Why are we still surprised by England’s football failures?
By jorginho_94, 26 Jun 2012 jorginho_94 is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- England Football, euro 2012, football, Italy football, Wayne Rooney
Related coverage
Once again, England feels the pain from 12 yards as the battle of the 442s resolved nothing after 120 minutes.
As much as Sepp Blatter would like to save his hide in sourcing an alternative to the penalty shoot out (a measure of his need to obfuscate and leave a ‘legacy’ rather than altruism), the method is still the one to sort teams who can’t pull away in the normally allotted time.
It provides the denouement that all good sport has at its core and should not be changed.
Before spot kicks though, a fascinating tactical battle was played out. Observing the tweets during the game, you could be forgiven for thinking people were watching two completely different matches. Some believed Italy were unlucky not to be ahead at half time, while others, ignoring the lopsided possession stats, felt England were also unlucky.
Apart from a strong period from 5″ – 18″, England showed again their inferior capacity to keep possession individually and collectively in tight and open spaces. Roy Hodgson, perhaps with this knowledge, concentrated forward movements down the flanks, primarily down the right with Milner and Johnson, with the former delivering a glut of crosses, mostly predictable.
Over the full 120 minutes however, this external approach failed to match the Pirlo choreographed and executed use of the centre of the park, with consistent overlapping from Abate and Balzaretti keeping Cole and Johnson pegged back.
After considerable license to roam against Sweden and Ukraine, Gerrard’s style was considerably cramped by the Italian’s central interplay, while Pirlo’s distribution meant that one of Rooney or Wellback were committed to marking him. This was an admission of defeat, albeit a small one.
Rooney’s lack of match fitness was evident early on, and frankly he never improved. Maybe the only thing that kept him on was the prospect of spot kicks. When Pirlo was shadowed, Marchisio, De Rossi and Montolivo were also adept at keeping the ball.
But for all the domination of possession, Italy was blunt in the last third, with even less inspiring finishing. A player that features high on my most hated/most respected list, Pippo Inzaghi, would have been breaking items at regular intervals watching this as chance after chance came.
A duo of Inzaghi and Diego Milito (if he were to do a Motta) would have torn this game apart by half time. Curious was the introduction of Diamanti for Cassano over Di Natale. But as Diamanti sealed the win with Italy’s fourth penalty, Cesare Prandelli breathed a sigh of relief and begged his players to get in the ice baths.
As the tabloids conjure up new headlines describing the unsurprising outcome, my pick would have to be from The Sun “Ashes to Ashleys”, the sobering truth will stay ignored. The English public overrate their national team and still equate the status and appeal of their league with success internationally.
Hodgson knows this; anyone with half a football brain knows this. The EPL has glitz and glamour. It outbids the Serie A, La Liga and the Bundesliga but it still can not teach an Englishman to keep the ball.
Until it or a change in the system does, it will perennially be a case of almost, next time.
Sport, all day long. Does this sound too good to be true? We're searching for a Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. If you're a sales star who doesn't mind a hit, kick, throw, or cycle, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (48) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (132)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (102)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (95)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (93)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (91)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (80)
- What A-League matches should be on Friday night FTA? (132)
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (108)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (21)
- Last-gasp Cahill strike stuns LA Galaxy (3)
- Merrick back in A-League as Phoenix coach (30)
- Leave your A-League colours at the door for Australia (80)
- Ferguson bows out as Man United draw 5-5
- Are we supporting the Soccerwhos? (108)
- Where are the champions in the Champions League? (21)
- EPL Super Sunday 2013: Final day live scores, updates, blog (38)
- David Beckham – the underrated superstar (19)
- Who would be a football manager? (7)
- Bundesliga: can Freiburg ‘do a Gladbach’? (0)
- R.I.P Sir Alex (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- England Football, euro 2012, football, Italy football, Wayne Rooney

June 26th 2012 @ 11:42am
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 26th 2012 @ 11:42am | Report comment
Some pretty embarrassing facts about ENG at Euro2012
* average 39% of the possession in 4 games
* Christiano Ronaldo has had more shots on target in 4 games than the entire ENG squad
* ITA had more shots on target in the match against ENG, than ENG has had during their entire Euro2012 campaign
* ENG’s most successful passing combination against Italy was: Goalkeeper (Joe Hart) to the substitute striker, Andy Carroll
Read more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jun/25/euro-2012-statistics-damn-england
June 26th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Worlds Biggest said | June 26th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
I don’t think anyone is surprised by England’s Major tournament performances. If anything the expectations are just too high. England don’t develop the talent to compete with the super powers.
June 26th 2012 @ 12:51pm
Johnno said | June 26th 2012 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
Embarrising are the words to describe England’s expectations, so removed from reality .
They have won1 major trophy since the world cup started in 1930, yet are seen as often the home or the biggest football nation just laughable.
80 years 1 trophy and at home at the old wembley to one of the most controversial goals ever scored.
To compare England’s record to Germany is just so laughable I don not know where to start.
June 26th 2012 @ 2:48pm
Australian Rules said | June 26th 2012 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Agreed.
The performances aren’t embarrassing…it’s the expectations.
June 26th 2012 @ 4:43pm
Jonny G said | June 26th 2012 @ 4:43pm | Report comment
1966?
June 26th 2012 @ 7:41pm
Punter said | June 26th 2012 @ 7:41pm | Report comment
I’ll bite;
World cup since 1966, (Germany also won in 1954).
Germany, very consistent record World cup since 1966, won twice, runners up 4 times including 1966, only 3 times never qualified for semis.
England winners in 1966, semis just twice including 1966, did not qualify for world cup 3 times 1974, 1978 & 1994.
European cup
Germany Champions 3 times, runners up 3 times.
England best twice semis
June 26th 2012 @ 1:34pm
Matthew Skellett said | June 26th 2012 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
I’m not surprised at all really , England had a ‘dream’ pool to qualify from-featuring such ‘world-beaters’ as Montenegro, San Marino, Macedonia and the Faroe Islands -and so it goes -they must have paid off the right UEFA programming official to get that result in the first place
June 26th 2012 @ 11:00pm
HardcorePrawn said | June 26th 2012 @ 11:00pm | Report comment
If only it had been that easy!
England’s qualifying group contained Montenegro, Switzerland, Wales and Bulgaria. Admittedly not world beaters, but Montenegro are quite a fancied side who impressed many in getting to second place in the group, before losing the qualifier against the Czechs. Switzerland have some form when it comes to qualifying for major tournaments, and in Wales England faced one of their local rivals, never an easy game.
June 27th 2012 @ 10:15pm
Matthew Skellett said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:15pm | Report comment
Ok HardcoreP ; you got me lol it was Montenegro, Switzerland , Wales and Bulgaria -well realistically ONLY SWITZERLAND had any realistic chance of beating England twice -it’s so “funny” it’s laughable how this happens
June 28th 2012 @ 10:29am
HardcorePrawn said | June 28th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
It’s the nature of the beast though, the draw for qualification is made from pots into which UEFA (and FIFA for WC qualifiers too) place teams according to their rankings. If they were to do it otherwise we could see a qualifying group containing Germany, Spain, Portugal, Italy, and the Netherlands and another containing San Marino, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, Andorra, and the Faroes. The end result could see only a handful of strong teams going to the Euros and the rest of the teams coming from the weaker nations.
Admittedly this strategy makes it harder and harder for certain teams to qualify (Scotland spring to mind), and I’m entirely unconvinced by FIFA’s rankings, seeing as they constantly put England in the top 10 (bear in mind I write this as an Englishman too), but at least we get a tournament populated by the stronger teams.
The cynic in me suggests that it might be worth considering the value that sponsors place on certain teams too. Despite the schadenfreude that England’s exit has generated here amongst Australian fans, an England game always attracts a lot of international viewers. Quite why I do not know: I’m obliged to continue to watch England games thanks to my heritage, but neutrals don’t have to suffer our technically naive performances willingly!
Whether sponsors demands do influence how qualifying groups are arranged is probably one for conspiracy theorists, but I would reckon there may be something in it…
June 26th 2012 @ 1:57pm
Tom Murphy said | June 26th 2012 @ 1:57pm | Report comment
In my opinion this tournament for England was a turning point.
A lot of people out there are making large comparisons between this and previous tournaments but a huge downfall there is the fact of who is the competition and the squad the manager has to play. On paper for euro 2008, World Cup 2010 England’s starting 11 could compete and most probably beat all other teams fighting for the win. but as was shown its not what wins you tournaments. I put a lot of the failure to the fact that they are playing classic football. If anyone else watches majority of the top level footballing countries they will see a formation other than a 4-4-2 (not even a 4-1-2-1-2). this formation is outdated and non-effective in this modern day. When England realise the potential in their young players and the talent that is coming from the country they will realise that this is what’s holding them back. I highly recommend them switching to a 4-2-3-1. it may be wrong but from my knowledge of how the sport is changing and how players are evolving i see England winning tournaments with this structure and believing they can compete!
June 26th 2012 @ 2:27pm
Johnno said | June 26th 2012 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
But hostelry has shown Tom Murphy, England have never evolved through the times. 1 major trophy in 82 years. They still believe in the long ball and physical type players like Wayne Rooney and Alan Shearer are there definition of success when the rest of the world does not agree with that.
England ignore touch players like Aoran Lennon or Theo Walcott, and i don’t believe England would of selected another touch player Ryan Giggs if he was eligible for England. England would prefer a player like Grahame le Saux or dennis wise on the left to a player like Ryan Giggs says a lot about there culture.
To think that England would not select ryan gigs if he was elegible for England and they don’t rate ryan Giggs says it all about England as a footballing nation.
June 26th 2012 @ 2:57pm
ianm said | June 26th 2012 @ 2:57pm | Report comment
Good work there Johnno, making a strawman argument about whether England would select Ryan Giggs or not and then using your unilateral decision that they wouldn’t to bash England with. Geez, it’s not like there aren’t any valid reasons to knock England without having to make them up!!
June 26th 2012 @ 3:11pm
Johnno said | June 26th 2012 @ 3:11pm | Report comment
ianm do you think England would select Ryan Giggs if he wanted to play for England . What is your opinion. Coz Giggs doesn’t play the football England like.
June 26th 2012 @ 6:19pm
ianm said | June 26th 2012 @ 6:19pm | Report comment
Absolutely, I’ve no doubt Giggs would’ve played heaps of times for England. I don’t think England’s problem is as straightforward as picking the wrong players, I wish it was, the problem is they don’t have the cattle. The players they have simply aren’t as good as they are made out to be.
I also believe Giggs was exactly the sort of player England would go for, he puts in a good shift as well as having exceptional talent (plus he’s one footed which seems to be a prerequisite for England selection). Giggs was world class in his day, one of the best players never to have played in the finals of a major compeition in my opinion.
I think you are drawing your conclusion from the way England overlooked players like Glenn Hoddle and Matt LeTissier; for players of their talent they definitely didn’t see enough game time for England because the managers couldn’t figure out how to accommodate them. However, I don’t think Giggs is the same type of player as those two, he was and still is a genuine left winger, a position English coaches know and understand. Hoddle and LeTissier were cut from a mould coaches simply couldn’t get to grips with.
June 28th 2012 @ 8:36pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 28th 2012 @ 8:36pm | Report comment
Johnno
Someone at Team Great Britain must have read your post b/c it’s being reported that Ryan Giggs has been picked to play for Great Britain at the London 2012 Olympics!
Fantastic that he finally gets a chance to play in a major tournament.
June 28th 2012 @ 10:59pm
Johnno said | June 28th 2012 @ 10:59pm | Report comment
Fus iread it it is a terrible descio. I don’t know a lot about footballers and talant and how they are rated in football but this sounds disgraceful.
Surely someone of Beckham’s stature in football is far greater than ryan gigs. Yes gigs played for Man United too, but it was David buckram who made Man United not giggs.
Beckham always got more media attention and endorsements and hype, in footballing circles is Ryan Giggs Fuss really regarded more highly than the great Beckham, this seems a terrible selection .They are basically saying they think Ryan Giggs is a better footballer than the great David Beckham, unbelievable . I hardly ever heard about Giggs and Scholes contribution at Man United just Becks. In fact i heard more about his wife Posh attending Man United games than players like Giggs or Scholes Fuss.
June 29th 2012 @ 3:41am
Colin N said | June 29th 2012 @ 3:41am | Report comment
Johnno, Giggs is playing in the Premirship to a good standard, Beckham the MLS The only reason you heard more of Beckham was because of his “celebrity status.” IMO, Giggs is a far better footballer.
June 26th 2012 @ 3:51pm
UK Steve said | June 26th 2012 @ 3:51pm | Report comment
Johnno – that’s totally ridiculous. Giggs would have over 100 caps for England, if he had of elected to play for them.
Fussball’s first post was pretty close to the mark. A mate of mine has been a scout at Chelsea, Watford and now Reading, and he said his remit has always been to “find us really quick kids, we’ll teach them how to play when they get here”. That’s seems to be the philosophy at English clubs.
June 27th 2012 @ 2:29pm
gawa said | June 27th 2012 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
As crazy as it may seem this overlooking of what I would call football players for athletes is the norm in the UK. I recall a local newspaper interview (about ten years ago) with a scout from a lower league English team who had visited our local clubs in Northern Ireland and he spoke of the need to withstand the physical nature of the game.
The first thing that stood out when I moved to Oz was the intention to hold onto the ball, this is not a very common concept in the UK.
Indeed when Everton played Brisbane Roar a few season the stats showed that the Everton players ran more than in the average EPL game. We would have to assume this is because Brisbane would not simply give the ball away within 2-3 passes.
Watching both the England and Rep of Ireland players being totally physically exhausted after each Euro game shows that no matter how fit you are you can’t outrun a well passed football for an entire game.
June 28th 2012 @ 10:33am
HardcorePrawn said | June 28th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
It’s worth remembering that historically, England’s naturally gifted flair players were considered “luxuries”, I’m thinking of Chris Waddle, Glenn Hoddle, Matt le Tissier. While the likes of the combative David Batty would be amongst the first called up to any squad.
June 26th 2012 @ 7:57pm
Colin N said | June 26th 2012 @ 7:57pm | Report comment
Theo Walcott and Lennon touch players!? Which Walcott and Lennon have you been watching. They’re pace men. Didn’t you see how Walcott was falling over the ball against Italy and struggling keep possession.
Now…Oxlade-Chamberlain is a technically gifted player.
June 26th 2012 @ 3:02pm
Red Block said | June 26th 2012 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Why not follow the touch football play off? Every two minutes a player drops off until a result is found. Of course, we could stop at 6 players per team.
Imagine the tension and tactical nuances at the end of every two minutes, will the manager take off an attacker or a defender? Can our team score?
Ask Totti or Southgate what it feels to be like to be the one who misses. It is never forgotten. Now think about what it would be like, if they had scored. No need to point out the obvious.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
June 26th 2012 @ 4:50pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | June 26th 2012 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
Well, it looks like Jamie Carragher at least understands the problem. And, according to Jamie, Gareth Sougthgate, who is a contender to be the FAs next technical director, also understands the problem.
In particular, Carragher says: Southgate “is passionate about shifting the priority away from a culture which sees a football match as ‘going to war’ and instead emphasises ball retention and technical ability.”
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/england/9354727/Euro-2012-if-England-think-radically-and-act-now-we-can-do-a-Germany-says-Jamie-Carragher.html
The first step on the road to redemption is: “admit there is a problem”. For all of us, who fell in love with football because of we watched the English version, I hope the FA listens and learns.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:46am
ianm said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:46am | Report comment
Fussball – I agree entirely but followers of the English game have been making these arguments for at least 10-15 years and nothing has been done about it. Hopefully, England are now in such a parlous state that the FA will finally act. Any change in direction will take a long time though, coaches need to be retrained before they teach the kids in a different way then they need to wait for those kids to come through the youth grades. I doubt whether England’s fans and more importantly the English media will have the patience to wait for these changes to bear fruit.
June 26th 2012 @ 8:58pm
Realfootball said | June 26th 2012 @ 8:58pm | Report comment
Gerard personifies the mailaise of English football – all engine and power, average to poor technique on the ball, and with just one forward gear. The comparison with Pirlo or Ozil is sobering.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:17pm
Chips Rafferty said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:17pm | Report comment
Gerard is at least a bloke, who looks like a bloke, playing a bloke’s game, for men’s men to watch hairy blokes colliding with each other.
Pilo and Ozil are Nancy boys. They should be playing sheila’s sockah. If they had dresses on they’d look like hawt sheilas to me. They oughtta play a season in the Scottish premier league to become real men, like Gattuso did.
Gawd bless the naivety that underpins strayan sockah!
June 27th 2012 @ 7:38am
ianm said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:38am | Report comment
When I was a kid, we played 7-a-side games where if it was a draw at full time, whichever team had earned the most corners was deemed the winner. I’m sure there are some flaws to this system but it is more of an indicator about who offered a more attacking threat than penalties surely.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:04am
Bondy said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:04am | Report comment
With a penalty shoot out everybody knows the score, you’ve geared your brain for up to 120 minutes of football prior to the contest after that your going to pens,whats wrong with penalties havent you had enough attacking play after 120 minutes?.
I’ve been involved in pens at club level its not only something the pros experience we all do, I think its a true test of charecter in the human being and throw in luck one of the primary drivers in obtaining a win.To go to pens and now your in the lap of the gods it’s not that bad a specticle either .
June 27th 2012 @ 7:10pm
Chips Rafferty said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:10pm | Report comment
Not a bad article there son. I couldnt do that much betta myself if I was a sockah journo. You oughtta take over in the OZ penthouse publications, instead of Cawkerill, Fawster and Fink Tank.
Unfortunately the two bob suburban bloggers just don’t get it. It goes over their heads as we have no sockah kulcha here.
The Poms shafted the spaghetti suckers in every part of the game, but mainly shooting and tackling, which is what men’s footy is all about.
This isn’t sheila’s sockah. The spaghetti suckers are now made up of nancy boys, now that Gattuso isn’t on the team sheet.