Blade Runner may miss London Games
By Jocelyn McLennan, 29 Jun 2012 Jocelyn McLennan is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Athletics, London 2012 Olympics, Oscar Pistorius
Double amputee South African athlete Oscar Pistorius has three more chances until Sunday to post a qualifying time for the London Olympics. He finished second in a heat at the African Championship in Benin on Wednesday.
The time, 46.32 seconds, was over a second outside the 45.30 he needs to run to qualify for the London Games so his window of chance is closing fast.
Although the Court of Arbitration for Sport in June 2011 ruled that Pistorius may compete against the able bodied runners, ethical debate still surrounds him. The ruling overturned the 2008 IAAF decision that his carbon fibre prosthetic blades gave the athlete an “unfair advantage”.
The argument for the court’s ruling is that Pistorius’ blades compare to other athletes’ strapping, braces and bandages for injuries. Although it is assisting the body, it is only bringing him back his ‘normal’ level and not beyond.
While this may be the case for Pistorius now, i.e. that his blades are only giving him back his legs that nature has taken away, what of the technology in the future?
Technology for prosthetics has come a long way since WWII war ace Douglas Badar was given false legs of tin. Advancements in materials and fibres will only accelerate and further the mobility to many, athlete or not. This is where the line has to be drawn.
While we all admire Pistorius for his never say die determination and not allowing the loss of his legs to deter him, he may already be beyond the speed of what he would have been if he still possessed his own limbs, harsh as that may sound.
Reigning Olympic 400 metre champion American LaShawn Merritt raised his concern about what is a level playing field in May this year. “I haven’t really been keeping up with it, but I don’t know how the judge made a ruling on it and what goes on with the prosthetic legs…he gets better every year”.
Merritt’s objection smacks of hypocrisy after he was suspended for 21 months for a doping violation in 2010.
Perhaps the only way to set a fair benchmark is to measure the compression and thrust on the track surface of Merritt and perhaps another top three 400 metre runners and somehow devise a way to set Pistorius’ blades to the same thrust. Although this may compel Pistorius to be never better then number two he would at least be competing on pseudo equal terms.
What ever the final ruling, it will not be an easy decision for the powers that be in world athletics.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Nadal, Serena affirm favouritism for French Open (15)
- Can boxing great Pacquiao return to his former self? (14)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
- Has sports journalism lost its way? (12)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: episode four (9)
- ‘Wild’ Will willing: Tomlinson targets American assault (8)
- Nadal and Djokovic chasing Federer (12)
- Aussie Power chasing history at Indy 500
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for (5)
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (9)
- 2013 French Open: men’s matches to watch out for (5)
- James Te Huna’s back on track for UFC 160 (0)
- Five things you’ll see at UFC 160 (1)
- UFC 160: Velasquez vs. Bigfoot II – analysis and prediction (0)
- Will the real Bernard please stand up (9)
- UFC 160: Junior Dos Santos vs Mark Hunt – analysis and prediction (2)
- Garcia’s racial comments alude to broader issues (3)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Athletics, London 2012 Olympics, Oscar Pistorius

June 29th 2012 @ 12:05pm
Dan said | June 29th 2012 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
I’m really conflicted by this issue but my big hope here is science. Surely at some stage science will develop the kind of quantitative testing that can establish whether an athlete is receiving an actual (rather than perceived) advantage from their prosthetic?
At which time, surely they can develop some kind of standard for prosthetics – dictatiting the material, dimensions and so on, so that it is a level playing field for all.
Over all, I understand the concerns of the able-bodied athletes but can’t blame Oscar and other amputees from wanting to compete against the best of the able-bodied athletes as well as the best of those who aren’t.
June 29th 2012 @ 12:36pm
Jocelyn said | June 29th 2012 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Dan one of the biggests concerns the athletes have had is not being beaten by him but whether Pistorius can keep his balance ans not stumble into their lanes and trip them up. That to me is very precious as any runner can fall interfere with another. Look what happens in all the distance races for examlple. That is athletics. That is sport. I think the likes of Merritt are just scared of being beaten by him.Ironically former Commonwealth gold medallist West Australian John Steffensen was beaten by the Pistorius in May in The Netherlands. Wonder how his ego handled that?
June 29th 2012 @ 2:27pm
Cam Baker said | June 29th 2012 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Well Steffenson did injure himself earlier in the year…
What I don’t like about the IAAF ruling in relation to Oscar is that they say he can run 1st leg of a relay but not any other leg as they think it might be dangerous to have him in the mixed changeover zone. That is BS. He should either be allowed to run or not. Perhaps the real reason for that rule is they are scared what kind of split time he could run with a flying start as he is so slow out of the blocks…
June 29th 2012 @ 4:08pm
Jocelyn said | June 29th 2012 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
Cam I agree completely. I think they are just scared altogether as he is a damn good runner and no-one wants to chance being beaten by him.
June 29th 2012 @ 5:33pm
oldhacker said | June 29th 2012 @ 5:33pm | Report comment
Good on Oscar for what he has achieved, but the gorilla in this particular dressing room is technology. Oscar’s pins do not appear to give him an advantage in 2012 but what if the scientists invent a super-duper new material which gives the boy seven-league boots and a sub-43 second 400m? At what point do the officials draw the line without contravening human rights legislation? Unless the blazers decide one way or the other, and soon, the future of athletics is eight lanes of Douglas Baders with hi-tech undercarriage bounding around the track at unprecedented speed. Maybe we’ll have to organise special Olympics for able-bodied athletes …