Sticky subject: Should Stuart coach the Blues in 2013?
By Ryan O'Connell, 10 Jul 2012 Ryan O'Connell is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- NRL, NSW Blues, Ricky Stuart, Rugby League, State Of Origin
New South Wales Blues rugby league coach, Ricky Stuart, announces his side for State of Origin Game 2 2012 (AAP Image/Paul Miller)
Related coverage
When your sole coaching responsibility is State of Origin, it’s a very, very, very long off season. Especially if you lose.
However, that’s exactly where Ricky Stuart finds himself after his second year back as New South Wales head coach.
Blues players call for Stuart to stay
His predecessor, Craig Bellamy, also tasted the sourness of defeat, but at least he was able to immediately throw himself back into coaching club football’s most consistent side in recent times, the Melbourne Storm.
Stuart has no such luck, and after coming so close to victory, one feels this loss may burn even more than every other before it.
For all the progress that many feel the Blues have made, at the end of the day, Stuart has still presided over two series losses, and questions will be asked about his position, either by NSW hierachy or by the media. It’s the nature of the job, unfortunately.
So, should Stuart remain at the helm?
In Sydney’s Sun Herald, Phil Gould, New South Wales’ most successful coach, called for Ricky Stuart to be retained by the Blues for the next ten years.
Upon reading the headline, I was absolutely shocked. No coach, regardless of how successful they’ve been, should be given a guarantee of ten years, let alone one whose record is far from perfect.
However, further reading of the article highlighted that Gould was only suggesting that Stuart should be involved in the Blues set-up, rather than necessarily the head coach. Such has been Stuart’s importance in building the culture of the Blues, that Gould feels he needs to stay close to the set-up of the Blues camp for the next decade.
Even Wayne Bennett has recognised the impact Stuart has had upon the Blues, and has stated that it’s imperative he keeps the coaching role.
Gus Gould and Wayne Bennett have forgotten more about rugby league than I know, and if two of the most astute minds in the game believe Ricky Stuart is the right man for the job, I would be arrogant and foolish to disagree with them.
However, some issues with NSW’s performance do need to be addressed.
Poor kicking and terrible spacing/bunching, along with no shape, in attack. Consistent early kicking in the tackle count. A lack of creativity and options on the fifth tackle.
All these problems were not necessarily Stuart’s fault. However, the buck needs to stop somewhere.
Were these issues a result of poor coaching by Stuart? Or was he simply let down by his players, who failed to execute his plans?
Having done a little coaching in my life, albeit in a different sport, I know all too well that you are at the mercy of your players, in terms of being judged a good coach or not. The best tactics in the world are useless if your players don’t execute them.
It’s therefore difficult to say that Stuart should take a lot of blame for the poor performance of the Blues last Wednesday night, without knowing exactly what the game plans were.
The issue is that, at times, the Blues looked like they didn’t have much strategy in their plans.
Take the early kicking as an example. Numerous times, the Blues kicked early in the tackle count, yet it appeared to be without much thought. On a few occasions, the Queensland wingers were already in good position to receive the kick, so any notion of attempting to surprise them can be ruled out.
Likewise, on one attacking raid in the first half, the Blues had the ball on halfway on tackle three, but kicked the ball. Another two hit ups could have easily seen them in great attacking position well inside Queensland’s half, but instead the Maroons ran the ball back to near halfway.
The amount of early kicking indicates it must have definitely been a tactic, but what purpose it served, or what was the desired outcome, remains a mystery.
There is no doubt that the passion and spirit of the Blues has improved, and that Stuart deserves a large proportion of the credit for it. The players love him, and want to play for him. Even Queensland fans have been effusive in their praise of this NSW team, and the toughness, commitment and the pride in their jersey that they’ve displayed.
Yet as Blues skipper Paul Gallen stated after the third game: “It doesn’t say ‘pride and effort’ on the trophy. It says 2-1.”
An optimist will say passion is a big part of Origin, and the Blues have regained that, and only lost by one point to an all-time great Queensland team.
A pessimist will say that tactics are an equally big part of Origin, and NSW were severely lacking in that department, and that the Blues have lost seven series in a row.
As ever, the truth lies somewhere in between those two polarising opinions.
I think Stuart should be retained, regardless of whether he has an NRL coaching commitment or not. Having failed to win the Origin trophy back, he has unfinished business. I also don’t think the Blues have the luxury of adjusting to a new coach and new coaching philosophy.
However, if Stuart is retained, the Blues tactics and execution in attack need to be analysed.
Personally, I think you’ll find that Stuart’s tactics are sound, but the players need to execute them much better, especially from the all important position of halfback.
Having said that, it’s important to remember that selecting the right players, and then preparing them to execute under pressure, remains one of the key responsibilities of the coach.
Which suggests Stuart really does have unfinished business.
Ryan is an ex-representative basketballer who shot too much, and a (very) medium pace bowler. He's been with The Roar as an expert since February 2011, has written for the Seven Network, and been a regular on ABC radio. Ryan tweets from @RyanOak.
- Explore:
- NRL, NSW Blues, Ricky Stuart, Rugby League, State Of Origin

July 10th 2012 @ 2:46am
Steve said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:46am | Report comment
I for one can’t understand all the Ricky love. The worst thing is the fans seem to have fallen for it to. He is the coach of the NSW rugby league team, not the Bangladeshi cricket team. We are the biggest rugby league state in the world not some developing nation trying to improve each year yet people have this attitude of oh it’s ok we are improving, watch out next year we’re coming. You should get one chance as NSW coach and it you lose somebody else gets a turn.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:38am
The Barry said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
That’s ludicrous – how can you ever hope to progress if you change coaches every year.
Let’s not lose sight of the fact that while NSW may be the bigger state we are competing with a golden age of Queensland players.
Guys like Lockyer, Slater, Thurston, Smith, Inglis, Price, Petero, Myles, Hodges, Tate, Thaiday would all come up in discussion for spots in QLDs best ever Origin selection. That’s a fair representation from seven years for a competition that’s been going for 32.
Who would NSW have in that time – Gallen ? Anyone else ?
Stuart did an amazing job to get within a point of QLD based on the cattle he has at his disposal.
July 10th 2012 @ 12:33pm
JazzyJase said | July 10th 2012 @ 12:33pm | Report comment
Whether it’s coaches or refereeing decisions, lets face it, QLD are too good for us.
July 10th 2012 @ 12:50pm
Ryan O'Connell said | July 10th 2012 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
Someone said it below, but I’m not sure that’s an excuse anymore. If NSW played to the absolute best of their ability, they would have won this series. But they didn’t, and there needs to be accountability for that.
‘Improvement’ shouldn’t be a KPI for the Blues head coach.
(I’ll ignore the refereeing decisions comment!)
July 10th 2012 @ 1:21pm
The Barry said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
And if QLD also played to their best they would have flogged us.
I think considering the teams and the circumstances Ricky did a pretty good job to get the Blues so close.
July 10th 2012 @ 1:37pm
WoobliesFan said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:37pm | Report comment
Touche
July 10th 2012 @ 1:55pm
Ryan O'Connell said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
Agreed Barry.
It’s a tricky one, because on one hand you could say that the opportunity to beat Queensland may never be that close again, and the Blues stuffed it.
On the other hand, you could say Stuart is part of the reason NSW were so close in the first place.
(I’m doing some quality fence sitting today!)
July 10th 2012 @ 2:07pm
The Barry said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
It is a tricky one.
I’ve made about four comments here in support of Stuart and have already been tagged a Stuart apologist (whatever that is).
I’m really not – I just think we need to have a) a better option than Stuart and b) a succession plan that involves some sort of handover from Stuart to the new coach.
If we just say “you lost. you’re sacked. now who else is out there” we may as well put our hands up for another four or five series. We’re not in the 1980s any more…
July 10th 2012 @ 10:45am
ScottWoodward.me said | July 10th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
Steve
Well said you could have written my story
July 10th 2012 @ 7:35am
Mals said | July 10th 2012 @ 7:35am | Report comment
NSW will not win a series with Mitchell Pearce at half back. He was poor in both attack & defence in game 3. His game management skills are lacking, look at his brain snap going for a field goal on the 1st tackle in the golden point period against the Sharks last night.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download The Roar’s iPhone App in the App Store here.
July 10th 2012 @ 9:59am
Ryan O'Connell said | July 10th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
If Pearce is the issue, as you allude to, doesn’t Stuart have to take responsibility for picking him?
July 10th 2012 @ 1:49pm
Mango Jack said | July 10th 2012 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
OK, but who should replace him? There is no standout half back. Maybe Mullen or Wallace, but neither are screaming out for selection.
July 10th 2012 @ 7:54am
Andy said | July 10th 2012 @ 7:54am | Report comment
The problem with Ricky Stuart is that in game one and three he signaled the players to take the two points in the first half. You do not get many penalties close to the opposition line at origin level. This to me suggests that maybe Hasler would be a better option as coach, especially if Stuart ends up coaching a losing club team like the eels or raiders.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:10am
M.O.C. said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:10am | Report comment
At the start of the series Gus Gould said in one of his nauseating pre-game rambles “…Ricky Stuart told me that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result”. Well despite this wisdom, NSW have done exactly that – they basically picked the same side with the same coach as they have done in past years and now Gus is suggesting they do it again and again for the next 10 years – this surely fulfills their own definition of insanity.
July 10th 2012 @ 2:09pm
Damn Straight said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
Haha, i love how Ricky borrows quotes off famous people and then passes them off as his own. Gus, it was actually Einstein who said that.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:22am
steve b said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:22am | Report comment
They lost the series by one point , the boys all are behind him and want him their again,,just leave things the way they are,,, we are not to far off the mark,,and Sticky says he wants to go around again ,,,and he has bought the passion back to the lads ,,we have to stop chopping and changing …. ,,
July 10th 2012 @ 3:48pm
DingoBob said | July 10th 2012 @ 3:48pm | Report comment
I agree Steve. As a QLDer I hope Ricky is in the job for at least a couple of years. He is very entertaining.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:25am
The Barry said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:25am | Report comment
As has been publicised ‘Ricky gets Origin’. I think the way that he’s bonded the team and created the spirit he has in just two years is fantastic. Bellamy and Murray couldn’t do it. On paper QLD should be much more than one point better than NSW, the only reason we were so close is the spirit that Stuart has created.
Tactically he leaves a bit to be desired. The lack of props, the one off hit ups or dummy half runs, the lack of halves running the game, the lack of width in attack, 45 backrowers in each team.
I like the idea of Stuart being kept in and around the origin squad – not sure what role with someone else coaching. Guys like Barrett and Dymock have played plenty of Origin and have seen what Stuart has created this year.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:35am
LK said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:35am | Report comment
OK, if the Blues do let him go, who replaces him? There aren’t too many obvious candidates. Most of the obvious choices are involved with NRL clubs eg Sheens and Hasler. The NSWRL has said they don’t want to go back to doing that. Plus, Bellamy got three years and he did a worse job with the Blues. Much worse.
July 10th 2012 @ 8:38am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:38am | Report comment
Passion, commitment, pride in the jersey…blah, blah, blah.
Seven straight series losses. That’s all that counts. I don’t really care whether the team loses by one point or twenty – at the end of the day, it’s still a loss. And there have been too many for too long. Stuart’s had long enough to turn it around, and for whatever reason he hasn’t been able to.
Time for a fresh approach I think.
July 10th 2012 @ 9:58am
Ryan O'Connell said | July 10th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
To be fair to Stuart, he was only the coach for two of those seven losses – it’s a bit harsh to saddle him with the previous 5 series losses before his reign.
If you’re saying Stuart has had long enough to turn it around, do you think two series is enough? (I’m honestly asking the question, I don’t know the answer.)
July 10th 2012 @ 2:00pm
Mango Jack said | July 10th 2012 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
Any assessment of Stuart’s performance has to take into account the improvement over the 2 years. We came sooo close to beating a team many consider to be the best ever. And we did that with an origin rookie 5/8 who will be better for the experience, and best-of-a-mediocre-bunch halfback. I think he deserves 1 more chance. He can’t improve without winning it, can he?
July 10th 2012 @ 8:42am
CrossIT said | July 10th 2012 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Get a player who can actually control the direction of the game, and you can safely say that one point would have been made up for. NSW were lost at sea for the majority of all three games, let’s be honest, get some structure and some direction and watch out.
July 10th 2012 @ 9:01am
Spiro Zavos said | July 10th 2012 @ 9:01am | Report comment
The power of the rugby league media shouldn’t be over-looked here. Ricky Stuart is the darling of The Sunday Telegraph, for whom he writes a column. It is understandable that the paper promotes one of its stars. But if say Brian Smith were coaching the NSW Blues and had made the same coaching and selection mistakes of Stuart, would The Sunday Telegraph be as understanding as it has been with Stuart?
The fact of the matter is that NSW has the preponderance of rugby league numbers in players to select from, rather like the Waratahs. Admittedly, this is a golden period of supreme talent in Queensland for Mal Meninga to select his Maroons team from.
But the inability of Stuart to create a halves combination that has class and a winning element represents a failure of selection and coaching (in the limited time a State of Origin coach has with his team.)
The notion of Stuart being involved for the next 10 years is simply job-creation for a mate by Phil Gould.
The Blues looked to me to be poorly coached and selected throughout this State of Origin series, and last year. In the final game they were beginning to bunch after about 20 minutes.
Where the Maroons had clear and simple tactics, like Cameron Smith kicking early and deep to start putting the Blues under pressure after the Maroons had weathered a series of attacks, the Blues just kicked and hoped most of the time.
July 10th 2012 @ 10:49am
ScottWoodward.me said | July 10th 2012 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Spiro
Thanks, its good to read that from someone in the media.
With your permission I will copy your bit into my story in the next column.
July 10th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Ryan O'Connell said | July 10th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
Yes Spiro, you’re quite correct. Never underestimate the power of the NSW media in influencing rugby league.
And Scott, I have my issues with Ricky Stuart, and they are well documented. I even hint at them above. However, I feel a third year isn’t totally unreasonable. Additionally, if the NSWRL hold firm on their belief that the Blues coach should be full time, that certainly narrows down the candidates.
July 13th 2012 @ 2:22pm
Charles said | July 13th 2012 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Let’s get real here and stop the pretence! If you analyse the overall performance of Ricky Stuart as NSW Coach in State of Origin you can honestly come to only one conclusion, he is not up to the task. NSW could have done a lot better, as we do have the players, we do have the passion. What has let us down is poor selection criteria with players selected that is not up to the task, players selected out of position, a poor game plan and simply poor coaching. After being forced to change his selections and mostly through injuries he has finally come up with a team that is closer to the mark to be competitive! However, he has failed to address the issues which are resulting to our losses with the biggest being Mitchell Pearce in the half back position. In other words Ricky Stuart has not done his job despite doing it full time. As I have stated time and time again in these forums you need experience and blend your youth in which QLD do so well. Mitchell Pearce needs more time and like everyone I am excited with players like Uate but they all need more time to learn their craft, especially their defence. The best thing NSW can do is have a expert selection panel of three and allow the coach to put forward the team he wants for approval. The best person for that role would be Andrew Johns who really knows the game inside out!