Shamrock at UFC 22 remains one of the greatest fights in UFC history, though you’ll never see it mentioned as such by the company due to Shamrock’s contentious relationship with Dana White.
As the sport got back onto PPV and began working towards being accepted, Ortiz was one of the faces of the franchise, along with Ken Shamrock, Chuck Liddell and Randy Couture, three men he would face in multiple historic encounters throughout the early 2000s.
Personally, I think Ortiz is a victim of bad timing and the tendency to revise history as we look back in hindsight.
Though he holds the record for most fights in UFC history (26), most consecutive light heavyweight title defences (5), and most successful light heavyweight title defences (5), many people look back at Ortiz’s reign atop the 205-pound weight class and diminish his success based on who he fought, and, more importantly, who he didn’t fight. Wins over the likes of Evan Tanner, Elvis Sinosic, and Vladimir Matyushenko don’t carry as much weight or value in retrospect as wins over Liddell and Couture could have.
Considering his combined 0-3 record against the pair, people tend to discount Ortiz’s success in the early stages of his career.
The truth is, you can only beat the person that is put in front of you, and that’s exactly what Ortiz did before running into Couture at UFC 44.
Same goes for his trio of victories over Ken Shamrock. Because of the rapid decline of “The World’s Most Dangerous Man,” some people pretend as if Ortiz was facing the same shell of man who is still trying to find fights today. Shamrock was 25-7-2 when he first faced Ortiz, and though he wasn’t the same physical specimen and ferocious competitor who took part in the early UFC events, he wasn’t a slouch either.
Even after losing to Couture and Liddell in back-to-back bouts that stood as the biggest fights in UFC history at the time, Ortiz still strung together a five-fight winning streak to earn a second meeting with “The Iceman.” While that fight turned out to be the start of his lengthy run without a win, Ortiz was truly one of the most dominant, and influential figures in the UFC early in his career, and is extremely deserving of the honour he’ll receive at this year’s UFC Fan Expo in July.
Now we’ll just have to see if he can pull off another surprise victory on the Fourth of July weekend this year, so that he can ride off into the sunset on a high note.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Cheap Seats Podcast: Episode 7 (24)
- Bases loaded, but Australian baseball strikes out (24)
- Will Tebow lead the Patriots to the promised land? (16)
- Could Vergne replace Webber? (14)
- 2014 MLB season set to launch in Sydney (13)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (12)
- Justin Gatlin and the question that remains (10)
- Suzuki to return for 2015 MotoGP season (0)
- Wimbledon 2013: Women’s Singles preview (0)
- New owners for Lotus (0)
- MotoGP’s three amigos sweep the podium in Catalunya (7)
- US Open: English Rose denies Jason Day his maiden major (1)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (13)
- King James must dominate for Miami (3)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- dana white, MMA, Tito Ortiz, UFC

June 14th 2012 @ 12:21pm
Sam Brown said | June 14th 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
The control the UFC weilds over the legacy of MMA is shocking. Basically if you aren’t in with Dana, you can kiss your MMA legacy goodbye. Tito is prime example, when they did the 100 best fights in UFC history they totally burried Tito. While that was a fan based poll they certainly didn’t place once of their most dominate champs ever at the forefront of peoples minds.
I’m glad you bought up Frank Shamrock because he is perfect example number 2 of how the UFC weilds complete power and is totally bias in the way it treats things such as the Hall of Fame, he should have been put in with guys like Mark Coleman and Royce Gracie but because he isn’t one the UFC’s good books he gets shafted. I’m no Fedor fan but watch as they try and discredit Fedor and hope the fans forget his astonishing run through the guts of the heavyweight division in the mid 00′s.
I mean, good on Tito, long overdue IMO. He isn’t everyone’s cup of tea but not even the UFC can ignore his legacy (or maybe it is just chosing to recognise it now Tito is back in Dana’s good books).