Here’s to the Swans winning the flag
Shane Mumford of the Swans in the ruck (Slattery Images)
Related coverage
It has been such an intriguing exercise so far trying to determine a favourite for this year’s flag. So intriguing, in fact, I hadn’t found the time to consider who it was I wanted to win it.
But yesterday, while the team sitting on the top of the ladder was being criticised for operating above its station, and a newspaper article bemoaned its cost-of-living salary cap concessions, I made a decision.
I want the Sydney Swans to win the Premiership.
If it can’t be the poor Western Bulldogs ,who I have a weakness for, then let it be the maligned and unfashionable Swans.
I didn’t see this first expansion team as a “foreign” enterprise. I watched on with interest throughout the slightly grotesque carnival of its early years with helicopter arrivals, poaching of star players, and the blond mulletted bogan in pink boots. Also, I didn’t feel threatened when it prospered, as it was a validation of the game in the non- AFL State.
It didn’t rely solely on Victorian recruits either. One of its most celebrated players, captain and Brownlow medallist Paul Kelly, was a New South Welshman. Also they were good enough to give away an even better one, to North Melbourne in 1987. Wayne Carey, the boy from Wagga Wagga, would go on to become probably the greatest footballer ever.
During those early hedonistic days it would have been hard to imagine the side becoming the dowdy consistent one of modern times.
To supporters of teams with stronger rosters, or flashier styles, the arrival of Paul Roos’ mob put a damper on things. Missing the finals just twice in the last decade they have stifled, smothered and flooded the life out of teams with better premiership credentials.
In their “dominant” period of 2005 and 2006 they won a grand final by a paltry four points and lost another by a mere behind.
The newspaper article I referred to talked of the Swans “splashing” money around thanks to the extra $800,000 they are granted to cover the higher cost-of-living expenses of Sydney.
The truth is many of the Swans players are rejects from other clubs, recruited to fill holes in the outfit but also providing the compelling spectacle of players out to prove a point.
Its reliance on the other States is still enormous with only 7 of its 39 listed players coming from NSW which means the vast majority of its young draftees will be without the comfort of family and friends when they embark on their arduous AFL journey.
The Melbourne clubs have a huge retention advantage simply by being located near the homes and families of most their players.
Much has been said about the Swans’ ultimate lack of class, and over reliance on Adam Goodes and the resurrection of Lewis Jetta.
But two important things have changed. Firstly, they’re on top of the ladder. Who saw that coming? They could only manage third in their premiership season. And secondly, they are currently the best team for forcing and punishing turnovers as well as being a more offensive team than in the past hence the whopping percentage of 146. In 2005 they finished with 116%.
In such a tightly contested season, I’m hoping the tough and dowdy Swans – now with a bit more pizazz – will be capable of stealing the show.
- Explore:
- AFL, Sydney Swans

July 12th 2012 @ 8:55am
Christo the Daddyo said | July 12th 2012 @ 8:55am | Report comment
The ‘resurrection’ of Lewis Jetta? Don’t you mean the rise? Resurrection implies he used to be a star, lost it and has now regained it. Incorrect.
Seriously though – you’d have to say that the Swans recruiters are the best in the league. The number of players that were average at other clubs that have been recruited by the Swans and turned into match winners is nothing short of astonishing.
And I tend to think the reliance on certain players (e.g. Goodes) is overstated. The team played well enough without him (and without Mumford – their primary ruckman) over the last few weeks when he’s been out injured to burst that myth. The Swans do seem to be an example of ‘the whole being greater than the sum of its parts’ theory.
I’m not sure they’ll win the comp, but they do seem to in with a realistic chance. This weekend’s game against the Eagles will be crucial.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:23am
Winston said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:23am | Report comment
Agree about the recruiters, but it’s also the coaching staff. I watch Ted Richards nowadays and try to remember just how poorly he played at the Bombers. It would have to be more than just “a change of scenery” that has sparked his improvement. He now must be in contention for all australian.
They did over-rely on goodes though. The games they lost in the middle period to Adelaide, Richmond and Saints are all because they were missing Goodes. I think it’s more that during that period the team learned how to cope with that and is now therefore a better team than they were at the start of the year. Now they know they don’t need goodes to win, and goodes can just go wherever he wants on the field. How good is that!
July 12th 2012 @ 1:21pm
Matt F said | July 12th 2012 @ 1:21pm | Report comment
The Essendon win, even though we almost blew it, was huge for the whole “win without Goodes” factor. Our other wins without him had been against Melbourne, the Roos (he was suspended after the Port game for a week) and the Dogs. None are heavyweight sides and all 3 were at the SCG. To go down to Melbourne and beat a good side like Essendon without Goodes, when many people tipped against us, would have given the players a massive confidence boost.
July 13th 2012 @ 2:38pm
Smokey said | July 13th 2012 @ 2:38pm | Report comment
Goodes played against Adelaide. Admittedly if he had not gone off early in the fourth quarter they probably would have won given they only lost by 5 points…
July 12th 2012 @ 9:30am
Pope Paul VII said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:30am | Report comment
North let WCE out of gaol, much more accomplished Sydney will put them back in the slammer. Sydney can certainly win the GF.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:34am
Hamish said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:34am | Report comment
There used to be a theory that an expansion club in your area meant the incumbent team usually picked up its game and had a good season. Certainly true in the 90s with basketball and the Crows/Power and maybe eagles/Freo and maybe the Titans in GC helped the Broncos but recent history for the Suns/Lions and Victory/Heart werent too flash. Interesting to see how the Sydney FC goes this year with the Wanderers..
July 12th 2012 @ 9:53am
Sean said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:53am | Report comment
I approve of this article.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:58am
Cameron said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:58am | Report comment
There may have been an exception in 2005, but to win the flag, the Swans need to play well at the MCG, where they have a poor record. This makes alot of punters wary about declaring them premiership favourites.
July 12th 2012 @ 10:15am
SafaRugby said | July 12th 2012 @ 10:15am | Report comment
Great article Andrew! I’m a Queenslander who supports North (and now GC as well) and am loving how truly national the sport is becoming! I also think the Swans deserve to be favourites as they’ve been the most consistent team all season. Wouldn’t mind seeing a Sydney v Eagles repeat final…
July 12th 2012 @ 10:21am
Pope Paul VII said | July 12th 2012 @ 10:21am | Report comment
By the same token Cam WCE were dead lucky in 2006. If the Swans hadn’t been so timid in the first half…..anyway. I don’t think the MCG hoodoo is a big deal. If they get there they will not got to water. As it is, I reckon Syd, Collies, Hawthorn, WCE are main players Still hoping for North but you know, reality and stuff.
July 12th 2012 @ 10:33am
swannies05 said | July 12th 2012 @ 10:33am | Report comment
Can’t wait to be called swannies0512 come October!! Go you good things.
July 12th 2012 @ 11:19am
clipper said | July 12th 2012 @ 11:19am | Report comment
It’s a pity the SCG will resemble a war zone for the next couple of years – it must be putting people off going to the matches. The game against Collingwood will be the real test as to how serious a contender they will be in September.
July 12th 2012 @ 11:21am
wisey_9 said | July 12th 2012 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Growing up in the early 90′s, I admit I jumped on the bandwagon and became a supporter of clubs that were doing well at the time. The Raiders in the NRL, and Leeds in English football. It has pretty much been a steady decline from both teams since then – so many false dawns, so much anguish.
That is why I am so proud of my beloved Swans. The only ‘local’ team that I support, they have surely been one of the most consistent AFL teams since the early 90′s. We haven’t bottomed out and spent a few years at the wrong end of the table collecting draft picks, and they are almost guaranteed to give a contest in every game. We have a bit a joke in my family that whenever the Swans get ahead by 30+ points, we think they deliberately allow the other team back into the game just to ensure a good spectacle.
And Christo is right – credit needs to go to the recruiters. After every single trade week, I feel like the Swans walk away with exactly what they were after…
Bring on September!