Are referees the new stars of the NRL?
By DragonPunk, 20 Jun 2012 DragonPunk is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Greg Inglis, NRL, nrl referees, Rugby League, State Of Origin
NRL referees co-coach Bill Harrigan speaks to the media about some of the controversial referee calls during last nights State of Origin during a press conference at Rugby League Central in Sydney, Thursday, May 24, 2012. The NSW Blues lost to Queensland in the first of three State of Origin matches. (AAP Image/Dean Lewins)
Related coverage
I can picture it now, the advertising campaign for the 2013 season. But there’s a change to the normal advertising campaigns.
Instead of the usual big hits, scintillating attacking play and the turbo charged anthem which accompany the ads. I think the NRL should centre it on the people who have pushed their way into the spotlight in 2012, the referees.
It seems that in 2012, the standard of refereeing in the NRL has plunged to a surprisingly new low, highlighted by the weekly outrage that follows Bill Harrigan’s round up of the “controversial” decisions of the weekend.
We’ve had the Greg Inglis rebound try which left all those from the south of the Tweed screaming blue murder. There have been countless other decisions which have been declared wrong a few days after the game.
That is the fundamental flaw within the system. There is no accountability in the ranks; sure someone will be “dropped” for a week, with Matt Cecchin being the highest profile case, but the standard is not improving.
Cecchin is following on in a grand tradition of referees who create a personality for themselves to mimic their refereeing style. This normally gives the illusion that the referee is bigger than the game. However, referees are best when not seen at all or discussed.
Matt Cecchin is a product of this refereeing system. He’s not afraid to make the big call which in itself isn’t bad but when he consistently gets them wrong, much like Origin One where some very petty penalty calls (Greg Bird lifting “tackle” a prime example) ruin what might have been a closer contest.
This kind of reactive refereeing is destroying a game which deep down has its charm in the simplicity of the rules. You knock it on, it’s a scrum, you stand offside, penalty or when a team is attacking, playing an advantage. That is natural common sense. The major complaint fans have is the lack of it being applied to situations by referees in game situations.
Currently the rules are being observed to the smallest detail (see the Greg Inglis try)
In my time watching rugby league, I haven’t heard of this ruling before and even when it was explained as wrong by Harrigan, Cecchin wasn’t reprimanded.
You will never eradicate blunders by the referees in any sport but you can limit them by using common sense on rulings. Rugby league can’t keep allowing errors to dominate the headlines, as it will reflect badly on a game which is looking to go to the next level.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- How rugby league should expand (132)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (106)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Manly coach slams NRL rule changes (12)
- Taylor’s Origin bid up to NRL judiciary (2)
- Storm get new owners as News Limited sell out (13)
- Desperate Tigers recall Marshall into NRL
- Manly call for NRL extra-time rethink (2)
- NRL fans: the English are coming (14)
- Daly Cherry-Evans the highlight of a bumper NRL weekend (31)
- NRL fans: the English are coming (14)
- Wind down the whining rugby league! (19)
- Time for the NRL to introduce silver point (51)
- A Blues Origin jumper for everyone? Why not (8)
- NRL golden point must get the flick (29)
- Cronulla Sharks fighting a war they can’t win (70)
- Where were you when sport sold its soul? (32)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Greg Inglis, NRL, nrl referees, Rugby League, State Of Origin

June 20th 2012 @ 8:49am
Sailosi said | June 20th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Referees contribute greatly to the spectacle of rugby league. Could you imagine if there was a game with no penalties. There would never be any tries. And how often do their decisions make games close.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 20th 2012 @ 2:46pm
DragonPunk said | June 20th 2012 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
I’m not saying they don’t add to the game but it’s when Referees decide to become bigger than the game, it starts being a problem. It’s not good for every week, the NRL has at least one horrible refereeing error (FPN “try” vs Brisbane and DCE “try” which was given on Monday.
It just makes RL look amateur and unprofessional in a time where the code is looking to get 1B+ in TV rights.
June 20th 2012 @ 9:09am
turbodewd said | June 20th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Let me get this straight.
SOO2: Uate makes a huge blunder by lacking the courage to take a high ball – he lets it bounce and Qld score. But if a referee makes one blunder he’s dropped to lower grade?! Bit silly if you ask me.
RL is an incredibly hard sport to referee. Errors will always be made and, occasionally close games can be decided by a refereeing error. The video ref will reduce the prevalence of such outcomes. Fans just need to lump it OR have 7 referees on the field like in the NFL which they wont stomach.
Move on people!
PS (SOO1: The Inglis try was a try, Farah kicked the ball out of his grasp with his shin and it incidentally bounced off Inglis in the same motion – play on!)
June 20th 2012 @ 10:05am
eagleJack said | June 20th 2012 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Yes, but do you really think it should have been a try? Im a Manly fan and can’t believe DCE was awarded his try against the Storm on Monday night. But it follows the same premise as the GI try. So under the “rules” it was a try.
How can it be that anywhere else on the field these would be called knock-ons. But in the act of scoring they are not. The onus of ball security needs to be put back onto the attacking player. The rule of dislodging the ball was brought in because Billy Slater was endangering players by sliding feet first and attacking the ball. But now it seems any accidental dislodging of the ball is apparently “played at” so play on. Ridiculous. An attacking player must protect the ball and any loose carries must be punished with the defensive team the beneficiary.
Unfortunately the refs are victims of the material they are working with. The material needs updating.
June 20th 2012 @ 11:10am
turbodewd said | June 20th 2012 @ 11:10am | Report comment
Lets not get bogged down on the Inglis try. Harrigan is sending mixed messages and is losing the plot a little. I read a few days ago he had a different view on a certain call recently. He is just feeding the fire with stuff like that.
RL rules are hard to enforce in real time with such a fast-paced game. We need to lump the occasional bad errors and hope the video ref can pick up the vast majority.
June 20th 2012 @ 11:51am
eagleJack said | June 20th 2012 @ 11:51am | Report comment
turbo I have no problem with on-field refs making mistakes. They make split second decisions. There are bound to be errors and the vast majority of fans realise this.
But it is the video refs who are the issue. And I don’t actually have a problem with them per se. More with the rules they are being told to enforce.
Another case in point was in the Sharks v Eels game a few weeks back. Colin Best in the process of scoring on the left hand side was hit in a good tackle, the ball came loose and went forward into the in-goal and the Sharks winger came through and put a hand on it. Knock-on scrum feed Eels. But the ref went upstairs.
As suspected the replay showed the ball coming loose from a good hit. Knock-on scrum feed Eels. But wait… they go to another angle… then a third angle… fourth… what is going on? While it was clear that Best had lost the ball, obviously the refs have been told to look for any chance that the defending player has aided in the ball coming free. This is a joke. Thankfully sanity prevailed on this occasion and it was ruled no-try. But the fact it even went past 1 replay shows there is a serious flaw in our current rulings in this area.
June 20th 2012 @ 11:57am
turbodewd said | June 20th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Mate, im on your side. The video ref should have limits placed on how long he can view replays. Maybe 60 seconds or 45.
Personally Id like to see us use video replay the way the NFL does, it makes so much more sense. It takes the responsibility off the official more so he’s free to make a call as he sees fit.
June 20th 2012 @ 9:45am
Pot Stirrer said | June 20th 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
I think the ref standard would improve if they changed the system to 1 controlling ref and the other just keeps the teams back the 10 mtrs. Also i think the Video Ref should only be allowed 4 replays, 3 in slowmo and 1 in normal speed, if he cant confirm or deny then it should be refs call.
June 20th 2012 @ 2:48pm
DragonPunk said | June 20th 2012 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
I agree. Having two referees has stretched the resources thin and the NRL is paying for it, with inexperienced officials, making mistakes.
The video referees need to apply “common sense” much like the referees, slowing things down to 1/1000th isn’t helping.
June 20th 2012 @ 3:39pm
Frank The Tank said | June 20th 2012 @ 3:39pm | Report comment
I think this is a pretty good article, the refs are getting too big for the game. They shouldn’t be aloowed to talk to the players the way they do, in particular calling them by their first name. Again League needs to look at AFL, their refs aren’t pros and quite frankly no one knows their names. The game is about the players, not the refs.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:56am
Jaceman said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:56am | Report comment
In a game where the number of penalties are low but with the 10 metre rule, a penalty virtually guarantees that the non offending team will be attacking the opponents line as a result then the referees decisions are crucial. They are game changers so penalties for minor infringements when the same thing is let go for the rest of the game guarantees controversy…