Rise and fall of Mitchell Johnson
By JLemmon, 3 Jul 2012 JLemmon is a Roar Rookie
Related coverage
I’m just going to come out and say it: I am and probably will forever be an unabashed Mitchell Johnson fan.
Please, put down your pitch forks and turn those torches elsewhere; it’s not like I want him anywhere near Australian colours as Cummins, Pattison, Starc and the unheralded Coulter Nile are surely the future, but like a teenaged girl may fall for those big dark eyes and bad boy tattoo, I too have been forever seduced by the enigmatic inswinger, the vicious bouncer.
It’s in the same way that pretty girl from Starbucks flirts and draws love hearts on the cup of my regular cappucino, I know she’s really going home with the guy on the motorbike, and I know five more wides are only a few overs away.
As a child of Australian dominance, Johnson was one of the few youngsters whose career I could follow from the start. I remember the early days; all promise, he came with the blessings of the mustachioed Zeus Lillee, Johnson his appointed Hercules.
He was a wild colt from the harsh north, one of crickets rare breeds, a left armer with enough pace to scare batsmen. The 10 overs of a one day international bridled my young star, I yearned for the day he would steam in with four slips and a gully, released from the shackles of field restrictions and powerplays.
It would come eventually, ironically it was the retirement of the metronomic McGrath that would see my wild thing released. The start was steady, series against Sri Lanka and India came and went, tail end wickets and the occasional lower order bash, it was a steady beginning.
It would take a world series bout, a clash of the titans for my giant to awake from his slumber, and when he emerged it seemed nothing could match. It was a young, cocky South Africa that arrived in 2008.
McGrath, Warne and Gilchrist were gone and behind their own champion, Steyn, the Proteas seemed poised to finally take the mantle. Johnson, though, met the challenge. 8/61 will always be remembered, swerving yorkers, brutal bouncers, fading light and Bouchers stumps destroyed, he was simply unplayable.
The Saffers would win on Australian soil but our new champion couldn’t live with that. Across the seas our hero would venture, he wasn’t alone now, followed by a young country boy Hughes, and a wise man from the west, North, the pursuit was on.
Hughes slashed and North supported but it was Johnson who seemingly revived Australian cricket. He cracked Kallis’ helmet, he destroyed Smith’s hand, he swung the ball viciously and if he didn’t, he fooled them into thinking he would, over 2008/09 the cricketing world bowed to our colt from the bush, our Mitchy.
Just like all tragedies, though, those blessed with the curse of potential fall the hardest. He was destroyed in England, the swing was gone, the head was now shaved and brow furrowed, the mental fragility was seen for the first time. KP cut and flicked him, even Bell, tormented himself by Warne took it out on my colt.
The aura was gone, the batsmen were no longer troubled (the same can’t be said for the wicketkeeper, though). It wasn’t a few bad games, or a bad series, or a bad year, it was the beginning of the end, a slow, cruel death. Slowly he lost the new ball, then status as spearhead, then guaranteed spot in the XI.
The flirting would continue, talk of a remodeled action and a destructive 6/38 in Perth, but it was always back to the new, gelded Mitch. India, even Sri Lanka began to take their fill, and the first star I had seen born was slowly exploding, all too soon.
As I type Johnson swings one back into Bopara and has an LBW decision turned down, this after delivering four no balls so far in his five overs. That sums up Johnsons’ career far better then I ever could.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- Australia needs to bench Nathan Lyon for Ashes success (84)
- Usman Khawaja’s case for selection (78)
- DIZZY: Australian bowlers look the goods for the Ashes (76)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (58)
- Who will Sam Robson represent: Australia or England? (47)
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (41)
- Rogers’ 214 gives Aussies Ashes boost (40)
- David Warner and Australian cricket’s ‘Siege Mentality’ (19)
- Could Bird be the difference in the Ashes? (21)
- Warner targets media in Twitter rant (5)
- Strauss wants Pietersen fit for Ashes
- David Warner unleashes stream of abuse on Twitter (44)
- HENRY: Oh no, cricket is in a spot of bother, again… (8)
- Warner’s case to bat at six (68)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Cricket Australia, Mitchell Johnson

July 3rd 2012 @ 7:54am
kenweir said | July 3rd 2012 @ 7:54am | Report comment
Indeed a good well written post and interesting however despite what you say in my opinion Johnson would be one of the worst if not the worst pace bowler Australia has ever had and I have seen them all back to the days of Lindwall and Miller.
Maybe,just maybe if he was prepared to take advice offered by the great DKL things may have been different.
July 3rd 2012 @ 1:05pm
tonysalerno said | July 3rd 2012 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
That’s a bit harsh kenweir.
Hindsight is a beautiful thing; it allows you to criticise based on what has been done not what was done previously.
In the late 2000s Johnson was Australia’s spearhead and go-to man for Ricky Ponting. Now that Johnson is out of form and may be permanently out of the Australian side you can not say he should have never been there.
I am not flying the banner for Johnson ( mainly because the author has done enough of that with his strange crush on MJ) i just believe he should be accredited for what he has done not how he is playing now.
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:10pm
Danno1 said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:10pm | Report comment
That is not only unduly harsh, but ignorant of test fast bowlers though the 70′s, 80′s, 90′s and 00′s who were far worse than Johnson.
Off the top of my head is Dave Colley, Dave Gilbert, Scott Muller, Joe Angel, Paul Wilson, Brendon Julian, Glen Campbell (not the singer), Simon O’Donnell, Simon Davies,Tony Dodemaide the list goes on.
These guys were ineffectual at best, average at worst, and caused no batsmen any fear. In short they were far, far worse than Johnson.
Johnson’s main crime is that his talent exceeds his ability to harness it. You could call him the most frustrating fast bowler ever to play for Australia, but 190 wickets, striking every 56 balls is a long way better than the worst.
So lets keep some perspective please.
July 4th 2012 @ 11:58am
Brendon said | July 4th 2012 @ 11:58am | Report comment
I’ll think you’ll find its Greg Campbell not Glen but you were right – he was no rhinestone cowboy. He is Ricky Ponting’s uncle though.
You can throw Chris Mathews into that list too.
July 4th 2012 @ 12:58pm
Brendon said | July 4th 2012 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Simon O’donnell and Brendan Julian were better bowlers than this bloke and they are the only two I know from that list, so I am assuming that’s just your opinon, would have Julian and Big Simon every day, at least they can consistently put it on the pitch even now. It’s not just the bowling, it’s the times he does hit, he goes missing when we need it, makes things worse when they are already bad. It’s not his fault the selectors and coach need a good hard look at themselves. as for DK, well even he get’s one wrong every now and then.
July 4th 2012 @ 1:47pm
Danno said | July 4th 2012 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
You aren’t Brendon Julian are you?
He may have been able to land it on the pitch, but the only thing he scared was his mates when they were on the pull, he would take all the good stuff and leave them with scraps.
He was quality off the pitch and in the discos that’s for sure, a bit like Simon O’Donnell.
Simon O’Donnell was a very average test match bowler, a good one day bowler though. (Clint MCkay of the 80′s?)
Look through a highlight reel for their respective career in test matches, and you’ll find Mitch smashes these blokes.
He terrified and dismantled the best test batting lineup the world over 6 tests against Sth Africa, and manged it …well…barely ever since except against England in Perth, but that is about seven test matches more than Jjulian & O’Donnell ever did.
July 4th 2012 @ 2:05pm
Brendon said | July 4th 2012 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
Lol, no not the man himself. You are right of course, Mitchell was a better bowler due to sheer pace, but I would have the other two blokes on deck first, especially Simon O’Donnel who could frighten the life out of some bowling attacks on his day. Purely becasue of the accuracy factor, Mitchy loses games for Australia, not just wins them and you can’t have someone in the team that let’s the rest of the players down at crucial moments. Probably a mute argument as my first three bowlers at the moment would be Siddle, Pattinson & Mckay, then Cummins, Harris, Starc. Mitch probably shouldn’t even be getting a look in. Starc is well ahead of Johnson and is a left armer with plenty of pace, why are we wasting time on a 30 year old bloke on the comeback trail?
July 4th 2012 @ 2:44pm
Danno said | July 4th 2012 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
Yep
Agree wholeheartedly that he should not be on a current contract, he is way down the list now, and has not demonstrated he can get back to anywhere near his best.
Mind you who’d a thought Siddle was ever going to be a threatening bowler? A great trier, but now he is genuinely good, and I nevert hought I’d say that about him.
Starc has proved he can be nearly as good as Mitch at his best but waaaaay more consistent, and handy with the bat as well.
Maybe CA have found advertising with him Mitch as the face brings more women to the game? I can’t think of any other reason for him to get a contract.
July 4th 2012 @ 7:42pm
Lolly said | July 4th 2012 @ 7:42pm | Report comment
Hey don’t knock Jo Angel, he was a good bowler. I’d have taken him over Brendan Julian any day week. He had limited opportunities and got done over by having to tour Pakistan early in his career.
July 3rd 2012 @ 8:42am
matt h said | July 3rd 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
There are a few words that sum up Mitch: “who the hell knows”. That covers every ball, every over, every time at bat, every series. the most frustrating cricketer on earth. Our very own Steve Harmison. Like England, we must let Mitch go, give up the chance of brilliance and develop the steady quality of Anderson, Broad and Bresnan. And that’s sad, becasue in the last five years almost every truly memorable moment in Australian cricket – good and bad – has been Mitch….and Dave Warner, who of course appears to be heading down the same path.
July 3rd 2012 @ 8:55am
Disco said | July 3rd 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Johnson’s good form was a flash in the pan. He’s only been selected at Test level post-Ashes ’09 because the likes of Ponting, Clarke etc. have felt the need the need to put an arm around his shoulders – favouritism. Tat said, his ODi record is good; not that he should have made his comeback from injury in this series.
July 3rd 2012 @ 9:21am
Disco said | July 3rd 2012 @ 9:21am | Report comment
“Mitch just has to start playing cricket again, he’s been off for about eight months now,” Arthur said. “He’s just got to get out, get his confidence back, and he’s got to realise he belongs in international cricket again and he’ll do that pretty quickly. He just needs to get some good performances under his belt.”
July 4th 2012 @ 1:00pm
Brendon said | July 4th 2012 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Have you got an opinion here? or just quoting the coach?
July 3rd 2012 @ 10:20am
Pope Paul VII said | July 3rd 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
I think Johnners big ace was being a really fast lefty. His speed and angle were awkward to say the least when accurate, hence wickets but even when he was wayward he was hard to get onto, as the ball hurtled down at 145 plus down the legside or more likely a foot and a half outside off stump, so he wasn’t particularly expensive.
Sadly for poor old Johnners it all went wrong. Did those tatts upset the aerodynamics of his hitherto lethal arm? Was it the spat with his mum?
Anyway Mickey Mouse’s penchant for picking players with no proper cricket behind them, eg S Marsh, is plain stupid. He cannot be a selector because he lacks objectivity. It’s nuts.
July 3rd 2012 @ 12:41pm
Disco said | July 3rd 2012 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
Now it seems Arthur has lots to say about managing Cummins properly. Bit late, would you say?
July 3rd 2012 @ 11:41am
Dan said | July 3rd 2012 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Mmm not my first choice that’s for sure
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 3rd 2012 @ 6:33pm
The Werewolf said | July 3rd 2012 @ 6:33pm | Report comment
Was anyone else just a bit weirded out by the man crush?
Still an interesting read! Cheers JL.
Mate the starbuck’s girl is someone you should attend to.
July 3rd 2012 @ 6:48pm
JLemmon said | July 3rd 2012 @ 6:48pm | Report comment
Haha what can I say, must be the mystery of the bloke
July 3rd 2012 @ 6:36pm
Osswosh said | July 3rd 2012 @ 6:36pm | Report comment
He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right, Mitchell Johnson his bowling is shite
Good summer memories eh
July 3rd 2012 @ 11:34pm
isaac said | July 3rd 2012 @ 11:34pm | Report comment
to be quite honest, Mitchell Johnson should go back an play for western australia. maybe he will get a wicket.
July 4th 2012 @ 7:35am
kenweir said | July 4th 2012 @ 7:35am | Report comment
Tonysalerno and Danno1 are probably quite correct but I thought that some good discussion would come from a reply like mine,but I didn,t stir up much interest after all ,maybe Origin is on everyones mind.
July 4th 2012 @ 9:03am
JohnB said | July 4th 2012 @ 9:03am | Report comment
Chris Matthews was another quick left hander with bags of talent, who sadly managed much less than Johnson in the performance stakes. Danno’s list is not a bad one of bowlers less good than Johnson (though O’Donnell and Dodemaide would claim to be all-rounders). Go back a bit further and you hit a number of test players in the WSC years who were not great (Callen, Gannon). When it comes to turning available talent into consistent performance, Johnson may be one of the least good!