Wallabies borrow from All Blacks to close out Wales
By Spiro Zavos, 18 Jun 2012 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, David Pocock, Rugby Union, Wales, wallabies
248 Have your say
Wallaby glory against Wales came with an All Black twist (AAP Image/Joe Castro)
Related coverage
Mike Harris’ final penalty, a kick for glory to give Australia a 25 – 23 victory over Wales, capped a terrific Test match in which the lead changed sides no fewer than nine times.
The tension as he lined up the kick was unbearable. If he missed the Wallabies would be condemned for the second time in three Tests for not being able to close out a winnable match.
I made a note that at least he was kicking from the right side of the field for a right-foot kicker. But having come on only minutes earlier, after an injured Berrick Barnes had missed his easiest shot of the match, was a strike against him pulling off the kick, you would have thought.
From the media box in Etihad Stadium it was impossible to tell whether he had kicked the ball straight on target. But a huge rushing, roaring cry of ‘Yeeessss!’ resounded around the stadium as the kick was only part way on its journey through the posts.
‘Yeeesss!’ proved the right call as Wallabies rushed from all parts of the field and the benches to give Harris hugs. Grown men, warriors with blood trickling down their faces, in their gold jerseys, were jumping around like kids at a party.
Nearly two hours earlier I had watched the last few minutes of the dramatic New Zealand – Ireland Test at Christchurch. With minutes remaining and the score locked in at 19 – 19 the All Blacks had conceded a scrum just outside their 22. In the last couple of scrums, Ireland had gained an unexpected advantage and were pushing the All Black pack around.
I saw the ARU’s media director Peter Jenkins, who in a previous incarnation was a fine rugby writer for The Daily Telegraph.
“There’s no way the All Blacks are going to get out of this one,” I told him.
Jenkins looked at the screen as the packs began scrumming. ‘They’ll find a way to win,’ he replied.
The scrum collapsed in a whirling mess of green and black jerseys. The referee Nigel Owens who’d been having a bit of a running verbal battle with Richie McCaw most of the match blew an extra-shrill blast on the whistle. Penalty to Ireland?
No, a penalty against Ireland for wheeling the scrum illegally.
It is history now that minutes later, with time almost up, Dan Carter booted over a dropped goal, his third attempt of the match, to confirm the truism that the All Blacks do finds ways, Test after Test, to win the close matches.
Now flash forward to the closing minutes of the Australia – Wales match.
It is the 73rd minute, the score is Australia 22 – Wales 23. Barnes misses a kick in front of the posts and about 40m out. Before the failed kick Barnes had limped around with what seemed like a cramp.
He is replaced by Mike Harris.
Here is how the ARU media unit gives the count down to the end of the match:
“74th minute Penalty to Wales – kick for touch. 75th Knock on Wales – scrum Australia. 78th Knock on by Australia – play on. 79th Knock on by Australia – play on. 80th Penalty to Australia – kick for touch. 80th Penalty to Australia – kick at goal. 80th Penalty attempt by Mike Harris successful: Australia 25 – Wales 23.”
What these details don’t tell us is what actually happened. One of those knock-ons came from Harris pushing a pass under the Wales goal posts. Why the Wallabies didn’t set themselves for a dropped goal is a matter that defies understanding.
The scrum from which the penalty to the Wallabies came from was not too far outside their own 22. Like the All Blacks, the Wallabies were facing a defeat with Wales in the position to close out the Test with a dropped goal, try or a penalty.
This last possibility was very much alive as Ben Alexander had conceded two scrum penalties within minutes of coming on to the field. The Wallabies scrum was under pressure from Wales for most of the second half.
A Welsh journalist asked me at this point to confirm that it is 43 years since Wales last defeated the Wallabies in Australia. ‘Correct,’ I told her.
The excellent New Zealand referee, Chris Pollock, blows his whistle. Penalty. Game over for the Wallabies it seems to me. But the penalty is given against Wales. Some crafty dropping of the scrum to fool the referee has backfired.
Then Harris pulls off his first great kick. A long punt that takes play well into the half of Wales. In all the jubilation and analysis after the match the length and accuracy of this punt and how it put the Wallabies in a strong position to win the Test has been overlooked.
Now David Pocock’s captaincy comes under scrutiny. The obvious play is to take the lineout off the top and smash up the field until within drop kick range. But the Wallabies do a surprising thing. They drive from the lineout. I say this is surprising because it’s a tactic they rarely use and when they do, it’s generally nullified easily.
But this drive is a perfect one and rumbles on. Digby Ioane, who has the instinct of a loose forward rather than a winger, sees that it is making progress but slowing a bit. He races across the field, puts his shoulder into the heaving pack and the maul lurches forward. Then it tumbles in a heap.
Pollock blows the whistle. Penalty to Australia.
David Lord reports in his The Roar piece on the Test on Sunday that Pocock then goes up to Harris and tells him: ‘We’ll love you if you hit it, or miss it.’
And he hits it!
The reason why I believe that the call for the drive was great captaincy is that Pocock gave his side several options of getting some points. If the driving maul was pulled down, as it was in fact, the Wallabies had the chance to kick the winning penalty.
If they had to play the ball from a stopped maul, they had the chance to hit up a couple of times, win an offside or hands in the ruck penalty. If Wales remained resolute they then had the final option of the dropped goal.
This clarity of thinking is something that doesn’t normally come so quickly in the career of a captain, as it has with Pocock. McCaw has it but he has been a Test captain for many years. In fact, he showed a similar clarity, as the All Blacks faced their moment of truth with a 5m scrum under Ireland’s posts right on time.
A solid scrum saw the All Blacks hold the ball for a second or so in the hope of getting an off-side penalty. Then McCaw, playing at number 8, drove forward.
At the time I thought, ‘what is all this about?’ But, of course, he was trying to force another penalty. And when Ireland stayed on-side, the ball was shoveled back to Carter to boot the winning goal.
This matter of having a zen-like belief that the victory will come if the right things are done patiently, correctly and without rushing is a hallmark of the great captain. McCaw has it. I’m inclined to think that Pocock has it, too.
He made mistakes under pressure in his first outing as captain against Scotland. Essentially he did not follow the iron-clad law of Test rugby, especially in a low-scoring Test, of ‘Take The Points.’
I was told, too, by people close to the Wallabies that Pocock has not regarded himself as a stand-in, interim captain. He has laid down the law to even the senior players when he felt this was necessary.
So here is a fearless prediction. By the time James Horwill comes back into the Wallabies as a much-needed, driving second-rower, Pocock will have established himself as the long-term Wallaby captain.
When I was thinking about how the All Blacks and the Wallabies did a sort of Houdini trick of getting out of their Tests with wins when it looked for all the world as if they were gone and locked into a defeat, the thought came to me that there was another dimension to the evening’s results.
A New Zealand-bred and trained player, with only a handful of minutes of Test experience to his name, kicked the winning goal. The coach of the Wallabies learnt all his rugby in New Zealand. To give all this a further international aspect, the captain of the Wallabies learnt his early rugby in Zimbabwe and South Africa.
But on Saturday night they were proud Wallaby players and a coach who might, perhaps, have taken the Wallabies into the realm of being able to close out victories the way the All Blacks have for so many years.
Spiro Zavos, a founding writer on The Roar, was long time editorial writer on the Sydney Morning Herald, where he started a rugby column that has run for nearly 30 years. Spiro has written 12 books: fiction, biography, politics and histories of Australian, New Zealand, British and South African rugby. He is regarded as one of the foremost writers on rugby throughout the world.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- All Blacks, David Pocock, Rugby Union, Wales, wallabies


June 18th 2012 @ 9:31am
Ian said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:31am | Report comment
Excellent referee Chris Pollock-that’s a good one! For goodness sakes, he never once policed the offside line at rucks and mauls. Not one of the Welsh players were behind the last feet at ruck time. No wonder they were able to rush up so quickly in defense.
In the WC, someone remarked, after the Welsh lost to the Boks, that they haven’t developed the mentality to believe they can actually beat the Boks. I suspect this is true of Wales and Ireland when they play Aus, NZ or the Boks.
June 18th 2012 @ 9:56am
Hoy said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:56am | Report comment
I agree Ian. He let the Welsh get away with an awful lot at the ruck. Offsides, slowing down our ball, entering from the side etc. Very cynical play from Wales to disrupt our quick ball, and they were allowed to get away with it, and were unlucky to lose, but lucky to get in that position in reality.
June 18th 2012 @ 9:36am
allblackfan said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:36am | Report comment
KPM, Thorn retired, Kaino is seriously injured.
Kaino decided to make some serious coin then come back for the RWC 2015 challenge.
I agree about Guildford; I think he is playing his way out of an AB jersey (but you just can’t ignore his speed).
The good thing is that all the new players will now know what test rugby is about. That’s what you call education!
Sam Cane looks the goods
June 18th 2012 @ 9:44am
Jutsie said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
The weird thing about guilford’s poor form was that he was on fire for the crusader in the last few games
June 18th 2012 @ 2:59pm
Team Taniwha said | June 18th 2012 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
Guildford is a classic flat trackbBully. He is wheels and nothing else, not enough bulk to make it over the gain line. Unfortunatley, Gear’s work rate really lets him down, fails to get involved for long periods. Maybe he will get a start in Hamilton. Hope they perserve with savea, could really rock his confidence if they drop him for 3rd test.
June 18th 2012 @ 8:44pm
Sylvester said | June 18th 2012 @ 8:44pm | Report comment
To be fair to Guildford, the ball hasn’t gone his way in either test. He would have scored at least two of Savea’s tries in the first had he been on that side, and would have scored one of his own on the right had Dagg not fluffed it.
You can see him looking for work, which is a good sign, but he’s hardly going to punch holes through the middle with the Irish defending the way they were.
June 18th 2012 @ 9:58am
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
abf I think the NZRU shouldn’t have sent Kaino off with their blessing nor should do so with any key player. Kaino is fundamental to the team, or was.
Neither C nor B Smith nor Guildford should be in an AB jersey: they seriously weaken the backline. That backline last week didn’t look like an AB backline at all: it was hard to imagine where any fireworks would have come from. I’m not convinced Savea is a better attacking player than Ranger or Taylor either. In New Zealand there is amazing quality in the backs but only if they’re selected. Is A.Smith a better newcomer than Kerr-Barlow as well? Also, the tactical effort in attack wasn’t very impressive.
June 18th 2012 @ 10:25am
allblackfan said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:25am | Report comment
KPM, you don’t like C Smith. I get it.
But your dislike for him is blinding you to the truth — C Smith is having a blinder and appears to only be getting better with age.
Since the ABs selectors don’t listen to you that’s fine. But that’s neither here nor there.
Let’s not forget ABs finished the game one-man down (very dumn mistake from Dagg who was deservedly sinbinned).
It’s still early days from Savea but already he appears to be a better player than the inconsistent Ranger while Taylor hasn’t really had a chance to fire.
Aaron Smith’s passing game is better than Kerr-Barlow but Kerr-Barlow is better defensively.
I agree that tactical approach from the ABs wasn’t great and the coaches were aware of that. I wonder if the cold had anything to do with that? During the game, I saw several ABs trying to keep their hands warm!
As for Kaino, the NZRU did the right thing. The NZRU is very aware of its cash limitations and if there is a chance to keep their players they will pursue that. Kaino’s absence (given his stated desire to return for the RWC 2015) can be viewed as the mother of all sabbaticals!
My understanding is that all of NZ’s top players can get a sabbatical to pursue lucrative opportunities. That’s one reason why NZ is developing its depth — it’s not enough to replace a very good player with a good player, the replacement must be a very good player as well. Of course, this also requires astute player management.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:51pm
rae1 said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
Yes absolutely,Israel Dagg showed his lack of maturity when he did his no arms tackle,and he was lucky Odriscoll did not call for a lineout and set up the dropkick to put them ahead or else the final score may have been different.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:24pm
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
abf since I last looked at this thread not so long ago it has become huge so you may not see this. I didn’t find that backline penetrated Ireland much. Now obviously it was quite safe defensively, but the loss was in attack. In the end I think Hansen will need to make the trade off the other way, losing in defense what he gains in attack.
In terms of tactics the problem wasn’t so much that they didn’t run the ball but that when they did it didn’t work.
June 18th 2012 @ 9:42am
Atawhai Drive said | June 18th 2012 @ 9:42am | Report comment
The Wallabies-Wales Test was tense but ugly to watch.
Wayne Smith’s piece in The Australian this morning is right on the money.
How many times do we have to watch Will Genia look at the ball at the back of the ruck for what seems like hours, before he passes it to a lumbering forward?
As Smith says: “For the good of Australian rugby, the Wallabies must do more than execute. They must excite. The men in gold cannot become men in grey.”
The Springboks-England match was terrific to watch, until the usual run of mindless substitutions in the second half. Test rugby can still be a good spectacle.
June 18th 2012 @ 10:15am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
AD – I agree the Test was close so that made it exciting.
Both sides were pretty pedestrian though and I am trying to establish exactly what they do at training as to me it was a version of league, with one off runners and one pass per phase stuff. Outside Digby and the one break by Barnes was there much to get enthused about?
If that’s what the coaching team has come up with over 5 yrs then its quite an embarrassment…
June 18th 2012 @ 1:25pm
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
Justin2 to be fair to the Wallabies most of the players who could play an exciting game were injured. With Cooper, Beale and JOC everything is different.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:47pm
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
You miss the point…
June 18th 2012 @ 11:31am
rl said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:31am | Report comment
AD, Genia’s clearly playing to some team plan, but it’s a massively sh*t plan. Genia gets a call and then has to wait until a cohort of 3-4 forwards feel they have readied themselves for a mid-field “settler”. So OK, I get that it is good to vary things up and not simply pop a ball to a forward running in the tight. And you might want a set up a ruck in midfield to open up your options. But surely, wouldn’t it be better to keep the defence in 2 minds by first passing to an actual playmaker (Barnes), who can at least assess what is in front of him before deciding to hand off to a forward steaming off one of his shoulders?
June 18th 2012 @ 12:26pm
jeznez said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
I re-watched the game yesterday and had periods while I watched it in fast forward as I zipped about to find the pieces I wanted to look at in the cold light of day.
At one ruck the ball sat there so long I had to double check the remote to confirm I was in fast forward – turned out I was in 4X speed and it still looked slow it was there for so long.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:44pm
Uncle Argyle said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Was it reminiscent of the 2002 Sydney 5th grade grand final where Colleagues Defeated Old Ignations 3-0 after a stella place kick from Dan ‘The Truth’ Petrie (now of Bloomberg fame)?
June 18th 2012 @ 4:23pm
jeznez said | June 18th 2012 @ 4:23pm | Report comment
Uncle Arg, that was a glorious game with much more running than you would have thought!
‘The Peach’ we never bought into his attempt to try and switch his name to ‘The Truth’ did hit the prettiest wobbly penalty I’ve ever seen – will never forget that thing – it flew like a brick, bounced off the cross-bar and somehow went over. Brilliant!
I was the starting hooker in that game – one of the biggest front-rows I’ve ever been apart of.
June 18th 2012 @ 7:35pm
Uncle Argyle said | June 18th 2012 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
Jez,
we all love ‘The Peach’ but I love the stage name of ….’The Truth’!….
June 18th 2012 @ 10:07am
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:07am | Report comment
AD I think it’s hard for the Wallabies to excite without Cooper, JOC and Beale, the three really creative players. Also two such pedestrian centres will always ruin the attack.
June 18th 2012 @ 10:15am
Atawhai Drive said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Good point, KPM. I will head for Allianz Stadium next Saturday hoping for better things, but not confident. Beale will be back, at fullback, but we’ll still have those two pedestrian centres you refer to. Even with the series pressure off it’s likely the Wallabies will repeat the pick-and-drive strategy.
June 18th 2012 @ 10:42am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:42am | Report comment
I dont disagree with that but the Brumbies have been playing some “enterprising football” wihtout having those talented guys too. Comes back to coaching and practice…
June 18th 2012 @ 1:26pm
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
AD and J2 firstly the Brumbies are playing at a lower level and have players such as Tomane, Leiifano, Speight who are very good for Super level.
Although many dislike him Cooper in my eyes revolutionises a backline and his absence is the real difference here.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:48pm
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
Again you miss the point…
June 18th 2012 @ 11:26am
Recalcitrant said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:26am | Report comment
What this all means is, our schools here in Australia DO NOT produce rugby players of a decent enough standard.
We either need to make union mainstream and get the clubs producing players or get government schools playing the sport as well as the APS ones. The best sportspeople come out of general population not the private.
The ARU should put down a million dollars to the winning school to win a championship of schools. That would get every headmaster in Oz building teams. That money could go a long way to improving a school.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:27pm
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Agreed, but the ARU have no interest in spreading the game to new schools.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:36am
kiwi said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:36am | Report comment
For mine, Ireland played about as good as they could play.
AB’s played – in many ways – as badly as they could play – and they still won. Luckily or not, they still won. With 14 men for the last seven minutes.
It was a great learning experience for the AB’s – and for the coaches and fans – in so many ways. Everybody hopefully learnt something that will make the AB’s more formidable in the future.
The weather didn’t help (same for both sides, so no excuse), but Ireland played the conditions better.
As Foster said at half time (paraphrased), it was one of those games where maybe it was better for the other team to have the ball.
I honestly believe Ireland have less to play for next week than last (series over), and the AB”s will have a lot of stung pride. I think the game/result will be more like the first test then the second.
I’d pick a couple of Irish ahead of who we have available at blindside at present.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:57am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Ireland are still chasing a win v NZ. Knowing they can compete should see them go all out to get that first W…
June 18th 2012 @ 1:17pm
Markus said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
I really hope so, but I fear the exact opposite may happen.
O’Driscoll sounded absolutely beaten at the end of that match, like they had absolutely nothing left they could throw at the All Blacks to push them into the ‘win’ category for the first time ever.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:34pm
kiwi said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
Read another post somewhere likening it to “almost” climbing Everest – then having another go just a week later.
My fear for Ireland would be that Everest’s possibly going to grow 50% higher!
June 18th 2012 @ 6:01pm
Kuruki said | June 18th 2012 @ 6:01pm | Report comment
I think if the irish are ever going to get that win it needs to be this weekend. They will reflect on how close they got, they will get confidence and belief from that and i’m sure they will give everything in Hamilton on Saturday night. The All Blacks are in for another hard test. I can’t wait.
June 19th 2012 @ 10:33am
Jarmen said | June 19th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Agree with everything you say here Kiwi and I alluded to this further up the thread.
if anything I believe the ABs will be woken up from their slumber and they will want to put out a massive warning to their RC foes.
Ireland I believe and I am happy to be proven wrong have played about as good as they can here and like you say I think we will be looking at a scoreline close to the first test than the second.
The ABs had an off night and still won, the Irish played one of their best matches I have seen them play in a long time not including the WC pool match against Australia. Can they back it up with another big one?
For me the jury is still out
June 18th 2012 @ 11:38am
nickoldschool said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Hope we get a bigger crowd next w-e. 33k for a test match v the reigning 6N champ isnt much for a 3M + city like Melbourne. Hope we get 40K at SFS on Saturday. Been a long time since we have seen it packed or near packed.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:50am
Atawhai Drive said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
The afternoon kickoff should help _ the first daytime Wallabies Test in Sydney since 1998.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:56am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Agree it was a poor crowd. Poor stadium for Rugby and ticket prices in a non rugby town starting at $40 doesnt enthuse the curious…
Should have been played at AAMI – much better atmosphere, ground. Its the new home of rugby in Melbs.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:03pm
MR said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
Spiro, Wales lost that game (rather than a classic WB win) because:
1) No pick and drive to close game out in last two minutes (madness)
2) Did not collapse maul on half way line at line out which was well. Outside kicking range (poor tactics)
It was poor captaincy and poor leadership by Wales who yet again managed to snatch defeat fr the jaws of victory
June 18th 2012 @ 12:05pm
Sprigs said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
This is an interesting analysis of the Irish v NZ Test.
“The men in green had the All Blacks on a plate – beaten up, shell-shocked, panicking and looking decidedly unlike world champions.”
No, it wasn’t in an Irish or Australian newspaper, but rather in the NZ Herald and written by Gregor Paul.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=10813521
June 18th 2012 @ 1:23pm
Kuruki said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Gregor Paul is a muppet. And he is a Pom which explains everything.
June 18th 2012 @ 3:01pm
Team Taniwha said | June 18th 2012 @ 3:01pm | Report comment
He normally is fairly impartial, I actually like his pieces. Rattue on the other hand just writes for page hits. I think the AB’s did look shell shocked and a touch of panic. They were conceding points every time Ireland came in their half.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:11pm
Dave Edwards said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:11pm | Report comment
Just because the lead was exchanged nine times doesn’t make it a “terrific” test match. I’d rather it changed zero times and the game was simply allowed to flow.
Can rugby union please start stopping the clock whenever a scrum collapses, a bloke goes down with an injury, or a prop feels he needs a drink of water? I reckon about 15-20 minutes are lost each game… and even with five minutes to go neither team showed any sense of urgency, knowing that the game would be decided by a penalty.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Jutsie said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
It was a good thing that the wallabies didn’t show urgency, in the last few years when they have been in this position the backs run around like headless chicken and the forwards keep making 2mtr drives without any thought. It usually ends with a turnover near the line, I thought that it was going to be the same story when hooper knocked it on the first time but I’m glad the senior players calmly thought their way into a winning position.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:50pm
M.O.C. said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
This always used to be factored into “injury-time” which the ref added to the end of the game. Not sure what happened to that because now the siren sounds and the game finishes.
Perhaps a call should go out – bring back injury time, rucking, get rid of lifting in the line-out and the 1m gap, scrum engagement calls and the “hit”.
June 18th 2012 @ 5:40pm
Sprigs said | June 18th 2012 @ 5:40pm | Report comment
I read somewhere that there are usually about 33-35 minutes of actual play out of the 80 minutes in a Test.
June 18th 2012 @ 8:27pm
chris said | June 18th 2012 @ 8:27pm | Report comment
Dead right. Here you are, from the IRB’s 2011 RWC review:
In percentage terms, RWC 2011 matches produced an average ball in play time of 44% or 35 mins 25 secs.
The highest Ball in play figure was 54% or 43 mins 54 secs (South Africa v Fiji)
The lowest Ball in play figure was 37% or 29 mins 34 secs (Australia v Ireland)
The last figure . . . 50 minutes of stoppages!