Is Australia on the brink of an ODI disaster?
Roar Guru By tonysalerno, 9 Jul 2012 tonysalerno is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, England cricket, ODI cricket
Related coverage
Australia are on the verge of a humiliating whitewash at the hands of England after going 3-0 down in the current One Day International series.
The Aussies have struggled in all facets of the game, and with one game washed out, their form will have to change drastically if they are to avoid a clean sweep.
England’s motivation heading into the one-day series was the number one ranking; knowing if they could record a 5-0 victory against the Australians they would take the title.
The current number one, Australia, have had a tough time defending their crown, being dominated with the bat, ball and in the field.
The Australians have failed to post a score above 260, scraping past 250 twice, while posting a disappointing 200 in game three. Australia’s top order has failed, bar a standout performance by Shane Watson in game one.
The Australian batsmen have not supported cameos by George Bailey, Michael Clarke and David Hussey. Inconsistency has necessitated continual rebuilding, limiting their ability to post a big score in the final overs.
England, chasing in two of the three matches, have managed their run well, recording convincing victories by six and eight wickets respectively. Australia’s bowling has been unable to take wickets at crucial times, unlike England.
The English pacemen have fared well at their home grounds, with Steven Finn snaring figures of 4-24 in the series-clinching one-dayer.
Australia has struggled to adapt to the colder, nippier English conditions. The wet and dewy environment has seen the ball seam around for the new-ball bowlers.
Australia was unfortunate to lose the toss in game three, as they were sent in to bat on a bowler’s wicket. A collapse from Australia’s top order set the tone for an English onslaught.
The tourists have been reeling throughout the Natwest series, but are they on the verge of a series whitewash? Australia’s chances of halting England’s momentum have suffered a major blow, with Brett Lee and Shane Watson both ruled out for the remainder of the series.
Watson has been strong at the top of the order, batting at an average of 35 as one of Australia’s best.
England too has been affected on the injury front with off-spinner Graeme Swann being ruled out for the final two games. Swann has only managed one wicket from the three games, but will be missed for his leadership and slip fielding.
Australia has struggled during this series but has shown glimpses of form during each innings. Out-of-form players like Peter Forrest and George Bailey will have to lift their game, while players like Clarke and Hussey will have to capatilise on their starts.
Australia has their backs against the wall but can still defeat England this series. If defeating the old foe isn’t enough motivation, surely retaining the number one ranking should be.
The Ashes journey begins
The Australian cricket team have left Australia to begin their tour of England, with a mission to reclaim the Ashes.
Australian captain Michael Clarke and his teammates were optimistic about their chances before jetting off.
Click here to hear the thoughts of our Australian cricket team as they left for England.
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, England cricket, ODI cricket
July 9th 2012 @ 6:10am
Viscount Crouchback said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:10am | Report comment
I hear Mickey Arthur has suggested that his chaps have been “bullied” and lack “mongrel”. Damning words but also entirely accurate: England really have flayed these Aussies in the manner of a colonial governor giving six of the best to a surly convict circa 1820.
Let’s hope the Ashes are more competitive and exciting.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:32am
Red Kev said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:32am | Report comment
I think Arthur is overlooking a lot if he thinks it came down to a lack of mongrel.
Try a lack of technique, form and in some cases skill and talent.
And a lack of coaching (that’s right “batting coach” Langer I’m looking at you).
July 9th 2012 @ 9:16am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:16am | Report comment
+1 on the criticism of Langer. He’s had long enough to work with the players – and he’s been an abject failure. Not one batsman has improved during his time with the team, and plenty have gone backwards.
Time for some fresh coaching blood.
July 9th 2012 @ 10:20am
Blaze said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Spot diggity dog. Throw in losing McDermott as bowling coach, whom was probably the only coach actually making inroads…. Gonna be a long ashes series… Or short… Whomever bats first… Lol
July 9th 2012 @ 10:29am
Disco said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:29am | Report comment
Hear hear. Langer has been a disaster since taking on the role. And Arthur gets no sympathy with his blind faith in certain players and disregard of others.
July 9th 2012 @ 11:57am
tonysalerno said | July 9th 2012 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Australia’s batting is a problem but i do not think Langer’s coaching is to blame.
Granted there were some good points mentioned here but Langer can’t control poor batting decisions Australia’s batting order chooses to make.
Then again if you were to point the finger- Langer would be a good place to start.
July 9th 2012 @ 12:08pm
Blaze said | July 9th 2012 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
But isn’t that langers job? Making sure the batsmen make the correct decisions? Along with making sure the batsmen are using the correct techniques? Let me know if I’m wrong, cause I may well be, but I would have thought that those two things were his only tasks in the job.
July 9th 2012 @ 12:16pm
Red Kev said | July 9th 2012 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
But you can look at the batting and see that the most promising young batsmen in Australia to come into the team (Khawaja and S.Marsh) during Langer’s tenure have completely come apart and left broken and out of form.
July 9th 2012 @ 2:48pm
tonysalerno said | July 9th 2012 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Blaze, mate you are not wrong.
You and Red Kev make very good points- granted i am making a weak defense of Justin Langer but he is not the sole reason for Australia’s failure in this series. Australia batted very well during their summer against the Indians. It is a step up and class and different decisions which has made the series difficult.
July 9th 2012 @ 4:18pm
Disco said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:18pm | Report comment
Australia’s batting has been poor (the India series apart) since Langer’s been ‘batting coach’. As far as I can see, his only achievements has been mentoring young players out of the team and ensuring Watson continues to fall short as Test top-order player.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:29am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:29am | Report comment
It’s hardly surprising though – England are in the middle of their season, they’ve just come off a series against the Windies and they’re playing at home.
I hope Cricket Australia made a shed-load of money off this mini-tour, because it’s been a disaster of epic proportions in every other way. Not one player has shown the slightest bit of improvement and our bowling stocks have halved due to injury.
July 9th 2012 @ 1:08pm
matt h said | July 9th 2012 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
Agreed. We were set up for a fall. These sorts of tours with everything stacked against us may have been ok in our dominant era, but this time around is was lambs to the slaughter.
July 9th 2012 @ 9:44am
mike from tari said | July 9th 2012 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Dont know why Starc was not in the team, his 20×20 & 1 day form was bettter than some of those chosen.
July 9th 2012 @ 10:16am
Pope Paul VII said | July 9th 2012 @ 10:16am | Report comment
England have primarily test players, Australia have picked a fair smattering of non ( at this stage ) test level players and left out veterans and recently discarded test players. England likely would have won handsomely even if Australia were at full strength but I think Australia need to revisit basing the core of their one day team on their preferred test team. Basically the Australian batting has needs to be quite orthodox because that’s all the English bowlers will allow. It’s going to take patience, reflexes and cool temprement to hope to challenge England for the Ashes. The selectors are in lala land if they don’t realise that. Chances are Australia will lose anyway but you at least need to pick the best players. Boon and S Waugh are two Australia stuck with in lean times, these days they may not have got a second chance.
July 9th 2012 @ 11:14am
Brett McKay said | July 9th 2012 @ 11:14am | Report comment
it’s interesting that England are winning with what is essentially their Test side, plus or minus a couple. We’re almost going back to how one-day teams were picked 20 years ago..
July 9th 2012 @ 12:41pm
Disco said | July 9th 2012 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
Yes, but during Australia’s very dominant period, really only Bevan, Hogg and Symonds were regular ODI specialists (until the latter was shoehorned into a Test batting role ahead of far-superior options). It’s a sound idea to play your best players in both forms of the game, unless of course there’s a unique case of a player struggling badly in one but excelling in the other.
July 9th 2012 @ 1:11pm
matt h said | July 9th 2012 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Yes in England where the conditions favour the ball a bit more, and especialoly now we have new balls from either end. On the sub-continent and even in Australia, the one-day specialist biffer plays a bigger factor. Ravi Bopara looks dangerous in these seaming conditions. elsewhere he would be cannon fodder. but good on England for recognising this and playing to the conditions.
July 9th 2012 @ 3:29pm
Bayman said | July 9th 2012 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
matt h,
While I might agree that conditions generally have favoured the bowlers over the batsmen a less charitable critic than I might suggest it’s only favoured English bowlers.
Batting second, England are cruising past us with the majority of their wickets intact. On the upside, however, our sports scientists are managing to lose a bowler or two every day. No doubt they are gathering a great deal of valuable data for future reference.
At this stage I’m thinking of booking an Ashes trip to take in the last two Tests in 2013. I reckon by then my constant offering of services as a bowler will be met with some favour. I wouldn’t get a game for the first Test but by the time the fifth comes around I reckon I’m a certainty – and because I’m not exactly a “finely tuned” athlete I also reckon I’m half a chance to get through the game without injury (unless, of course, Jimmy Anderson brings one back sharply when I’m batting and crushes the old box!)
Of course, I may not get a gig if Richie Benaud makes himself available but by then I reckon the selectors will be down to just him or me – and I’m twenty years younger than Richie.
July 9th 2012 @ 4:15pm
Disco said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
Can Australia’s current ‘biffers’ thrive against quality seam bowling even outside of England? We’re yet to see, though South Africa will be here in six months.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:26pm
BD said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:26pm | Report comment
its beacuse their best batsmen are their best batsmen period. And the play up the order and they play properly. the only one that is unorthodox is Morgan and he comes in at 5 where these types of players belong in teams.
warner in comparison is a joke for an opening batsman and should be at 6 or 7 in both ODI’s and tests (he shouldn’t be in the test side)
July 9th 2012 @ 3:23pm
Pope Paul VII said | July 9th 2012 @ 3:23pm | Report comment
I’ve been impressed by Bopa’s fiesty medium pace. He’s a bit nippy.
July 9th 2012 @ 4:12pm
Disco said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:12pm | Report comment
Yes, he’s been very effective.
Meanwhile, Andrew McDonald sits on the boys’ club black list…
July 9th 2012 @ 4:34pm
Pope Paul VII said | July 9th 2012 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
Apparently so Disco, defies logic, Macca should have been a cert for this comp
July 9th 2012 @ 5:24pm
tonysalerno said | July 9th 2012 @ 5:24pm | Report comment
Andrew McDonald has been in and around the international scene but has never really taken the next step. A tremendous domestic player and will arguably hailed a future vic legend but he would probably not be right for ODI selection.
If McDonald was selected he would have been as heavily scrutinised as Forest and Bailey alike.
July 10th 2012 @ 9:05am
Disco said | July 10th 2012 @ 9:05am | Report comment
Not sure what you mean. It’s hardly McDonald’s fault the selectors have long been favouring pace over accuracy and guile.
A genuine allrounder, he did well when he played Test cricket and has done well for Victoria since then. McDonald has never played an ODI. The next step would be for the selectors to recognise how useful his bowling is and pick him, I would have thought.
July 9th 2012 @ 5:45pm
Bayman said | July 9th 2012 @ 5:45pm | Report comment
Tony,
It depends entirely on whether anyone thinks ODIs are really important.
For those that do may I paraphrase the late, great Joseph Stalin (who knew a thing or two about batting on a sticky wicket), “The loss of one ODI to England is a tragedy – the loss of four is a statistic!”
May that thought offer some comfort to those that care. Personally, I’m less concerned about the results than I am about the selections and the fact our fitness gurus are up to their neck in it again. Cummins is in danger of creating some sort of record which even the accident prone Shane Watson can only dream about – that is never playing consecutive games for Australia.
Watto being Watto, of course, promptly injured himself before realising he had already played consecutive games this series. That’s Watto for you – pretty, but dumb! He’s no threat to Cummins is our Watto.
July 10th 2012 @ 1:08pm
Duncan Gering said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
That’s Watto for you – pretty, but dumb!!
Just thought it needed to be typed again.
July 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm
Lancashire said | July 9th 2012 @ 6:15pm | Report comment
You shouldn’t criticise Langer for players techniques, unless they’re full-time national players he can’t have enough time with them to sort that out, but you can criticise him for their shot selection, the mental side of batting is exactly what the batting coach is there for. Witness A Cook: the English summer before the last Ashes he couldn’t score a run, and we know what happened once G Gooch became the full-time England batting coach …
I reckon CA saw this tour as a learning curve to see if any of this lot were up to playing Ashes cricket next year, so at least now they know – none of them.
July 9th 2012 @ 8:06pm
tonysalerno said | July 9th 2012 @ 8:06pm | Report comment
Lancashire i understand where you are coming from on both of your points.
But my English mate, it is hard to judge test ability on one day performances. A lot of this Australian side will change- with the inclusion of Ponting and M.Hussey just to name a few but Australia will put in a better performance in the 2012/13 ashes.