Will the Welsh defy the Wallabies? Predictions vs eventualities
By LeftArmSpinner, 18 Jun 2012 LeftArmSpinner is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Wales rugby, wallabies
This is the second part of my article, after the enthralling Wallabies game against Wales. I made a number of predictions about the game, and today I have matched them to the actual outcomes.
Prediction: The Welsh will bring their ‘A’ game and the pressure will tell on the Wallabies. The Wallabies will realise that they need the Trois Enfant TerriblĂ© of O’Connor, Beale and Cooper a lot more than they thought.
Actual: The Welsh did rise to another level. They hurried the Wallabies throughout the first half. But, the Wallabies remained composed and kept trying. To go in at 13-7 was not a true reflection of the game in the first half.
Trois Enfant Terriblé were missed but only because they take the team to another level. The current team have shown tenacity and self belief for two games in a row. This is an improvement on the 2011 team.
Prediction: I predict that the Welsh will win a close one on the back of a much better performance than last week and parity at the breakdown. The Wallabies backs will struggle because the fly half is under pressure and the Welsh will kick their goals and their outside backs will eventfully reap the rewards of the hard work from the forwards.
Actual: The Wallabies won in a thriller. Either team could have won.
Wales get back Gatland, their experienced and motivational if not domestically challenged, coach, albeit unofficially.
Prediction: The Welsh will start playing from the kickoff rather than late in the second half. The Welsh spine of Halfpenny, Priestland, Phillips, Warburton and Rees will perform much better than in the first game and nearer to their previous high standards. North will cause all sort of problems for Vuna. Watch out for an impressive performance from Ashley Beck in the centres.
Actual: the Welsh spine did improve significantly but Genia continued on from last week. Vuna was tested and found wanting. But the welsh did not make the yellow card pay the way it should have.
Prediction: It all starts at the breakdown. The Wallabies dominated the breakdown last week. This week, the Welsh will achieve parity with their physical, forward pack. No team will dominate the breakdown against the Wallabies while Pocock, and now Hooper, are around.
Actual: the breakdown was fierce and ended up with parity for Botha teams. Pocock was awesome and hooper’s cameo was punctuated by two errors.
Prediction: Parity can and will cause a ripple effect through the Australian backs. Genia will be less effective but still competent. Barnes will have fewer opportunities, less time and be under more pressure. This is the fulcrum of this game and the series.
Actual: the commentators said that Barnes is a better player for the wallabies than the Tahs. I completely agree.
Prediction: Barnes has more respect for the jersey than to openly carry on with the panic decisions and then the huffing and puffing that he displays at the Waratahs. However, it may still be going on in his head.
If he cannot control this urge, or deflect the Welsh “attention”, the Wallabies will be in for a long and disappointing night. Quick hands to well placed support runners is the answer. Barnes is not that sort of fly half!
Actual: Barnes kept on trying different things but still kicks too much.
Prediction: A comparison of each team’s spines is a close run thing. The Welsh win fullback and fly half. The Wallabies win halfback, number 8 and hooker. The main contentious position is fullback. Halfpenny can match Adam Ashley-Cooper’s traditional strengths such as in the air, but exceeds him in open field running.
Prediction: The Welsh have a lot more to lose than the Wallabies this week. The Rugby World Cupn playoff had little meaning. The subsequent rematch in Wales was a fundraiser and a bridge too far for the Welsh who were into their domestic season.
Prediction: Last week, the Welsh were surprisingly off the pace. This Saturday’s game is their last chance to prove that they are the real deal. The Wallabies, on the other hand, are already through to the final of this three game tournament. Despite the Welsh being so average last week, the Wallabies only scampered home by 8 points.
Prediction: The Wallabies showed that they are still capable of relaxing at critical stages just like the 2008-2011 versions. This will again occur this weekend.
The Welsh came ready to play this week and took it to the Wallabies. The Wallabies replied in kind and struck like a death adder when it counted.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- SPIRO: ‘Captain Magic’ Quade Cooper goes down with all flags flying (333)
- Deans confirms no spot for Quade Cooper (281)
- Want to beat the Lions? Pick Quade Cooper (229)
- SPIRO: All Blacks learning to live without Carter (218)
- Wallabies’ six worst-kept secrets confirmed (204)
- A lesson in Deans-speak (154)
- Inside the mind of Robbie Deans (150)
- Jake White: the Lions can crumble
- If all the Wallabies leak this week is a team, then happy days (21)
- A rugby series twelve years in the making (2)
- Brian Smith says referees will be crucial
- Carter back at 10 in reshaped All Blacks (61)
- France ring changes for All Blacks Test
- Mo’onia Gerrard swaps netball for rugby (3)
- A rugby series twelve years in the making (2)
- Brian Smith says referees will be crucial (1)
- British and Irish Lions teams post WW2 (part 3) (15)
- Fifteen reasons why the Lions will beat the Wallabies (27)
- Lions vs Wallabies: the teams I’d pick (17)
- My Waratahs vs Lions experience (2)
- Brumbies vs British and Irish Lions: Tour match live scores, blog (220)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Wales rugby, wallabies

June 18th 2012 @ 10:47am
Bigbaz said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:47am | Report comment
Barnes was better than I thought he could be but one run does not make a winter. I reckon the Wallabies were better than the scoreboard indicated, but thats their problem isn’t it ,they are still unable to convert pressure and dominence into points. I think they had 65% of possesion.
June 18th 2012 @ 10:59am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Baz I tend to agree. Barnes played well. The reality is outside of his one break we created very little. Is an ongoing concern for me that there is little “total and inclusive rugby” being played by AUS right now.
This victory has already papered over some rather big cracks that will open in the 4N.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:21am
LeftArmSpinner said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Jussie, come on., the wallabies mounted pressure with the phases and then got the penalty on several occasions. less errors. all good!
June 18th 2012 @ 11:28am
Justin2 said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:28am | Report comment
LAS – I do like that we are winning and we MUST pick our best 15 again this week and win again. A slip here is not good enough IMO. With Beale back at 15 we will be improved with AAC to the wing and Vuna punted.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:19am
LeftArmSpinner said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
Barnes was good, no question. I could not compose a sentence for about 4 days after the birth of my first son so he “done good” to even turn up and then play well.
dont worry about the stats. winning teams often lose the stats. its the score board that matters.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:10am
redsnut said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:10am | Report comment
“dead adder ” shouldn’t that be a death adder?
June 18th 2012 @ 11:18am
Tristan Rayner said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Thanks, fixed.
June 18th 2012 @ 11:20am
LeftArmSpinner said | June 18th 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Tristan, very diligent editing. my typo, i am sure.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:10pm
Sherry said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:10pm | Report comment
No, I like dead adder better. There’s a great Raymond Chandler story in which an accountant is found murdered. Maybe LAS got an audit on his last tax return, hence the understandable typo.
June 18th 2012 @ 12:32pm
Uncle Argyle said | June 18th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
LAS,
For me Barnes is a better Wallaby than Waratah. This might have somthing to do with the better service he gets from Genia and the running options like Ioane as well. I thought Barnes had a good game apart from some unforced errors his game management was mostly good.
Credit must go to the forward pack of the first 60 odd minutes. I thought collectively they were good. It started to look shakey when the subs came on. Ben Alexander and Michael Hooper did not contribute brilliantly and made some unforced errors. I thought Dennis did well, Faiga’a made an impact as obviously Milke Harris did at the death.
Overall I thought it a better performance than Brisbane. Vuna really must go. Robe Horne was OK but really who couldn’t have scored that try? There was nothing special about Horne’s performance.
I think our discipline needs work as does the balance of our bench. I like Dave Dennis and Michael Hooper but for me we do need a specialist lock on the bench moving forward.
June 18th 2012 @ 2:16pm
Jutsie said | June 18th 2012 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
There was at least one special moment in Horne’s game, he stopped a certain try in the first half after phillips made the break down the right wing, I think wales had a 3 man overlap on the wallaby 22 but horne came out of the line and stopped all their momentum allowing pocock to get the breakdown turnover.
June 18th 2012 @ 6:16pm
wallaby fan said | June 18th 2012 @ 6:16pm | Report comment
IT IS ALL TO DO WITH GENIA.
June 18th 2012 @ 1:54pm
kingplaymaker said | June 18th 2012 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
LAS did North cause problems for Vuna?
Also, I wouldn’t say either team could have won. Barnes’ injury scuppered a straightforward kick in the 75th minute, Hooper dropped the ball very close to the line shortly after, again when the team was bringing the ball back into the opposition half. So that’s three chances which suggest Australia were bound to win unless they threw it away (which they very much tried to).