The next Immortal: The facts
By Tex Redmund, 21 Jun 2012 Tex Redmund is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Andrew Johns, Mal Meninga, NRL, Rugby League, Rugby League Immortals
125 Have your say
Debate around the next Immortal has re-emerged and sadly become quite emotive based upon state lines. Lets try to take emotion out of the equation, and look at two players often mentioned.
Player A – retired with the most appearances, and most points for the Australian national team, and became the top-point scorer for his State in State of Origin history.
At a point in time, he had played most Tests for Australia (45), scored most points for Australia – 272 in tests and 551 in all matches, achieved most Kangaroo tours of Great Britain and France – four in 1982, 1986, 1990 and 1994, and most Kangaroo tours as Captain – 2 in 1990 and 1994.
Player B – is one of only two players to have won the Golden Boot Award more than once and is the only player to have won the Dally M Medal three times.
He finished his career as the highest points scorer in Australian first grade premiership history with 2,176 points.
From the moment he was selected in his preferred position in Origin, he was either not selected at all or overlooked in that position for another player (and being selected in a different position) on more occasions than he was selected in his preferred position.
The data itself is pretty comparable, other than the number of occasions each player was deemed elite enough to captain their country – the highest accolade imaginable.
| Player A | Player B | ||||||||||
| Club | Club | ||||||||||
| Team | Pld | T | G | FG | P | Team |
Pld
|
T
|
G
|
FG
|
P
|
| England |
31
|
28
|
8
|
0
|
128
|
England |
3
|
1
|
12
|
1
|
29
|
| Australia |
166
|
74
|
283
|
2
|
864
|
Australia |
249
|
94
|
917
|
22
|
2176
|
| Total |
197
|
102
|
291
|
2
|
992
|
Total |
252
|
95
|
929
|
23
|
2205
|
| Premierships |
3
|
Premierships |
2
|
||||||||
| Representative | Representative | ||||||||||
| Team | Pld | T | G | FG | P | Team | Pld | T | G | FG | P |
| Origin | 32 | 6 | 69 | 0 | 161 | Origin |
23
|
4
|
37
|
4
|
94
|
| Australia | 46 | 21 | 96 | 0 | 272 | Australia |
24
|
7
|
78
|
0
|
184
|
| Captain | Captain | ||||||||||
| Origin | 9 | Origin |
6
|
||||||||
| Tests | 23 | Tests |
2
|
||||||||
When the achievements in text are considered however, Player A has a clear, clear advantage in regards to achievements at the highest level.
When this is taken with the context that Player B was, from the time of his Origin debut, actually overlooked entirely or overlooked from playing in his specialist position on more occasions than he was seen as the number one player in his position – the answer becomes clear that Player A is a significantly better candidate as being the next Immortal.
How an Immortal could so often be seen as a lesser option at the highest level in his specialist position is beyond me.
Player A = Mal Meninga, Player B = Andrew Johns.
For reference, Geoff Toovey and Brett Kimmorley were both often preferred to Andrew Johns at half for NSW, with Johns often selected at hooker.
![]()
Passionate about your league? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily league email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (116)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (91)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Six things that will improve the NRL (85)
- Another NRL mistake: the shoulder charge (2)
- Maloney’s selection is not building NSW’s dynasty (1)
- Did the NSW selectors get it wrong? Don’t be so sure (1)
- Sydney Roosters vs Melbourne Storm: NRL live scores, blog (107)
- Manly Sea Eagles vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (98)
- St George-Illawarra Dragons vs Penrith Panthers: NRL live scores, blog (110)
- Wests Tigers vs North Queensland Cowboys: Live Scores (26)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Andrew Johns, Mal Meninga, NRL, Rugby League, Rugby League Immortals


June 21st 2012 @ 10:27am
Bobo said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:27am | Report comment
What about Ken Irvine?
June 21st 2012 @ 11:01am
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:01am | Report comment
Ken and Provan will certainly be in the discussion as well.
My reservation with Irvine is that as a winger he influenced the game less hence his teams weren’t always good despite his quality as a finisher. That said his inclusion wouldn’t be an outrage.
for Johns I do think the biggest knock is that his own state selectors didn’t value him and he only ahd one origin series where he seemed to control it.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:05am
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
Once you become a immortal, their is no un-immortal, you cant take it back. Here is a table i want everyone to look at, this could change alot of peoples minds, with some added facts.
Mother Teresa, Nelson Madela, Dali Lama, Charlie Manson.
Bob Fulton, Reg Gasnier, Graham Langslands, John Raper, Joey Johns.
Now as you can see plainly in these 2 cases, their is a odd one out, one is a murderer in the top line amounst persons working for humanity, the other is a drug taker by his own ommission and he took these drugs while he was playing. Weekly.
Put Johnson or Armstrong , another 2 athletes tainted by drugs in either of these groups as well, would you be happy to see our so-called highest honor with any of these poeple in the groups. ???
No, of course not, you will taint the whole thing and nobody will ever again take this concept seriously. The ARL, or NRL really has to find a visionary, someone who can take the game forward before we start making mistakes we cant undo. Like signing 20 year deals for finals, and 6 year tv deals,thanks Dave.
Why we even allow reporters like Alexander or the other muppet, Paul Kent to even have a say on who the immortals might be, sowers the whole process to me. I wish these blokes would be told to keep their unwanted veiws out of the process, even Bob Fulton should not be allowed to choose. This should be done by higher statesmen. Someone with a bit of wisdom, not your common street reporter who is pushing a wheelbarrow, his own agenda.
Grant needs to find a CEO, and fast, and start acting like he knows what he is doing. I am not seeing leadership.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:54am
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
Alexander and PaulKent don’t have a say on who the next Immortal will be.
Along with the five living Immortals – Bob Fulton, Reg Gasnier, John Raper, Graeme Langlands and Wally Lewis – there will be thirteen other individuals that deliberate over the candidates. These are Wayne Bennett, Ray Warren, John Grant, David Middleton, Ray Hadley, Phil Rothfield, Roy Masters, Geoff Prenter, Ian Heads, Norman Tasker, Tony Durkin, Martin Lenehan and Mitchell Dale.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:40pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
Just to throw it out there is it not a conflict of interest to have Langlands, Raper and Gasnier voting for one of their former team mates ? I understand that all three have selected Provan.
I’m sure their integrity is beyond reproach and their opinion that Provan was the best candidate 100% valid but for some reason it doesn’t sit right.
I’m sure there’d be concerns if Harragon, Matt Johns and Tony Butterfield were on the panel.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:06pm
eagleJack said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
Oh oikee you never cease to come up with crackers. Bob Fulton, a living Immortal, should not be allowed to choose? Should his place be taken by your well rounded and balanced self?
June 21st 2012 @ 12:21pm
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
his first group of four is along the lines of the chewbacca defence.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:29pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
I was just putting up a graft, so we can all understand the concequenses of the decision these guys will make. As for Fulton, and other immortals, i dont like the fact they get a vote. No, its not right, they never voted themselves in, why should they get a vote now. Anyone who questions this is questionable.
As for Kent and alexander, no Ryan, they dont have a say, but like ophra they have a audience, and they both have big mouths. You only have to look at what Brandi said about internatiopnal rugby league is Dead, yes Dead he said, well fix it Brandi, dont say Origin is taking over if you dont have a plan B, because Origin has no plan B at the moment.
These load mouths get listened to by a tv audience, and this can drag a whole heap of followers down a cetain path, if you know what i mean, I am here to keep a balance on this subject, and i am showing you cold hard facts, are you Happy, to put a Drug taker by his own admission along side our so-called immortals of the game, if you are, then i think it time i changed sports, not you.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:42pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
Alexander and Kent have as much right to comment as you or King Wally or Crash Craddock.
Alexander did not say that Test footy was dead he said that Origin meant more to players and was a better standard…are you going to disagree ? Tamou and Kasiano wouldn’t.
If Johns came out and said that he was struggling with mental illness and turned to booze there would be mass public sympathy…what’s the difference because it’s drugs. If anything he deserves credit for getting on top of his problems and not descending into ongoing addiction.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:53pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
He said and i repeat, International league is dead. Now if you dont agree, your a lair. I will record it now to keep and show anyone who wants to see the replay. This is what he said to Tallis.
I will watch it again and get everything he said for you.
Why are you trying to make out i am lying, i am trying to tell everyone the facts, and these 2 blokes along with many other reporters and commentators are doing more damage than good to the game, so many they should be told pull your heads in or we take you off the air. The reporting is too NSW heavy anyhow.
Everyone has known this for many years, even Queensland has its own Origin station now. So in other words, everyone has had enough, we are sick of the BS.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:05pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
If you can’t entrust the living Immortals to be judges, then who the hell can you? You think any them will be swayed by something Alexander or Kent says?
June 21st 2012 @ 1:32pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
Oikee – who called whom a liar…?
I watched the same show that you did. Brandy made a point that Origin was regarded as superior to Origin.
So NSW journos aren’t allowed to report from a NSW perspective ? Does that go for the Courier Mail ?
What about Crash Craddock ? He comments from a QLD perspective. Guys like Tallis, Vautin, Ikin and Sailor are the most one eyed, biased, parochial media pundits I’ve ever seen – are you ready to pull them off the air ? No they’re probably ok.
I love the liberal use of the word “fact” around here today….hahaha
I think it must mean something different North of the border…
June 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm
Ronnie the Eel said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
Well said, Barry. If the Qld supporters want enough evidence of biased media coverage, they have to look no further than The Footy Show – hosted by none other than the one-eyed ex-Maroon and Qld biased identity – Fatty Vautin. The same can’t be said of Sterlo, perhaps one of the most unbiased commentators there is….
not sure which media they read, listen to or watch up there but we get enough of QLD media bias on NSW televised sports programmes, one can then only imagine what it’s been like up there for the last 32 years…. but all we’ll keep hearing from them is based on double standards as per usual…
With anyone that even looks like having a bit of success and may have spent 10 minutes at a Gold Coast pub they want to label them a “Queenslander” and jump on the success bandwagon…
June 21st 2012 @ 1:45pm
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
No you said that Charles Manson is to the Dali Lama what Johns is to Raper.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:39pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
Oikee – that’s ridiculous even by your standards…Mother Teressa, Charlie Manson, Dali Lama ??????? What are you on about ????
So comparing Johns to Raper is like Manson to Mother Teressa. hahahaha
June 21st 2012 @ 2:30pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:30pm | Report comment
I put up this graft so you could understand what is being said. If you put Charlie Manson in with that group, yes it looks extreme, i admit this, and is how i made my point with joey Johns, he does not fit, as i said he admitted to taking Drugs, but you guys dont want to mention this, lets not mention the war boys, as Faulty would say, i mentioned it once, but i dont think nobody noticed. ???
I can notice Joey Johns sitting alongside the Immortals, and from where i sit, it does not look good,. As i said, once your imortalised, their is no going back, and i dont want this game to make the mistake of making a player who admitted to taking drugs a immortal, it will not only cheapen the immortals, it will cheapen the whole brand.
Now speaking of cheapening the brand. Ryan, these immortals were picked to be immortals, they are not Gods mate. Whio can you trsut you ask, how about this, someone with a bit of common sense would be a start, maybe John Howard, the PM of NZ, i dont know, lets find someone we can all have faith in, not Bob Fulton, he has already shown he is just a immortal, nothing else, by getting behind Joey,
So he has lost all credibilty.
The Barry, mate come on, everyone knows that Rugby League is NSW top heavy. Everyone knows this, not just me saying it, the united nations is saying it, Cabul is saying it, gee even Obama is saying it, its like a wooden nose it is that obvious.
Mate i am taping that show now, i will tell everyone what was said by Brandi, his own words, i i know for a fact he said iNternational league is dead. You can all watch it yourselves, its on shortly replayed on Fox.
I wont let this go mate. Throw me a bone, you wont get it back.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:35pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:35pm | Report comment
You want the PM of NZ to decide an Immortal over Bob Fulton?
You sir, are mad.
The Immortals are based on ‘on field achievement’. Nothing more, nothing less. Johns’ drug taking is irrelevant. You may not like it, but you don’t make the rules. Johnny Raper was no angel, I can assure you, but he’s an Immortal.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:33pm
Bigbaz said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:33pm | Report comment
The standards of Rapers’ day were different to Johns.Raper bowler hat and all was seen to be a larrakin rather than a cheat.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:15pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
So Ryan, your saying that Bob Fulton, a football player is better knowedgeable than the PM of NZ, no sir, you are mad, not me.
Understand this, Bob Fulton is a knucklehead footy player, now, i love my footy players, but running the world i draw a line. I also mentioned John Howard, i see you never mentioned him because i already have you on the ropes.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:25pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
Yes, I’m saying that Bob Fulton is more knowledgeable than the PM of NZ (who you can’t even name – it’s John Key, by the way). And when I say ‘knowledgeable’, I mean on the requirements for this particular job: picking rugby league’s best players. That’s hardly ‘running the world’.
And yes, I’d prefer Bob Fulton choosing the next Immortal over John Howard, for the exact same reason.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:43pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:43pm | Report comment
Good, we are getting into the nitty gritty here Ryan. Yes John Key, nice work Ryan. Ok now lets go further, ok, now here is a senorio, we have Joey Johns, now this never happened, but according to you, we should pick Joey over Mal regardless of this happening, he mass murdered 25 people in Brisbane, no, bare with me, under your line of thinking, regardless of anything that happens around the game, you take no notice of intetrnational uproar, you make Joey your Immortal.
Now Ryan, mate,,,,,,,, this is what you are saying, No, honest, this is the truth of your argument. Now, i am not trying to make you look stupid,.
Get back to me. I can keep this alive, i have my Mrs home shortly, then your in trouble. She is the smart one.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:50pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
Them the rules, mate! I don’t make them.
And how come, in your hypotheticals, it’s never Mal murdering someone?
June 22nd 2012 @ 10:44am
oikee said | June 22nd 2012 @ 10:44am | Report comment
Same senario Ryan, if Lockyer mass murdered, would we still pick him as a immortal, hey kiddies, it’s ok, he was a good footballer.
Where are you going kiddies, come back, he is only a self confessed drug taker. Forget all that, he played good footy. ???
You can see where i am going Ryan surely. Yes, Mal, Lockyer, anyone, if you or me did this, do you think it would look good. ? No lets be sensible.
And this is why i think someone needs to step in and change the way we look at the Immortal voting. As i just showed, it is not a sensible way of doing the process.
Anyhow, i have given my best shot at this argument, it is now in the hands of the gods.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:54pm
Ronnie the Eel said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
Let me interpret a bit of oikee for all the normal readers and posters of this forum – when he uses the term “everyone” in his post above referring to League being NSW top heavy – he really means the ten Qld supporters he hangs out with at his local RSL who agree with his obviously unbiased sentiments……
A bit of history for you here as well, oikee, wouldn’t go astray – NSW was settled prior to QLD and league was played in NSW before QLD as well….. that might go some of the way to explaining your personal perception that league is NSW -heavy – just because the administrators and headquarters are in NSW and QLD’ers get jealous and think the world is against them…..
And you seem to want to hang anyyone that was a NSW player that has admitted to making poor decisions in their lives…..
June 21st 2012 @ 4:25pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
True, Ronny, but Queensland was right on your tail, we have been ever sinse, Only a year behind we started our own team and comp after NSW.
1909. Plus we are kicking the life outta the game, we have crowds 3 times what NSW can muster, pretty much like your 10 and a dog thoery, mate i have 5 million behind me, over 1.25 Broncos fans.
It took you 6 months to sell out your 1 home game, even then you managed to be 900 hundred short, it will take 1 hour to sell 105 thlousand tickets to our homegame series next year.
You have issues, back em up mate, cause we are going to rock your plastic world Ricky has created.
We’re commin to get ya.
Be afraid mate, be very afriad, Queensland are taking no prisoners at game 3 suncorp.
June 22nd 2012 @ 12:42pm
Ronnie the Eel said | June 22nd 2012 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
Oh stop your dribbling, oikee…. what’s the use of selling 105 thousand tickets to your one and only home-game in origin next year oikee, when Suncorp has only capacity for around 50,000??? That shows a bit of a difference right there… at least our stadiums can hold a decent size crowd….
where are you gunna fit the other 60,000 who won’t be able to fit in to Suncorp even if they have tickets, in your yard with a big screen? You must have the most perfect ticket- booking system ever invented up there if your ticketing agencies can sell and administer 105,000 tickets in only one hour! Them’s big numbers… Perhaps you should write to the QRL and request them to build bigger stadiums to support the massive crowds you always get at Suncorp..
And I think if we only had three clubs spread in an entire state a la Qld – let alone the One City Wonders (the Broncos) as the only team in your capital city, then we might well be able to crow more than you do now about our massive supporter base!!!
If you added all supporters of all the NSW NRL clubs together and spread them among three teams only , whom do you think would then have the highest supporter base and put more bums on seats at matches? Not Qld teams, that’s for certain…
The ‘plastic world’ that QLD created began 32 years ago….. and is continually perpetuated by oikee…
June 21st 2012 @ 10:16pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
Oikee – no-one knows what your saying and your ridiculous comparisons completely cloud whatever obscure point you’re trying to make.
I don’t know what the “graft” you keep talking about is.
From Manson to Basil Fawlty to the NZ PM picking immortals – you are an absolute gibberer
June 21st 2012 @ 9:38pm
Big_Marn2000 said | June 21st 2012 @ 9:38pm | Report comment
You’re an idiot Oikee. Firstly, Joey didn’t take drugs every week of his career. If you watch this interview and part 2 which is linked to that first video, you’ll see he mainly took drugs in the off-season. He did it occasionally during the season proper, but it was mostly in the off-season. Secondly, it’s easy to criticize Joey for his behavior, but I’d like to see you cope with the pressure he was under. And thirdly, if you knew anything about the Immortals, you’d know that what happens off the field is completely irrelevant. Joey could have been a murderer, a terrorist, a people smuggler, whatever. The Immortals is entirely about recognizing the most consistent and the best on-field performance.
June 22nd 2012 @ 10:52am
oikee said | June 22nd 2012 @ 10:52am | Report comment
So you 2 guys, you and Barry above dont mind our code to put up as our most treasured role models a Drug taker. That is what you are both agreeing to, well i wont be part of it, i wont rate the immortals, and the whole thing will just be that little bit sleazy. good luck with that, but no kid, grandkid, son, daughter ,anyone i know will be part of this farse, that is all it will be , your agreeing to immortalise a drug taker,. Nice work chaps, good luck with that, i wont be part of it, I hope you understand that jibbering Barry.
I put up a good argument, you guys are like white pointers, your eyes roll back into your head and you close everything, you refuse to listen to anyone who might talk sense,. Anyhow, good luck, like i said, i wont be party to this nonsense. And enjoy living with it if he gets voted.
And i hope rugby league can live with the fact they dont mind making a self confessed drug taker a immortal, bugger everything else, bugger the kids, bugger the lot, it means nothing, we are blind to everything, we just have to forge ahead blindly, without conscience, make him immortal, it will appease the gods,.
I give up, i tried , now its up to the gods.
June 29th 2012 @ 10:17am
Coop said | June 29th 2012 @ 10:17am | Report comment
oikee, Rugby League immortals are judged for their performances on the field, nothing else.
Regardless of drugs and off field behaviour, if you think having Andrew Johns as an immortal will cheapen the lable, you clearly have not watched any of his matches. Why should he be denied because your kids and grandkids won’t like it? You kick up a stink over off field behaviour without looking at his stats, accolades and highlights, which is what these immortals are selected on.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:09am
sheek said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Bobo,
There are two criteria for being selected as an immortal.
1. You obviously have to have been a “great” of the game.
2. You have to be alive at the time of your nomination & selection. Thus – immortal.
Although Irvine was selected as a winger in Australian rugby league’s “team of the century”, he is now deceased, & therefore ineligible for immortal selection.
Two other immortals – Clive Churchill & Arthur Beetson – has since passed away. But they were both alive at the time of their nomination & selection.
My tip is Norm Provan. The argument might be to induct him before he passes onto greener pastures. He is after all, around 80 years old now. The Dragons immortals – Gasnier, Raper & Langlands – are pushing very hard in his corner.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:23am
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
I agree with this as well. Norm Provan is a classic immortal. I will also be pushing for big Mal, i dont care if his only sin is what did the game ever do for me. Maybe becoming a immortal big Mal.
As for Joey, he is like the gate keeper, i just cant allow myself to ever think a guy who admitted to taking drugs can even be considered a immortal. He has been forgiven for this, by most, that is enough reward.
I wont change my mind, and if he becomes immortal, i wont ever support the immortals ever again, they will be tainted, the lot fo them.
It is a huge price to pay, but being immortal is also the highest honor. If we drop the standards its all over.
This game has to uphold a great traditional burdon it has placed on itself. The point is, we will respect the status if they do the right thing. Taking the easy road will finish the whole process, detroy it.
Take care rugby league, your treading thin ice.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:49pm
Mals said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:49pm | Report comment
Oikee you can’t stand it because Andrew Johns is from NSW and single handly won Origins for NSW. You are using the drug taking as an excuse, it still gets up your nose, just admit it
June 22nd 2012 @ 11:00am
oikee said | June 22nd 2012 @ 11:00am | Report comment
No i am looking further than that Mals, i am thinking of the message we will be sending to kids.
We are immortalising a drug taker. Mate it cant be said any easier than that.
The game will be making a self confessed drug taker a immortal.
It has nothing to do with what state he comes from, i would be as outspoken about any player who did the same.
Like i said, none of my kids will be party to this, and i will make sure it is known by everyone i know.
Sorry, these are my morals, not you or anyone will change my mind.
I made the argument above to Ryan when he said it is only about his playing career, bullocks, and if it is, we need to change this fast.
I have had my say, argue amounst yourselves, i will wait for the outcome.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:44am
Bobo said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Thanks Sheek
I was under the impression that the player must have been actually seen by the judges, rather than alive at the time of award. Thanks for the correction, as his absence seemed incredible to me.
As to Meninga and Johns – well, I’m not sure either deserve it, but Meninga is the better pick. Johns at his best was a better player, but Meninga was consistently superb over a longer period. It’s harder to be consistent than intermittently brilliant. Just ask Quade Cooper and Mitchell Johnson.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:06pm
Ronnie the Eel said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
Unsure if you watched or are referring to the same Andrew Johns that most people had over his career – “intermittently brilliant” would not be a usual term applied to Joey – as he was a consistently high performer over his career.- you don’t win the awards and accolades that he did by only being intermittently brilliant..
not really a valid comparison to put him in the same league as Mitchell Johnson and Mr Cooper…….
June 21st 2012 @ 12:23pm
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:23pm | Report comment
I thought the immortal refered to your place and standing in the game
Saying you need to be alive “hence immortal” assumes that they’ve bestowed eternal life in the literal sense despite two past failures
June 21st 2012 @ 12:40pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
I went and seen the mummies mushi, on Monday, awesome. The mummies have eternal life, there is a book of the dead with spells and whatnot to carry you into the afterlife. See what you learn.
So each of these immortals need to be wrapped and barmed and put in a shocophsis and buried in a tomb.
If anyone here thinks i am burying Joey, you have another thing coming. We should have wrapped Artie and barmed and placed him in a carkest and entombed big Artie.
In 1000 years time imagine the tourists, gee wizz, this Artie guy was unreal.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:12pm
Arthur Fonzarelli said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Re Johns being selected out of position, I recollect Big Mal being selected as a 2nd rower in the 1986 Kangaroo tour when he couldnt get picked in the centres ahead of Miles & Kenny.
To all the Johns haters who feel his personal life should rule him out, – can we honestly say that we have 100% knowledge that Big Mal, Raper, Langlands, Fulton, Beetson etc etc dont have any skeletons in their closets from their youths?
Or are they all paragons of virtue and holiness ?
June 21st 2012 @ 7:40pm
soapit said | June 21st 2012 @ 7:40pm | Report comment
yeah anyone who pulls that picked out of position thing out as a negative to johns is kidding themselves.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:18pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:18pm | Report comment
I thing Mal Meninga should be the next Immortal.
However, just a few points to add in order to balance your piece:
- When people talk about the fact Meninga captained two Kangaroo Tours, it’s important to remember that there were no Kangaroo Tours between 1994 and 2001. It’s worth noting, because it shouldn’t be held against Australian players were denied the opportunity during that time period.
- Whilst captaining your country is a great honour, ‘best player’ and ‘captain’ are not the same thing.
- You stated that “When the achievements in text are considered however, Player A has a clear, clear advantage in regards to achievements at the highest level.” But to that point, Johns won 4 Man of the Match awards at Origin level, Meninga won 1. Johns was also the player of the Australia v Great Britain series in 2001, and the Most Valuable Player of the 1995 World Cup in England. Surely these count as ‘achievements’ at the highest level?
- During voting for the Team of the Century, Johns was named in the top 10 players of all time, Meninga was not.
- Johns was nominated the ‘best player of the last 30 years’ by Rugby League Week.
I’m not picking a fight, and Mal deserves to be an Immortal, but you’ve been fairly selective with the statistics and accomplishments you’ve chosen.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:41pm
nq said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
also johen won player of the match in origin at hooker out of his prefered position
June 21st 2012 @ 12:32pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
“How an Immortal could so often be seen as a lesser option at the highest level in his specialist position is beyond me.”
“For reference, Geoff Toovey and Brett Kimmorley were both often preferred to Andrew Johns at half for NSW, with Johns often selected at hooker.”
Both of these comments are pretty inaccurate. Johns debuted for NSW in State of Origin in 1995 and finished in 2005. After 1998, Johns was never selected at hooker again. And in total, he played just 5 games in the position. That’s hardly ‘often’.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:48pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Johns also might have started with the 9 on his back but he spent a big chunk of those games playing first receiver.
It also means he was more versatile than Meninga – is that versatility to play different positions on the field not worthy of recognition as part of the overall consideration.
I think there’s compelling cases for both Meninga and Johns and I’d be happy to see either get the nod. I’d be happier if they both got it.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:45pm
Tex Redmund said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
Hi Ryan – I see this as a forum as being for thought and discussion so no criticism is taken by me as fight-picking. From the time Johns made his debut, the following players were preferred at halfback for NSW ahead of him; Geoff Toovey (6 occasions), Brett Kimmorley (6), Trent Barrett (2), John Simon, Craig Gower, Brett Finch (1). 6 seperate players and over 17 occasions. Injury played a part for 2 series, but otherwise… hardly the stuff of an Immortal is it?
June 21st 2012 @ 4:01pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:01pm | Report comment
Hey Tex,
Johns made his debut for NSW in 1995, aged 21, as the starting number 7. He then played hooker in 1996 and 1997. After 1997, at just 23 years of age, he never played anything but his preferred halfback position.
In other words, once he was established and in his prime, he was never again overlooked for the number 7 jersey, unless he was injured.
As for the early in his career, he was so talented that they made room for him at number 9, just to accommodate getting him in the side, despite his relatively young age.
After 1997 (and 23 years of age), no player was picked ahead of him until he retired.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:32pm
Tex Redmund said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
“After 1997, he never played anything but his preferred halfback position… unless injured” is a fair point. As for whether he was selected out of position at hooker for reasons other than he not being the preferred halfback – whilst possible (and not reflected in pure data) it is also quite debatable.
I am not pushing a “Johns hating” agenda as has been accused by some – I wanted a balanced and non-emotive approach to considering this. Johns was class, but when you look at Meninga’s achievements particularly at international level, despite too suffering numerous significant injuries, I personally consider him the better contender – if only one is to be chosen.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:42pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
I think Mal should go in too, mate.
And I think Joey should be right behind him, or at least next.
June 21st 2012 @ 11:06pm
peeeko said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:06pm | Report comment
if you are suggesting that finch, simon, gower and barrett were ever selected ahead of johns you are very mistaken
June 21st 2012 @ 12:33pm
The High Shot said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Let them both in, they both deserve it. Add Locky too.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:03pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Agreed
June 21st 2012 @ 3:56pm
Tex Redmund said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
I guess a question to be considered is should the brightest period of a players career or their ability and achievement over their entire career be the greatest consideration in evaluating Immortal candidates? Johns was unplayable for 2 arguably 3 seasons at all levels of the game. He was magnificent over that period, but over the previous years was a quality but certainly not 5-star player. By comparison, Mal Meninga’s arguably didn’t reach the dizzying heights of magnificance that Johns did when at his best, but his achievements spanned his career. Over his career, he performed at a consistently higher level. Which then should take precedence – Brighter for Shorter, or Better for Longer?
June 21st 2012 @ 4:48pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:48pm | Report comment
Need to be careful here – surely Johns brilliance was more than two seasons? Barring injury, he was dominant from 1997(ish) to 2005.
June 21st 2012 @ 5:03pm
Tex Redmund said | June 21st 2012 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
You can’t speculate on how he would have performed had he not been injured though can you? A little presumptuous?
June 21st 2012 @ 5:05pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 5:05pm | Report comment
I’m not presuming – he was still active for more than two of those years!
June 21st 2012 @ 8:32pm
Eric George said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:32pm | Report comment
I’ll never forget the impact Johns had in 2005, when he was injured through for the majority of the season, worked incredibly hard to come back, and turned the Knights into the best wooden spoon team the competition’s ever seen when he returned. The Knights won 8 of their last 11 matches when he came back, beating the majority of the top 8 teams that season (including the minor premiers:parramatta). Johns also came back from rep football retirement in Origin 2, which the Blues won (Joey won man of the match honours).
Johns was a force of nature unlike any other player in the League at the time, and the way he performed through his injury shortened seasons should elevate his claims, not discount them.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:46pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:46pm | Report comment
Tex – regardless of your motivation, your use of data is questionable at best as is your use of the word ‘fact’.
Johns made his debut in 1994 and scored 20-odd points and picked up man of the match.
In 1995 he was picked for NSW and Australia. He was the player of the world cup.
His Dally Ms were in 98, 99 and 02. Golden Boots in 99 and 02.
He was Dally M rep player of the year in 2005.
He is the second highest pointscorer of all time in the NRL.
This isn’t the record of someone who had two or three good years in the game.
He played 14 years of first grade – he was far from a flash in the pan who shone brightly for two or three years.
Despite being such a magnificent player and having such a lengthy career for Canberra, Maroons and australia Mal didn’t dominate games and seasons to anywhere near the same level as Johns – evidenced by awards
The only gap in Johns’ career is the 2003-04 period when he had back and knee injuries.
The fact that he came back and perform at the highest levels past 30 years of age and after two years out of the game with injury is testament to how good he was.
Your attempts to re-write history and downplay Johns record are laughable.
You’ll get far more respect if you talk up Mals record without bagging Johns.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:55pm
A1 said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:55pm | Report comment
One of the best comments ever on the roar
June 21st 2012 @ 12:37pm
Dubble Bubble said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:37pm | Report comment
Firtsly Meninga isn’t even considered the best in his position .Steve Rogers would be considered a superior center and I don’t hear his name being bandied about.Secondly Johns wasn’t selected out of position as often as people pushing the antiJohns barrow like to believe. In the games with Toovey, Johns wore the nine but was playing as a seven with Toovey being the Dummy half.This was because Toovs was considered too small to pack down in the scrum.Why they didn’t just give Johns the 7 jumper anyway I don’t know. As when it was with Kimmorley it was often a case of us having two fantastic halves and a desire to use them both. Johns playing hooker then was more to do with Johns’ versatility and Kimmorleys lack thereof.
June 21st 2012 @ 12:47pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
Mal is on the highlights packages, not Steve Rogers. Mal also took St Helens to a challenge cup, so he played in 2 hemispheres, as well as scoring the winning try to keep our ashes series alive.
I also remember Mal being the catilist behind the Raiders winning 2 finals.
Mal played Origin for over 10 years, he lasted for 14 and was captain of most teams.
Mal also has taken Origin to new heights, lets be honest, it was going nowhere in 2006.
I am happy to say no centre had more presense than Mal, even today he revered worldwide. (which is north england and east oz in my world).
June 21st 2012 @ 1:08pm
Dubble Bubble said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
In regards to his success as Origin coach I believe that playing ability and ONLY playing ability was to be considered.A lot of this push for Mal has as much to do with his success as coach as his playing achievements.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:28pm
Pot Stirrer said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Thats Rubbish, Mal was a terrible coach for the raiders and no one gives him the credit for “coaching” QLD.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:33pm
josh said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
It also has a fair bit to do with him being the only QLDer being genuinely considered at this point in time v Coote, Rogers, Provan, Johns, Sterling (all NSW)
June 21st 2012 @ 1:50pm
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
“steve rogers would be considered a superior centre” um sure by those locked in state funded asylums or employed by the sharks
June 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
Next they will be throwing up E.T as a Immortal.
After Big Mal, i think Lockyer and Petro are Queensland possibles. These are the type of people who you would be proud to call a immortal, and not have to apoligise. Can NSW say the same about Joey, he will be forever a immortal, forever the stain that tainted the Immortals, forever a NSW mistake.
Mother Teresa, Nelson Madela, Dali Lama, Reg Gasnier John Raper, Norm Proven, Joey Johns.
Have alook, your not bringing me into supporting any damm immortals if Johns is on this list.
I think we all should wake up, it will taint the game, the immortals will become the laughing stock of Australian sport.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:42pm
mushi said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
Petro isn’t an immortal. I love petro and he was a great prop but you have to be a transcendent player to be an immortal and Petro wasn’t.
Johns was the best palyer of his mini era and deserves consideration. He took recreational drugs that’s a matter for him and his family, most of those Mummies you looked at committed genocide!
June 21st 2012 @ 12:53pm
Pot Stirrer said | June 21st 2012 @ 12:53pm | Report comment
Player A went on 4 kangaroo tours and captained 2 of them, thats a staggering 21 more tests than player B. . For me that is enough said. Personaly i Dont remember Johns as prominently as i remember Meninga.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:01pm
Ryan O'Connell said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
There were no Kangaroo Tours between 1994 and 2001, whereas in Mal’s era they were every four years.
June 21st 2012 @ 1:26pm
Pot Stirrer said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:26pm | Report comment
Maybe but how many tests would that be then, He also played more origin and i dont think points scored should count,
June 21st 2012 @ 1:23pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
Joey won 3 Dally Ms to Mals none. Enough said.
For a large part of his career Mal would have one big game every 6 weeks. Joey turned it on week in and week out. I know who I remember better.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:45pm
oikee said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:45pm | Report comment
For a large part of his career, Mal would have 3 broken arms, read his come back history after this, the guy was born a immortal. Joey on the other hand won 3 Dally M’s, ? ok, how many while he was taking drugs, give me some facts.
He admitted this, its not a secret mate.
Think about it, your pushing for a drug user to become a immortal. I wonder if we can immotalise al Capone, why not.
It would make sense if your a NSwelshman.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:54pm
A1 said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
Not performance enhancing drugs, and never failed a drug test. So its irrelevant.
I’m also here to tell you that Darren Lockyer is no angel. If some truths about him ever come out, I wonder if you’ll be consistent?
June 21st 2012 @ 3:18pm
eagleJack said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
A1, that’s what I find so amusing about all of this. Johns happened to be caught in London. Trust me when I say there are plenty of others out there who have been lucky.
Thankfully it is all irrelevant.
“Candidates can only be judged on their playing ability alone, and nothing else”.
June 21st 2012 @ 2:56pm
Mals said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:56pm | Report comment
You have lost the plot Oikee. Johns was NOT taking performancing enhancing drugs while playing rugby league.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:48pm
DJ said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:48pm | Report comment
Drugs are Drugs they are on the Banned substance list for sport wether ecstasy ,cocaine or Steroids they are all banned and if you take them as a profesional sports man you are a drug cheat . No other sport in the world would knowingly admit a Drug cheat into there hall of fame if they were caught or self admited to being a drug cheat . Rugby league will be open to scrutiny if it admits a drug cheat . Other sports from around the world have removed Gold medals well after Olympic games after athletes admited to taking drugs that could not be detected Baseball removed some members from the Hall of fame after it was reveled that they took drugs during there profesional sports days this whole thing has become more a NSW v QLD thing it’s not state of origin guys for mine I don’t want jhons admited into the immortals because he admited to being a drug cheat over a ten year period of his carrer even if at times he took the banned substances in the off season you can still be tested an found guilty of being a drug cheat in the off season just because he wasn’t caught does not make it any better in my oppinion he admitted to being a drug cheat that should be the end of it .If not for this indescresion he would have my vote hands down .I think Norm proven has to be admited this time around his list of feats speak for themself and he’s on the trophy all our teams try to win if not him then Sterling or Meninga would get my vote any one of those three would sit alright with me
June 21st 2012 @ 2:57pm
Ronnie the Eel said | June 21st 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
There’s only one reason he had three broken arms – because he used to try and break defender’s jaws by leading with his forearm when in possession of the ball – an immortal what?
June 21st 2012 @ 10:57pm
The Barry said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:57pm | Report comment
Oiks – you’re gibbering again.
Johns came back from serious back and knee injuries in 03 and 04 to dominate and win the 05 Origin series and be named rep player of the year.He also had a cracking end to the 05 season for the Knights.
yes I agree Mal was very brave coming back from his injuries. So was Johns.
Just because Johns has admitted to having drugs doesn’t mean he took them day in day out for 20 years…it’s like suggesting that if someone has had a beer then they must have been drunk for 20 years.
Mate you are the deadset last person in the world who has the right to asking for ‘facts’
June 21st 2012 @ 11:14pm
peeeko said | June 21st 2012 @ 11:14pm | Report comment
how the hell are you allowed to “contribute” to this website?
June 21st 2012 @ 4:14pm
Pot Stirrer said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:14pm | Report comment
Mike Eden won a dally M to, as have most decent Halfbacks that played in winning sides.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:34pm
eagleJack said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
Sorry PS but Mike Eden won the Rothman’s Medal in 1983. Terry Lamb won the Dally M that year.
The Rothman’s Medal is now called the Provan Summons medal. Andrew Johns won 5 of them.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:41pm
Pot Stirrer said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:41pm | Report comment
another halve though
June 21st 2012 @ 4:45pm
eagleJack said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
Yes there have been some fantastic halves in our game. And Johns was named to be the best of them and thus named in the Team of the Century. He will be an Immortal. Whether it is this round or next.
June 21st 2012 @ 4:36pm
Bigbaz said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:36pm | Report comment
aren’t the Dally Ms sponsered and judged by a Sydney newspaper?
June 21st 2012 @ 4:41pm
eagleJack said | June 21st 2012 @ 4:41pm | Report comment
Not everything is a conspiracy.
Each match is judged by an independent including Queenslanders Wally Lewis, Gary Belcher.