New All Blacks coach Steve Hansen. AAP Images
Related coverage
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news
- Wallabies news
- New Zealand All Blacks news
- 2013 Wallabies squad news
With the resumption of Super Rugby days away but the memories of the June Tests still fresh, there is one task to do before fully concentrating on provincial duties again.
There have been some significant movers over the past month, men whose stocks have surged noticeably in advance of The Rugby Championship. Here are 10 who can reflect happily over the past month, and a suggested XV based on performances in the Australia v Wales, New Zealand v Ireland and South Africa v England Test series.
Coach Foley fronts Waratahs board
1. Berrick Barnes (Australia). Before Christian Lealiifaano’s injury, he might have been on the outskirts of the Wallabies’ squad. Now it would be something of an injustice if he does not make the 22, at least, for the first Bledisloe Test. Character – and no little skill – in abundance.
2. Nathan Sharpe (Australia). The Wallabies’ second-rower completely spooked the Welsh lineout, and the visitors would have picked up one Test had he not done so. The Lions will be praying that he stays retired next time. Also influential with his carries and short passing game.
3. Steve Hansen (New Zealand). Some surprisingly bold selections have paid off, and New Zealanders are a lot less fretful now about depth in positions No.4, No.7, No.9 and No.10 than they were one month ago. There will be a few concerns about the scrum, but the lineout didn’t lose a single throw in three Tests.
4. Wycliff Palu (Australia). The Wallabies’ pack now has a major physical presence again. His ability to come through an intense three-week period bodes well for the future, because the Wallabies desperately need his ability to win the gainline. Standout moment was wading straight through the middle of the Welsh ruck in Brisbane. Very handy option at the front of the lineout, too.
5. Tatafu Polota-Nau (Australia). Those picking him ahead of Stephen Moore would have been in the minority, but it now appears he has reclaimed the No.2 starting jersey. Questions remain about his throwing, but Moore has also had problems with his aim at the Brumbies. Needs to sort out the scrum though.
6. Aaron Smith (New Zealand). If the All Blacks are not being subdued up front this little halfback is going to cause all sorts of problems. Immaculate, crisp delivery – and the competitiveness to lift Irish No.7 Sean O’Brien and dump him on his backside in defence.
7. Sam Cane (New Zealand). Cane had acquitted himself adequately but not spectacularly at the Chiefs, and certainly hadn’t made the impression of Michael Hooper or Liam Gill. But his displays against Ireland justified the selectors’ faith, and more. Has all the attributes of a classic All Blacks No.7 – as a link player on attack as well as a defender.
8. Cian Healey (Ireland). A snarling, intense ball of muscle who carried the ball with serious purpose, especially in the second Test in Christchurch. Lions form: especially with his improved set-piece work under new scrum coach Greg Feek.
9. Marcell Coetzee (South Africa). The Springboks’ omission of Heinrich Brussow is still bewildering, but the young Sharks back-rower carried out his duties with aplomb. Exceptional ball-carrying ability, especially when his side is on the front foot.
10. Pieter de Villiers (South Africa). It has not attracted much fanfare, but one of the storylines of the Springboks’ series was the quality of their scrum, especially when Jannie du Plessis was on the field. New scrum coach de Villiers, who played his Test rugby for France, has made an immediate impact.
June XV from the three-Test series involving Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Wales, Ireland and England:
Cian Healey (Ireland), Bismarck du Plessis (South Africa), Jannie du Plessis (South Africa), Brodie Retallick (New Zealand), Nathan Sharpe (Australia), Willem Alberts (South Africa), David Pocock (Australia), Richie McCaw (New Zealand), Will Genia (Australia), Dan Carter (New Zealand), Digby Ioane (Australia), Sonny Bill Williams (New Zealand), Conrad Smith (New Zealand), JP Pietersen (South Africa), Leigh Halfpenny (Wales)
Paul Cully is a freelance journalist who was born in New Zealand, raised in Northern Ireland, but spent most of his working life in Australia. He is a former Sun-Herald sports editor, rugby tragic, and current Roar and RugbyHeaven contributor.
Have you seen the new Wallabies jersey? Want one of your own? We're giving away a brand new 2013 Wallabies jersey to one lucky Roarer, click here to go in the running to win.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, wallabies



June 27th 2012 @ 5:33am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 5:33am | Report comment
bismark played strong but made some pretty stupid unforced errors. he needs to engage his brain more often
June 27th 2012 @ 6:51am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:51am | Report comment
It was interesting that after he got Tuilagi’ed he went missing on Saturday. Has to be said…
Cue the South African bloggers calling me all sorts? Sorry gents!
June 27th 2012 @ 5:36am
Colin N said | June 27th 2012 @ 5:36am | Report comment
Jannie du Plessis? Despite pretty much failing to get the upper hand on a 21-year-old throughout the series and despite the performances of Dan Cole, Adam Jones and Owen Franks (he wasn’t at his best but still contributed much more than du Plessis)?
June 27th 2012 @ 7:44am
Ben S said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:44am | Report comment
Coetzee got totally outplayed by Robshaw and Johnson IMO too.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:23am
Colin N said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:23am | Report comment
I thought Coetzee showed up pretty well considering his inexperience, particularly in the first half of the second Test, but that was mainly due to the power of Alberts and Bismark du Plessis if anything.
But yeah, when the English tacklers stopped South Africa at source (in the first half of the first Test, second half of the second and the third Test), England dominated the breakdown and Coetzee struggled to make an impact.
The breakdown has always been an issue for England in the last few years, but all of Robshaw, Johnson, Haskell, Cole, Marler and Corbisiero (on his Six Nations showing) have shown excellent technique and strength in turning over opposition ball.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:13pm
Ben S said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:13pm | Report comment
Cole especially has been pretty excellent there.
Did you notice Hartley’s new tackling technique on the Boks? Going low with no arms.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:23pm
Jutsie said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:23pm | Report comment
Yes! I did notice hartley’s tackling technique. He must have got some tips from S. Faiingaa!
June 27th 2012 @ 9:41pm
Ben S said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:41pm | Report comment
Only problem was that was how Bismarck scored in the 2nd Test. Dopey Hartley went for a no arms charge and mistimed. Not a good idea a few yards out from your try line…
June 27th 2012 @ 10:23pm
Colin N said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:23pm | Report comment
Or Lydiate, the master of the scything tackle.
Re: Cole, Ben. It’s something I noticed he was doing more of in his time with Leicester last season. He played flanker in his younger days and he’s obviously got exceptional upper body strength.
Generally stopped giving stupid penaties away as well, although there were a couple of occasions last Saturday when he went back to his old ways.
June 27th 2012 @ 10:35pm
Ben S said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:35pm | Report comment
Yeah, Lydiate too, although Lydiate uses his arms like Worsley used to. Hartley gets down on one knee or as low as possible and tends not to use his arms, like Faingaa, as Jutsie pointed out. I can see him getting penalised for it in the future.
Agreed re: Cole – one thing I’ve noticed with Cole is that he does tend to push the boundaries of the ref. Interesting to read Vickery and Mark Regan note that Cole is probably close to being the first name on the teamsheet. He could be awesome over the next few seasons.
June 28th 2012 @ 5:36am
mania said | June 28th 2012 @ 5:36am | Report comment
isnt that the same as TPN’s. grass cutting with no arms and all head. TPN’s in the wrong sport. give the man a helmet, he’d be awesome at gridiron.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:09am
kingplaymaker said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:09am | Report comment
Agree with this all to the extent that can’t think of anything to add: great article.
Sharpe absolutely must stay for the Lions.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:23am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:23am | Report comment
Just on the June tests;
Adam Jones for Du Plessis, Etzebeth for Rettalick, Heaslip for McCaw, Barnes for Carter.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:28am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:28am | Report comment
WW – your deluded. seriously barnes for carter?!? heaslip for mccaw i can understand if your a richie hater. but barnes for carter?
i can understand you not picking retallick as he wasnt as visible as other locks because he was doing his job and the dark arts of the tight5 should go unnoticed despite it being the most important offensive aspect.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:46am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:46am | Report comment
Didn’t mean to ruin your day so just calm down.
But yes in the June series these players shone brighter than those two, who are better players of course, just not this month.
I thought Carter looked liked he was going through the motions and rightly so because he doesn’t need to prove anything and he doesn’t want to re-injure his groin and McCaw only played one match at no 8 and he is not a no 8, so how could he picked at no 8? Heaslip was excellent in the first two matches.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:59am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:59am | Report comment
wussywolf – my days great so far. i’m chilled. i’m calm. your deluded. you need to settle petal. enjoy your ignorant blissful bubble.
the fact carter cruised just showed how much time he has on his hands. so just because carter made it look easier barnes gets the nod? funny, sorry i thought it was based on quality of play not your pet favourites
healsip was awesome but mccaw is king.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:05am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:05am | Report comment
Cool I’m glad you’re calm although reducing yourself to name calling would suggest otherwise.
Barnes played better than any no 10 this June.
Sorry I understand that in NZ it is sacrilegious to say anything other than Carter and McCaw are god but I am under no such obligation. In that regard I am an atheist.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:07am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:07am | Report comment
enjoy your bliss and leave the analysis to people with eyes and brains thanx
June 27th 2012 @ 7:19am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:19am | Report comment
Your right all players that play for NZ are superior to all others and Wellington is the capital of the world. Happy?
June 27th 2012 @ 7:23am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:23am | Report comment
thats better. know your role
June 27th 2012 @ 7:26am
Riccardo said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:26am | Report comment
“Barnes played better than any no 10 this June.”
While it’s true Barnes exceeded expectations your statement is untrue. Carter is the best pivot on the planet right now apart from his understudy Cruden, whose 25 minutes last weekend was the stuff Berrick can only dream about. This makes Barnes 3rd, at best.
Your statement regarding Retallick is debateable but then I also rate Eztebeth.
Heaslip only played 2 tests and while I agree he was outstanding he is no Richie McGaw whose complete game outranks Jamie’s anyway. Richie was superb all series. Even in the 2nd test where he made some uncharacteristic handling errors his stats were still compelling and his leadership under the hammer was excellent.
I’m not sure if you simply dislike the All Blacks or if you are being provocative but your assertions are ludicrous when subjected to even the slightest scrutiny, a bit like Marto’s.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:48am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:48am | Report comment
R mate listen it is just the June series I’m talking about. Carter really wasn’t himself. Cruden played for 20min or so.
Barnes was simply better IMHO this series. I did not say he is the better player. He isn’t but he played better than them in comparison…. this series.
Retallick was disappointing in the second match I’m afraid while Etzebeth got better as the series wore on. I look forward to watching both of their careers pan out.
McCaw was also not his best this series at all. I’m sorry if that offends you in some weird way but that doesn’t mean I am a ‘richie hater’ or that i dislike the All Black’s. I think Mccaw is a fine player and the AB’s deserve their no 1 ranking.
As for scrutiny? what scrutiny. Saying some one is ‘deluded’ and then going on a rant is not scrutiny. It’s a childish defense mechanism. Scrutiny would be giving me some kind of evidence to prove me wrong. Like some of those stats you’ve mentioned which of course would have to be weighed up against the fact he couldn’t catch a cold this series old McCaw.
But can we leave it at that please. I’m not going to argue with someone that believes because I though a player played better than McCaw or Carter for a couple of games that means I must hate the All Blacks.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:48am
Justin2 said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:48am | Report comment
Reality is that no 10 was particularly brilliant despite both sides arguing here. Cruden impressed more than any of them…
June 27th 2012 @ 7:52am
Damo said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Oh Werewolf, you are poking a bee hive there. But you have a right to the opinion that Barnes performed better than Carter. Well I am certain that Barnes played better than Carter in the last round.
But then I would argue that Cruden contributed more pro rata than Carter did anyway. Carter has been coasting so far so I would say your point is valid.
An open minded NZer (excuse us while we discuss this Mania) might imagine Carter in the current Wallaby backline and wonder if he could’ve lit it up as much as Barnes did.
Classic Carter would out score Barnes. But on current form Carter has been quiet in comparison. Just look at what Cruden did in only 25 mins with Carter’s backline.
I’m not saying Carter is history. But he is past his best it seems.
And Mania careful playing the man off the ball. Or you might end up in the bin with Richie, … sorry…Israel. (I’m getting my saints and thugs mixed up)
June 27th 2012 @ 7:55am
marky mark said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:55am | Report comment
No not having this. You NZers that just can’t handle anyone ver suggesting that someone other than McCaw or Carter are any good need psychological help. They are not gods.
Dusatoir is a better player than McCaw. Always has been always will be.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:04am
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:04am | Report comment
Many thanks Damo.
Didn’t realise I’d cause such a cafuffle expressing a view point. But there you go.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:07am
Jarmen said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:07am | Report comment
Yes Barnes certainly had the better of Carter in the third round, this could have been somewhat aided by the fact Carter was sitting in the stands.
Cruden in his 27 minutes he played in that 3rd test IMO showed he is and was a much better 10 and had more impact than any other ten on display between NZ and Aus. Beauden Barrett didn’t do too badly either.
Barnes was stable but best hmmmm your pulling a long string on that bow
June 27th 2012 @ 8:10am
Jarmen said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:10am | Report comment
“imagine Carter in the current Wallaby backline and wonder if he could’ve lit it up as much as Barnes did.”
If you really believe the Wallabies backline was LIT UP I pity the fool that took you to your your first rugby match. Thank you for the morning laugh.
Go back and watch matches 1 and 3 in the NZ vs Ire series to see what a LIT Up backline looks like
June 27th 2012 @ 8:23am
marky mark said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:23am | Report comment
No way Cruden in 20 odd minutes against a very poor excuse for a test match rugby line up was better than Barnes this June.
Absolutely ridiculous statement.
Barnes was clearly the best no 10 over the three test series. And that’s just a fact some of you NZers are just going to have to come to terms with i’m afraid.
the fact he’s our 5th choice fly half should give you a clue as to how hard we are going to be to beat this year. And we have the two best players in the world at 7 and 9!
June 27th 2012 @ 8:28am
Jerry said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
Feel the vibration Marky Mark.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:30am
Riccardo said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Markymark, what is it that you are not having exactly?
“Dusatoir is a better player than McCaw”.
I too rate Thierry, as a captain as well as a player. You know he’s a blindside flanker?
Anyway the IRB voting panel has rated Richie at least 3 times as good as him according to their annual investitures. Ironically it was McCaw who relinquished his 3rd player of the year title to Dusautoir last year on the back of that immense RWC final performance.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:35am
Jarmen said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:35am | Report comment
marky mark and the funky bunch,
BB best 10 pfffffttttt
I love a good morning chuckle
Best player in the world at 7 haha
I’ll give you a little merit there on Genia but not sure you noticed a young kid called Aaron Smith he was immense and easily the best half back in the June series and thats a fact you Aussies are just going to have to accept lol
June 27th 2012 @ 8:42am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
damo – he was lying on the ball so he got the message.
marky mark – good luck with that i hope aus brings everything for this bledisloe as its a big occasion. AB’s going for a 10th straight streak.
this argument isnt a case of me being precious bout mccaw and carter. its arguing WW’s opinion that barnes played better than carter. barnes looked like the usual barnes but without the silly kicking. carter looked like neo in matrix. carter made it look effortless. you may take it for granted his contribution as your all desensitised to it having seen it so often but carter ran the backs sublimely without having to break a sweat. he didnt make much glory for himself but made everyone around him look good.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:46am
marky mark said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:46am | Report comment
OMG what goes on in that country of yours to make you all so one sided? I hardly come on here but i had no idea how mental you all are. there’s someone claiming that Cruden did more in 20 minutes than barnes who was awesome for the wallabies and then starts talking about some Barritt guy. So NZ have the best 3 no 10′s in the world?
If barnes had worn a black jersey you’d all be crowing about him. Your credibility is zero.
Also Dusatoir wears the 6 but plays openside so how can we listen to anything else you have to say? and there is no way that mcCaw is anywhere near Pocock at the moment. I’d be saying that even if I weren’t australian. I’d be happy to concede that Dusatoir is a better player than Pocock but both are better than McCaw.
You spanked a second rate Irish side NZ. Congratulations. You know you almost lost to them the week before?
June 27th 2012 @ 8:50am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:50am | Report comment
jarmen i agree bout aaronSmith. genia, every now and then i rate as the best HB in the world but usually not for long. if wallby’s play well then genia plays well. aaronSmith is still quite young and has a lot to learn, but one thing i did note was that when AB’s werent playing well in the 2nd test aSmith was still playing at a high standard.
to me thats a measure of a great player. not how well you play in general or in a winning game but how much you contribute and perform in a losing game.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:51am
Riccardo said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Oh Mark.
“No way Cruden in 20 odd minutes against a very poor excuse for a test match rugby line up was better than Barnes this June.” I think you’ll find you’re wrong. Cruden’s cameo was one of the best fly-half performances you will see, albeit abbreviated. His vision and combinations, particularly with SBW were sublime. This is another whole level above what Barnes can do, although I concede Berrick has been a revelation for you guys.
As to your comment about Ireland, I think you’ll also fine that their 2nd Test performance in Christchurch far superior to anything Wales put in front of the Wallabies, who just scraped home in all 3 Tests and who were frankly, unconvincing. The Irish were pretty convincing at the RWC against the Wallabies, wouldn’t you agree.
“the fact he’s our 5th choice fly half should give you a clue as to how hard we are going to be to beat this year”. The Wallabies are always hard to beat Mark but your bravado only disguises flaws in your argument. Barnes is in reality Australia’s best first five option now. It is true that Cooper and perhaps Lealiifano may have been picked ahead of Barnes but for injury but I would be intertested to hear youir analysis of the other un-named incumbents.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:53am
ohtani's jacket said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Dusautoir is a blindside specialist.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:10am
Jarmen said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Whats better yet it was an Australian who actually first brought up the point that Cruden played the best of the 10s. I simply agree with him something marky you will find I very rarely do.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:12am
JBees said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Barnes did his job, nothing more nothing less. It’s understandable for this site to name him as the best during the June series because he is an aussie and this is an aussie site however the australian experts have spoken out about the wallabies found wanting in attack. Correct me if I’m wrong but isn’t it the role of the 10 to initiate/create oppunities on attack? In the short period Cruden was on the field he did exactly that as well as Carter in the 1st test. Just my opinion, enough said…
June 27th 2012 @ 10:23am
El Gamba said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Opinions, Werewolf, are just like…. well everyone has one.
Unfortunately an Australian’s opinion is not as valid as a kiwi’s.
June 27th 2012 @ 11:23am
Demon Dez said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
I’m a Wallaby supporter but I’m with you Mania… If Barnes is at 10, the Wallabies are going to lose to the ABs at ANZ and at their Eden Park graveyard… Carter, Cruden and Barrett will outplay Barnes any day. Deans knows this…
June 27th 2012 @ 11:50am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:50am | Report comment
thanx Demon Dez – but i didnt say AB’s were gonna win tho. i said carter was easily better than barnes on the midyear performances.
on paper AB’s look the goods to win, but unfortunately 2 things keep me wary
1) they dont dont play on paper and
2) never underestimate the wallaby’s
June 27th 2012 @ 1:27pm
Wal said | June 27th 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
There seems to be just as many Aussies defending their beliefs about who was the better 10 in June. They then just seem it necessary to put down a whole nation for defending an opposing point.
Carter was fantastic in the First test and created all sorts of space out side him, and he was the difference in the second test.
Aaron Crudens 25min was right up there with Carters exhibition against the Lions in 2005. but just to short to judge an entire series on.
I though Sexton at times looked alright and O’Gara had an impact when he came on to behind packs that were back pedaling in 2 tests.
I didn’t catch the England/SA series so can comment, but imagine their flyhalves both did what was required of them. All in all there actually was some fine inside back play with Genia in the second test finding gaps all over the place, A Smith provided great service and even found some gaps himself.
So maybe everyone should calm down an just be happy to have seen some good rugby over the last 3 weeks, and it means for an exciting lead up to the RC
June 27th 2012 @ 7:38pm
Kuruki said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:38pm | Report comment
Werewolf. I have listened to you say Barnes played the best of all 10′s. I also remember you saying you thought McCabe and Horne were really good as individuals and as a unit. If this is all true, are you a bit concerned that your 10 12 13 all played really well (according to you) yet the performance of the backline as a whole was pretty poor. And even as a trio they never really gained more then parity against the Welsh who were missing their first choice 12.
Could my theory that a better balance needs to be found be correct?
June 27th 2012 @ 8:11pm
Kuruki said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:11pm | Report comment
I will open both my eyes and genuinely give my opinion on Berrick Barnes.
Considering the poor form of the Waratahs, the kick happy nature and below par performances he had been putting in during the year, most people were writing him off only a month ago.
What Barnes done was come into the Wallaby side under a huge grey cloud and provide stability and regained some form that he had been lacking.
Was Berrick Barnes brilliant? No. Was he good? Yes.
Why did Barnes “look” brilliant to some even though he wasn’t playing any better then i have seen from him in the past? It was a mixture of two things. The first was relief, everyone was happy he found some form and stopped kicking away possession as a first choice option. Secondly the overall level of the series was pretty average. There was no real intensity shown by either side, not concerted like the Irish in the second test. This mixture of two things inflated what Barnes really achieved. IMO he just found form nothing anymore spectacular then he has done in the past. the real test for Barnes will come when they next assemble.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:39pm
The Werewolf said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:39pm | Report comment
Kuruki Mccabe and Hone scored 3 tries between them and they made more metres than their opposite no’s collectively and missed no tackles.
Pat McCabe has just been placed in the wallaby leadership group as well so your suggestion that we go backwards and choose a second five style 12 is an argument that will inevitably be lost by this move that now makes McCabe a wallaby certainty.
Barnes was the better of a poor showing from the no 10′s these past 3 weeks. Some say Cruden’s 26 minutes should give him the nod I say no it couldn’t possibly. Let’s see how he goes in a proper test series under pressure. Both he and Carter are better players than Barnes based on super xv form and past test form clearly but that’s not what this discussion is about.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:56pm
Kuruki said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:56pm | Report comment
My argument may be lost, but i think come Rugby Championship my point will be proven. We will now just have to wait and see. As an All Black fan i am stoked with McCabe’s inclusion in the leadership group, it means he is likely to stick around even if he is under performing. Which is great for us. And by under performing i don’t mean by his standards or yours, i mean compared to who he will be coming up against.
And i actually watched all 6 tests and if Carter and Cruden were “poor” then you guys are in some serious trouble when they play well.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:43am
ohtani's jacket said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:43am | Report comment
McCaw played a match and a half at 8, which was half the series.
Carter was fantastic in the first test — pinpoint kick-offs, sensational place kicking, just about led the side in tackling and took the ball to the line well. Even in the second test he was one of the only effective backs with the ball in hand and had a high tackle count once again.
June 27th 2012 @ 10:46am
Team Taniwha said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:46am | Report comment
Barnes seemed to miss a fairly crucial late penalty kick that was fairly straight forward that could have proved a lot more costly not for Harris’s last minute one in the second test and would have affected everyones judgements. Where as under pressure, Carter delivered a game winning drop kick.
Barnes played pretty well in the series on the whole, not great in the Scotland game but not a game for the backs. Interesting to see who lines up for the Championship.
June 27th 2012 @ 10:54am
Jutsie said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
Barnes missed the kick cos he was cramping up due to his hectic preparation for the game, flying back and forth through out the week to attend to his pregnant wife. He should have already been replaced before the kick as he was already grimacing in an earlier play.
June 27th 2012 @ 11:15am
ohtani's jacket said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:15am | Report comment
I thought Barnes did an admirable job for the Wallabies under quite difficult circumstances. I don’t know if I’d rate his overall performance as high as some, but if you consider that Carter missed the third test through injury there’s an argument for Barnes. I just don’t buy that Carter was going through the motions. When Carter goes through the motions he doesn’t attack the line much and isn’t as involved defensively. He put the groin to the test with his place kicking and all round game and looked sharp. Then again we heard all this last year too, and the year before that, and the year before that. One of these days it’ll come true.
June 27th 2012 @ 11:58am
El Gamba said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
Fair point OJ, it has to be put into context of the three tests, which is hard enough when the opposition is different and each had varying game time and roles within their team.
Carter was good in his two tests no question, don’t think he was going through the motions either (I actually think that that is a bit of an insult to a professional of Carter’s level in any case). The thing to like about Carter is that even this season he is evolving as a player, one example being the little inside dummy right at the defensive line he has used frequently of late.
Barnes performed his role within the Wallabies very well, with consideration to having two non ball players in the centres. He was steady and composed which was crucial to the Wallabies given the actual nature of those games.
Cruden, brilliant after 25 minutes. One swallow does not make a spring (or something) however.
June 27th 2012 @ 12:02pm
El Gamba said | June 27th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Sorry OJ. Forgot the plane.
http://www.admarkprint.co.nz/files/medium/81/All-Blacks.jpg
June 27th 2012 @ 7:16pm
Kuruki said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:16pm | Report comment
I have to disagree with you all. in 25 minutes Aaron Cruden destroyed the Irish won the test and done it all on one leg. Best cameo i have ever seen at test level.
June 27th 2012 @ 6:26am
biltongbek said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:26am | Report comment
Good to see JPPietersen recognised, the man had a good series, was dangerous when he got the ball, ran excellent lines, looked for work and scored two magnificent tries,(albeit with our boring tactics)
June 27th 2012 @ 6:33am
mania said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:33am | Report comment
JPPietersen played well but i thought habana played better. however i didnt see the last boks eng test
June 27th 2012 @ 6:44am
biltongbek said | June 27th 2012 @ 6:44am | Report comment
Mania, Habana showed some deft runs,, but still not being able to finish, his cinfidence is growing and being a senior player in the side he seems to be thiving with having that responsibility.
However in a dire test match Pietersen recived the ball inside his half, ran through 5 or 6 defenders sidestepping then got tackled a ruck was set, pick and drive ball came out, and Pietersen finshed the try.
Love seeing that young guy perform, and he is only 25 now.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:05am
kingplaymaker said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:05am | Report comment
biltongbek look how many Springbok forwards there are in this team and…how few backs…
June 27th 2012 @ 7:27am
Uncle Argyle said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:27am | Report comment
Interesting read Paul. I am really happy to see you mentioned the work of Wycliff Palu. I thought he was very good during the series, in particular his solo dismantling of some Welsh rucks and mauls. You mentioned Brisbane however he also went through the middle of a few in Sydney as well. Lets hope he stays fit and gets some support around his running game as well.
June 27th 2012 @ 7:47am
Justin2 said | June 27th 2012 @ 7:47am | Report comment
If that is an accurate 15, and I am not suggesting it isn’t, then it’s pretty sobering for Australia and the cheerleaders of our back line. The two centers selected have the ability to cross the gain line but also set up others around them and had some lovely little rehearsed plays to work.
Digby seems fortunate by the way. I thought he worked hard but he was far from his best.
June 27th 2012 @ 10:21am
Jutsie said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
You could look at it the opposite way and say we had the second most backline representatives with 2 compared to AB’s 3 and it was a tough call between carter who Cully chose and Barnes he has praised throughout the series (this article included). Pretty good effort for a backline with many new combinations.
I dont think there were many standout wingers, Digby’s work in the first test probably got him the nod, i think he had something like 130m gained, thats phenomenal.
June 27th 2012 @ 11:18am
RebelRanger said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
If we are allowed to judge a player on one game and ignore the other games I’d say Savea had a better game one. His 3 tries, big hits and work under the high ball were all class.
June 27th 2012 @ 11:27am
Jutsie said | June 27th 2012 @ 11:27am | Report comment
cant argue with that
June 27th 2012 @ 8:57am
Turnover said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Paul, how can you praise Tatafu whilst saying he has struggled with his line out throwing and that his scrummaging needs work?
They are the most fundamental roles that he must perform. If he can’t manage those then….
June 27th 2012 @ 10:36am
kingplaymaker said | June 27th 2012 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Because Turnover he was a ball of fire in the loose. Paul also said he need to sort out the scrum which probably is more coordination with props than how hard he pushes.
Completely dominant across the field and critical in the Wallabies’ victory. Just rewatch the last match and keep your eye only on him. He and Palu were flung again and again into the opposition, carrying, attacking, clearing-out and the Welsh simply had no answer.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:06am
ohtani's jacket said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:06am | Report comment
I thought Israel Dagg had a pretty good series considering the form he was in heading into it. Aside from his stupid sinbinning, there weren’t too many other blemishes on his game. He was arguably the MOTM in the first test with the number of tries he set up and I was impressed with his kicking game in this series, especially when they used him to punt out of the 22.
June 27th 2012 @ 8:21pm
Kuruki said | June 27th 2012 @ 8:21pm | Report comment
His punt is going to be really handy for us in the close tests. Barret also has a really nice low trajectory punt.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:10am
Rob9 said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Great seeing Barnes, Palu and TPN get mentions. I thought they all had a great series. I think what it proves is the value in experience in the test arena and we really should start exercising a bit of stability in our selection policy.
Deans chopping and changing in a world cup year drove me nuts. That and his experiments like bringing in an untested wing in to play inside centre (and persisting with it when it clearly was a flop)!!! Plain nuts!
We talk about stability and going with the tried and tested in Origin all of the time. QLD have been the masters of it and look how they’ve performed. Finally NSW is starting to value it. Take a look at the Welsh team and how they’ve performed over the past year. They seem to have locked down their combinations and they’re a stronger side for it. When you consider how young the team is, it’s a scary thought at how good they could be.
Regarding experience, I think we’ve sent Rocky packing from the Wallaby fold too early. He’s still in his 20’s and still clearly as tough as nails. Sure he might not hold down a starting berth now that Higgers is in and in some hot form, but the experience that he can bring to the team and should Higgers go down I still believe he’s the next best option at 6 we have. Not exactly a soft back up blindside option. I know there are money issues playing a part but I think we also let Burgess go to early too. We need these players in their late 20’s around the team as back up and help blood our youth.
For this team to realise its potential Deans must really start exercising some stability in his selection policy to give players a chance to perform. Players have off days and like cricket players, rugby players need time to play themselves back into some form. More value needs to be placed on experience and if a player in their late 20’s has a few quiet games, it doesn’t mean they’re over the hill. Rocky’s had a terrible run with injuries of late but when you look at the great loosies in world rugby, he’s really only coming into an age where he should be hitting his peak.
June 27th 2012 @ 9:14am
Jutsie said | June 27th 2012 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Im all for rocky getting a 2nd chance (if he was fully fit) too but I think his hamstrings are kaput. I dont think he will manage much game time even at the tahs let alone the wallabies