How to improve the greatest game of all
The NRL video referees are back under scrutiny (AAP Image/Chris Hyde)
Related coverage
Rugby League is a passion of mine and has been for as long as I can remember. I had the pleasure of playing the game from the age of five up to 17 and my on-field feats have stood the test of time, at least in my own mind.
Nowadays, as I am approaching a mid-life crisis, I marvel at the way the game has developed into one of the globe’s most respected and physically demanding contests.
The game will always have its critics. Fans of other codes will always want to knock rugby league, but many don’t take the chance to understand the game before they knock it.
I love rugby league, the collisions, the pace and the skill demonstrated in the modern game is breathtaking. There are so many attributes and good things the game has going for it. However, there are also areas that I’m sure many other lovers of the game have a reason to gripe about.
Even though I love rugby league, I do think there are areas where it could be improved. Some of these are:
1) Mid-season transfers
The game is a profession nowadays and players have the right to take care of themselves as best they can. Loyalty is not a term of endearment in any profession. The career span of a player is short. Notwithstanding that, it is difficult to accept a player can be committed to his team mates and jersey when he is focused on where he may be playing next season, next month or next week. Perhaps a transfer window deadline could be considered.
2) Scheduling of games
The Brisbane Broncos played a good portion of their early 2012 games consecutively on Friday nights. This allowed them consistency in their preparation for each week, a considerable advantage. Whereas other teams had to back up from Monday night games and play on Saturday, etc.
In addition and more importantly, the scheduling during the representative season is a dog’s breakfast. Teams who provide the bulk of rep players are often disadvantaged with byes during this period. It’s been mentioned constantly, however I firmly believe that representative matches should be standalone fixtures. If you disagree, have a look at the NRL crowd numbers the weekend after an Origin game.
3) Refereeing decisions
This gripe harps way back to when that Pommy bloke picked up the soccer ball in England and started to run and palm his chasers in the face. The video referee is in my opinion necessary for the game. The use of the video referee, though, needs to be refined. No penalties for head shots which should be the responsibility of the on field referees.
This will discourage players from lying down when there has been contact with the head. The on-field referees need to also be accountable for making decisions in the first instance rather than rely on the bloke upstairs. More often than not, the on field ref is in the best position and close enough to make a call on a try, however lacks the conviction to do so.
4) Scrums
Are they worth persisting with? They are no longer a genuine contest. The benefits are an opportunity for the attacking team; however it is hard to adjust seeing fullbacks packing in the second row, front rowers feeding the ball in the scrum and so on. They seem to be a debacle and a bit of a blight on the game.
5) Expansion
The wounds are still raw for many Bears and Jets fans and I can’t recall speaking to too many excited Steelers, Magpies, Saints and Tigers fans for clubs who have merged. There is a certain purity I believe when traditional clubs oppose each other, in front of their parochial followers.
While the game has broadened its horizons in places like Queensland and Melbourne, we need to consider at what cost. A lot of life long supporters have given the game away in recent years due to mergers or altogether axing’s of their teams
There are a multitude of changes and enhancements possible for the game; they are debated regularly on footy shows and in print. For instance there is the current Origin eligibility and among others interchange rules, 40/20′s etc.
On balance, the game itself has never been more exciting and breathtaking to watch. It is a great way to spend a Saturday night snuggled up next to a meat pie and a cold tinny.
But, Roarers, over to you. What would you like to see improved in the NRL?
The Crowd Says (61) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (180)
- How rugby league should expand (132)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (103)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (90)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (88)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- Give Dugan time before elevating his star again (11)
- Farah calls for unity at Wests Tigers (5)
- Dragons hail superstar Dugan (9)
- Roosters hold off Cowboys 12-8
- Sorry Warriors cop record NRL thrashing (19)
- Newcastle Knights vs Canterbury Bulldogs: NRL Live scores, blog (89)
- Cronulla Sharks vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (100)
- North Queensland Cowboys vs Sydney Roosters: NRL live scores, blog (91)
- Penrith Panthers vs New Zealand Warriors: NRL live scores (10)
- St George Illawarra Dragons vs Parramatta Eels: NRL Live scores, Blog (85)
- Albert Kelly should be the Blues’ number six (29)
- Cowboys discover the NRL is no country for old men (32)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin

June 21st 2012 @ 11:00am
allsports said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Maybe we can take transfer to another level and introduce player trades.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:29am
sheek said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:29am | Report comment
My thoughts.
1. Mid-season transfers. I agree, this is a disgrace. No matter what the professional sport, individuals & clubs are always on the best lookout for themselves. However, policing the greed/opportunism of individuals & clubs comes back to the will of the administrators, & how vigilant they wish to be upholding the integrity of their own sport.
2. Scheduling of games. There has to be a balance between the free ride offered the Broncos, & more revenue for broadcasters & sponsors, & providing all clubs with a more or less equitable distribution of matches on prime days (Friday evenings). Any sport needs all its clubs, the weaker along with the stronger. It all adds to the tradition, history, tribalism, etc. So treat everyone fairly.
3. Refereeing decisions. I really don’t know where to take this one. Technology has shown that when decisions are made by humans, they still manage to stuff it up. We could have a best of 5 video refs, or a best of 9 video refs, calling a majority decision ruling. And you can bet they will still get it wrong.
I reckon they had it right in the old days – leave the decision to the ref alone, & accept it on good faith. It seems they got it right much more often than they got it wrong.
4. Scrums. Rugby league scrums are a disgrace. Apparently the only reason they are persevered with, is to keep lumbering forwards away from the first tackle. Otherwise, they’ve become useless. Either make them a serious attacking weapon once again, or remove the name rugby. Because scrums are part of any rugby code.
In the past I’ve suggested that on the first tackle, the scrum be replaced by an American football style line of scrimmage. After the first tackle, normalcy returns.
5. Expansion. I don’t know why, but rugby league struggles to expand outside its heartland areas. NRL also needs to be careful about expanding to 18 or 20 teams, with many teams from regional areas. Which means their revenue potential is limited due a lack of concentrated population mass.
One of the things that makes AFL so successful, I believe, is that the 18 teams come from effectively just 5 cities. Gold Coast is basically a satellite of Brisbane, while Geelong is a satellite of Melbourne. This concentration of population & resources works very well for the AFL.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:44am
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Hi Sheek,
Regarding the referees – i couldn’t agree more with your comments. There will always be human error despite the technology, however best outcome is to accept the good with the bad and move on. i think it’s because of idiots like Gould who use their position in media to make a song and dance about every decision that outs enormous scrutiny on the whistleblowers. The refs who consistently make howlers will be found out but the old days of playing by the whistle is in my opinion the best way.
Scrums are a difficult beast. They clearly go through the motions and the result will always be feed the scrum behind second rowers feet and win the ball at present.
Enjoyed reading your other thoughts and points – make good sense
June 21st 2012 @ 2:40pm
sheek said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
JazzeJase,
Phil Gould has lost my respect, & anyone else who condoned Cooper Cronk’s professional foul on Todd Carney.
Sure, you do everything you can to help your team, even stretching the envelope of legality, but you’re still required to abide by the rules.
Ultimately, this was an irresponsible & extremely costly act by Cooper. While he was forcibly missing from action, NSW scored 12 points, & it should have been 14.
Conversely, there’s no absolute proof Carney would have scored anyway. We see so many examples of how players in attempting to score, will rush when they see an oncoming defender, & muck up the opportunity. Pressure does this.
Assuming Carney wasn’t interfered with, & with Billy Slater racing towards the ball also, would Carney have had the cool to collect & ground the ball properly anyway?
Phil Gould is not the messiah, he’s a first rate idiot…..!
June 21st 2012 @ 11:36am
turbodewd said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:36am | Report comment
The biggest issue the NRL faces is money, its that simple. If you get money right then everything else is so much easier!
So goal 1 is to maximise revenue and the biggest source of revenue is from TV contracts with FreeToAir channels. Every other suggestion in this thread pales into insignificance compared to this issue.
To maximise revenue we must place micro-breaks in the game where 20 or 30 second ads get inserted. Fans at the game would barely notice. Fans in front of TV would miss no footy.
Secondly, the game needs to be a smidge longer. The final 10min of each half must have clock stoppages for all breaks in play to eliminate time-wasting and appease fans. If there is 5min to go and the team taking the dropout is dawdling no time will be lost, fans neednt complain.
Lastly, unbundle SOO and the GF. Auction these seperately to the highest bidder. Auction the NRL regular season seperately.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:38am
Ads said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
I am one of those Western Suburbs Magpies fans. Have only been to 1 game of league since 1999 and that was last years faux heritage game v St George to honour 50 years since 1961 GF. Also watched another faux heritage game v Souths on TV. Until the Magpies come back I won’t be watching. I supported my club not the game. without the club I couldn’t care less about the game. So I follow my passion – Collingwood in the AFL, and attend Swans and Giants games. Go PIES!
June 21st 2012 @ 11:45am
OB Jones said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Yeah, I heard some North Sydney Bears and Wests Pies fans switch to RU to watch the Shute Shield or the Tahs or to the AFL to watch the Swans and GWS Giants.
June 25th 2012 @ 12:07am
alitis48 said | June 25th 2012 @ 12:07am | Report comment
Good they can keep supporting those other codes. We dont need those sort of people in RL
June 21st 2012 @ 11:50am
JazzyJase said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
Sadly mate you are not the only one who has given the game away but can understand your position. I barrack for the Sharks and would probably have zero interest in following the Perth Sharks or Central Coast Sharks. Expansion for the sake of it turns people away. Sheeks comments above regarding the AFL model shows how shrewd they are. Let’s face it, even in a sports mad city like Melbourne, with a team that has been the benchmark for almost a decade, the attendances and following in comparison to the Collingwoods, Richmonds, Carlton’s etc are relatively poor. Rugby League needs to look after it’s grass roots heartlands. As much as i loathe the bloke, Gus needs to be praised for his enthusiasm and passion for RL in the Greater Western area
June 21st 2012 @ 4:24pm
dishes said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:24pm | Report comment
As a sharks fan i hate to even talk about it, but I would definitely support them no matter where they went (if they had to relocate). if the were called the sharks and wore the traditional hoop jersey. If they left the comp altogether, rugby league would probably lose me as a fan.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:39pm
turbodewd said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
If the Canberra Raiders folded tomoro Id still follow the NRL. I have no idea which % of fans are like you or which are like me. I suspect most are like me…maybe a third are like yourself.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:11pm
Rob C said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Turbodewd, folding is very different to being forced out of the compeition. Would you feel the same way if the NRL kicked the Raiders out…?
I am a massive Dragons fan and was ok with the merger as my team retained most of its identity. I do feel sorry for the Steelers side of the merger, because they do not get enough of the limelight. Not many teams would though if they teamed up with Saints. Still for the Steelers they would be long gone if they did not merge witht he Dragons. Does not stop some of the old school supporters feeling like they have been ripped off. I can understand this.
Support for a sporting team is a very emotional thing and it is very difficult to replicate this with a new team. With that in mind I think any future expansion will need to come via relocation or competition expansion (no team should ever be forced to close down or not given adequate support at the expense of a new club). It will be interesting how the NRL tackle this issue because it could pose more harm than good.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:21pm
turbodewd said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
Rob,
teams dont get kicked out. The Jets were broke. North Sydney were broke. Illawarra was broke. Wests and Balmain chose to merge after NRL gave them a carrot. I think same with St.Geo and Illawarra.
June 21st 2012 @ 9:59pm
Col Quinn said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:59pm | Report comment
Norths were not broke. They merged with Manly, who broke the contract and ran off with North’s money. The NRl sat on its hands and did nothing. The current North’s bid has more financial backing than Melbourne
June 21st 2012 @ 1:58pm
JVGO said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
As a Sharks fan if they relocated I would probably still follow them. If they folded I suspect i would follow Souths, who I followed as a young kid when they were last winning premierships and whose district I have lived in actually for far longer then I did in the Shire when growing up. I have met a fair few of their players locally and they have a similar underdog battler ethos also. I attend Jets games as I live pretty handy and I would still have Origin and tests to get me involved. Of course it would be impossible to support teams I hated like the Dragons.
It will be interesting if Souths actually do something in the finals this year to see how involved I get with them. It might be the case for a lot of people if they make a run. It has been so long. but I imagine Souths would be most peoples second team if things happen for them.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:34pm
JVGO said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
So Ads you were passionate and entirely monogamous about Western Suburbs and were a one club man in RL but support and follow three AFL teams? I’d think you are just 3 times more passionate about AFL, except that you are constantly reading NRL threads in order to come on and say exactly the same thing every time. I find it all very hard to believe. The merchandising expenses must be horrendous.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:21pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
Mid-season transfers are fine up to a point in time – say June 30. How good has the Inu switch to the Dogs been ?
I don’t have a major problem with the Broncos scheduling. I don’t mind seeing them second on Friday nights. But then again I have Fox – if I only got three games of footy each weekend and one was the Broncs every time I might think differently.
Ok they get a bit of an advantage in preparation but they also have the disadvanatge of significant travel every second week (I know they’re not the only ones) as well as traditionally having the most players in Tests and Origin.
Scrums are scrums – who cares ? We’re definitely eulogising old school scrums – they were a shambles, loose arms, feet across, second row feeds, collapses, four re-packs and three minutes wasted. Good riddance. They provide an attacking opportunity for teams brave enough to take it.
Refs have always made mistakes. I’m starting to think that the reason we focus so much on them now is that teams regularly make 50+ metres in each set. When a penalty is given you get an additional 20 – 30 metres with the kick to touch so a penalty anywhere on the field can put your opposition in an attacking position and drastically change the momentum of the game.
In the 80s (and I’m sure before) teams would batter away to make 20 or 30 metres in an average set so the kick for touch was the reward.
A penalty now has far greater consequence than it did 20 years ago.
Starting a set on your own 40 metre line is a massive advantage these days in itself. We don’t need the kick for touch.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:38pm
Ian Masterton said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
Excellent point regarding penalties The Barry, maybe some lesser infringements should only be penalised with an equivalent to the Short arm penalty in Union. The side benefiting from this penalty would get the tackle count re-set but could only restart the game with a tap. You could keep the kick to touch or kicks at goal restart for more serious penalties.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:47pm
Rabbi said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Souths were kicked out. Perth were kicked out. Gold coast chargers wre kicked our. South qld were kicked out. None of these clubs were broke. Norths were made to participate in a forced merger ( admittedly they were broke).
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:51pm
turbodewd said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:51pm | Report comment
Souths were kicked out for not meeting some NRL minimum standards.
Perth, Adelaide, Hunter Mariners and SQld Crushers were victims of ARL-SL negotiations. Costs and teams had gone insane, there had to be cutbacks. Hunter was only created to make SL 10 teams.
Every GCoast team has folded because of no money.
History proved that if Illawarra joined SL they would have been saved, they would have been the 10th team! Those fools!
June 21st 2012 @ 6:46pm
db swannie said | June 21st 2012 @ 6:46pm | Report comment
Wrong ,The Chargers had 2 million plus in the bank at the time they were a victim of the ARL/SL compromise.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:46pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:46pm | Report comment
turbodewd,
You need to get your facts right.
The Gold Coast Chargers were one of the few clubs that made a profit during the Super League war. The only reason they were tossed out of the NRL by the ARL because it was less painful than getting rid of another Sydney club. Telling another Sydney club that they were out would have made it harder to ease the pain of the Super League war.
The Gold Coast has only ever had two teams: Chargers and Titans. Every other club that was called “Gold Coast” was based in Tweed Heads, NSW.
June 22nd 2012 @ 11:13am
Crosscoder said | June 22nd 2012 @ 11:13am | Report comment
In fact he Charges had the money in the bank after they were given the see you later,and some of the money was I believe, lent to the Newcastle Knights.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:14pm
Rabbi said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
Turbodewd, you are wrong about the gold coast chargers. They were in the black. They were, along with several other clubs, a burnt offering to news ltd, while other clubs were shanghaied into forced mergers. You’re probably right about Illawarra if they had gone super league, but it didn’t help Perth. Instead we got Melbourne, who while enjoying considerable on field success, are still small fry in the Melbourne sporting culture. I would argue that we should have stuck with Perth all along.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 21st 2012 @ 5:03pm
Rabbi said | June 21st 2012 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
Wh
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 21st 2012 @ 5:51pm
Ray said | June 21st 2012 @ 5:51pm | Report comment
I’d change the way time works. Perhaps stop the clock after a try is scored, a mistake, or a penalty, it would add close to twenty minutes to the contest. I just think that there is too much time wasting in the game, and it can rob the game of a grand stand finish.
There is nothing worse than late in a tight game when teams deliberately waste time in order to milk time off the clock. It may also aid crowds, with the length of the game justifying the expense and the time taken travel, especially in Sydney where getting to some games takes longer than the actual game itself.
It would also be a boost for television rights, longer games more air times, more time to put ads in place and doesn’t Channel 9 love that.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:47pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:47pm | Report comment
I think you’re on a winner there, Ray. It’s a great way to get more money out of the game.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:43pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:43pm | Report comment
I understand the author’s anger with mergers. If they’re done right they can be tolerable, but I think they are more likely to end in failure.
The Souths Magpies and Logan Scorpions merged to become the Souths Logan Magpies in 2002. All of their home games are played at Davies Park (West ENd, Brisbane) because it costs too much to play at Meakin Park (Slacks Creek, Logan). The Brisbane Strikers own Meakin Park. The Magpies can no longer afford to play at Meakin Park. The Raiders played at Meakin Park in front of 5,000 or so supporters a couple of years ago in a pre-season trial, with all money raised from ticket sales going to the Magpies. That’s a lot of tickets sold, but they didn’t much of a profit.
Logan City Council won’t help the Magpies out. They’ve done so much for AFL and soccer, but they neglect rugby league.