John Steffensen has a point
By Jocelyn McLennan, 15 Jul 2012 Jocelyn McLennan is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- 2012 London Olympics, Athletics
I want to declare upfront that I am a personal friend and supporter of John Steffensen, but that does not change the facts of this story.
Steffensen, along with his fellow 400 metre runners, Ben Offereins, Joel Milburn and Steven Solomon had not run A qualifying times, so Australia was not going to have a runner in the individual race at the London Olympics.
However, yesterday, on the back of a good time at the World Junior Championships, Solomon may be given the one discretionary individual berth.
As you can appreciate, Steffensen is outraged and has spoken out that is not only unfair to him but also team mates Offereins and Milburn. Steffenson is so outraged he has threatened to pull out of the relay team.
He has a point. A big point. The whole qualification and selection process for these Olympics has been inconsistent at best if not downright confusing. How can a discretionary selection be made fairly without it smacking of favouritism or bias?
If Australia did its selection like the USA, then Steffensen would be the individual runner going to London as he won the “selection trials” earlier in March beating Solomon.
I know some of Steffensen’s detractors will voice that he is not selected because of his outspokenness and flamboyance, but I don’t believe the Olympics are a popularity contest. Should you be punished for speaking out against bias?
Remember how “tut tut” the 1968 “black power” salute on the dais by the two American sprinters was viewed at the time? Yet today, we admire those people who spoke out against injustice.
Only three days ago I wrote a stinging article about Tamsyn Manou’s reaction to not being selected after being the national champion and only running B qualifiers. But now, after this back flip from the Athletics Australia, she too, has a point. As does the equestrian Sonja Johnson and all others who have narrowly missed selection.
John knew that his chances of securing an individual start in the London games was slim at best after tearing his left hamstring 20 metres from the finish of the Stawell Gift in April. Some lengthy and intense rehabilitation tested his own self belief at one stage of being ready for London.
“I am fighter and I will get through it,” he told me back in April.
Against the odds Steffensen returned to competition in late May in The Netherlands but again missed the A qualifier. The great irony of that race was that he was beaten by another controversial athlete, South African Oscar Pistorius.
He too, did not satisfy the 45.30 set by his national selectors, however, has been given an individual berth in London in what could be accused of being nothing more than a public relations exercise by his national federation.
Accepting that he would not compete as an individual this time around, Steffensen, along with his team mates, continued training hard while nervously waiting until the IAAF announced the relay rankings two weeks ago to find out if they would get to compete for their county. The teamed scraped in in 13th place out of the 16 permitted a start.
Now all of that has been thrown in to disarray. I just hope John listens to my advice as a friend and lets his running spikes do the talking and competes, as the really team could buck the odds, as they have done in the past, and snatch a medal.
I just hope the AOC over rides Athetics Australia, and comes to their senses on this one and not give Solomon the individual berth.
Otherwise, they may not only lose their credibility, but set a dangerous precedent from which they may never recover.
The Crowd Says (51) | Page 1 of Comments
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Cheap Seats Podcast: Episode 7 (24)
- Bases loaded, but Australian baseball strikes out (24)
- Will Tebow lead the Patriots to the promised land? (16)
- Could Vergne replace Webber? (14)
- 2014 MLB season set to launch in Sydney (13)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (12)
- Justin Gatlin and the question that remains (10)
- Suzuki to return for 2015 MotoGP season (0)
- Wimbledon 2013: Women’s Singles preview (0)
- New owners for Lotus (0)
- MotoGP’s three amigos sweep the podium in Catalunya (7)
- US Open: English Rose denies Jason Day his maiden major (1)
- Wimbledon 2013: Men’s Singles preview (13)
- King James must dominate for Miami (4)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- 2012 London Olympics, Athletics

July 15th 2012 @ 7:34am
Ziggy said | July 15th 2012 @ 7:34am | Report comment
While I agree with your sentiments, your comment on the ‘blade runner ‘is nasty and uncalled for. South Africa is entitled to their own selection policy and it has no relevance here. Do you want the selection policy to be determine from a world trial system i.e. world championships?
July 15th 2012 @ 12:06pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 12:06pm | Report comment
then why did South African athletics selecting him after he did not make the qualifying time. And by the way I have heard the line about it being a public relations exercise from other writers so not my line. I just want the whole selection criteria to be consistant. There seems to be a rule for the rich and one for the poor. Some people near enough is good enough and for others…well. Remember Jon had not said a thing up until now as he and his team mates had accepted that they had not qualfied as individuals. They all got on quietly with their training for the relay. This has just made a mockery of the whole selection process. If they let Steve run they should also let Tamsyn run and Sonja in the equestrian and perhaps Ian Thorpe as well. Get my point?
July 15th 2012 @ 5:55pm
Brian Roe said | July 15th 2012 @ 5:55pm | Report comment
Fact correction – Oscar Pistorius achieved the A IAAF entry standard earier this year.
July 16th 2012 @ 9:39am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:39am | Report comment
Yes once Brian in March in Pretoria but not twice as South African athletics had originally required. Read my earlier stories on Pistorius
July 15th 2012 @ 7:42am
Rabbitz said | July 15th 2012 @ 7:42am | Report comment
While I agree about selection processes being a collective but unsurprising schmozzle (I mean what do you expect from the administrators of minor sports when those who run the ‘big ticket sports’ are as bad as they are in the wide brown land).
However I do have to say that Steffensen lost me when he started banging on about “deserving respect”. Frankly he has missed the point about respect – you earn it, it is not given and if you think you ‘deserve’ it then you clearly don’t.
Being flamboyant and outspoken is all well and good but as a competitor in a minor sport you really risk losing any credibility that you may have gained through your sporting achievements.
Finally, who is his management / PR team? His rant on TV sounded like he was parroting Anthony Mundine, Surely his PR people must see that trying to emulate Mundine will lose more support that it garners…
July 15th 2012 @ 8:49am
Seiran said | July 15th 2012 @ 8:49am | Report comment
From what I’ve seen in the media, his outburst was about himself and not about fairness for his other team mates as this article points out; perhaps the media has misrepresented his views?
And no mention of him pulling the race card in this article? I guess the PR team are trying to salvage something.
July 15th 2012 @ 11:38am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 11:38am | Report comment
Seiran.There is a lot more going on behind the scenes that Jon never mentions. Yes in the “uncut” verson of the Channel Nine interview Jon’s support for his team mates was the first thing he said.Funny how it was edited out to make the interview appear self centred. One of the first people to contact and give him his support was Kyle Van der Kype. Wonder why?
July 15th 2012 @ 9:21am
Steggz said | July 15th 2012 @ 9:21am | Report comment
On these grounds, he may have a point (and it’s a big may). But when he started throwing around claims of racial discrimination, he lost any support I may have given him. The guy is verging on being Australian athletics’ answer to Mundine, and no one wants to see that happen.
July 15th 2012 @ 10:08am
Glen said | July 15th 2012 @ 10:08am | Report comment
I have the utmost respect for people like Jon and Anthony Mundine who have decided to make a difference to this incredibly racist country. All power to them!
As a black South African, I am amazed at the level of denial that exists in this country about what actually goes on here.
Truth is Australia has never gotten over its racist history where a non Anglo could not even get in because of the shameful white Australia policy.It is time to face the shame of racism in this country!
The racism permeates every aspect of life here……sport, politics, commerce and social. Even the police force is riddled with rednecks.
South Africa is so far ahead in facing its racist past and moving to a rainbow society that embraces all. Australia still proclaims its self a multicultural society and yet it is one of the most racially segregated countries in the world today.
July 15th 2012 @ 12:12pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Thank you Glen. my point exactly and from your point of view garners more credibility than I can make. You have said everything that I am delicately alluding to here. I think Jon will be very grateful of you speaking out.
July 15th 2012 @ 3:55pm
Seiran said | July 15th 2012 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Would you care to give specific examples of denial, political, and commercial racism, as well as racial segregation Glen?
Or are you just happy to make baseless accusations?
Would you care to explain why in your ‘so far ahead’ South Africa that the majority of white South Africans are still living in prosperity whilst the majority of black South Africans are still living in poverty stricken townships?
So far ahead indeed. I would say SA is getting better but in no way are they ‘so far ahead’.
July 15th 2012 @ 6:34pm
Glen said | July 15th 2012 @ 6:34pm | Report comment
The fact that I, as an international black man, have still to prove to you that racism is rife in this country is testament to your deep ignorance and the very denial that I have spoken about!
Denial. and politics..it took 200 years for this government to admit the atrocities commited against the Aborigies and apologise for raping them in every possible way.Just a few weeks ago I yet again viewed another Aboriginal being treated like a sub human being dragged to a cell and have the hell beaten out of him by the redneck police.
Commercial…As a Consultant working in different companies, I have seen how companies and the recruitment agencies serving them exclude ethnic people from selection just based on their surname.
Socially……I have been sworn a nigger from drunken, dumb white boys in cars and even sworn a black kunt from two apartment blocks in Sydney. Needless to say, I responded more than adequately to these low lifes.
SA is WAY ahead……….Given apartheid and its long term economic benefits for whites, we understand that it will take time for fair economic redistribution , but we know that the past in SA is still being confronted and that at least the work has started . In Australia, I am still having to illustrate to uninformed people like you that racism even exists………thats the denial and deep ignorance I was referring to.and have much more important things to do then to be educating people like you!
As for a racially segregated country, Australia is nothing more today than a federation of “national pockets’……every ethnic group sticking to themselves and white Australians making no effort to bridge the wide chasm between races .
As an avid traveller, I also have realised that Australia is well known as a very racist country by so many international people, including black South Africans! This is because Australia’s terrible history precedes it.
.
July 15th 2012 @ 8:57pm
Seiran said | July 15th 2012 @ 8:57pm | Report comment
I love how you yet again make blindingly baseless assumptions and generalisations. You have no idea about my own colour, heritage or even if I am Australian. But you seem fit to get on your high horse and lecture me????
Firstly, I’m sorry you have experienced racism in Australia; that doesn’t mean you should go and make generalisations about all Australians, including police, as racists and rednecks. It only demeans your argument.
Secondly, I am far from uninformed. As someone who has lived abroad for nearly half my life including your beloved South Africa, I have experienced racism and discrimination first hand. I just don’t make generalisations about a whole nation or occupation based on the few incidents I have experienced.
I only hope one day you open your eyes and realise that most of the people in this country are not racist, or fit any of the stereotypes you have decided we all fit into. My wife of Native Indian decent would likely agree.
July 15th 2012 @ 10:08am
Australian Rules said | July 15th 2012 @ 10:08am | Report comment
Jocelyn, I think most people would agree that AA have looked bad in the lead up to this Olympics. But this article gets it way wrong on a few fronts:
1) The selection trials were in March (an error) and since then we’ve seen young athletes improve on their times. Steff has not.
2) His rant was me me me…not some wider argument on behalf of the team (he threatened to boycott his team FFS).
3) Making a parallel between the black power human rights issue of 1968 and the cocky rantings of a spoilt brash Steffenson, is frankly bizarre.
4) Do we care about the selection policies of AA? Yes, they need to improve. Should youth be favoured over tired B-grade talent? Always.
July 15th 2012 @ 11:56am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 11:56am | Report comment
Australian Rules what I love about this blog is that everyone is entitled to their opinion.Why I have written it is because I want to give the other side of the story. Before I wrote it I spent half an hour on the phone with Jon in Paris to get his side. First thing Jon mentioned on the tv interview was in support of team mates Ben and Joel. Funny how the producer cut that from what went to air to make it look like a selfish rant. Plus there is a lot more said behind the scenes to Jon that he never wants printed. Read between the lines here to why I stuck my neck out with my 1968 comment!. And yes since March his times has slowed, Yours would have too if you tore your hamstring 20 metres from winning the Stawell Gift!. He is lucky to be running at all at this time. I think everyone has to remove the person from this arguemant and look at the point he is making!. Dont worry I dont ever agree with everything Jon says and does but I can understand why he does it.
July 16th 2012 @ 12:44pm
Cam said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:44pm | Report comment
Hi Jocelyn,
I don’t think John was going to win the final despite a great semi –
I understand your articles views and think the selection in place is black and white, but the communication towards athletes and coaches needs improving.. I am sure AA are endeavouring to do their best, but our best is never enough with so many people to please.
An athletes association would be beneficial sure, as the Rio criteria that places Steffensen as the second option in this instance due to Solomons potential would be further understood. This is an individual sport and perhaps some case studies to sports who also have trials so far away from an Olympics event would be good.
The American trials simply occur at a better part of the year for Olympic selection – Ours in March is not great timing, but a follow on from our domestic season and will always create a stir and unfortunately.
We will probably all be laughing when young Solomon breaks the National record in the future but in the meantime communication between AA and AOC is obviously the main issue here and John, Tamsyn, Lachlan etc all need the respect they deserve.
Thanks for your passion and lets hope John can get back to his 06 form before he hangs up the spikes as he deserves that much.
July 15th 2012 @ 11:12am
Betty B said | July 15th 2012 @ 11:12am | Report comment
John is well known for his outspokeness, so his point will be missed by the vast majority of fans.
Solomon has the potential, on age difference alone, and has more to gain (& return) from an individual run.
Personally, I have long waited for the day John retires – he’s not world class (despite what he thinks) and I’m not sure that he gives much back to the team or the younger runners like Solomon. But I’m not really in a position to judge these matters,
July 15th 2012 @ 11:43am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 11:43am | Report comment
Jon was running faster times at Solomon age. Also Jon is a big supporter of Solomon and thinks he can go a long way. He just thinks it is unfair to put him in in instead of Ben and Joel and himself. And no Jon has not returned to the form he had 6 years ago in the Commonwealth Games but he has suffered a series of crushing injuries that many others would have thrown in the towel over. Yes Jon is outspoken for a good reason. I have had enough trouble being taken seriously in this world because I am short, blonde and female and did not play AFL. Heaven to betsy what it would be like if I was not caucasion. one thing people dont see of Jon is how supportive he is of his younger team mates and young people in general.After the national championships two years ago he spent about half an hour talking with a young boy behind the stadium after he had asked for his autograph. The same boy ask another VERY prominant Aust athlete and he walked straight past the boy without even acknowledging him.
July 15th 2012 @ 12:14pm
William Goat said | July 15th 2012 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
The whole Olympic event is built on corruption & fraud, why did anyone think it was ever going to be transparent or fair ?
July 15th 2012 @ 12:49pm
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 15th 2012 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
Touche William. The Lords of the Rings! I rest my case
July 15th 2012 @ 12:56pm
Eric George said | July 15th 2012 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
Jocelyn, you have stated quite a few times now that John has been misrepresented by the media and unfairly painted as selfish in his claims. But the whole crux of your piece stems from your original statement that John should have been selected instead of Solomon!
July 16th 2012 @ 9:35am
Jocelyn McLennan said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:35am | Report comment
No my point is Eric…if the AA had stuck to its own rules no-one should be selected.
July 15th 2012 @ 1:03pm
oldhacker said | July 15th 2012 @ 1:03pm | Report comment
Steffenson’s tongue has a tendency to kick in before his brain but in this case he’s mostly right. Racism? Sure it exists in Australia and Steffenson has probably encountered it personally which influences his perspective on things. This time, though, it seems more a case of AA payback for all the other times that Steffenson’s tongue has flayed them. I used to be in athletics administration and, oh yes, this sort of thing occurs all the time (as it doubtless does in other sports). Steffenson won the nationals this year, repeat, won the nationals this year and has a proven ability to rise to a big event (Melbourne 06). If anyone was going to get an individual gig, it should have been him. Until leaned on by the AOC, AA was utterly intransigent with steeplechaser LaCaze. Now, suddenly, a B qualifier is fine even if you didn’t win the nationals in an Olympic year. Good luck to Solomon, he is the future, but AA is applying different standards to different people. This is usually called favouritism.