Carlton not injured, just soft
By Cameron Rose, 2 Jul 2012 Cameron Rose is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- AFL, Brett Ratten, Carlton Blues, Chris Judd, Marc Murphy
Nick Duigan and Chris Judd head to the rooms (Photo: Darrian Traynor/AFL Media)
Related coverage
Are injuries to blame for Carlton’s derailed season, or is this just another excuse from a club whose mental strength compares unfavourably to that of Sam Stosur?
Popular opinion is that the Blues have been ‘decimated’ by untimely injuries to key personnel, which is the main reason behind them losing four matches in a row, and six of their last seven.
Frankly, I’m not buying it.
This is a club where whinging is the favourite pass-time. There have already been many memorable instances this season.
It all started with Sam Lonergan’s ferocious, agenda-setting tackle on Andrew Carrazzo in the opening minutes of Carlton’s round four defeat at the hands of Essendon.
Carrazzo broke a shoulder blade as a result, but rather than taking the opportunity to use this event as a motivator, the Blues showed themselves to be spineless, allowing the Bombers to run rampant over the course of the day.
When asked about the incident, rather than talk about how football is an often brutal sport of hard men and harder play, Carrazzo’s reaction was to be ‘disappointed with how it happened’.
Marc Murphy was on Channel Seven’s Game Day on the Sunday following the match and stated that the team was ‘looking forward to playing Essendon next time’ when asked about Lonergan’s tackle, a veiled threat of payback contained within. Never mind the 115 minutes of football he and his teammates had to avenge the perceived injustice the day before.
Some unruly Blues fans needed to vent their anger at Carlton’s inept performance that day, and decided that Twitter was the right forum, and Lonergan the right target, attacking him with abuse and threats. These were acts of cowardice far below anything we’ll see on the field this year.
In fact, any person targeting sportspeople on Twitter merely confirms themselves as the lowest common denominator.
Twitter was the next scene of the victim mentality held by Carlton players, Marc Murphy involved again, along with Jeremy Laidler and Jarrad Waite, all three complaining about the umpiring in the round 12 West Coast game.
Never mind that the Eagles were first to the ball with the hardness that is their forte, and never mind that the free kick count was only 23-21 West Coast’s way, the loss was apparently all the umpires’ fault.
So now that we’ve established the ‘culture of complaining’ so prevalent at Carlton, let’s get back to this supposedly horrific injury count.
The Blues have used 32 players this year, the same as West Coast, Hawthorn, North Melbourne and St Kilda, and less than Collingwood and Geelong, all teams above them on the ladder. Even Essendon and Adelaide have used only one less, so the difference is negligible.
Marc Murphy has been a significant loss after being cannon-balled by Patrick Dangerfield. He’s missed five matches so far, but haven’t Collingwood also had premium midfielders miss a lot of football? Dale Thomas has watched four matches from the stands, Scott Pendlebury three, and Dane Swan two. The Pies have won all of them.
Andrew Carrazzo, that rare breed of tagger who wins more possession that his opponent, is a critical element of the Carlton midfield. A player of his quality missing seven games can’t be covered, right?
I wonder if the Hawks feel that way about Luke Hodge, the Pies about Luke Ball, and the Eagles about Mark LeCras? All are just as important to their clubs as Carrazzo is to the Blues, and between them have played five matches this season.
The difference is that Hawthorn, Collingwood and West Coast moved on, putting more faith in next generation players like Bruest and Whitecross, Beams and Sidebottom, Shuey and Selwood. All three sides are strongly favoured for a top-four position.
Meanwhile, Carlton brings back limited triers Brock McLean and Aaron Joseph while the promising Kane Lucas and Andrew Collins run around at VFL level, the latter two collecting 59 disposals for Northern on Saturday.
Jarrad Waite has only played six games this year, but please don’t tell me that Brett Ratten has this 29-year-old crock as the key plank in his plan to deliver premiership glory to the navy Blue hordes?
For all of Waite’s abilities, he’s only had one top three best and fairest finish in his career, and from the start of 2009, a year in which Carlton returned to the finals and has stayed since, the versatile swingman has played only 43 of a possible 82 matches, a return of just over 50%.
To put it simply, Waite is a bonus addition if and when he is fit to play, not a key member of the side.
Jeremy Laidler has been a handy addition to the backline since crossing from Geelong, but has only played four matches this year, and won’t be returning. He’ll be the classic case of an injured player becoming much more important while absent. Watch for his powers to become a combination of Glenn Archer and Andrew McLeod the longer he is out.
Instead, we’ll know that he’s played only 25 games since being drafted in 2008, and couldn’t find a spot in the top ten in Carlton’s best and fairest last year.
Good teams have an army of Laidler-type ‘role players’ in reserve, and the top sides have all called on unheralded players to fill holes this year when required.
Apart from Murphy, Carazzo, Waite and Laidler, it’s basically been all hands on deck for the Blues in 2012.
Instead of injuries, it’s been players hopelessly out of form and devoid of confidence that has been the problem.
Chris Judd is struggling under the burden of carrying this team for years, Michael Jamison hasn’t been at his best, Chris Yarran has been a disgrace, toe injury notwithstanding, Bryce Gibbs plays with a confused mind, Kade Simpson hasn’t been allowed to free-wheel in Murphy’s absence, Andrew Walker found consistency in 2011 but perhaps it was fleeting, while Jeff Garlett has been playing with all the impact of Leon Davis in the 2002 grand final.
But the biggest problem has been Matthew Kruezer. Jack Watts has been unfairly maligned as an under-performing number one draft pick, while Kreuzer has been given a free pass. The Carlton big man has the lowest output-to-reputation ratio in the league.
Admittedly his cause hasn’t been helped by the ridiculous notion of playing three ruckmen, which tells me that Brett Ratten still doesn’t know what his best set up is.
But Ratten’s worthiness as senior coach is a story for another day.
Carlton are in free-fall at the moment, but don’t listen when their supporters whine about injuries, for it will just be another sign of mental weakness that has enveloped the club.
According to the much-lauded membership campaigns, Carlton were ‘coming’, but now they’re going. We can smell what they’re cooking, and it’s the whiff of failure. ‘No passengers’ has become ‘all passengers’.
I am Carlton? No thanks.
Cameron Rose is a born and bred Melbournian, raised on a regime of AFL, cricket and horse racing. He likes people who agree with him but loves those that don't, for in his mind there is nothing better than a roaring debate. He tweets from @camtherose.
![]()
Passionate about your AFL? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily AFL email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- AFL, Brett Ratten, Carlton Blues, Chris Judd, Marc Murphy


July 2nd 2012 @ 11:46am
Hawks9108 said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Redb – Collingwood and Wst Coast have covered injuries well… the Bombers on the other hand have been gifted an easy draw.
Carlton IMO have been harshly treated in this article….injuries have played a major part in the Blues fortunes this year.
Some sides can cover their good players if they are out injured, Carlton obviously doesn’t have the depth that other sides have…at their best they would be well and truly a contender this year.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:54am
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
Well well after 14 rounds you think a ‘soft’ draw keeps a team in the top4-5?
Try again.
July 2nd 2012 @ 11:57am
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
It’s got North into the 8 so why not.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:03pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
North are one win ahead of 13th placed Fremantle.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:16pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
Yep north are only 1 game ahead of 13th Freo after already play 2 games against GWS and 1 against the Suns.
Matt F North don’t count as a real top 8 side and they were very lucky to win it
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:32pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
Well the terms were “sides in the 8″ so they have to be included, though I agree that they are the “odd one out” so to speak. Who would you propose replace them though? Of all the teams fighting out for 8th spot the only team that Essendon haven’t beaten is St Kilda and that’s because they haven’t played them yet. They do play them this week though and I don’t think you’ll find many people tipping St Kilda.
When you consider that their two losses against Top 8 sides have been by 1 and 4 points, it’s hard to argue that they don’t belong there.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:45pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
Matt F – Yes the terms were “teams inside the 8″ but a team that is inside the 8 for I think the first time this year, is very unlikely to stay and is only there because it has 2 games in hand against the Giants & Suns is hardly evidence of the bombers tough draw.
It’s not the margins or even the fact they have played 4 teams in the top 8 it’s that after 14 rounds they have only played 4 teams in the 8 and one of them is the 8th side. Carlton Is about to play Collingwood a second time, has played Adelaide, West Coast in Perth (as opposed to the bombers playing them in Melb), Hawthorn, Geelong and Essendon and has only missed Sydney and North. They beat the Pies and “only lost” to the Eagles and Geelong by 2 goals.
Who’s draw has been harder?
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:13pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
I’m not going to claim that Essendon’s draw has been harder than Carlton’s but they are 4 games ahead. That’s a large gap no matter what the dra looks like. Besides when they did play Essendon the result wasn’t exactly a great one for the Blues.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:52pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Melb ourne by 6 ponts – oh wait which way round was that again?
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:17pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
I thought that we were talking about results against Top 8 sides? That being said, given that I’m not an Essendon fan (Swans fan here) I found the Melbourne win over Essendon to be extremely funny
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:23pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
.
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:15pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
/
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:23pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
Matt F – I am having touble replying to the right comment as they don’t appear until after I have posted.
I am not saying the draw is to blame for the blues position just pointing out that despite Redb’s assertions the bombers have hardly had a tough run and had they played a couple more top 8 teams they could well be a lot further down the ladder.
Yeah the last time they played was terrible, a loss and Carrazzo, Laidler and Yarran all injured.
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:52pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
Australian Rules 3 frrom 7, could be worse than that, the underdog usually wins the Carlton Essendon game (and the blues could have Murphy & Waite back by then), Richmond are no puch over and North can do anything as the last couple of weeks have shown.
July 2nd 2012 @ 12:56pm
Hawks9108 said | July 2nd 2012 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
the Bombers have played only 2 sides that are in the 8….lost to both
enough said IMO
Try again Redb!!
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:07pm
Matt F said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:07pm | Report comment
Obviously you’ve forgotten about their wins over the Kangaroos and West Coast.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:48pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
Collingwood by one point in an Anzac Day classic and Sydney by less than a goal.
Sydney smashed Hawthorn.
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:32pm
Australian Rules said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
Redb, I’d hardly count my chickens…
The Bombers’ end-of-season run is: Geel, Haw, Adel (away), North, Carl, Rich, Coll.
Could easily be 3 wins from the last 7 games heading into finals…
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:15pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:15pm | Report comment
AR,
Not counting chickens at all, I have Essendon 4-5th by seasons end.
Geelong
North
Carlton
Richmond
4 possible wins on form, past performance.
Hawthorn yet to be tested.
Adelaide are vulnerable as North and Richmond proved.
Collingwood have an edge in the midfield over us.
1 maybe loss – HAw
1 maybe win – Adel
1 likely loss – Coll
You left off St Kilda and Port Adelaide as 2 likely wins.
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:26pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
Redb – How is you form better than geelongs, Who have you beaten in the last month?
And if you lose that one, and to Hawthorn and Adelaide that will be what 1 win in 7 weeks, will the calls be comning for Hirds head as they are Rattens?
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:49pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:49pm | Report comment
Who have Geelong beaten?
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:58pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
In the past 6 weeks Geelong have beaten The bulldogs, GWS, Carlton & Port Adelaide had the bye and lost by a goal to Sydney.
Essendon have beaten GWS, Freo and the Bulldogs, had the Bye and Lost to Melbourne and Sydney.
I can’t see how you can say you are in better form than Geelong on that basis. You have both beaten 2 of the same teams, Carlton & Freo are on the same number of wins and Port Adelaide are above Melbourne, and you both lost the same side by a similar margin. I think it should definitely be in the maybe pile rather than the win column
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:14pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:14pm | Report comment
Macca,
Your obsessing.
Essendon 4th
Carlton 10th
Nuff said.
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:21pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:21pm | Report comment
Not obsessing Redb, just pointing out the obvious your form and Geelongs form is at best similar at worst they are travelling better.
Ans ladder positions after round 14 don’t count for much. The blues run home isn’t too bad (a lot of winnable games) and their list is only going to get better.
July 2nd 2012 @ 4:48pm
Australian Rules said | July 2nd 2012 @ 4:48pm | Report comment
“Hawthorn yet to be tested”…?
Hawks’ Top 8 scalps: Collingwood (4 goals), Adelaide (9 goals), North (19 goals)…and adding Carlton (8).
Essendon has 2 Top 8 scalps: a depleted WCE in Melb (10 goals), and North (2 points)…and adding Carlton (5 goals).
The last 7 games are all massive danger games for the Bombers.
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:45am
Redb said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:45am | Report comment
Hawthorn yet to be tested by Essendon’s improved team in 2012. Not that they have not been tested.
Too many here are playing footy maths – X beat Y and Z therefore will beat R because it lost to Y.
This season is much more even, so a 10-3 win loss record is pretty good as teams the Bombers have beaten have knocked off others above it.
July 2nd 2012 @ 1:58pm
tonysalerno said | July 2nd 2012 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
Carlton is going to get hammered on Friday.
And it’s not because they’re are injured or soft but because they are a club in crisis.
July 2nd 2012 @ 2:32pm
Hawks9108 said | July 2nd 2012 @ 2:32pm | Report comment
yep gotta take that hit from you Redb….geez we had the swans on toast too….
the win agianst the Eagles doesn’t count as i think from memory the eagles had 10 out and as macca alluded to they played them here in melbourne..swans had them by about 9 goals late in the 3rd term…as for the Roos they only just made it into the 8 for the first time yesterday
the bombers are going along Ok…let us see where they are at when they don’t play all the weaker sides
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:18pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:18pm | Report comment
Hawks9108,
I look forward to the Hawthron game, we have something to prove as last year our performance was well below where we are now. I’m not so sure Hawthorn have improved all that much.
Essendon has improved considerably in 2012 and that’s all I wanted.
You can only beat who you play but small losses to Coll and Sydney means we are not far off the mark.
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:26pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:26pm | Report comment
And what does a small loss to Melbourne mean?
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:43pm
Redb said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
Terrible kicking is terrible football, the Bombers played badly against Melbourne. No excuses but it happens in football from time to time.
Keep talking about Essendon Macca, it helps with the pain for the Blues fans. Nice deflection.
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:16pm
zacbrygel said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:16pm | Report comment
I reckon this article is spot on. I’m a Carlton supporter and even I agree with this.
July 2nd 2012 @ 3:52pm
Macca said | July 2nd 2012 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
,
July 2nd 2012 @ 5:38pm
Rossi said | July 2nd 2012 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Excellent article. You would think any Carlton supporter reading it would stop and think. And then along comes Macca…
Begs the question though- what’s the cause of their problems? Answer- their culture. Sense of entitlement, deserved or not. Starts with the president and filters all the way down to, well, Macca.
July 2nd 2012 @ 5:47pm
Cameron Rose said | July 2nd 2012 @ 5:47pm | Report comment
Rossi, I can tell you that made me laugh out loud. Quality. And spot on with the sense of entitlement thing too.
July 2nd 2012 @ 10:16pm
mccartney said | July 2nd 2012 @ 10:16pm | Report comment
re Carlton’s “sense of entitlement” – that is your opinion and is not a fact. Your belief that they have a “sense of entitlement” is based on what you read in the newspaper ie Carlton are “arrogant” Carlton are “rich” etc.. Yet the club is actually far from being rich or haviing grounds to be arrogant – what do they have to be arrogant about? Collingwood and Essendon are rich and powerful, but you never hear the bad press about their “arrogance, wealth, entitlement etc”. What you may be meaning is they talked big and delivered little…that is not ” a sense of entitlement” though.
Carlton dragged themselves up in the 1960s to be a powerful team. They did it with grit and guts. I agree with the writer of this article in one sense though – there are not enough players with balls in the team, just a whole let of ballerinas. Watch North go in and attack and hunt the ball on the weekend. That is what is needed, not glory boys expecting fame and fortune to fall into their lap. It is a tough game – North accepted it on the weekend and got the job done. Can Carlton?
July 3rd 2012 @ 3:16pm
Rossi said | July 3rd 2012 @ 3:16pm | Report comment
No, I base my ‘sense of entitlement’ theory from my interactions with Carlton supporters. Heck, what about the arrogance in their marketing campaigns? Sticks’ comment ‘we are Carlton, fornicate the rest. Pratt & Ratten talking about the Carlton swagger. FFS, on another sport forum, their fans started a thread titled ‘how should we behave after we win the next two flags?’ Read the above article for other examples. Then, perhaps, take a look in the mirror.
Never thought Carlton are rich, don’t they still owe the AFL money from the bailout?
July 3rd 2012 @ 3:22pm
Macca said | July 3rd 2012 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
And Rossi what of Collingwood? Are Carlton the only team that wants success?
July 3rd 2012 @ 5:38pm
Rossi said | July 3rd 2012 @ 5:38pm | Report comment
Collingwood don’t make arrogant statements, the team just goes about winning. 32 year and 20 year drought has meant we have 2 be humble. Still, we stuck fat and remained passionate about our team & always supported Iarge numbers. Look at Ratten’s comments after the Blues assumed premiership favouritism.
July 4th 2012 @ 8:58am
Macca said | July 4th 2012 @ 8:58am | Report comment
“Collingwood don’t make arrogant statements” That’s the funniest thing I have read in years. How many clubs has McGuire declared war on?
July 3rd 2012 @ 7:52am
brendan said | July 3rd 2012 @ 7:52am | Report comment
Carltons problems are not injury related nor are they soft its quite simply a list management issue.They have too many smalls and too many talls and not enough mid size players around the 190 – 195 cm range.For there game plan to work they need all there best players firing and that never happens to any team due to numerous reasons.I agree with you Cameron that Laidler is becoming a better player the longer he is injured.as a Geelong supporter i watched him in the twos and then a couple times in the ones and he gives his all but he can sometimes appear flat-footed.Admittedly Laidler has played good football for the Blues but like most of his teammates he can plan his holidays for September .
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:01am
Macca said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Brendan we have been over this but if you could show that the blues have less players on their list in that range than any other and also have a look at the heights of the players the blues have injured to see if injuries have played a part in what you see as a deficiency.
July 3rd 2012 @ 1:42pm
brendan said | July 3rd 2012 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Macca Collingwood currently on top excluding players who have played less than 20 games have these players between 190cm -195 cm Tarrant, Dawes ,Reid, Brown, Maxwell, Goldsack and Pendlebury.Geelomg last years premier bare in mind Ling the captain was in that range and has since retired , have these players in that range Taylor ,Podsiadly ,Scarlett, Mackie and Corey.Carlton have Waite -injured admittedly-,Thornton, Bower, Walker and Jamison .Even when fit Carlton lack depth in this area.Yes we have covered it and i lay London to a brick so has the committee at Carlton and they will get some talls for next year.
July 3rd 2012 @ 2:13pm
Macca said | July 3rd 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
Brendan – The blues McInnes (191) and Watson (195) and Simon White & Josh Bootsma(190) which you exclude becasue they have played less than 20 games but my point is the blues have identified the issue and have recruited accordingly. They are obviously unlucky Henderson and McCarthy grew to 196cm and Laidler only got to 189.
On top of this they have recruited Casboult Mitchell & Rowe (all 198) to take the key forward role.
Unfortunately of this list, Waite, Walker, Thornton, White, Henderson, Casboult, Mitchell, Rowe and Jamison have all missed games this year because of injury.
And assuming McInnes (who I think will come in for Bootsma this week) plays a few games this year without even recruiting a tall next year their depth will magically appear due to exposure Watson Mcinnes and Bootsma get this year and the return from injury of White.
July 3rd 2012 @ 5:00pm
brendan said | July 3rd 2012 @ 5:00pm | Report comment
Geelong have more players in that range so do Collingwood.For the sake of the discussion i used 20 games as a criteria.You over-rate unproven talent so the premise of the so called depth next year is a fallacy as it was when you proclaimed it last year.I read in todays sun that Bruce Mathieson the pokies king wants every put on notice at Carlton so maybe a shake up is a good thing for this once great club.Geelong recruited Taylor from the Wafl and Podsiadly from the Vfl two premiership players Carlton could have got.There recruiters need to scan the lower leagues for key position players and trade accordingly.Brown at Geelong is kicking goals in the twos but cant get in the ones he is the sort of player you guys should try to get.
July 4th 2012 @ 8:55am
Macca said | July 4th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Brendan – You want the blues to draft tall player which would then fall into the “unproven talent” category.
My point was the blues hav e obviously identified the issue and over the past few years have recruited Henderson, McCarthy, McInnes, Watson, laidler & Bootsma on top of the taller Casboult & Mitchell and Rowe (who is a mature age player).
The blues also got Duigan as a mature age who has been a great result and shows they are looking at the areas you highlight.
The fact is that you can only recruit so many players a year.
Completely agree about Mitch Brown, I am not saying we couldn’t do with a quality key forward, I am saying that there is a possibility we have three on the list right now if they can reccover from their injuries. Look at Casboults performances in the VFL late last year.
July 3rd 2012 @ 1:49pm
Lroy said | July 3rd 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
“Jarrad Waite has only played six games this year, but please don’t tell me that Brett Ratten has this 29-year-old crock as the key plank in his plan to deliver premiership glory to the navy Blue hordes?”
Mate, that is hilarious. Waite is a decent player, but he’s not up there with the other power forwads in the comp, apparently he makes $600 k per year?
Why the Blues recruited Brock McLean is a mystery.. the buy was a plodding trier at Melbourne.. why don’t the Blues play their young guys?
To win a flag you need bookends.. great full forward.. great full back.. and a decent spine… CHF, CHB and center.. apart from Judd I dont see that the Blues have anyone in those positions who are the best in the league in that position.
Kruezer and Judd should all play in the forward line.. Waite can lead out from the pocket.. Crikey Judd would probably make a decent CHF methinks. HE played Full forward for WCE on day in a final against Port.. the guy could hardly walk (groin injury) and he almost single handedly kept the Eagles in the game…
July 3rd 2012 @ 2:55pm
Macca said | July 3rd 2012 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Lroy – Look at McLeans stats over the past 5 weeks ans seeing as people complain the blues don’t have enough inside players to criticise them for getting an inside player is a bit rich.
And as for playing the young guns, Watson and Bootsma were their last 2 top draft picks, both played last weekend. Lucas has played about 1/2 a dozen games this year but failed to take his chance. He did get 30 plus touches on the weekend so if he gets that again he won’t be far away. McInnes will quite likely play this week. Mitchell is still coming back from injury and dylan Buckely missed a lot of games early with a finger injury and weighs less than70kg. Which other young Guns do you want them to play?
July 3rd 2012 @ 3:22pm
Lroy said | July 3rd 2012 @ 3:22pm | Report comment
Mate, OK, point taken.. up and coming center half forward, centre half back, full back .. Ill give you Waite for now. Judd isn’t going to last forever… need someone to step up and take over the centre position soon methinks.
If your happy with the way the Blues are traveling so be it.
I still don’t rate Brock McLean but if you think he is up there with the other top midfielders in the comp then I bow to your better judgement
July 3rd 2012 @ 3:36pm
Macca said | July 3rd 2012 @ 3:36pm | Report comment
DOn’t think McLean is up their with Selwood Judd Pendlebury and co but Gysberts went 11 in tht draft and he isn’t either and McLean does the inside work the blues need.
That bloke Murphy could step up and take over the centre position perhaps?
And given the corruption of the last 2 drafts where a lot of the top talent was removed prior and then all the top draft picks were given to the new clubs it’s a bit hard for the blues to top up everywhere.
I am not saying I am happy but I can look past the win/loss and see a list developing. If they do miss the finals this year and Ratten get’s dumped the new caoch will get a top 10 pick in a really good draft plus Casboult and Mitchell as potential key forwards, Watson, Bootsma and Mcinnes as young defenders and Buckley as a midifelder. If Lucas can pull his finger out and Laidler, Waite, Henderson, Murphy & Carrazzo (plus judd) are all injury free the new coach gets a side ready made.
July 4th 2012 @ 4:20pm
Lroy said | July 4th 2012 @ 4:20pm | Report comment
Ok Macca, Im not going to disagree with you.. I don’t actually support the Blues , you obviously do… from the sounds of it your blokes aren’t far of the mark??
The Judmeister can play in the forward line trust me.. he is a very difficult match up.. He’s too quick for a big guy.. too strong over head for a little guy… And I think throwing Kruezer into the square ala Paul Salmon has a bit of merit in it too..
Good luck with it all. Ive read a few of your earlier blogs.. why don’t you send some of it to Caroline Wilson.. maybe some of the journo’s need to stop kicking you blokes while you are down eh??
Cheers