Wallabies vs Lions will be a special encounter
By David Lord, 21 Jun 2012 David Lord is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, The British and Irish Lions, wallabies
Related coverage
It’s a year and a day to the kick off between the Wallabies and the British and Irish Lions at Suncorp in the first of three Tests.
The last time these two teams met in 2001 was an historic series for the men-in-gold coached by Rod Macqueen, and skippered by John Eales, to win 2-1 for the first and only time.
That was indeed a golden era of Wallaby rugby, with those two giants of the game at the helm, capturing the Rugby World Cup in 1999, the Bledisloe Cup from 1998 to 2001, the Tri-Nations in 2000 and 2001, with the icing on the cake, conquering the Lions.
The max.
The current Wallabies won’t be taking on the Lions in 366 days time with that same illustrious track record.
But the Lions won’t be boasting impressive form, either, judging by Wales, England, and Ireland losing all six internationals to the Wallabies, Boks, and All Blacks respectively in the last fortnight.
But that only adds to the aura.
The British and Irish Lions teams have an aura of their own, and the mere fact they only tour Australia every 12 years puts them in a very special category as a combined side from England, Ireland, Scotland, and Wales.
It doesn’t happen in any other international sport.
To make it even more special, the Lions attract fanatical support from the Home Unions, expect a sea of red from them numbering in the many thousands.
Their colour clash with the gold-decked Wallaby supporters will be a spectacular sight, and important side issue.
It’s amazing how Lions officianardos have viewed Australian rugby.
Over the years, the Lions only played the Wallabies as the “warm-up” for the “real internationals” against the All Blacks, believing the Wallabies weren’t strong enough to tour alone.
That was the case in the Lions tours of 1904, 1930, 1950, 1959, and 1966 where in total the Wallabies met the tourists 10 times for just one win.
On the same tours, the All Blacks played 17 and won 14 with a draw.
Which rather proved the point, the Wallabies weren’t strong enough.
That thinking changed in 1989 and the Wallabies immediately proved their worth by comfortably winning the first Test at the SFS by 30-12. The Lions squared the series at Ballymore with a hard-fought 19-12 win, and took the series 2-1 with a nail-biting 19-18 win at the SFS.
That was the “infamous” Test where crack Wallaby winger David Campese was unfairly pilloried for passing on his goal-line, the ball was dropped by full-back Greg Martin, Lions winger Ieuan Evans swooped and scored.
If there was an offender, it wasn’t Campese, but Martin for not being alert. Had he been so, and quick enough, he had an empty field in front of him and could have gone all the way.
The point is, the pass should have been held.
So instead of winning an exciting first exclusive Lions tour of Australia, the Wallabies were pipped at the post.
Macqueen and Eales made sure that didn’t repeat 12 years later, losing the first Test at the Gabba 29-13, but bouncing back to comprehensively win the second at Colonial in Melbourne 35-14, and clinching the series 29-23 at Stadium Australia.
Euphoric days. A dose of the same next year would do wonders for Wallaby rugby and their frustrated fans.
It will be all yours to lock away, Robbie Deans and David Pocock.
Watch the full match replay between the Wallabies and British and Irish Lions from 2001
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
![]()
Passionate about your union? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily union email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, The British and Irish Lions, wallabies


June 21st 2012 @ 3:02pm
ben said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
the scrums in this test were fantastic…crouch touch engage.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:24pm
20-20 said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:24pm | Report comment
I was at game three against the Lions in 1989, and David Campese did not need to throw “that pass”. We were winning. You’re dream of Greg Martin running the length of the field to score is very romantic, but unrealistic. Neither Martin or Campese had the pace to score a length of field try. When learning to play rugby, I was taught not to pass in your own in goal. For whatever reason you have decided that because it was Campese this basic fundamental should be ignored. Why didn’t Campo take the drop out and send the Lions back down field? That’s where Martin and the rest of the Wallaby supporters thought Campese was headed. It’s now ancient history but what Campese tried was speculative, not basic rugby, and cost us the series.
June 21st 2012 @ 3:49pm
Worlds Biggest said | June 21st 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
Albo, very hard to argue with your points and the footage. As Buddha Handy said in the commentary, it was very ” Mickey Mouse ” rugby, he should have simply grounded it for a 22 drop out. If the pass was on the mark Marto wouldn’t have got far as Evans was all over him plus Marto didn’t have a lot of gas anyway. Quite simply, it was probably the softest try in Lions history and turned the game and series there way. In saying that Campo more than redeemed himself 2 years later playing a huge role in winning the World Cup.
June 21st 2012 @ 8:51pm
Frank O'Keeffe said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:51pm | Report comment
‘That was the “infamous” Test where crack Wallaby winger David Campese was unfairly pilloried for passing on his goal-line, the ball was dropped by full-back Greg Martin, Lions winger Ieuan Evans swooped and scored.
If there was an offender, it wasn’t Campese, but Martin for not being alert. Had he been so, and quick enough, he had an empty field in front of him and could have gone all the way.
The point is, the pass should have been held.’
Goodness! That’s a bit harsh on Greg Martin…
For what it’s worth the Wallabies probably would have lost even without that mistake. The forwards were too soft and they let the Lions get away with whatever they liked. Two penalties got the Wallabies back in it, but the Test was controlled by the Lions’ forwards. Bob Dwyer was kind enough to say he didn’t think Campese’s mistake cost them the series.
The 2001 Lions series has to be one of my top 10 favourite series ever… maybe top 5.
The Lions in that first Test played rugby at such an incredibly high standard. It’s hard to say who the Lions MOTM was in that Test (Keith Wood got it) because all played well. We all remember Robinson’s in and away, and O’Driscoll’s solo effort, Hill’s performance against George Smith, Quinell’s awesome power, Wilkinson’s kicking… it was incredibly impressive!
The only thing the Lions didn’t do was put points on the board in that first half of the 2nd Test. They could have scored many more points, and only led 6-11. The way the backrow (Finegan especially), Gregan, and Roff all played was very impressive.
The third Test was basically even, except that Burke made his shots on goal and Wilkinson didn’t.
June 21st 2012 @ 8:56pm
Johnno said | June 21st 2012 @ 8:56pm | Report comment
Richard Hill being out of the 3rd test really hurt them bad, i don’t think the wallabies would of won had richard hill played in that test. Many say richard hill is the no 1 no 6 of all time. And notice a pattern they england what a team that was won he world cup with no 6 richard hill in it .
June 21st 2012 @ 10:14pm
postmatchkebab said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:14pm | Report comment
Great to see the youtube clip. If Campo was filthy afterwards, it was because he didn’t back himself properly. What I mean by that is that he had already half beaten the opponent prior to the pass. A stall, dummy & step would have left them cold. In fact Marto seems to be in a worse position than campo to be effective.
No other defenders within a bull’s roar an easy 20m+ was there to claim. Any other situation Campo would have beaten a half commited defender 1 on 1 with ease. The in goal factor spooked him. Classic how the try gets celebrated with a wee little pat instead of the mobbing for any try in our current era no matter how easy or incredible it was.
June 21st 2012 @ 10:28pm
S T Rineestee.rine@gmail.com said | June 21st 2012 @ 10:28pm | Report comment
Greetings David
Thanks for the article AND the old video of deciding Test – Ws versus Lions
Forgotten how exciting it was, & what about Harrison stealing line-out ball on
OZ 20 metres when Lions were attacking?
Sweet revenge as UK press had slandered him calling him neanderthal &
a plod. Some plod.
Next to Gregan he was Man of Match
S. T
June 22nd 2012 @ 8:56am
RugbyTragic said | June 22nd 2012 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more S. T , it was a pivotal moment , specially after the crap Austin Healy had said about him , can’t wait for next year!
June 23rd 2012 @ 12:41am
Ben S said | June 23rd 2012 @ 12:41am | Report comment
Because Justin Harrison never proved himself to be a jackass…
The Wallabies had the lineout calls of the Lions, btw.
June 22nd 2012 @ 11:26pm
S T Rineestee.rine@gmail.com said | June 22nd 2012 @ 11:26pm | Report comment
Austin Healy should change his name to Edsel, but still a sore loser
S T