Far from a mercenary, Sonny Bill has an NRL plan
By Damien, 9 Jul 2012 Damien is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- All Blacks, Rugby League, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams
103 Have your say
Related coverage
Fellow Roarer Scott Woodward started the rumours off, and it looks like he was spot on. Sonny Bill Williams is going back to where it all began, the NRL.
Last year I wrote an article which tried to reason whether SBW is worth all the negotiation fuss. Many articles have been written on that same topic, and after the rumors become official many more will be.
The questions are ones we all know. Why can’t SBW commit to more than a year? What does he actually want to do? SBW was just getting to grips with rugby, why change now?
Before I get to those questions I’ll briefly look at the ringleader of the whole circus, Khoder Nasser. At a Men Of League gala dinner a few years, comedian Vince Sorrenti ago said the following. “David Gallop is caught in a lift with three people: Osama Bin Laden, Khoder Nasser, and Adolf Hitler. Gallop has a gun, but only two bullets. What does he do? Shoots Khoder twice!”
As talented as SBW is, he would not be getting paid anywhere near $2 million a season if it weren’t for Nasser. He is very lucky to have Nasser in his corner. Negotiating such short term, option-heavy deals is extremely complicated. It’s not only hard on the New Zealand rugby union and NRL, its equally draining on SBW’s camp.
No normal agent would have the time, resources or sheer audacity to achieve these sort of outcomes. Having only two clients in Mundine and SBW (given Cooper and Paterson are almost hobbies for Nasser) means that Nasser is able to spend much more time on SBW’s deals.
Most people understand that professional athletes have a short career, and how important it is to make the most of it. In SBW’s case the fans want to know what he’s trying to achieve. Is it purely about money?
The missing piece to this very complicated puzzle is boxing. Most people are dismissing this as a sideline or a joke, but the SBW camp are very serious about it.
For all the criticism that SBW receives about his boxing, his camp firmly believe that SBW can be a success at the sweet science. Most fans are basing their judgements about SBW’s boxing prospects from what they see now. What Nasser and Mundine are banking on is what SBW will be like as a boxer in five years’ time. Everyone has to start somewhere. While they’re lucrative, SBW’s football talents will complicate the boxing issue, but it doesn’t change the direction that they’re headed in.
This was much the same as when SBW first came to rugby. The critics judged what they saw in front of them and spoke as if he would never improve as a rugby player. It took roughly four years but now SBW has developed into a world class rugby midfielder.
SBW has clearly stated that training for a fight during rugby season doesn’t work. He tried it last year and his form suffered, costing him the best chance of making the All Black starting line-up for the World Cup.
The pathway that SBW is taking now gives him the best chance to make better improvements as a boxer while still getting paid quite handsomely.
Signing again with the New Zealand rugby union would mean that SBW would probably finish up for 2012 in December. That doesn’t give him much in terms of a preparation for an off-season fight. That would also mean that he won’t fight again until the next off-season. Like this season, technically he would be able to fight, but his All Black position would not be as solid as it normally would be if he were take up a bout.
Personally last year I didn’t see the upside of SBW returning to the NRL, but when you look at it from the point of view of what will improve SBW as a boxer then the move to Bondi Junction makes sense.
One, travel. Travel is part and parcel of being a pro footballer, which has made it hard for SBW to put in the proper boxing training necessary to improve. With the Mundine Camp in Redfern, only seven kilometres from Bondi Junction, getting extra boxing training with the right trainers will be much easier. Also basing himself in Sydney will lessen the travel load.
Two, easy money. The stint in Japan will make SBW’s prep for his next fight much easier because of the low standard of play in Japanese rugby. The return will be huge because SBW be getting around $100K per game.
Three, the challenge. The NRL is the physically toughest footy code in the world. The collisions are hard and fast. SBW loves the physical side of the game, and with some big forwards hitting their straps I’m sure SBW would want to test himself.
Clearly the SBW Camp isn’t too worried about SBW’s global appeal yet (for PPV fights) because if that were the case he would have been better off staying with rugby. They probably weighed up the pro and cons and decided that for this year at least the NRL was the best option.
A common criticism of SBW is that he is just a highly paid mercenary that goes to the highest bidder. When you actually look at the details it becomes obvious that this tag is grossly unfair.
In 2005 SBW knocked back AUD$3 million from St Helens that would have made him the highest-paid league player in the world. In 2010 the French publication Midi Olympique reported that SBW knocked back a three-year, NZD$6 million offer from Toulon. This would have made him the highest-paid player in either code.
Instead he signed for the New Zealand rugby union, on an offer worth $NZ 550,000. That’s about 25% of his market worth.
In June 2011 SBW donated NZD$100,000 from his fight pursue to the Christchurch Earthquake Appeal.
Adding up the contracts from St Helens and Toulon will show that SBW has actually knocked back about $AUD 7.7M. Hardly the actions of a money-hungry mercenary. This also puts to rest the criticism that he always take the easy route. An easy route would be to stay in France for the next three years earning NZD$2 million a season, not trying to fit in boxing matches during the NRL season.
Another criticism involves the short contracts. This is quite an easy question to answer. SBW actually values his freedom as a pro athlete more than money. He has knocked back lucrative endorsement contracts from companies like Adidas because of the conditions it would place him under. For example if he were to become an ambassador for Adidas he wouldn’t be able to play league.
Last week rugby journalist Marc Hinton wrote “I know for a fact sponsors are queuing up to add his name to their stable. A certain sportswear manufacturer, for one, would practically write a blank cheque to be able to splash him on their billboards.” But SBW keeps knocking these opportunities back.
The reason is the same as the short contracts: the freedom to move on if you’re not happy. It would be interesting to know how much endorsement money SBW has knocked back as well.
Therein lie some of the reasons for the public frustration with SBW. Most people want guarantees, predictability and security with their contracts. For SBW having short contracts keeps things exciting for him, and always has him on his toes. A bad season and he can forget about getting a better deal for the next season. This makes him ‘different’ and some of the public react in kind.
Another common criticism is that SBW is not a ‘team player’. With this some people confuse the business of professional sport with the actual sport itself. The business of pro sport is a lot different to the actual pro sport. With respect to the business of sport issue the criticism is probably valid. Then again that is just the nature of the beast.
With respect to the functionality of the actual team, this criticism is way off. SBW started his New Zealand rugby at a club called Belfast in Christchurch. In Oct 2010 rugby journalist Gregor Paul wrote on SBW’s time at Belfast.
“He was an inspiration to our boys,” says Belfast coach Don Fisher. “After he came, our boys turned things around and won four games. Sonny has been so supportive. He turned up to all the trainings, came to the team photograph and was even down at our touch night this week.
“He’s a down-to-earth guy who fitted in really well and if he does indeed win All Black selection, it will be by right, not because of the investment that was made in him.”
What Fisher doesn’t say is that Williams stood for an hour after his game for Belfast signing autographs. Everyone wanted a piece of him, and through it all, he smiled, scribbled and laughed.
He does the same after every game for Canterbury, and far from being a concern, Williams may in fact be the benchmark for All Blacks in terms of how they engage the public.
The stories of Williams as a humble sort, keen to keep his head down and be one of the boys, are consistent. He has said all the right things, done all that has been asked and more, and the perception of Williams believing his own hype is far removed from the reality.
My prediction is that SBW will be back at the Chiefs (if Wayne Smith is still there) in 2014 to try and make the starting All Black Rugby World Cup side for 2015, and then he will retire from both codes after the World Cup to concentrate full-time on boxing.
In the end time will tell whether those boxing ambitions will bear fruit. For his sake I hope they do, because he has knocked back a lot of money in order to give himself a shot.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- Four observations about State of Origin 2013 game 1 (321)
- Is Gallen brave or just plain stupid? (264)
- Violence or apathy? Rugby league at a crossroads (239)
- UPDATE: Blake Ferguson charged, suspended by NRL – will miss Origin (211)
- Is everyone in rugby league completely mad? (163)
- NRL prepared to condone violence for the ‘good of the game’? (131)
- Smithy looks punch-drunk after less than a season in charge (127)
- Meninga blames media for bar scandal (10)
- Harrison’s Origin omission a mistake: Lang (3)
- Watmough sits out NSW Origin training (5)
- Meninga raises the bar for the Maroons (57)
- Rebel Raiders: the victims of a poisonous office culture (35)
- How hard is your NRL team’s draw? (14)
- Concerns with the NRL Integrity Unit (3)
- Rebel Raiders: the victims of a poisonous office culture (35)
- How hard is your NRL team’s draw? (14)
- Concerns with the NRL Integrity Unit (3)
- 2013 State of Origin: game two preview (10)
- Stupidity costs Raiders a realistic shot at glory (7)
- Why is rugby league missing the slow boat to China? (34)
- Bring back the biff? I’ll pass (1)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- All Blacks, Rugby League, Rugby Union, Sonny Bill Williams

July 9th 2012 @ 6:15am
Damien said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:15am | Report comment
Just a slight clarification on SBW’s ‘boxing during the rugby season doesn’t work’ statement. In NZ Rugby it didn’t give him the best chace for the All Blacks. In the NRL however it MAY be a different story.
July 9th 2012 @ 6:19am
JCVD said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:19am | Report comment
Probably one of the best articles I’ve read on the roar. An objective piece which has finally cleared the air with regards to endorsements and other lucrative contracts which SBW has knocked back. It’s evident that he clearly loves his boxing and I’m sure with more training he will be a major success.
I hope the NRL community really embrace his return and make the most of this opportunity to promote the sport. What are his chances of playing in the league world cup next year for new Zealand in the UK? If he does play this will be a great leg up for the code as SBW is a well known sports star here in the UK and will certainly generate a lot of interest
July 9th 2012 @ 6:40am
Shaun said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:40am | Report comment
Let’s not forget the many other nations that will be at the league world cup that were also at the union world cup just last year e.g. France, the Pacific nations & other European nations. They are all already very aware of who SBW is and i think having him there will be a great advertisement for the game and will generate massive interest and intrigue. Of course he has to first make the side & have an injury free run. But i would genuinely cherish him working alongside the Kiwi’s bigger units & running off some Benji magic. Can’t wait. But more than that, i can’t wait to see him up against the Doggies for the first time. Add his personal issues with the club & the naturally rivalry & lothing between fans & players on each side & you one massive encounter.
Oh…& i hope the Kiwis also pulverise the aussies in the league world cup.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:12am
Go warriors said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Agree Shaun. It is no coincidence that SBW returning to RL happens to be the same year of the RLWC. There is no doubt he would love to win the RL world cup and add that to his union world cup. Very few players get to win a world cup let alone a world cup in both codes.
Mind you he does have to make the Kiwi team first. The Kiwis have a got an enormous amount of depth and it is not like they have been struggling in the last few years so he will really have to work hard to get back into the team.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:48am
WQ said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:48am | Report comment
I’d rather see him play State of Origin for QLD
July 9th 2012 @ 10:26am
oikee said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:26am | Report comment
July 9th 2012 @ 6:43am
King of the Gorgonites said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:43am | Report comment
The guy is a joke. He was a joke in rugby and will once again be a joke in league.
He loves short term contracts, but if he does an acl then he may never sign a big contract again.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:15am
soapit said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:15am | Report comment
dont agree he’s a joke but thats a thought, he’s been fairly lucky with injury since leaving league but he was pretty injury prone there for a while.
July 9th 2012 @ 10:28am
oikee said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:28am | Report comment
Hodges and Burgess, always injured. Part of the game really.
Lockyer went through the whole season only to get injured in his last game to make a final. Cant be helped.
July 9th 2012 @ 10:54am
soapit said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:54am | Report comment
but they’re not negotiating new contracts each year.
July 9th 2012 @ 11:18am
oikee said | July 9th 2012 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Yes but if my Broncos told me they were signing up Burgess for 800 thousand, i would be saying hurry up.
Injuries are part of the game. Hodges is fantastic, and i call him 1 game Hodges, he plays one and has a month off. Part of life at the Broncos, no big deal, i have come to live with it now.
He is a damm good player in those 1 or 2 games.
July 9th 2012 @ 2:31pm
soapit said | July 9th 2012 @ 2:31pm | Report comment
certainly something to think about though, is he only worth 700k say because of the risk he will only play a quarter of the games.
July 9th 2012 @ 7:15am
gaz said | July 9th 2012 @ 7:15am | Report comment
The manner in which he decided to leave the Bulldogs and Rugby League should never be forgotten or forgiven.
Shame on you Roosters, if the rumours are correct you are a joke.
This fellow has no morals or principles and there is no room for his type in Rugby League.
Like the bit about the lift.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:49am
WQ said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:49am | Report comment
You did’nt read Damien’s article or are you calling him a liar?
July 9th 2012 @ 11:49am
gaz said | July 9th 2012 @ 11:49am | Report comment
What’s your beef?
July 9th 2012 @ 4:06pm
WQ said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:06pm | Report comment
Damien has made a number of points in his article that are clearly at odds to your statement about SBW having no morals or principles.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:19pm
Gaz said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:19pm | Report comment
Got nothing to do with Damian, it’s only his opinion. This fellow walked out on his contract , his club, his mates and the NRL He has no morals or principles and should not be allowed back into the NRL on any terms or conditions. The Roosters or any other team that has anything to do with this chap is a joke and will rue the day they made that decision. The NRL and new Commission likewise if they don’t put a stop to this travesty.
July 9th 2012 @ 10:33pm
Damien said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:33pm | Report comment
Hi Gaz,
Just as a matter of interest where do we draw the line on the morals & principles call.
There are more than a few stars in the NRL that have actually had to defend criminal charges against them. When they got off on a technicality it is still widely accepted that they did the crime, but will not serve any time. (Brett Stewart is NOT on this list..just to be clear)
Do they get the boot as well ?
Also do you think Jamie Lyon should have ever been let back into the NRL ?
July 10th 2012 @ 2:12am
Gaz said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:12am | Report comment
Damien,
You tell me where you draw the line.
The fellow you are attempting to defend was not only deceitful but showed the utmost arrogance and contempt for a code he now wants to use as a means to satisfy his own ego and pocket.
Nothing more and nothing less.
He thumbed his nose at the NRL and it’s establishment, shot through in the middle of the night like a mongrel dog without so much as an explanation.
It’s now time for the NRL to follow suit and thumb their nose at him, tell him he’s not wanted, go to Japanese Union, fight all Mundines has beens if he likes but never darken our doorway again.
Criminal charge issues is another story entirely.
You are a tad unfair comparing Jamie Lyon because what your prodigy did really is beyond compare with anything else in the past and we need to make a stand here and now to prevent it ever occurring in the future.
I believe all code jumpers, yes Hunt and Folou included, should face an automatic ten year ban but that also is another story.
July 10th 2012 @ 6:05am
Damien said | July 10th 2012 @ 6:05am | Report comment
Hi Gaz,
The NRL isn’t heaven so if you have ‘sinned’ you’ll be cast out never to be let back in.
Personally I think the NRL are doing OK with who they let in. Maybe they’re abit harsh IMO on who they selectively cut like Robert Lui more recently and Tevita Latu a while back.
Inglis, and Bird did the same thing probably worse in Birds case but they only recieved a slap on the wrist. Shaun Metcalf from the Warriors is probably the worst offender of all (he spent 18 months in prison for it). In my book at least beating up or even worse glassing a woman is almost unforgivable. Scabbles over money are sad but I take a much harsher view on violence against women. If proper process is follwed and also the powers that be are satisfied with the remorse and rehab then I’m fine with them playing in the NRL
Not sure why you’re not as up in arms over Jamie Lyons actions as your are with SBW. As I mentioned in another post. The Walkout’s been done to death, opening old wounds isn’t going to help anyone.
Faumuina from the Cowboys a few years back did the exact same thing to Harlequins in England. He’s probably the poster child forbreaking contracts (remeber the Warriors issue) I thought what Jamie Lyon did was worse if you want to take the high ground. He took off without telling anyone also.
Sterlo’s words “Jamie Lyon dudded Parramatta like you wouldn’t believe. He got $125,000 for an off-season and one game”. He also mentioned that the Eels didn’t put up a fight or any legal actions out of good faith even though they were filthy about the whole thing. Also the Eels didn’t get a cent in compensation.
Lyons then moves to England then comes back to Manly. Not the Eels which probably deserve his skills more than anyone.
SBW does his walkout but at least he paid the Bulldogs some compensation. $750,000 which is the largest ‘break contract’ fee in Australian sporting history. He also explained that he didn’t think he was getting his market rate. Not everyone liked it, but at least he told us his reasons. Lyons paid nothing.
Now I don’t think Lyons should be cast out or anything. I don’t mind him despite him playing for the Eagles (nobody’s perfect LOL).
I don’t agree with your code jumping ban but I understand it.
You still haven’t said where you draw the line though.
July 10th 2012 @ 2:08pm
Gaz said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
Hey Damien,
I guess in a nut shell it’s all about Williams initially leaving Canterbury and the NRL. It’s basically about what, how and why he left.
You have explained the why bit quite well and I understand and have no issues with that and also believe he has made a fist of it. I also don’t much care what he did but it is how he went about it that should see him remain an outcast.
Let’s face it, he needs to play rugby league again like a hole in the head. He just wants to prove a point and scoff at those who criticized his walkout. Under the circumstances I don’t believe he should be given that chance.
July 10th 2012 @ 2:59pm
Damien said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
Hi Gaz,
Sort of agree bout his return. It does have that ‘Prodigal Son’ feel about it.
After I posted the reply I realised the whole ‘heaven, rugby league’ irony LOL.
July 9th 2012 @ 4:08pm
Ken said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
Did you? Damien’s article was a great read and put forward a decent argument that SBW’s decisions post RL and his preference for 1 year contracts don’t backup the perception that he’s a mercenary.
It did not deal though with that disgraceful act when he sneaked out onto a plane mid-week, mid-season after being named in that weeks side with 4 years to run on his contract. If he was man enough to come out and say ‘sorry, I was young, impulsive and made a bad call’ rather than still trying to justify it I think most people (Dogs supporter notwithstanding) would let it go. As it is though, it’s a huge black mark against his name and speaks poorly of his dedication to a team, regardless of the anecdote in the article.
July 9th 2012 @ 5:29pm
Damien said | July 9th 2012 @ 5:29pm | Report comment
Ken,
I would need to write another article to properly go through the Walkout.
I wanted to add it in this article but it would have been too long. This one was long enough.
SBW has apologised to the Doggie fans about the hurt from the Walkout but he didn’t say that that he was sorry it actually happened.
The Walkout was more of a business of sports issue than an actuall team sports issue.
Too be honest I think we should all move on from the Walkout. Its been done to death.
I laughed when I saw that my article is one of four artcles about SBW on the Roar. Thats gotta be some kind of record.
The angle that this article was meant to take was my thoughts on the direction SBW wanted to head and why. Also wanted to give my impression on some of the tags that he has been labelled with.
I think we’ve all read enough about how good/great/overated/hopeless he is at sport. Or as my wife likes to say ‘We’ve all read enough about him fullstop !! LOL. Of course I had to bite my tongue on that issue.
You are absolutely right about the perception of SBW being a mercenary through his preference for 1 year deals. No amount of feel good stories will ever change that. Most people would relate that to themselves changing jobs every year. Pro sport is much different but thats the way the cookie crumbles I suppose.
July 9th 2012 @ 7:48pm
WQ said | July 9th 2012 @ 7:48pm | Report comment
Ken he has apologised, but you like most Bulldogs fans can’t let the walkout go. That is your choice however ask yourself this, do you think he could have got the point he is at today if he had stayed with the Bulldogs?
Somehow I don’t think so. Once you have accepted that then ask yourself should he have sacrificed his own career for the Bulldogs? Once again I don’t think so.
July 10th 2012 @ 1:27pm
Matt F said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
Sacrificed his career? He willingly signed a contract! I don’t think it’s too much to ask of a player to see out the contract that he willingly signed or, at the very least, ask for and negotiate a release. If I want to quit my job and go overseas I don’t just leave. I tell my employer what I plan to do. If I have a contract with them then I either see it out or negotiate a release. I don’t just leave and not tell them.
I have no personal issue with anything that he’s done since he left the Bulldogs. If he wants to sign one year contracts then that’s fine. Nobody forces a club to sign him if they don’t want to.
July 9th 2012 @ 7:34am
Gremlin said | July 9th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
I admire the athletic ability of SBW. All pro’ sports people are ” free lancers” by nature of the bussiness. I still can’ t get behind the extremes SBW takes this to. Maybe I’m just old fashioned.
July 9th 2012 @ 1:49pm
The Barry said | July 9th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
I think that’s a very good point Gremlin. Obviously the way he walked out on the Bulldogshas turned a lot of people against him but I think we’re all used to the paradigm of the one club player. Even if players play for multiple clubs they are with each joint for a couple of seasons.
Sonny Bill challenges that paradigm on every level. Walking out on the Dogs. New sports, let alone new clubs every couple of seasons. It really changes the way that we think about athletes.
My concern about or for Sonny Bill is his legacy. Will he be remembered as one of the great league players ? No. Will he be one of the great rugby players ? No. Will he be remembered as one of the great fighters. Not on what we’ve seen so far. To become a great you need a degree of longevity as well as talent.
But maybe this is another way that SBW is challenging us – that legacy is not as important as we’ve always assumed.
July 9th 2012 @ 3:04pm
Gremlin said | July 9th 2012 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Just learned about Penny Panthers ” releasing” Lewis. Always thought we’d be talking about him in the same brerath as Hindy, Burt, Menzies, Lokyer and other one club guys. maybe SBW is just lighting the way? don’t know? have to think a bit more, ouch!
With the dogs issue The Barry, I’m led to belive SBW ended up walking after pleading for a release, citing the release of Mason as cause.” he’s a trouble maker and you grant him a release, I behave myself and you tell me no”, probably not those exact words but something like it. Although I understand his frustrations, I too, can not agree with his actions. Talis sat on his hands for a year to prove a piont. You dont have to runaway to get heard, there other options.
July 9th 2012 @ 7:39am
Sailosi said | July 9th 2012 @ 7:39am | Report comment
I can’t see him ever returning to rugby union, in 2014 he’ll be 28 and you’d have to wonder whether he has the desire to do it all again. He would also have to take a significant pay cut. The one concern about him playing in Japan is the ridiculous amount of training they do. They absolutely flog them, which might make him a bit flat.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:32am
Pogo said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
28 is hardly over the hill though, if he does return to RU it would probable be in France, where he wouldn’t have to take a pay cut.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:25am
oikee said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
Only 28 when he goes back to Union, Thorn is 36 and played a world cup.
I look forward to the Newcastle Knights rematch with Big Willie, i look forward to the Dogs clash, i look forward to seeing him all around the place as it will attrack alot of interest in league circles. The guy is a walking billboard. The Roosters might fork out 1 million, i think he will bring them 10 million if they promote this right.
Imagine the Roosters playing a game in Perth, or taking a game to Adelaide. And their memberships will probably go close to doubling, what have they got now, 6 thousand, expect that to double.
Celebrities arriving in Sydney will want a part of him, the Roosters name will be spread around the world. Mate, brilliant, he does not even have to play a game, and it is a coup for the NRL.
The kids love the guy, and the NRL can promote any big hits he puts on for years. Genious. Nice work Roosters.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:17am
soapit said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:17am | Report comment
bit different for the forwards though oikee. plus thorn is the exception, not the rule
however 28-32 is often considered the peak for centres in rugby as they master their skills before their pace goes but taking a couple of years out will probably stop him reaching his peak in either sport before he slows down.
July 9th 2012 @ 11:05am
jdubya said | July 9th 2012 @ 11:05am | Report comment
The Roosters have well over 10 000 members Oikee. Not everybody can afford to live in the Eastern Suburbs though
Can’t wait for SBW to get to Bondi. It’s also very obvious at this point that he is signing a one year deal so he can play in Japan in the off season without the NRL intervening, ala Benji marshall a couple of years ago. I predict that he will stay on to at least the end of the RLWC before returning to Rugby for the 2015 WC.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:31am
Col Quinn said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Damien,
SBW still hasn’t signed with Easts. I don’t agree with Easts signing him for reasons that we have both written about previously. However, I do think he has learnt some lessons from the Bulldogs debacle. I am not sure whether his manager has. SBW will have to negotiate his own contract with Easts as Easts cannot deal with Nasser, as Nasser will not sign the ethics and monetary clauses in the ARL managers code. If SBW does return to RL, I am not sure that he will be the success that he expects to be. The pace of the game has increased since he left. He will have to adapt to very different defensive patterns and there are some very large and very hard forwards now playing who will be only too happy to test how tough SBW thinks he is. On a one to one SBW would be equal to the task but if he is it by pairs or three I don’t think he will be able to take the week to week battering. However, we will see if he signs and if that happens if he will survive.
CQ
July 9th 2012 @ 5:44pm
Damien said | July 9th 2012 @ 5:44pm | Report comment
Thanks Col,
I was wondering how you would respond.
The whole thing with Nasser not signing to me at least could open Nasser up to some serious hassles (and having ethics is not one of them OK ? LOL )
I’ve actually read the document (linked below) that Nasser would need to sign and there are a few things that could seriously distract him.
One of them is that the NRL can make Nasser complete course that they think will benefit him. Of course this could be nothing but it wouldn’t surprise me if the NRL made Nasser take all sorts of management courses etc. just to annoy him.
Nasser probably thinks why open yourself to that.
Of course this could mean nothing.
http://www.nrl.com/Portals/NRL/RadEditor/documents/nrlhq/NRLAPARules2006.pdf
Time will tell if SBW goes better than when he was at the Dogs..
July 9th 2012 @ 8:04pm
Col Quinn said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:04pm | Report comment
Hey Damien,
thanks for the thoughts. I am still not sure if he will go to Easts (sorry Sydney). This handshake business has me a little curious, because he was getting advice from a couple of St George people at the time. Now that would be interesting as the Dogs hate the Dragons even more that they hate Chooks!
July 9th 2012 @ 8:59am
Sailosi said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I’m just saying that at 28 he might not be bothered. Plus he’s a back, tight forwards in rugby union don’t reach their peak until their 30′s.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:02am
Sailosi said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Oikee, why would he have that kind of effect. He played in the nrl before and didn’t cause memberships to double, why would Perth or Adelaide care about him. He travelled to London to play with the crusaders and they only got 35,000 people, they would have got that with or without SBW. I think your overstating his effect just slightly.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.