Tamsyn Manou dines out on past glories
By Jocelyn McLennan, 12 Jul 2012 Jocelyn McLennan is a Roar Pro
I feel I am about the only athlete in Australia not to have launched an appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport regarding my non Olympic selection.
Considering my current personal best for the 100 metre sprint could be timed with a sun dial and for anything longer using a calendar, I don’t really have an argument for my case.
However, it seems that qualifying standards are just a rough guide according to some competitors. Tamsyn Manou nee Lewis seems to dining out on past glories to gain a spot in the Olympic team.
Not having run a time under two minutes for two years, you would have to agree with the selectors. Yes, she is a former indoor world champion and yes she has won numerous national titles, but if you have little prospect than finishing way down the pack in the first round there hardly seems much point.
Considering the cost to Australian tax payers and the AOC to send the team to London, you would hope they are of some chance of at least making semi finals as it hardly seems worth it from a financial viability point of view even if it does mean that we do not have competitors in a lot of events.
Yes, Merlene Ottey did not qualify either for Slovenia, as she would struggle to make is past the first round, but she did not whinge to all and sundry about her past glories to gain selection to her eighth Olympics.
Manou’s attitude is starting to sound reminiscent of Pat Cash who, many years after his one grand slam win at Wimbledon, was still demanding wild cards to enter tournaments even though his form and ranking gave little assurance to tournament directors that he would make it past the first round. By gaining a wildcard he was guaranteeing himself a first round pay cheque and, most times, ranking points.
You could agree with Manou if she was coming back from injury and her times were on the way down to very close to the mark to be granted a waiver and be selected, but alas, they are not.
Considering the times that the top ranked runners like Pamela Jelimo are currently setting, Manou would be finishing a good fifty metres behind them. Ranked outside the top eighty in the world at the moment, with a time set in February, there seems little justification for her non-selection appeal apart from the national champion plea.
However, if all countries were to have a competitor just for that reason, then there could be in excess of 200 competitors for each event! Most runners would have to race up to ten times to make the final. By then they would be lucky to be standing let alone running.
I think common sense has prevailed in this case with Manou. Yes, I missed selection too, for the sheer utter reason that I am not good enough anymore.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Nadal, Serena affirm favouritism for French Open (15)
- Cheap Seats Podcast: episode two (14)
- Durant is a superhero, but not super enough (13)
- Can boxing great Pacquiao return to his former self? (12)
- Protecting sport or an infringement of human rights? (12)
- Will Mayweather vs Pacquiao happen? (11)
- French Open preview: Men’s draw most open in years. (10)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics, Athletics, Athletics Australia, Tamsyn Lewis

July 12th 2012 @ 8:33am
sledgeross said | July 12th 2012 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Here here!
July 12th 2012 @ 9:12am
Hansie said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Tamsyn loves publicity. She achieved nothing in her previous Olympic attempts – London 2012 would be no different.
July 12th 2012 @ 10:02am
Kev said | July 12th 2012 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Spot on. Fade quietly into retirement Tamsyn. Don’t blame the selectors for your failure to achieve the required qualifying time.
July 12th 2012 @ 10:45am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 12th 2012 @ 10:45am | Report comment
I thought I was being very harsh with this story but it seems people agree with me emphatically!
July 12th 2012 @ 2:13pm
Kev said | July 12th 2012 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
No you’re absolutely correct and sometimes the truth is harsh. The whining and squabbling from athletes of different events over qualification is becoming embarrassing.
July 14th 2012 @ 3:25pm
William Goat said | July 14th 2012 @ 3:25pm | Report comment
Given that Olympic participation is generally reliant on tax dollar based sponsorship please be as harsh as you feel comfortable. I for one couldn’t give a hoot about any of it, but if athletes are using my money to pay their elite way, then please feel free to actually be elite ! If not, then pay for it yourself & go for glory ! Just don’t use my money do so.
July 12th 2012 @ 11:54am
Grimmace said | July 12th 2012 @ 11:54am | Report comment
In what other sport’s environemnt is this tolerated? Is it that a lot of olympic sports are individual sports where a ‘me first’ attitude prevails?
July 12th 2012 @ 12:39pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 12th 2012 @ 12:39pm | Report comment
Yes Grimmace it has all got a bit out of hand with these Olympics….the US selection is harsh….finish top 3 in the trials and thats it..no ifs buts or can I qualify later with them.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:38pm
Cam Baker said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:38pm | Report comment
If this was the US she would actually be in the team because she won the trials and has a B qualifying time. And she won the World Indoor Championships with a time more than a second slower than what she has run this year.
What I really admire about Tamsyn is that she speaks up not just for herself but for all athletes who are on the verge of selection. If it wasn’t for people like Tamsyn speaking up then athletes such as Genevieve LaCaze (who everyone in Australia thinks should be on the team) would not be there.
Tamsyn has been a great advocate of Australian Athletics for many years and deserves our respect.
July 12th 2012 @ 2:07pm
Cameron said | July 12th 2012 @ 2:07pm | Report comment
If there is no other runner within cooee of her in this country, why not send her as our represntative in that event? We like to see Australian reps in events.
If athletes are missing out by just a whisker of an A qualifying time as Tamsyn did, why not send them because they run a B qualifying time as the IOC allow?
Young kids and aspiring athletes can be inspired to take the long years training to make the Olympics by watching our athletes that are given the chance to compete.
Besides, is there not a chance that an athlete closely outside an A qualifying time will be inspired to lift to greater heights if included in an Olympic team? Of coarse there is!
At the end of the day, Australia does not have alot of depth in athletics, and Athletics Australia cannot keep demanding all athletes achieve the A standard.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:06pm
Tamsyn Mcwhine said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:06pm | Report comment
There isn’t unlimited money, there needs to be some standards to being an Olympian – what magical world do you live in?
July 18th 2012 @ 2:11pm
The House said | July 18th 2012 @ 2:11pm | Report comment
You are showing your ignorance. There are standards. An A standard and a B standard. Tamsyn has achieved the B standard on more than one occasion this season and ran 2.00.78 last year, one of 6 times she broke 2.02. With no Aussie having achieved the A standard, Tamsyn has qualified uner the Olympic guidelines but apparently that’s not good enough for Athletics Australia.
July 12th 2012 @ 2:24pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 12th 2012 @ 2:24pm | Report comment
Thing is Cameron if she was close to the time it would make sense but I think her latest effort last week was like a 2:03 or something …so on that form she would really struggle not to finish last or near to it in her first heat!…not sure that young kids would get inspired by that at all. Yes I know we currently dont have anyone near her in the 800m at the moment but we also dont have any high jumpers of either gender, womens 4 x 100m and 4 x 400 metre relays…the list goes on….like I have said in the article…you have to have qualifying standards or just having national champions for each sport there would be that many competitors the Olympics would take 3 months to run!…she has not missed by a whisker she has missed by quite a bit!….
July 12th 2012 @ 9:58pm
Caroline said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:58pm | Report comment
The 2.03 you quote was racing the olympic champ. She did a fast first lap and blew up. This sometimes happens when you race. All oher races have been around the B qualifyer mark. . I am a masters athlete (41) who looks up to Tamsyn. I run a 3.11 800m and keep fit and healthy being a recreational athlete. I save the medicare system money as a result and value being able to watch my track idols on TV every 2 years. IAAF has increased the qualifying marks and this also reflects the drugs in sport issue. Athletics Australia have been widely critizised for their elitiest appoach in the last 4 years, in the past, B’s were selected if their wasn’t an A in an event. This new approach has seen the profile of Track and Field in Australia take a dive. Predictions are that there will be a personell overhaul at Athletics Australia following the la caze selection debarcle and general behaviour of some employees.
August 8th 2012 @ 11:22pm
Mike said | August 8th 2012 @ 11:22pm | Report comment
Just came across this foolish article when searching for something. What a fool the author is…Do some research!
‘if we just picked the national champion from each country, the Olympics wold take 3 months’. – thanks Einstein! That’s why the IOC and IAAF have qualifying standards. Manou, and many other Australians met those qualifying standards but were not selected because Athletics Australia chose to enforce a higher qualifying standard not required.
Funnily enough, having just watched the heats of the women’s 800m, not one woman in the entire field of heats managed the A qualifying standard set by Athletics Australia! Manou would have been Top 10 if she matched her best time this season and 2:07 was winning a heat….
July 12th 2012 @ 3:45pm
Kev said | July 12th 2012 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
If you thought AA’s qualifying standards were harsh spare a thought for the American track and field team who have qualifying events on one day and if you have a bad day you don’t make it. Doesn’t matter if you were the defending Olympic champion or you had dominated your event for the past year or two, if you don’t perform on that occasion then you miss out.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:03pm
Matt J said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:03pm | Report comment
What a great article. Tamsyn calls everyone else self-centred and tries to portray herself as standing up for herself, but she’s whining and trying to change the rules to suit herself.
July 12th 2012 @ 9:14pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 12th 2012 @ 9:14pm | Report comment
thank you Matt J…and yes Kev that is right with the US as I said to Cameron…you get one chance and that is it…
July 18th 2012 @ 2:18pm
The House said | July 18th 2012 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Yes, the US system is harsh but as Cam Baker said (and you don’t seem to realise because you keep referring to the US system), if Australia had adopted the same qualification rules as the US, Tamsyn would be in the team and off to London. Athletics Australia should be taking the maximum number of athletes eligible under the Olympic rules, as are the Australian teams for almost all other Olympic sports.