Melbourne Heart transfer policy: The Ajax System required
By Stefanov, 16 Jul 2012 Stefanov is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- A-League, Ajax Amsterdam, football, melbourne heart
Related coverage
In recent weeks, Melbourne Heart have commissioned the rapid fire sales of some of their finest young players; fuelling the ever growing movements of our most exciting prospects to foreign shores.
Promising young striker Eli Babalj decided to give another season of A-League football a miss and sealed a move to the club he supported as a boy, Serbian powerhouse Red Star Belgrade.
This was speedily followed with key defender Curtis Good all but putting pen to paper to seal a move to English Premier League powerhouse Newcastle United.
Not to end there, in the last week it has been reported that his defensive partner Brendan Hamill is set to sign for Korean club and 2010 AFC Champions League winner Seongnam Ilhwa.
Now, selling off of our best young talent isn’t necessarily a negative. These promising players have all attracted reported transfer fees in excess of $A500,000 each, proving that there is plenty of money to be gained from player sales, through successful youth development.
In fact this is a part of global football, and some of Europe’s biggest clubs are fiscal powerhouses due to their youth development and resulting transfers.
The argument that these young stars can be retained is futile, as football is a global game and players will fall victim to a global market. Unfortunately for a developing league there is always going to be more money elsewhere. The key behind players leaving, is the fact that they do want to leave, getting in their way is going to help no-one.
Players will always want to seek greener pastures, embracing this player market is a critical element in the business world. Dutch powerhouse AFC Ajax has been generating profits for decades due to their shrewd business operations.
They thrive off youth development; their globally spread academies are some of the best in the world and have produced local stars such as Van Der Vaart, Sneijder, Babel and even foreign stars such as South African Steven Pienaar.
In the six years up to 2008, the club generated a net surplus of €76 million in the transfer market. This is enough to keep a club sustainable for years, allowing the club to improve facilities, staff, and academies and eventually leading to domestic and global dominance on and off the pitch. Their profitable operations have allowed for bigger spending in the transfer market, while yet to pay off, the money is readily available.
It is where this money is going to be spent that is the big sticking point for Melbourne Heart supporters and fans. This extra income is a huge blessing for a club trying to gain market share in a tight sporting market, this money needs to be treated accordingly. Sadly without much debate we can accept that this latest influx of funding will go straight to paying off debts and covering lacklustre gate receipts.
This is unfortunately a very reactive use of this money. As a passionate fan, I am in my right to demand something that will excite me, something that will keep me attending our home fixtures. At the end of 2004, Portuguese club F.C. Porto, another transfer dependant club, sold star playmaker Deco to Barcelona for over €21 million. While tragic, they managed to bring in exciting winger Ricardo Quaresma, proving transfers can work both ways. Fans don’t want just profits, they want to be pleased.
The proactive approach for the Melbourne Heart board would be setting their sights on attracting a genuine world class marquee player to our club. The FFA implemented the dual marquee player system for a reason; they went by the expectation that this rule would be embraced by clubs that could afford it. We can afford it.
While some fans will promote the ultra-conservative use of saving money, the majority of fans would without question want to see a big fish landing on our shores. Marquee players, big names, world-class players bring in the crowds. The signing of Harry Kewell last year for Melbourne Victory was monumental off the pitch.
He brought back much needed media attention, crowds and that glamour back to the game. Dwight Yorke and Robbie Fowler are just some names to prove that big name marquee players work.
We have an opportunity to reclaim some of the spotlight from our bigger brother in the Melbourne Victory. The Harry Kewell departure has paved the way for our club to lure those fickle casual fans who remain on the sidelines. Luring a big name that would rival Harry Kewell would raise eyebrows and deliver a much needed PR blow to our rival, the Melbourne Victory.
While Marcos Flores may be a decent replacement, he lacks the star power of Kewell. We can sign someone with star power that would regenerate the low crowds, poor gate receipts and the lack of media attention we are currently experiencing.
The MLS in America believes in selling the youth to bring in the stars. While no longer in their peak, names such as Beckham, Henry and Juan Pablo Angel bring in the crowds, while still putting up solid performances on and off the pitch.
Mark “Marco” Bresciano, is the most obvious name that comes to mind. A favourite son returning would definitely rival that hype generated with Harry Kewell, it would perhaps even surpass it. Melbourne Heart should capitalise on his reported unhappiness in the Middle East and bring him home with this newly acquired transfer war chest.
I can only picture Marco on a lazy Sunday morning sipping on a freshly brewed coffee at his beloved Lygon Street.
Other big names such as Fabio Grosso, Pippo Inzaghi and even Michael Owen have all been linked to the A-League in recent weeks, in fact French superstar Robert Pires is offering himself up to clubs. It would be a pleasant surprise if one or more lined up for the red and white in season eight.
So while it is good to sell our young players for the right price, let’s make sure that the money is spent well, spent on pleasing the most valuable commodity to a football club, the fans. Melbourne Heart it is time we are no longer the timid younger brother in this town, it is time we started taking the limelight.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- South Melbourne saga shows the divisions in our football family (170)
- NSL lessons vital for A-League’s future (103)
- A-League expansion possibilities (102)
- Maybe not South Melbourne FC, but South Melbourne United FC? (98)
- The FA Cup final lost its lustre long ago (92)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (84)
- Don’t be fooled: FFA Cup is too big a risk (78)
- Who would be a football manager? (2)
- Bundesliga: can Freiburg ‘do a Gladbach’? (0)
- R.I.P Sir Alex (0)
- Can the Victory reach 50,000 and beyond? (77)
- EPL lacking drama for end of season finale (10)
- Central Coast Mariners vs Guangzhou Evergrande: ACL live scores, blog (90)
- English football has drama Aussie sport can’t replicate (86)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- A-League, Ajax Amsterdam, football, melbourne heart

July 16th 2012 @ 8:21am
Stevo said | July 16th 2012 @ 8:21am | Report comment
This piece is a welcome change from the recent tripe from Lord. Yes I want a star like the next bloke but as far as youth is concerned Heart is doing pretty well compared to our neighbours. If we spend on a marquee I’d rather a local boy that has connection to the country/state rather than a blowin like Owen on mega bucks. I think our football crowds are a bit more sophisticated that over in the US. Be patient and grow sustainably and not get caught in Clive Palmer hype and then crash and burn. We’ll still beat MV in the derbies no doubt.
July 16th 2012 @ 9:43am
midfield general said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Agreed, I’m all for bringing Bresch back not any of the other above mentioned. Sustainable growth is fine too but how long can they last getting 5-6000 at the AMMI?
July 16th 2012 @ 12:32pm
Kasey said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
Considering we are only about to see MHT for their third season and their home crowds are trending upwards every year since they debuted in 2010-11 (and yes I know they get the ‘bonus’ of 2 home derbies. So what? The AFL blatantly manipulate their draw for their own purposes, Melbournians should be used to it by now! ) I don’t know what more you expect. Melbourne is a big sports city, more than enough room for a massive football team, and a niche team, ala Liverpool/Barca and Everton/Espanyol. I really enjoyed reading this article, but of course somebody had to drag it down to lowest common denominators comments on crowds, I guess that’s the inclusive nature of football fans at work, giving football illiterates something to comment on;)
July 16th 2012 @ 5:54pm
Evan Askew said | July 16th 2012 @ 5:54pm | Report comment
Yet despite the negativity on Hearts crowds, the likes of South Melbourne and Melbourne Knights would have given their left nut to be getting that every week. For Brunswick Jueventus and Sunshine George Cross it would be totally inconvievable.
July 16th 2012 @ 9:00pm
jbinnie said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:00pm | Report comment
kasey – don’t like the way you dismiss the 2 home derby gates that Hearts enjoy with a “So what?” and then go on to try and justify the matter by saying the AFL do the same thing all the time. What has the AFL got to do with a system,now apparently coming into it’s third year of operation, that apparently is blatently taking huge amounts of money away from the coffers of Melbourne Victory (unless of course there is an “under the counter” deal on the income from the third “derby”.????.)
Heart’s “true” increase in their average crowd figure last year was around 800 and this was for an attraction,the team’s play, that was probably better than their city neighbours, who were not having their best season.The interesting thing coming up this season is what will happen in Melbourne crowd distribution if the “Ange factor” and even the “Flores factor ” result in an improved Victory performance.The Heart officials must be sweating on that outcome for lets be frank and honest that 800 “gain” could disappear like snow in sunshine if Victory start to put it all together ,for their crowd figures last. season were actually in free fall for most of the season. Even though they showed an average increase over the season their actual average number fell consecutively over 13 weeks from 40,000 to finish at 19000.
The “help” the FFA may be giving Heart is not actually helping at all for it is creating a false figure in their income columns,their officials would be better employed in getting that “real” average up from their 6000 nearer to the 10,000 we were told 2 years ago that an HAL club needed just to “break even”, or could that be a reason for the “fire sale” referred to in this article.Hopefully they will succeed.
By the way, hope you are well jb
July 17th 2012 @ 12:40pm
Kasey said | July 17th 2012 @ 12:40pm | Report comment
I fail to see what your problem is jb.
We both want the league to survive and thrive. At the moment that means 10 strong and viable teams. In business, the start up phase is invariably the hardest. If that means that the FFA give MHT a bit of a boost by scheduling 2 home derbies, than surely that’s better than splashing actual hard cash in bailing them out? The reason I bring the AFL up is because they have horribly compromised the fairness of their competition draw to maximize crowds and TV ratings. Givem the eveess between the 2 Melbourne teams and the fact they both use AAMI Pk as a home venue during various times of the season two home derbies doesn’t appear to me to hopelessly compromise the fairness of the A-League competition. As for the fans, MHT like to promote the fact that they play ALL of their games at AAMI so by virtue of having a cross town rival, MVC fans get the same 14 home games as the rest of us and they also get a bonus 2 quasi-home games at one of the best stadiums in Australia simply a different train station rather than a plane flight away for the rest of us wishing to go to an away game. Even you admit that the Heart is growning, even if it is slowly at the moment….If this little sleight of hand ensures that the Heart has time to build a solid support base then I don’t have a problem with it.
July 17th 2012 @ 3:10pm
Kasey said | July 17th 2012 @ 3:10pm | Report comment
Either way we are discussing a moot point, this season(#8): 2012-13, the three Melbourne derbies are split as follows:
#7, Victory Home game,
#8 Heart Home game and the final regular season derby, derby
#9, Victory Home game It is obvious that the MHT average home crowd will take a hit based on this but seeing as the Melbourne derby averages 25k at AAMI Pk and 36k at etihad, the boost to the league numbers should be noticeable. Also noticeable should be the reduction in whigning from MVC fans who never seemed to care that AUFC fans had to travel to Melbourne for two away games against our biggest rivals for 3 of the last 4 seasons…thankfully this is yet another thing the FFA have corrected for this season’s fixture:) .
July 17th 2012 @ 9:31pm
jbinnie said | July 17th 2012 @ 9:31pm | Report comment
Kasey- I don’t have a problem with any action the FFA may take in “easing the burden” on Heart, however if we take it that everything is “above” board and use a simple average $30 entry fee ,the last 2 seasons could have seen Melbourne Victory lose out on at least $500,000 (maybe more)in gate income not to mention any deals they may have with the food and drink people at the stadium.
Now if I were a NQ Fury fan, or for that matter a CCM fan, I could ask why were their clubs not given a $500,000 “helping hand” when needed. Get my point
Another way of calculating the “loss” to Victory is that the four Heart “home derbies” so far has drawn a total of nearly 102,000 .Now when you consider that Heart’s “real” average gate at all other games last year was 6000 it could be said that 78,000 of those attending these derbies were Victory fans spending gate money ($30) in the region of $2,300,000 to watch their team play. Did Victory get any of that money? I don’t suppose we’ll ever know but you won’t change my mind that it is a very dangerous precedent to set.
Now a simple solution would be to award two home derby games to Victory on each alternate year. No??????.Cheers jb
July 17th 2012 @ 10:39pm
Stevo said | July 17th 2012 @ 10:39pm | Report comment
Thanks for the maths jbinnie but you have conveniently forgotten to mention that MV received a 5 year period free of competition to develop a presence in the Melbourne market. Surely that’s worth some compensation to a start-up club – isn’t it? Let me put it another way, if the FFA had setup two teams in Melbourne from day dot, I reckon there would be a very good chance that the membership now would split 50/50 or say 60/40 – about equal numbers for both. Then you can have your rotating two home derbys every second year without argument.
July 16th 2012 @ 8:40am
Futbanous said | July 16th 2012 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Good to see a story under the “Football” heading that isn’t worded to attract the lowest common denominator & understands football,isn’t that what the recent football media journalist conference was about,football journalists understanding football culture?
Agree the old saying you have to “speculate to accumulate” is very true. A marquee is speculation, but if the right one & handled correctly can be a long term winner,particularly in not only putting the Euro followers bums on seats,but getting your club recognised. Read Shanghai Shenhua & Drogba. Their is a proviso though moolah,more below.
Also agree that our A-League clubs have to emulate the best development systems of Ajax &Fc Porto also.
Also need to increasingly look towards Japan to see what their doing,with Japanese stars going to “Big” European clubs & not sitting on the bench like ours often do e.g. Shinji Kagawa. Interesting article here about Kagawa transferred to ManU from the Bundesliga & the increasing number of Japanese players in the Bundesliga & why.
As we have just been thrashed 5-0 by the Japanese U22 team, what their doing in Japan is worh a look don’t you think? Rado from my team the Roar has already been at FC Tokyo to learn why they were superior to the Roar in the ACL competition.
http://goal.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/15/j-league-to-bundesliga-and-beyond/
Sure as Stefanov says that money could go towards paying off debt,but speculation on a marquee would be my preferred option. However is A muted 1.5 million for 3 players enough to finance a decent one considering what the opposition worldwide is offering i.e. Shanghai/Drogba.
Are we running before we can walk?
If we can produce players in the A-League that command massive transfer fees,example being Sao Paulos Lucas Moura or even a quarter of the muted 20 million pound bid by ManU then maybe a club could afford an International star like Drogba.
What do others think speculate to accumulate with limited cash or travel down the conservative path until our clubs are more established & producing “in demand” players like Japan on the world stage.
Their is one other thought on this speculate to accumulate angle.
Whoever gets the rights to football in the next TV deal could gamble on providing extra cash for marquees across the A-League. Would require at least 20 million extra per year ,but IMO would drive up subscriptions & therefore viewing audience for whoever takes the gamble.
July 16th 2012 @ 8:45am
Futbanous said | July 16th 2012 @ 8:45am | Report comment
On Lucas Moura just can’t mention his name without sharing his ET skills. No sound unfortunately but enjoy.
July 16th 2012 @ 9:21am
Fussball ist unser leben said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Thanks for contributing a real football discussion article, Stefanov – you put many of The Roar’s alleged sporting “experts” to shame with your ability to delve into a football issue.
I think it’s fantastic that HAL clubs have discovered this wonderful revenue source from developing young players & then selling them for profit. It not only provides the obvious financial benefits for the club, but also stimulates “player churn” so that more and more young Aussie footballers get a chance to undertake the journey to become professional footballers.
After only 7 years of HAL, it’s obvious that the 2 most technical leagues in Asia – the J-League & K-league – are well acquainted with the HAL & the quality of footballer we are producing.
In relation to signing “big name players”, I would urge caution. If clubs can forecast a positive return on the investment, they should go for it. But, my “back of the envelope” calculations suggest that any player, who costs more than $3m p.a., is unlikely to yield a net profit for any HAL club.
July 16th 2012 @ 12:12pm
Nobby Stiles said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
The J League and the K league are a step up from the HAL according to Aussie players who have moved to these leagues.
It would be nice to see them recruiting our midfielders as well as CBs.
July 16th 2012 @ 12:58pm
Fussball ist unser leben said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Nobby Stiles
Yes, you make a fair point re:AUS football exports to J & K leauges.
But, HAL only 7 years old and already we’ve exported Kruse, Rukavytsya, Leckie, Amini, who are all midfielders & strikers & all developed in the HAL, to the Bundesliga, which is the league I consider to have the best depth of all the World’s football leagues: technically, tactically & physically.
Two other players – again, none are CBs, Tommy Oar, Adam Sarota & Michael Zullo to the Eredivisie, which is another league renowned for its highly technical football.
At last count (May 2012) there were 198 Aussies with professional football contracts overseas and whilst the majority were NOT developed in the HAL, they still all learnt their basic technical skills as kids in Australia.
The breakdown – by position – reveals the majority of AUS players with o/s club contracts are Midfielders then Strikers
GK: 13%, Defenders: 24%, Midfielders: 38%, Strikers: 25%
Source: http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/Abroad/2012-05.html
July 16th 2012 @ 9:49pm
Nobby Stiles said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:49pm | Report comment
Fuss, I was essentially speaking about the K League. Apparently, Aussie CBs have been targeted.
Also, a number of players, like Kennedy and Bosnar, have lauded the quality of midfields in Japan.
Fair comment about midfielders going to the Bundesliga 1 and 2. However, not many of them are established first eleven players yet.
Interesting stats about the composition of overseas players according to position.
July 16th 2012 @ 9:59am
nordster said | July 16th 2012 @ 9:59am | Report comment
Yes well said …australia’s natural advantage in the football world is its raw playing stocks. We are only just starting to begin to realise some of the potential! Many countries dont have this, especially the west asian leagues. So its natural the a-league assumes this role, and uses the proceeds to build further in youth, financial sustainability and funding exciting imports to draw punters. Not wanting to get carried away with the real figures the clubs draw in as its not massive, but it contributes and can grow. (Wait for the first one to really crack the big time!) And also rewards a development ethos.
If any illiterate out there wants to suggest being a ‘development’ league is an insult, point them to this article.
And its just the start as none of the clubs have fully established academy systems yet. The smartest ones are well down the path though. Best money they can spend is here …not enforcing a wage fixing floor with tv proceeds …let the clubs decide where they want to spend revenue, if some want to trim their wage spend for a year or so to fund development, they should be free to do so.
Also agree with fuss above on “churn” this is a dirty word in some industries lol, here though its clearing the way for more unknowns to move thru the system. Which all these talents were not so long ago.
July 16th 2012 @ 12:02pm
Titus said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
I think the development of youngsters is far more important than the marquee’s. Marquee’s are good to give you a couple of players with that little bit extra quality like, Carle, Flores, Fred, Van Dyke and these players are good to have around to improve the quality of the youngsters but the key to this league is developing youngsters and selling them for a good price to become key players in good leagues.
Hamill to Korea is fine but he most likely won’t progress there and will finally move to the middle east for even more money and our national team won’t develop. Curtis Good and possibly Babalj will be good moves, or at the very least we will now if they have what it takes, if not they will head back to Asia or the middle east.
The U20′s got beaten 5-0 by Japan overnight and it really highlights how far off the pace we are with our development, even teams like Timor, Macau and Singapore are on our level. This is where money needs to be invested in my opinion, in identifying and developing juniors. And I don’t just mean the big kid who has an impressive resume because he busselled his way up the ranks, I mean find the kids with the technical skills, encourage them, develop them and teach them to play smart.
SFC went with the big marquee’s and put them in a team of journeymen and the result was poor football, losses and no junior development. I think SFC are learning and gradually moving in the technical football, junior development and affordable marquee’s who are part of team, direction which I think is the right one. Keep an eye out for Hagi Gligor in the coming years, these are the players we want to develop.
Melbourne Heart have got it mostly right IMO. They now need to scout for some technically gifted youngsters to replace those that moved on and continue the process, The crowds may take years to build but if the club is profitable, who cares.
Having said all that, Bresc at a reasonable price would be brilliant : )
July 16th 2012 @ 12:04pm
Brew said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:04pm | Report comment
Interesting article.
Thanks for writing it.
July 16th 2012 @ 12:46pm
Wotdoo said | July 16th 2012 @ 12:46pm | Report comment
“Mark “Marco” Bresciano, is the most obvious name that comes to mind. A favourite son returning would definitely rival that hype generated with Harry Kewell, it would perhaps even surpass it. Melbourne Heart should capitalise on his reported unhappiness in the Middle East and bring him home with this newly acquired transfer war chest.”
Sorry if I’m reading this wrong but comparing the hype that Harry returning and what bresciano would bring is so far apart is rediculous. I can’t believe you even tried to bring that out.
Australia’s greatest ever player as voted y the public players and journos not even in the same league in terms of hype.
July 16th 2012 @ 1:02pm
Nobby Stiles said | July 16th 2012 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Interesting comment about Bresc, Watdoo.
ATM Bresc is playing better football with the national team than Harry. Would he play well in the HAL? Others have struggled to cope with the style of play in the HAL. Harry says it is a lot harder than it looks.
I Just hope if Bresc came back, not the most physical of players, he wouldn’t be monstered physically by other A League players and rendered ineffectual.
July 16th 2012 @ 1:27pm
pete4 said | July 16th 2012 @ 1:27pm | Report comment
The Heart still have a fairly experienced defense with Bolton, Colosimo, Marrone and Behich there.
Mebrathu, Tadic and Gerhardt looking like good acquisitions so if Owen ends up joining it’ll be very interesting Round 1 derby indeed