Origin III breaks ratings records
By John Davidson, 5 Jul 2012 John Davidson is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin, State of Origin 2012
Related coverage
Queensland’s one-point victory to secure seven State of Origin series wins in a row has helped the Nine Network notch a new TV ratings record for the rugby league showpiece.
Around 2.62 million viewers in Australia’s five capital cities tuned in for the Suncorp decider, according to OzTam, while nationally it had an average audience of 4.04 million.
The metro audience peaked at 3.23 million, while the national audience peak at 4.82 million.
The metro figure included 1.186 million in Sydney, 406,000 in Melbourne, 866,000 in Brisbane, 67,000 in Adelaide and 99,000 in Perth. The Game III figure received a bigger audience in both Sydney and Brisbane.
This was the highest rating State of Origin game since the introduction of OzTam figures, and the pre-match and post-match coverage also performed well. The post-match show was watched by 2.328 million, and the pre-match coverage was watched by 1.568 million.
In NSW Nine showed ‘The Blue Wall’, a half-hour program hosted by Michael Slater, Andrew Johns, Brad Fittler and Paul Harragon, and in Queensland Nine broadcast a Maroon version.
While this was a nice touch, it was not repeated in Games I and II. Nine could be doing more to get the most out of its Origin rights. Broadcasting both post-match press conferences would be a start, which Fox Sports does. So would livening up its broadcast team.
Nine seems to want to replicate its cricket style of broadcast and commentary. While I think Phil Gould has a lot to offer, do Queensland fans want to hear his speech right before kick-off?
There is a lot of knowledge on the panel with Vautin, Sterling, Lockyer, Lewis, Fittler, etc, and a lot of Origin experience. But some just aren’t built to be on TV, and their biases are just too obvious.
Lockyer can barely speak, so putting him in as a sideline-eye or a ‘colour’ commentator is pointless. Get that man a lozenge, or get that man out of the team.
Nine should be introducing some more journos and less-invested staff to get involved. Some women would also be a smart ploy, to broaden the appeal of the game.
Super Rugby interviews players and captains as they leave the field at half-time, wouldn’t that be a great touch in Origin?
The State of Origin is a fantastic spectacle, one of the best sports events on the planet, and last night was no exception. But if the NRL Commission wants rugby league to continue to grow and to grab that $1 billion rights mark, and Nine wants to hold onto the rights, then more needs to be done.
![]()
Passionate about your league? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily league email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- How to increase crowd numbers in the NRL (181)
- All I am saying is give Pearce a chance (123)
- Why do NRL fans love empty seats? (115)
- Let me tell you why people don’t like Manly (112)
- Ease up on ASADA: NRL boss (91)
- It’s time for Channel Nine to get serious about the NRL (90)
- Six things that will improve the NRL (85)
- Wests Tigers vs North Queensland Cowboys: Live Scores (23)
- Canterbury Bulldogs vs Brisbane Broncos: NRL live scores, blog (114)
- The NRL’s David Smith declares war on drugs (1)
- NSW State of Origin rituals ready for game I (18)
- 2013 NRL season: Round 11 preview (9)
- Hot Roosters await Storm in a teacup (17)
- Broncos halves dramas continue (7)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin, State of Origin 2012


July 5th 2012 @ 1:18pm
Australian Rules said | July 5th 2012 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
Outstanding figures. Origin is, as always, a juggernaut on the telly.
Agree re Lockyer…the great man has to have the worst voice in the history of television.
As John said above, whilst the know-how and experience of the Ch9 panel is impressive, surely they can evolve from their biased hokey commentary.
July 5th 2012 @ 1:50pm
SandBox said | July 5th 2012 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
will he even be able to speak in 10 years time?
July 5th 2012 @ 3:34pm
micka said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
He kept asking “how good is….”
Very Locky…. very good.
July 6th 2012 @ 12:55pm
matt h said | July 6th 2012 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
There are two good things about Locky’s commentary:
1. It halves Andrew Johns’ commentary time, and
2. In the post match interviews it is obviuos how much the other players respect him.
July 5th 2012 @ 1:29pm
p.Tah said | July 5th 2012 @ 1:29pm | Report comment
Impressive figures.
Given the closeness of the game and that the result was on the line up until the final whistle, I never understand why people tune in for events such as this and then don’t watch all of it (i.e. 4.8m peak but 4m average audience).
July 5th 2012 @ 1:37pm
turbodewd said | July 5th 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
What is amazing is how Bris has less than half the population of Syd and yet comes very close to it in ratings. The NRL needs to find out why, I think they need to engage the migrant community and encourage then to adopt RL as another sport they follow.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:47pm
jdubya said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:47pm | Report comment
mate you post that in just about every thread.
You really need to get down to Sydney because everybody has been talking about Rugby League for the last 6 weeks.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:12pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:12pm | Report comment
If everyone in Sydney has been speaking about origin then how come not everyone watched it?
July 5th 2012 @ 5:20pm
Bring Back the Bears said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:20pm | Report comment
If Rugby League is Queenslands game how come less than half of Brisbane watched it?
July 5th 2012 @ 6:10pm
yewonk said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:10pm | Report comment
maybe the other twenty five were at their friends houses watching it.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:47pm
Whites said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:47pm | Report comment
It’s not half with the Oztam ratings.
Sydney: 1.186m out of 4.715m in the ratings area. 25%
Brisbane: 0.866m out of 3.033m in the ratings area. 28.5%
July 6th 2012 @ 12:57pm
matt h said | July 6th 2012 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Interesting isn’t it. I guess there are heaps of people who gather in larger numbers to watch one set maybe, or they are out at pubs and clubs. But then AFL is Melbourne’s games and I would bet a similar proportion at best watch the big games
July 5th 2012 @ 5:19pm
Meesta Cool said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:19pm | Report comment
These figures do not tell the Full story, there are literally thusands of homes that treat SOO nights as an opportunity to get together and enjoy the game, probably the average for every 1.000 recorded would = 4-5 people. Lots of parties round or avenue and we are in Victoria, gawd, knows what it would be like in homes, Clubs and Pubs in NSW and Queensland…
Good on Ch9 for smashing ALL records with thios game, sorry to say “we told you so”, and I for one hope that it was YOUR LAST!.
July 5th 2012 @ 6:09pm
Gleeso said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:09pm | Report comment
Great point, it would be good to get an idea of the numbers that are attracted into pubs and clubs on Origin night.
July 6th 2012 @ 8:45am
D Maaga said | July 6th 2012 @ 8:45am | Report comment
its usually very quite in brisbane during origin nights unless your in caxton stree or in a few bars around suncorp stadium. most people prefer to watched at home due work and schools the next day.
July 5th 2012 @ 1:53pm
Sailosi said | July 5th 2012 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
One thing that confuses me in Australia is how come we can’t get massive figures in relation to population. For example the supee bowl gets around 130mill which is almost a third of the population, the rugby world cup final got 15 million in France which is about a quarter and england got around 18 million for Euro. What is going to be the event that gets 7-8 million in Australia?
July 5th 2012 @ 2:08pm
GC Tiger said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
A televised flogging of Julia Gillard
July 5th 2012 @ 3:13pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
I’d record that and watch it every day.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:25pm
oikee said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:25pm | Report comment
You have to pay that, world class son.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:14pm
Meesta Cool said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:14pm | Report comment
If this were Face Biik, I’d hit the ‘LIKE’ button..
July 5th 2012 @ 10:12pm
tigerbalm said | July 5th 2012 @ 10:12pm | Report comment
GC tiger – mate great comment. i am a lefty but i have to say it is not often that i laugh out loud when i happen to trawl comments on pages like this, cheers
July 5th 2012 @ 10:58pm
King of the Gorgonites said | July 5th 2012 @ 10:58pm | Report comment
Brilliant.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:09pm
Jimmy said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Maybe we get more people to pubs and clubs?
July 5th 2012 @ 2:13pm
Will Sinclair said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
Surely at least 25% of the population watches the Melbourne Cup each year?
July 5th 2012 @ 2:41pm
Dayer said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:41pm | Report comment
SOO 3 just played is and will be the highest rating TV sport telecast ever in the history of Australia TV.
I do not think Melb Cup even comes close, maybe because everyone’s at work using one TV.
FYI
WIKIPEDIA’s figures show = 6,045,000 viewers for the SOO3 (5 Cities only)
July 5th 2012 @ 4:12pm
seanmaguire said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
Yeah I saw the Wikipedia page and it is completely wrong. The Hewitt tennis final is still the highest.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:27pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:27pm | Report comment
1 2005 Australian Open – Men’s Singles Final: Marat Safin def. Lleyton Hewitt 4,045,000
2 2003 Rugby World Cup Final 4,016,000
3 MasterChef Australia (season 2) – finale challenge 3,962,000
2012 State Of Origin 3 – 2.68 million
July 6th 2012 @ 1:00pm
matt h said | July 6th 2012 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Depends on your definitions. In the article the numbers are different, and you have to be careful to compare like iwth like re metrto or regionals included. not saying you are wrong – just don;t know unless you define very carefully
July 5th 2012 @ 3:03pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
Was thinking this myself. They are fantastic viewing figures for SOO 3 but why (in the sports mad country Oz is) don’t the tv viewing figures reflect this? In big football matches in Europe and USA it is not unusual for 40-60% of the entire population watching (and these don’t include pubs/clubs/fan zones). In Oz this would be figures of 8 -12m and we dont get close although Cathy Freeman got around 7m from memory in the 2000 Olympics. Perhaps a football WC final involving the Socceroos?
Anyway congrats to SOO 3 for great figures and an exciting game.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:30pm
Australian Rules said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:30pm | Report comment
Sailosi
To understand the reason it’s not as comparatively big as the Superbowl or WC, just look at the figures in Adelaide, Perth and Melbourne (to a lesser extent). The sport is still growing in those cities.
I think the Socceroos would have to make a WC Semi to get 1/4 or 1/3 of the population watching it.
July 6th 2012 @ 1:02pm
matt h said | July 6th 2012 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Yep, we simply do not have a code that is number one in all areas. you really can only look at the % in the state where the code is number one. Even then, unlike Europe, there are still three other codes taking support away.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:56pm
Whites said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
Don’t forget the ratings just record in home viewers. That’s fine for a regular drama or comedy(nobody goes to the pub to watch the latest episode of Two and Half Men with their mates). So for any big sporting like GF or SOO you can add at least 50% to the number to get a real picture.
Then there is the great divide in Australia. Across NSW/QLD Oztam generally records 25-30% of the population watching SOO or the NRL Grand Final. The reverse is then true in the southern states for the AFL GF.
The only events that record 30%+ averages nationwide would be the olympics, a Socceroos WC quarter final, semi or final in out time zone or an all Australian final at the Australian Open.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:09pm
Bounsinball said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:09pm | Report comment
Big reason for low percentage is that a quarter of the population of Australia were not born here, so there is potential for growth in the next decade if pursued properly.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:38pm
Col Quinn said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:38pm | Report comment
When Union was on a high and the Wallabies were in the RUWC final in 2003 the ratings were a shade over 4 mill. This is the national side and for the final of a world cup. SOO has now achieved similar figures. I think there is a difference in Australian culture that goes against good TV ratings. How are all the clubs and pubs rated? My local had about 1000 people crammed in watching 4 big screens. How is this rated? Also there is a sizable portion of the Australian population that care nought all for sport, my wife for one, that is why I was at the local instead of home getting a decent view of the game. Life Sailosi I am confused as well. The only thing about some of the European TV ratings is what my advertising son tells me. European TV ratings are notoriously unreliable and are sometimes boosted to suit the programs sponsors.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:59pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:59pm | Report comment
That last comment is rubbish. The ratings are done the same way as here. Are you saying the Aussies are the only reliable tv ratings in the world? Same inthe US. Andy Murray had about 8m viewers the other night in England and the Euro final15m.
The figure l have seen on US and English websites for estimating out of home views is to add 20% to the total in home viewing number. This obviously is not a precise or totally accurate method but one they use to give advertisers some information.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:15pm
Col Quinn said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:15pm | Report comment
Why it is if advertising guys say European TV ratings are unreliable is that rubbish. I have seen conflicting figures for the French viewing response to the RUWC, some in the region of 18 Mill and other around 8 Mill. Now if conflicting viewer rating a published on the web, from so called reputable sources then why is the comments from a guy who works all over the world in advertising rubbish. How are the rating calculated here, I am very interested. Cables give an accurate stat on how many sets are tuned to channel but this does not tell how many watchers there are. In my field of mech engineering a 20% variation on the result is statistically unreliable. If this is the situations then English TV ratings are unreliable.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:34pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:34pm | Report comment
So if you are saying all ratings figures are rubbish because of the small sample that is a different story…however that’s the system that’s used…to take a small, representative sample of the country and then have them electronically record their viewing habits(or have them automatically recorded).
I regularly check overseas tv ratings websites after major sporting events and haven’t seen any of the major disparity of ratings you mentioned. It is more likely media reports of ratings which can be variable. Check;;
http://www.barb.co.uk/. For the UK and for the rest of Europe
http://www.international-television.org/tv_audience_measurement_research_boards_and_institutes.html.
http://www.mediametrie.com/
July 5th 2012 @ 5:53pm
Sailosi said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:53pm | Report comment
Col there is an interst article that has been posted on the roar a few times that debunks a lot of the myths surrounding tv ratings for sport, here is a link:
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/general/tvs-great-viewing-mirage-768839.html
July 5th 2012 @ 6:23pm
Col Quinn said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:23pm | Report comment
Sailosi,
So it appears as though my son’s industry perspective of TV ratings is well placed. MVD has suggested the problems with small cohort analysis and the overall accuracy of these methods. My son maintained that the Rugby Union WC did not reach the audience claimed by the IRB. There were discrepancies between the IRB figures for viewing habits in selected countries and those countries locally recorded viewing habits. Unfortunately much of the data we examine is published on the web and these are not verifiable sources. Because there is no peer review of some of the material put up on the web, the statistics can be changed to suit the purpose. The quicker TV ratings data is peer review in some manner then the quicker we will have some data that is somewhat acceptable.
July 5th 2012 @ 6:45pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:45pm | Report comment
funny how the goalpost is always change to suit rugby league. i mean i saw hundread times more people in and around brisbane city during the 2003 rugby world cup final that saturday night than last night. we actually had a hard time alst night finding a pub or bar that was full and in the end we decided to watched at the caxton.
its usually times like this where posters of the roar finally found a kiwi mate, south african neigbour, a rugby union fan who had enough of union or a relative in the tv ratings industry.
July 5th 2012 @ 6:57pm
Sailosi said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:57pm | Report comment
What is reported by Fifa, the RWC and the Olypmics etc is the number of potential viewers, i.e the home beinfg broadcast to. The RWC final actually stands up pretty well being the fifth most watched sports program of 2007. The cricket result was interesting. In reality all sports lie about their ratings. Here is another link showing the great sports tv rating myths.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/why-fifas-claim-of-one-billion-tv-viewers-was-a-quarter-right-438302.html
July 5th 2012 @ 7:11pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:11pm | Report comment
sailosi, are you talking about england or french tv ratings 2007?
July 5th 2012 @ 7:26pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:26pm | Report comment
Col Quinn
The problem mainly stemmed from the individual sporting organizations/promoters making exaggerated claims of global viewership which were then reported in the media. However the claims were not backed up by the ratings data. Many countries around the world don’t have such ratings capacity for obvious reasons. Also ‘educated’ guesses were made for countries with no such data.
The article posted by Sailosi is an old one and true at the time. These days media data is recorded and collated for 54 countries including virtually all of the western world. These figures are used for world wide viewership figures but generally take some months to be collated and checked. Obviously it’s much easier to get the ratings for just one country which, in Australia’s case,is available the next day as we can see.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:38pm
Sailosi said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:38pm | Report comment
i’m only going on what is written in the article.
July 6th 2012 @ 9:09am
peeeko said | July 6th 2012 @ 9:09am | Report comment
Thanks for posting that interesting article, I have always disbelieved the numbers spruced eecially the man city numbers in may
July 5th 2012 @ 2:06pm
Will Sinclair said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:06pm | Report comment
You’d have to say this confirms that the rights to State of Origin will be sold (or at least offered) as a separate package in the next rights deal.
It’s an absolute juggernaut.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:09pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Considering rugby league is not a national sport,the figures of 4.04m viewers less than 1/5 of the population is remarkable. The figures have been growing consistently,and by anyone’s stretch 4 m plus is a massive figure.Remember no NRL teams in Perth or Adelaide.
The figure of 406,000 in Melbourne,suggests having an NRL team and playing a SOO game there ,are hardly fruitless exercises.
Perhaps growing the game in other states will add further to the ratings.
Comparing a RWC final in the country it is staged,or the NFL where the code is indeed national,is liike chalk and cheese.
I did not realise Oz population was 28-32m ,based on a 25% viewership of 7-8m.The ARLC,ch9,sponsors,advertisers would be over the moon with the ratings results.
This result is only going to add further to the value of the next TV deal.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:14pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
i didn’t know the 2011 rwc was played in france but great ratings for origin by the way.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:22pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:22pm | Report comment
I assumed he was mentioning the WC final in France not the nZ one…What that has to do with SOO ratings in this country is beyond me..
July 5th 2012 @ 2:19pm
Steve said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
Australia’s population is 22 million, so a third viewing would be 7million. I do hope your not an accountant.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:08pm
jdubya said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
Actually it would be 7.33… million. I do hope you’re not an accountant.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:29pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:29pm | Report comment
He quoted a figure for France of about a quarter of the population .I was drawing comparsions with that figure Steve.
If 1/4 represents 7-8m the country would have 28m.If I referred to a third as per teh USA ,the country based on 7-8m would be 21-24m.
He did include France,which you obviously did not bother to check.
And yes I do have a basic accounting background.So your hopes have been dashed.
July 5th 2012 @ 5:53pm
Meesta Cool said | July 5th 2012 @ 5:53pm | Report comment
Hey Crosscoder, wasn’t this match also shown ‘Live’ to an International market??. wonder what ratings can be collected on that viewing audience?.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:35pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:35pm | Report comment
I believe NZ was about 180,000.Have no idea of other countries,but suggest it would be minimal.At least its exposure into many countries,regardless of the eyeballs watching.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:11pm
Will Sinclair said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
I think the RWC Final in 2003 is still the highest (I stand to be corrected on that, though), also with a tick over 4 million people?
Although, it’s not particularly fair to compare raw data 10 years apart. There are about 2 million more people in Australia now than there were back in 2003.
Still – massive result for rugby league, and for Origin. Massive.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:16pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:16pm | Report comment
4.1 millionfive metropolitan city only. i wonder what the total is with regionals.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:12pm
GC Tiger said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
I sore that the CH9 boss thanked his team for a suburb Job. No mention of the players or the game. I think it would have been even bigger if another channel had it and presented properly. Also if it started at 7.30 it would get a lot more early work people to stay awake until the end and give some kids the chance to see at least half the game if not all.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:53pm
Spencer said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
Is the “suburb job” a new reality show? Missed it. Any good?
July 5th 2012 @ 4:15pm
GC Tiger said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Maybe you missed it when you were looking for a life.
July 6th 2012 @ 6:28pm
tigerbalm said | July 6th 2012 @ 6:28pm | Report comment
mate, you have done it again
July 5th 2012 @ 2:25pm
Dayer said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:25pm | Report comment
John, Great reading
and yes I agree 100% re: commentators. I hope the new broadcaster (Hope and praying its not NINE) employ Women and Jurnos to present on the game with one or two ex=players, there are just too many EX- Players who mumbo jumbo a lot. RE: Phil Gould “do Queensland fans want to hear his speech right before kick-off?” The answer is plain NO. To tell you the truth he is not TV friendly.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:17pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:17pm | Report comment
I’m a Gould fan.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:32pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:32pm | Report comment
You are kidding QGIRL. You need to be tarred and feathered.I thought the only Gould fans were Oak Milk management and his mirror.
July 6th 2012 @ 11:49am
Curious said | July 6th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
And so say all of us. Can’t stand the bloke
July 7th 2012 @ 10:06pm
Queensland's Game Is Rugby League said | July 7th 2012 @ 10:06pm | Report comment
He has a good knowledge of the game, he’s passionate about his state and can be quite funny. Good character. I respect him because he loves the game to pieces and will do anything he can to help it grow.
All of the commentators have faults, but most of them are decent. I try to focus on their good points. Too many people in rugby league dwell over the few negatives.
July 5th 2012 @ 2:46pm
Atawhai Drive said | July 5th 2012 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
Correct me if I’m wrong, but ratings are based on people watching at home. Viewers at pubs and clubs are not counted.
The “national audience peaked at 4.82 million”, allegedly (a figure based on extrapolating from a few hundred electronic boxes in private homes).
I would be amazed if there was not at least one pub/club viewer for every home viewer. So there could easily have been 8 million or even 10 million people watching last night’s match. We’ll never know.
Commercial television networks answerable to shareholders and advertisers have to take ratings seriously. Ratings are more a means of measuring audience share than a reliable count of total audience numbers. Strange how ratings stories appear on the general news pages of newspapers, instead of the business section.
Agreed: Channel 9 desperately needs to bring its rugby league coverage up to date, ditto its cricket broadcasts. But never underestimate the conservatism of Australian commercial television.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:08pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:08pm | Report comment
Interesting point and from my reading(on TV websites) of big US and European Football matches the estimate figure of those viewing out of home is about 20% on top of the in home numbers, which would mean another 800,000 to 1million.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:23pm
Big Tommy said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
Good point Atawhai Drive there would be a lot people crowding into pubs to watch the game. Do these viewers also get included into the tv ratings.
It would also be interesting to see how many viewers outside of Australia watch state of origin. From my understanding state of origin is shown live into over 100 countries. I know through my experience traveling the world a lot of pubs especially Australian pubs show state of origin and the pubs are always packed to the rafters.
July 5th 2012 @ 3:55pm
Go warriors said | July 5th 2012 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Big Tommy I have to agree I have also traveled to many countries and seen state of origin in different countries around the world. The pubs were jam packed. Obviously the majority of fans were aussies and kiwis but when you consider how many aussies and kiwis there are traveling overseas it would be interesting to see the TV ratings from overseas.
July 5th 2012 @ 4:05pm
MV Dave said | July 5th 2012 @ 4:05pm | Report comment
A true indicator as to how many watch overseas is how much $ the NRL receive for the overseas tv rights. If its just ex pats then the rights wouldn’t be much.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:37pm
Crosscoder said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:37pm | Report comment
The overseas rights are minimal always have been,regardless of expats or locals that may switch on.
Exposure for any sport of tis nature and standard is priceless.
July 5th 2012 @ 6:54pm
D Maaga said | July 5th 2012 @ 6:54pm | Report comment
it all depends some countries the game was shown on a tuesday at 3am or wednesady at 9am so unless they are all unemployed. u can have 20 expats in a pub and is still count as one on the tv ratings.
July 5th 2012 @ 7:43pm
Sailosi said | July 5th 2012 @ 7:43pm | Report comment
Emric would have the NZ figures, it was 127,000 for game 1. Sky figures in the UK are impossible. I know last year for one of the games it was 23,000 which is pretty good. Overseas ratings are never as high as what you would think. In 2010 only 900,000 people watched the FIBA final in the USA on ESPN.