Let’s make tight jerseys a thing of the past
By FraggleWrangler, 5 Jul 2012 FraggleWrangler is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, wallabies
Related coverage
Those of us with rugby memories longer than ten years will remember the good old days before the 2003 Rugby World Cup. I’m not talking about the sight of Joe Roff diving over the goal-line against the Lions, or Kefu burrowing under the posts in John Eales’ last match, I’m referring to something even more noble – the old rugby jersey.
What a wonderful creation of cloth it was. Loose and comfortable in summer, and over little more than a t-shirt, warm in winter.
Rugged and sturdy, you could wear it outdoors – fishing, camping, digging, anywhere. Kept clean it was virtually formal wear, and any place with a dress code that didn’t allow you in the door was not a place you’d want to drink in anyway.
That sacred robe of your tribal colours would last for years, even decades, advertising your past and present sporting fancies, even telling part of your life story and history.
I can still wear my late father’s jersey, one that was last worn of a playing field back when Menzies was Prime Minister. Those old jerseys would get more comfortable the longer you had them, and only your widening girth in older age prevented you from wearing your high school jersey to your 25-year reunion.
They truly were a miracle of design in a simpler age.
Then darkness descended over the rugby world.
In 2003 the England team arrived in Australia wearing something that looked more at home at a velodrome than a rugby field. During the World Cup that year the French too, pranced around wearing something that made them look like rejects from the Tour de France.
Unfortunately England won the cup that year and no matter how convincing their performance on the field – even when they were holding the cup in their hands doing that god-awful ‘soccer bounce’ on the podium – you just couldn’t take them seriously when they looked like they were wearing spray-on spandex.
Of course the rest of the world followed, and now supporters are unable to wear accurate replica playing jerseys without looking like a complete goose. Players and pundits everywhere pleaded with the powers that be to go back to the old jerseys, but the playing advantages were obvious. Slicker and harder to tackle, they gave a slight advantage you’d be silly to ignore.
But now fans of the old jerseys have a new argument to use against these lycra leotards – how about the difficulty getting a bind in the scrum? Old jerseys used in some clubs even added extra layers around the shoulders for forwards, and cross stitching like a judo shirt.
Last year at a function I asked Jake White and Laurie Fisher why there were so fewer collapses and resets in footage of old wallaby matches from the 80s and 90s. One answer that came up was the new jerseys. Without a proper bind, props have their work cut out just trying to stay horizontal.
So how do we undo the damage? I had a quick look at the IRB rules and regulations regarding attire, and there are no set rules for the jersey, only that one should be worn, and Regulation 12 focuses on padding, not the actual jersey itself.
The addition of two simple lines into regulation 12 would solve the problem:
“The jersey shall be made of durable material and of solid construction. The jersey shall be loose fitting, allowing at least 2cm of slack around the shoulders and torso.”
So how about it Roarers? Should we as a group make enough noise for our respective unions to hear. Lets banish these glorified latex undershirts to the dustbin of history where they belong. The revolution begins here.
Quick poll: Should IRB rules be altered to abolish the modern style jersey?
- Yes, the sooner we return to the old style the better
- No, I like the skin-tight jerseys as they are
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
The Crowd Says (40) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Where is Deans in the pecking order of rugby coaches? (319)
- Wallabies squad announced: Folau in, no Quade Cooper – yet (267)
- Deans: Should he stay or should he go? (245)
- SPIRO’s Lions Diary: Deans goes for experience, plus Folau (242)
- Wallabies 25-man Lions squad: analysis (214)
- Quade Cooper misses Wallaby squad selection (209)
- Quade shouldn’t be fly half against the Lions (184)
- Could Matt Lucas be a Wallaby bolter? (79)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (142)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (31)
- Deans must forgive Quade: Slack (123)
- SPIRO: Super Rugby TMOs are making too many mistakes (93)
- Rebels’ O’Connor stays on sidelines (10)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (7)
- Australia, time to get behind the Wallabies (142)
- Who can still win the Super Rugby title? (31)
- ‘Lucky 29′ journey into despair (part one) (7)
- My open letter to the ARU (13)
- Super Rugby teams will skin the Lions (116)
- Super B to the rescue for rugby? (53)
- Picking your ‘First V’ for the Wallabies (67)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- Rugby Union, Rugby World Cup, wallabies

July 5th 2012 @ 10:13am
Touko said | July 5th 2012 @ 10:13am | Report comment
I say yes.
(But you could just sew a handle into the shoulder of the prop’s jerseys so the opposing props have got something to grab onto and bind, and change the law to make it a penalty if the props didn’t bind to the handle. This would also make props think they were important because they would be the only ‘special’ ones with unique jerseys.)
July 5th 2012 @ 11:47am
moaman said | July 5th 2012 @ 11:47am | Report comment
Or instead of a handle that protrudes-how about a slit-pocket the opposing prop can get his hand into?
July 5th 2012 @ 5:41pm
Touko said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:41pm | Report comment
No, that wouldn’t work because the props would get confused and keep wanting to put their hands back into the slip pocket all the time.
July 5th 2012 @ 10:33am
klippies101 said | July 5th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
the new rugby lerseys r ugly as hell bring back a collar . i cant waer those skintight things in support to the pub my gut stick out lol
July 5th 2012 @ 11:32am
Riccardo said | July 5th 2012 @ 11:32am | Report comment
x2
July 5th 2012 @ 11:12am
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | July 5th 2012 @ 11:12am | Report comment
I’ve always thought it strange that as the jerseys got tighter the shorts got looser.
Speaking of which, will someone in control please rid us of those appalling Wallaby shorts that look like the jersey is falling through the legs?
July 5th 2012 @ 4:28pm
flying hori said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
B B of B is that what the yellow streak is? lol
July 5th 2012 @ 5:06pm
Blinky Bill said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:06pm | Report comment
No yellow streak there mate. It’s pure gold as you’d expect from a classy bunch like the Wallabies.
Even so, it looks too much like a scene from when I see my Mum in the nursing home, with loose boxer shorts draping down. It’s just not a good look for the team that’s trying to reach number 1.
July 5th 2012 @ 11:14am
SuckerForRed said | July 5th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
Agree that something needs to be done about facilitating better binding in the scrum, and looser jerseys would be an easy solution. But like other can’t see it happening. I just wish that they would make the supporter kit in the old material but looking like the new jersey. Does that make sense? Don’t mind the style, just hate the material.
July 5th 2012 @ 11:24am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 5th 2012 @ 11:24am | Report comment
“Kept clean it was virtually formal wear, and any place with a dress code that didn’t allow you in the door was not a place you’d want to drink in anyway.”
Brilliant!
July 5th 2012 @ 12:01pm
Tumble Hill said | July 5th 2012 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
It’s an easy fix isnt it? Buy the jersey thats 2 sizes to big.
July 5th 2012 @ 12:12pm
Tumble Hill said | July 5th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
July 5th 2012 @ 12:15pm
Jimbo said | July 5th 2012 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
No chance of this happening though, the reality is that synthetic material tight jerseys are better. As many have stated, it makes players harder to tackle, whilst synthetic material is much better at getting rid of moisture and not getting soaked throughout the game.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:03pm
biltongbek said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:03pm | Report comment
Fragglewrangler, enjoyed your reminiscince of an era gone by, ah, those were the days, rugby was simpler, the laws less complicated and the odd fight on the field was ignored by the referee, I remember in those days even the blood looked better on those jerseys.
I do agree though that at least the forwards should have looser jerseys, I think binding in scrums as a whole is suffering because of it not just the front rows.
When you look at how easily scrums deteriorate or break apart these days something needs to be done.
July 5th 2012 @ 9:26pm
SandBox said | July 5th 2012 @ 9:26pm | Report comment
was under the impression in 2007 we had a special jersey made for the RWC, to allow better binding (technology which someone gave to the Boks).
Whatever happened? Was it a failure? There’s no reason a special front row jersey can’t be made with handles or some improvement. Australia should lead the way on this for obvious reasons.
As a reds supporter, I believe their merchandise regularly sells better in Polo shirts, probably for the reasons mentioned in this article. Not offering an old fashioned jersey for your team seems bad business to me.