Aussies will lose all five ODIs to English
Related coverage
What a disappointing couple of displays the Australian cricket team has produced these past few days in London. In fact they were worse than disappointing.
They were passionless, rudderless and frighteningly inept.
The message these two losses have given to not only the English cricket team but to the general sporting public in the UK is that Australia are most likely to lose this one day series 0-5.
But that is the good news. The bad news is that it has consolidated a growing confidence in the UK that next year’s Ashes will be an embarrassing miss match of cricketing talent and nous.
From the inept batting to the overhyped fast bowling, the current Australian cricket team is so far off being competitive against its most nostalgic rival I would doubt that one Australian would be selected in the opposition first eleven.
Who would of thought that possible five years ago?
David Warner, the big hitting opening batsman that every Aussie fan seems to think the world of, is now a selection certainty for the Australia one-day and Test side.
Yet a sincere question mark must be placed over his ‘batsmanship’ and his suitability for a Test series against the English seam attack. Warner’s appalling opening batting today was almost too painful to watch and set the tone for a disastrous batting display.
Not one Australian batsman looked like they should be playing international cricket, let alone be representing the number one ranked one day side in the world. Actually perhaps Brett Lee can yet again hold his head up high with the bat at least.
Both Watson and Bailey scored into the sixties but both of them failed to score rapidly when their eyes were in, giving the game over to the English before Cook and Bell were even asked to pad up.
Watson was good, but Bailey in particular struggled to play attacking strokes of any significance in the important 20 to 35 over period. The poultry 40 runs the Australians scored in this period was lacklustre and irresponsible in terms of setting up for a win.
Ricky Ponting and Michael Hussey, at a combined age of somewhere near 152, still seem to be the only players that Australia could rely on in twelve months’ time to contribute alongside Clarke and Watson.
Forrest, Bailey, Wade and ‘the other Hussey’ might be able to nut out some runs here and there but if these are the best alternatives to any of the before four mentioned, than Australia are in dire straits.
But back to where it all started. Warner’s decent scores from time to time, including his fifty in the first match, does not hide the fact that Steve Finn looks like he could take his scalp every other ball. And this folks, is on flat one-day pitches.
This Ashes tell tale of a mismatch does not bode well for the stocky left-hander when next year’s Test match wickets will offer more for the bowlers. Added to this, Warner and co will be up against a test bowling line-up where Finn is currently viewed as surplus to requirement.
If Finn, a 6ft 7in, accurate 90+mph bowler, can not make the English test line-up, than how could Bill Lawry have dared to make the now infamous statement that ‘Australia has the best seem attack in the world’ earlier this year. It clearly does not.
The English have taller, more accurate bowlers in Finn and Broad. In Finn’s case he is as fast and at times faster than all our test match candidates.
The English have arguably the world’s best swing bowler in Jimmy Anderson, who in the past few seasons in English conditions has been unplayable at times.
They have arguably the world’s finest fast bowling all rounder in Bresnan and they have the much improved Chris Tremlett and Graham Onions to call on as well.
Australia’s fast bowling stocks are very healthy compared to a few years ago that much is certain. However, it would be a stretch to suggest that even one of our bowlers would be preferred to the current crop of English bowlers, if indeed they all owned a red passport instead of a blue one.
Brett Lee is on the cusp of breaking Glenn McGraths’ Australian one day wicket taking record. But he looks like a player that is going through the motions hoping to get the wicket rather than striving to get it. One gets the feeling that he will bow out once he has taken that record and I do hope he gest there soon and steps aside.
Mitchell Johnson’s comeback was yet another humiliating experience for a player that is now a laughing stock in this part of the world. He did not spray the ball down the leg side, this time though. No, he has found another way to appear amateurish.
He has found a way to no ball more often than a young Pakistani bowler, who’s name should never be whispered in cricket circles again.
But there is hope isn’t there? Is there? Our next generation of quicks, the much heralded Pattinson and Cummins, seem to be more injury prone than Samuel L Jackson did when he played the sinister, brittle-boned weirdo known as ‘Mr Glass’ in the movie Unbreakable.
Our class of ’09, Hilfenhaus and Siddle have indeed improved but the psychological scars of previous Ashes campaigns may be too much of an advantage to the English batsman who must be thinking in terms of Oliver Twist; ‘Please sir may I have some more?’
I fear that even if Cummins and Pattinson are fit this time next year they will be no quicker, no taller and no more penetrative than what the English batsman are used to facing in their nets and in their domestic championships.
Perhaps we need to think of the tall left-armer that can hold the seam properly and swing the ball to offer a variation to what they are used to. No, not Johnson. The other left arm Mitchell, Mitchell Starc. Perhaps.
Or perhaps Nathan Lyon will have developed into a more consistent off spinner by this time next year and be capable of taking 40 odd test wickets in a series.
I sincerely hope that something amazing happens to Australian cricket in the next 12 months starting in a couple of days. Because at the moment there is only one conclusion to this week’s one day series and next year’s Ashes.
Five nil England.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (58)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (41)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (2)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (2)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (42)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (65)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket

July 2nd 2012 @ 7:24am
Viscount Crouchback said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:24am | Report comment
An accurate summary. 5-0 looks the most likely result if rain doesn’t intervene.
I never thought I’d see the day that an Australian team would field cricketers as average as Forrest, Smith and Bailey.
As for Warner – less chat to the press about England’s bowlers, more work on your decidedly uncultivated technique, young man.
July 2nd 2012 @ 7:49am
DJW said | July 2nd 2012 @ 7:49am | Report comment
Bringing Johnson in after such a long layoff without making him play state cricket first shows are selectors are still inept. His bowling display was horrendous.
The english scored at will while we struggled. But I guess when you look at Lee, Johnson, McKay and Doherty vs the current crop
of English bowlers, even with Jimmy out there still far better.
The fact in second innings when the game looked lost, they showed Micky Aurther on the side line and some of the players on the field laughing about really annoyed me. Only Clarke looked like he understands the gravity of the situation. The English are not only beating us but doing it with ease.
5-0 seems a real possibility.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:36am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Oh, but didn’t you know Johnson is a once-in-a-generation bowler with X-factor so he can miss over 18 months of cricket and then come back in an international match and blow away opposition batsmen?
Likewise, the youngster Cummins doesn’t need domestic experience to strengthen his body and gain bowling experience.
“Mitch has been bowling very well in the nets, he’s got good pace, as Pat Cummins does,” Clarke said. “Pat Cummins has got that x-factor, and we thought Mitch does as well, he’s left-arm so he brought something different, and as you’ve seen today he’s swinging the ball.”
July 2nd 2012 @ 5:18pm
Rhys said | July 2nd 2012 @ 5:18pm | Report comment
Ahhh the words ‘bowling well in the nets’. If only world beating performances on the field were guaranteed to follow. Seems the Australian camp still hasn’t worked out that net form is meaningless on the scoreboard.
July 4th 2012 @ 4:54pm
Disco said | July 4th 2012 @ 4:54pm | Report comment
Wade: “We have three or four blokes who bowl over 150km/h so it has been a bit of a nightmare in the past few weeks facing those guys in the nets.”
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:07am
Lolly said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:07am | Report comment
Warner has really annoyed me. His get-out shot was at least as lazy as the one he talked about from the first match. Can’t be bothered getting worked up about the journeymen in the team. You can’t expect them to score quickly against good bowling. And I found it funny watching the ‘Watson and Bailey Becalmed’ show. Neither of them can rotate the strike to save their lives.
The English team aren’t even having to play that well to flog the Aussies. Watched the heads go down after four overs of Lee and Johnson today. If there was any momentum floating around it had well and truly been hurled to the English team.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:37am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Especially, after he joined the party in questioning the English team’s credentials, as though he had a wealth of class and success to fall back on.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:16am
Rellum said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:16am | Report comment
To be fair, none of the bowlers from last night are likely to play in the Ashes unless there is multiple injuries.
I still can’t get to grips with Warner being hailed as out top batsmen. The guy is a tonker and that will only pay off occasionally. He has improved his shot selection but I still think he is a liability for the serious stuff next year.
July 2nd 2012 @ 6:01pm
The Werewolf said | July 2nd 2012 @ 6:01pm | Report comment
Granted the test bowlers will not be the ones on show yesterday but any combination that we put out will not be anything the English test batsman will fear. Their batsman are so confident and technically assured at the moment. So the key is the batting because from 1 to 7 they have a huge advantage.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:27am
Brendon said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:27am | Report comment
At least Warner doesnt fiddle around getting 10 runs off 30 deliveries and gets out. That is a chronic problem with the ODI side in recent years. That and players getting out around 50-60.
Why do we keep picking batsmen that are such slow starters and cant play shots? Its this idiotic “digging in” mentality that has unfortunately spread to the selectors.
If players are going to piss-fart around and then fail we might as well give Phil Hughes a shot in the ODI side.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:20am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:20am | Report comment
Yes, but unlike you, I think digging in is often crucial to success in Test match cricket.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:28am
Rellum said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:28am | Report comment
“To be fair, none of the bowlers from last night are NOT likely to play”
I did mean
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:39am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Fairly sound summary. I’d be surprised if it was 5-0 though.
The glaring weaknesses in the Australian selection process and muddied thinking of several players – both of which Arthur and Clarke seem content with – remain in both forms of the game.
July 2nd 2012 @ 8:54am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 8:54am | Report comment
“[Johnson] has been high on confidence, he’s been bowling very well in the nets. It’s his first game back so it’s going to take a bit of time. But Mitch was really looking forward to his opportunity today. It’s unfortunate we couldn’t get a win up but it is great to have him back around the group.”
Just so long as Clarke’s got his mate in the side.
July 2nd 2012 @ 10:13am
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
The solution is oibvious. We need to lobby the ICC about playing all matches in the nets
July 2nd 2012 @ 10:28am
Talisman said | July 2nd 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
“but it is great to have him back around the group”
The selectors pick him after no cricket for months, then pick him without any warmup games, then he bowls crap like we all know he does (most of the time) & the comment above is the best they can come up with??? I’ll tell you what – if I was a bowler in that group with any ability I’d be pissed off firstly for the free ride he’s given & secondly the fact that everyone in the team has to get an extra 5% out of themselves to try to cover for him.
The selectors have an instinctive ability to learn nothing from past experiences.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:22am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Yes, I’d be surprised if there wasn’t some resentment because the favouritism and public backing shown towards Johnson is farcical.
July 2nd 2012 @ 5:26pm
Rhys said | July 2nd 2012 @ 5:26pm | Report comment
Aside from being ‘one of the boys’, and Uncle Arthur’s love child, I think the other factor that pushes the Illustrated Man’s case for selectors is his perceived ‘marketability’. Many will poo-poo such a notion, but I hark back to the ‘Vodaphone 6′ from last summer. Mitchy boy featured prominently throughout that ad campaign, in addition to scoffing buckets of KFC, and posing proudly as a CommBank ambassador.
$utherland wants his poster boys to be seen on the field as well as the commercial breaks.
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am
Disco said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
I don’t doubt it.
July 2nd 2012 @ 9:24am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 2nd 2012 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Very disheartening games so far for Australia. And what are the medicos doing that allows Cummins to breakdown after bowling 10 overs?
Having said that, the writer is getting his formats confused – “Yet a sincere question mark must be placed over his ‘batsmanship’ and his suitability for a Test series against the English seam attack”.
So? We’re playing a ODI series. Whether Warner is cut out for Test duties is irrelevant at the moment.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:23am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:23am | Report comment
Cummins perhaps isn’t ready for international cricket. Should he spend at least one full season playing domestically?
July 2nd 2012 @ 9:29am
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 9:29am | Report comment
Watson continues to frustrate as an opener. Gets to 50 in even time, then takes another 30+ balls to make 16 and holes out in a concentration lapse..
July 2nd 2012 @ 10:09am
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 10:09am | Report comment
I agree, though it’s not such a major issue in the ODI side, given the nature of the format. It’s very frustrating in Test matches
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:29am
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:29am | Report comment
But the mental side of his game is a not a strong point; exacerbated by opening the batting and being a frontline bowler.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:06pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
I agree but an opener who is fairly consistent in scoring 50′s in ODI cricket is a fantastic asset to have abecause scoring 100′s is rarer due to time constraints and the pressure to score quicker. At test level you expect players to convert 50′s into 100′s more often because they have the time to do so and don’t have the pressure of needing to score 5-6 runs an over. My point wasn’t that it’s not an issue, just that it’s a fairly minor one in ODI cricket. Or at least it’s a much smaller problem in ODI’s than Tests. I’ve been saying for a long time that he should be batting at 6-7 in Test matches.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:31pm
Brett McKay said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
Matt, that’s true, but openers have the best chance of all to make hundreds in ODIs, and really shouldn’t be wasting fifties at that level. An ODI has 300 balls in an innings, so if your fairly consistent opener is making run-a-ball 50s, even if he’s ony getting half the strike and not accelerating, he should still be reaching three figures somewhere around the 30-35 over mark.
I take your point about ODI 100s being a bit rarer, but I don’t think that’s the case for opening batsmen. Realistically, a ODI openers conversion rate should be failry similar to a Test or even First Class opener, based on the opportunities and time allowed..
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:01pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
It’s a good point. i suppose years of watching the likes of Gilchrist and Hayden open the batting in ODI’s can inflate the perception of a good strike rate for an opener! I’m not overly fussed where Watson bats in the order to be honest. If we’re going to keep Warner at the top of the order then we probably need to pair him with a player who can compile a steady 100 now and then. In this case Watson probably would be better suited down the order but then the question becomes, who replaces him?
At present, our opening combination is probably the most settled and reliable part of our ODI line up so I’d say that we should probably be looking at the middle order more than the openers. The lack of a regular number 3 is the position I’m currently most concerned about.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:17pm
Rellum said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:17pm | Report comment
When we where winning one dayers we did have a fit and in form Shaun Marsh at the top of the order. Now that he is out of form we are lacking a quality replacement.
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:21pm
Disco said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:21pm | Report comment
Yeah, because as Arthur said, “Class is permanent, form is temporary.”
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:06pm
Lolly said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:06pm | Report comment
He went from motoring along to becoming shotless on getting 50.It was very funny to watch.